Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction.

Myocardial infarction is a leading cause of death worldwide1. Although advances have been made in acute treatment, an incomplete understanding of remodelling processes has limited the effectiveness of therapies to reduce late-stage mortality2. Here we generate an integrative high-resolution map of human cardiac remodelling after myocardial infarction using single-cell gene expression, chromatin accessibility and spatial transcriptomic profiling of multiple physiological zones at distinct time points in myocardium from patients with myocardial infarction and controls. Multi-modal data integration enabled us to evaluate cardiac cell-type compositions at increased resolution, yielding insights into changes of the cardiac transcriptome and epigenome through the identification of distinct tissue structures of injury, repair and remodelling. We identified and validated disease-specific cardiac cell states of major cell types and analysed them in their spatial context, evaluating their dependency on other cell types. Our data elucidate the molecular principles of human myocardial tissue organization, recapitulating a gradual cardiomyocyte and myeloid continuum following ischaemic injury. In sum, our study provides an integrative molecular map of human myocardial infarction, represents an essential reference for the field and paves the way for advanced mechanistic and therapeutic studies of cardiac disease.

Fully magnetically centrifugal left ventricular assist device and long-term outcomes: the ELEVATE registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HeartMate 3 (HM3) is a fully magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device, which received CE marking in 2015. The ELEVATE Registry was initiated to collect real-world outcomes in patients treated with HM3 post-CE Mark approval. METHODS: A total of 540 subjects implanted at 26 centres between March 2015 and February 2017 were included in this registry. Of these, 463 received the device as a primary implant (primary implant cohort, PIC), 19 as a pump exchange (pump exchange cohort), and in 58 patients, only anonymized survival data were collected (anonymized cohort, AC). Patients in the PIC contributed to the baseline demographics, survival, adverse events, quality of life (QoL) (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels visual analogue scale), and functional capacity (6 min walk distance) assessments, while patients in the AC contributed only to survival. RESULTS: Primary implant cohort patients had a mean age of 56 years and were predominantly male (89%) with 48% ischaemic aetiology. The majority of subjects was designated bridge to transplant (66%) and had INTERMACS Profiles 1-3 (70%). At baseline, the subjects had poor functional capacity (104 ± 140 m) and impaired QoL (35 ± 19 points). The overall survival rate of the PIC was 63.3% and survival free of stroke was 58.1% at 5 years. Significant improvements in functional capacity and QoL were observed and maintained for 5 years (301 ± 131 m and 64 ± 20 points, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data from the ELEVATE registry demonstrate an overall survival rate for primary implants of 63.3%. In the PIC, reductions in adverse events for patients in the extended follow-up and improved QoL and functional capacity were observed at 5 years in this patient population with advanced heart failure.

Aspirin resistance in patients with ventricular assist devices: A follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Despite combined anticoagulation therapy consisting of a vitamin K antagonist and an antiplatelet agent, thromboembolic complications often occur in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). In addition, bleeding events are also common. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs is a well-known phenomenon; however, the utilization of laboratory chemistry testing for the presence of such resistance, and then switching therapy, is controversial. METHODS: We tested 132 patients with LVAD (HeartWare n = 57, HeartMate II n = 22, HeartMate 3 n = 53) on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy for resistance and followed them for a maximum of 7 years regarding pump thrombosis. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and impedance aggregometry (IPA) were performed for testing platelet function. RESULTS: We could show that patients with ASA resistance displayed an increased risk of pump thrombosis, regardless of the test used (LTA: OR = 6.20, CI [1.86-20.64], p = 0.003; IPA: OR = 12.14, CI [3.00-49.07], p < 0.001). In patients with a HeartMate 3, we could not detect any pump thrombosis associated with aspirin resistance. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in bleeding events between patients with ASA resistance and ASA responders. CONCLUSION: Laboratory testing of ASA resistance seems to be a good tool to detect an increased risk of pump thrombosis, at least for patients with a HeartWare or HeartMate II. The extent to which these thromboses can be prevented with a change of medication has to be investigated in further studies. No pump thrombosis was detected in patients with a HeartMate 3, and the question should be asked as to what constellation of underlying and concomitant diseases must be present to justify ASA therapy for these patients.

Use of the CytoSorb® filter for elimination of residual therapeutic argatroban concentrations during heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass for heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: No antidote or established extracorporeal elimination strategy is available for argatroban. Hemadsorption facilitates elimination of smaller drugs. CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old patient underwent urgent heart transplantation. Because of a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, preoperative anticoagulation was performed with argatroban. Despite ceasing of the continuous infusion of argatroban 2 h before surgery, concentration only declined from 0.60 µg/ml to 0.58 µg/ml before surgery, and the activated clotting time (ACT) value shortly was 223 s. Microvascular bleeding had been observed when starting surgery. A CytoSorb® absorption column was integrated into the system of the heparin-anticoagulated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit and a flow of 400 mL/min provided during the 2 h of extracorporeal circulation. The argatroban concentration after weaning from CPB was 0.04 µg/ml and satisfying hemostasis had been achieved after protamine administration. CONCLUSION: Data indicate that the CytoSorb® absorption column might be an effective tool for quick extracorporeal removal of therapeutic concentrations of argatroban.

The HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD): A Single Institutional 10-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze our 10-year experience with the HVAD in a real-world scenario in a high-volume German heart center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of adults (≥18 years) with terminal heart failure (HF), who underwent HVAD implantation for durable LVAD therapy in our center between October 2009 and March 2020. Primary and secondary end points were all-cause death after implantation and LVAD-associated complications, respectively. We focused the distinct analyses on risk profiles at the time of implantation and implant strategies, i.e., bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or destination therapy (DT). RESULTS: A total of 510 patients were included, with 229 and 281 individuals in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) level 1 (45%) and 2 to 4, respectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR: 5-54 months). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after HVAD implantation was 66% (95% CI; 61.7-70%), 49.4% (95% CI; 44.9-53.8%), and 37.4% (95% CI; 32.8-42%), not censored for LVAD exchange, LVAD explantation, or heart transplantation. INTERMACS level 1 and peri-operative temporary right heart assistance were independent risk factors for survival. Survival was best in BTT patients undergoing heart transplantation at any time during follow-up. The INTERMACS level at time of HVAD implantation did not affect survival after heart transplantation. Freedom from the combined end point of any device-associated severe complication and death was 44.5% (95% CI; 40-48.8%) at 1-year after implantation. CONCLUSION: The HVAD is a reliable pump for durable mechanical circulatory support even in high-risk patients. Still, heart transplantation outperforms durable MCS therapy for a superior long-term survival.

Secondary aortic valve replacement in continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of secondary surgical aortic valve replacement (sSAVR) in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) in the context of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. From 2009 to 2020, 792 patients underwent cf-LVAD implantation [HVAD (Medtronic, USA), n = 585, and HM 3 (Abbott, USA), n = 207]. All cf-LVAD patients with severe AR requiring secondary AVR were enrolled in this study. A total of six patients (median, 40 years, IQR; 34-61 years, 50% male) underwent secondary surgical aortic valve replacement (sSAVR) after cf-LVAD implantation. Median time of previous LVAD support was 26 months (IQR: 21-29 months). Two patients required additional tricuspid valve repair (TVR) and one patient underwent SAVR after failed TAVR. Four patients needed temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) with a median of 30 days (IQR; 29-33 days). Three patients were bridged to urgent heart transplantation due to persevering right heart failure, whereas two destination therapy (DT) candidates survived without any associated complications. An additional DT patient died of pneumonia 1 month after sSAVR. Secondary surgical aortic valve replacement in ongoing LVAD patients is an advanced procedure for a complex cohort. In our series, sSAVR was safely performed and effective, but involved a high-risk for subsequent right heart failure, requiring urgent heart transplantation. In LVAD patients with severe AR requiring treatment where TAVR is not feasible, sSAVR can be evaluated as salvage option for bridge to transplant patients or selected destination therapy candidates.

Patients with ventricular assist device and cerebral entrapment-Supporting skullcap reimplantation.

Effects of cranioplasty (CP) and skullcap reimplantation after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for cerebral hemorrhage or malignant brain infarction in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support as bridge to transplantation has not been surveyed yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome and management after CP when aiming for transplantation. Data were collected from our prospective institutional database including all patients undergoing LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2019. Six patients needed CP procedures and were included. Our analysis focused on postoperative outcome, survival, and facilitation of heart transplantation. Study endpoints included also all-cause mortality. From a total of 1010 LVAD implantations during analysis period in our center, six bridge-to-transplantation LVAD patients [median age at LVAD implantation: 32.5 years (IQR: 24.8-39.5 years); four male, HVAD, n = 3; HM II, n = 1; HM 3, n = 2] underwent CP with imminent entrapment secondary to cerebral hemorrhage or malignant infarction. Primary heart failure etiology was myocarditis (n = 2), dilated (n = 2), or ischemic (n = 2). Median INTERMACS class was 1.5 (IQR; 1.0-2.8). Median time on LVAD support to DC procedure was 33 months (IQR: 16-48 months). The indication for DC was intraparenchymal hemorrhage (n = 4), subdural hematoma (n = 1), and malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (n = 1). After a median time of 4 months (IQR: 3.3-4.0 months, range; 2.0-10 months) post DC procedure, CP was subsequently performed without profound neurologic disabilities in all patients. After median time of 26 months (IQR: 21-42 months) follow-up, three patients successfully received heart transplantation, one patient could undergo LVAD explantation for myocardial recovery, and the remaining two patients are still on the list awaiting heart transplantation. CP procedure with skullcap reimplantation is feasible and can be safely performed in LVAD patients, which subsequently may even be eligible for heart transplantation with beneficial prognosis.

Identification of characteristics, risk factors, and predictors of recurrent LVAD thrombosis: conditions in HeartWare devices.

BACKGROUND: Redictors of repetitive left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-thrombosis have not been studied yet. METHODS: We identified predictors of recurrent LVAD thrombosis in HeartWare (HVAD) patients in a long-term study from 2010 until 2020. We included all patients with two or more thrombolysis treatments for repetitive HVAD thrombosis and effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy was defined as freedom from stroke, death, another HVAD thrombosis, or surgical device exchange within 30 days after the event. Study endpoints also include all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 534 HVAD implantations have been screened, and 73 patients (13.7%) developed first HVAD thrombosis after a median of 10 months (IQR; 6-21 months). 46 of these patients had effective thrombolysis in 71.7% (n = 33/46). After a median of 14 months (IQR 4-32 months) follow-up, 17 patients (51.5%) had developed a second HVAD thrombosis and all were treated with t-PA therapy again, resulting in effectiveness in 76.5% (n = 13/17). The four patients with ineffective t-PA therapy underwent subsequent surgical HVAD exchange. Multiple Cox regression model analysis revealed time interval between HVAD implantation and first thrombosis as an independent risk factor of recurrent thrombosis (HR, 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99, p = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 year follow-up showed no significant difference in overall survival for recurrent vs non-recurrent thrombosis groups (log-rank test, p = 0.959). CONCLUSION: Recurrent HVAD thrombosis mostly appears within 12 months after first thrombosis. Systemic t-PA therapy for recurrent pump thrombosis seems safe, achieving comparable effectiveness rates to initial t-PA therapy. Survival does not differ between patients with or without recurrent HVAD thrombosis.

Impact of a surgical approach for implantation of durable left ventricular assist devices in patients on extracorporeal life support.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on the postoperative outcome in patients who underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation after having received veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (va-ECLS) using data from a European registry (ECLS-VAD). Five hundred and thirty-one patients were included. METHODS: A propensity score-adjusted outcome analysis was performed, resulting in 324 patients in the full sternotomy (FS) group and 39 in the less invasive surgery (LIS) group. RESULTS: The surgery lasted in median 236 min in the FS group versus 263 min in the LIS group (p = 0.289). The median chest tube output during the first 24 h was similar in both groups. Patients who underwent implantation with an FS required more blood products during the first 24 postoperative hours (median 16 vs. 12, p = 0.033). The incidence of revision due to bleeding was also higher (35.5 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.016). A temporary postoperative right ventricular assist device was necessary in 45.1 (FS) versus 23.1% (LIS) of patients, respectively (p = 0.067). No stroke occurred in the LIS group during the first 30 days after surgery (7.4% in the FS group). The incidence of stroke and of renal, hepatic, and respiratory failure during the follow-up was similar in both groups. The 30-day and one-year survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: LIS for implantation of a durable LVAD in patients on va-ECLS implanted for cardiogenic shock is associated with less revision due to bleeding, less administration of blood products and absence of perioperative stroke, with no impact on survival.

Two-year outcome after implantation of a full magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device: results from the ELEVATE Registry.

AIMS: The ELEVATE Registry was designed to study long-term outcomes with the Heartmate 3 (HM3), a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal ventricular assist device, in a real-world population following CE-mark approval. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 540 patients, implanted in Europe and the Middle East were followed in ELEVATE. The registry included 463 patients receiving the HM3 as primary implant (Primary Implant Cohort), 19 patients underwent a pump upgrade from another device (Pump Exchange Cohort) and 58 patients who had experienced an outcome before having the possibility to sign the Informed Consent, for which only outcome data were collected (Anonymized Cohort). Data collection included demographics, survival, adverse events, EQ-5D Visual Analog Score quality of life (EQ-5D VAS QOL) questionnaire, and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Mean age was 55.6 ± 11.7 years (89% male, 48% ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Seventy per cent of patients were in INTERMACS Profile 1-3 and 12.7% were on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Primary Implant Cohort survival was 83% after 2 years. In the Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Primary Implant Cohort, strokes were observed in 10.2%, gastrointestinal bleedings in 9.7%, pump thrombosis in 1.5%, and outflow graft twists in 3.5%. Heartmate 3 implantation resulted in a significant and sustained improvement of functional capacity and QOL. CONCLUSION: In a real-world population, cohort implanted with the HM3 left ventricular assist device we demonstrate good long-term survival, sustained improvement of functional capacity, and low rates of adverse events (including pump thrombosis). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02497950.

Cardiomyopathy-associated mutations in the RS domain affect nuclear localization of RBM20.

Mutations in RBM20 encoding the RNA-binding motif protein 20 (RBM20) are associated with an early onset and clinically severe forms of cardiomyopathies. Transcriptome analyses revealed RBM20 as an important regulator of cardiac alternative splicing. RBM20 mutations are especially localized in exons 9 and 11 including the highly conserved arginine and serine-rich domain (RS domain). Here, we investigated in several cardiomyopathy patients, the previously described RBM20-mutation p.Pro638Leu localized within the RS domain. In addition, we identified in a patient the novel mutation p.Val914Ala localized in the (glutamate-rich) Glu-rich domain of RBM20 encoded by exon 11. Its impact on the disease was investigated with a novel TTN- and RYR2-splicing assay based on the patients' cardiac messenger RNA. Furthermore, we showed in cell culture and in human cardiac tissue that mutant RBM20-p.Pro638Leu is not localized in the nuclei but causes an abnormal cytoplasmic localization of the protein. In contrast the splicing deficient RBM20-p.Val914Ala has no influence on the intracellular localization. These results indicate that disease-associated variants in RBM20 lead to aberrant splicing through different pathomechanisms dependent on the localization of the mutation. This might have an impact on the future development of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of RBM20-induced cardiomyopathies.

Predictors of Physical Capacity 6 Months After Implantation of a Full Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis From the ELEVATE Registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device, preimplant predictors of poor physical performance are not well-described. We aimed to identify predictors of inability to walk more than 300 m on 6-minute walk test (6MWT) 6 months after HeartMate 3 implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the European Registry of Patients Implanted With a Full Magnetically Levitated LVAD, patients with available 6MWT at 6 months after implantation were included (N = 194) and grouped according to 6MWT distance (6MWD) of >300 m (n = 150) or 6MWD of <300 m (n = 44). Patients walking <300 m were older (60 ± 10 vs 52 ± 12 years; P < .001), more often New York Heart Association functional class IV (63% vs 42%; P = .03), and more often had type 2 diabetes (43% vs 17%; P < .001) at implantation. Atrial fibrillation was seen in 57% in those with a 6MWT of <300 m vs 31% in those walking longer (P < .002). Further, hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in those walking <300 m (both P < .01). In multivariable regression analysis, independent predictors of a 6MWD of <300 m were: atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR], 3.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-8.67), older age (OR for 10-year increment, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.55-5.07), New York Heart Association functional class IV (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.27-8.98), and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 or 2 (OR, 6.53; 95% CI, 1.92-22.19). CONCLUSIONS: Six months after HeartMate 3 implantation, 77% of patients walked >300 meters in 6 minutes. Apart from age and measures of heart failure severity, atrial fibrillation at implantation is an independent predictor of low 6MWD at 6 months after implantation.

Risk factors of early right ventricular failure in patients undergoing LVAD implantation with intermediate Intermacs profile for advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The clinical profile of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates is rapidly changing, with increasing proportion of patients in more stable clinical conditions. However, early postoperative right ventricular failure (eRVF) is still one of the cornerstones associated with increased mortality and the preoperative recognition of associated risk factors remains challenging. The aim of this study was to identify predictive parameters for eRVF after LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative intermediate Intermacs (InM) risk profile 3-5. METHODS: Preoperative laboratory, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization data collected from 80 patients with InM profile 3-5 before LVAD implantation were retrospectively tested with respect to their ability to predict the risk for eRVF after the implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD. RESULTS: Preoperative higher bilirubin and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher central venous pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (CVP/PCWP) were associated to higher risk of eRVF. Regarding the echocardiographic assessment, higher end diastolic linear dimensions of the RV, higher basal end diastolic RV linear dimension to LV ratio, severe tricuspid regurgitation, lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and lower RV fractional area contraction identified patients with higher risk for eRVF. In the multivariable analysis, a CVP/CPWP > 0.55 (odds ratio [OR]: 4, 95% confidence interval [CII]: 1.4-11.8;P = .01) and BUN > 44.5 mg/dL (OR: 6.6, 95% CI: 1.51-23; P = .011) independently predicted the risk of eRVF. CONCLUSION: Preoperative BUN > 44.5 mg/dL and CVP/PCWP > 0.55 are associated to an increased risk of eRVF following LVAD implantation in intermediate InM patients.

Six-month outcomes after treatment of advanced heart failure with a full magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device: report from the ELEVATE registry.

Aims: The ELEVATE registry was planned to study post-approval outcomes with HeartMate 3™ (HM3), a fully magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods and results: A total of 482 patients provided consent to participate in ELEVATE (enrolled cohort). Data collection included baseline demographics, survival, adverse events, quality of life (QOL) [EuroQoL-5 Dimensions visual analogue scale (VAS), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)]. An additional 58 patients were implanted with HM3 during the same period but expired or were explanted prior to consent, and only survival data were collected (anonymized cohort). We report the 6-month outcomes of the patients who received HM3 as their primary implant (n = 463) and the survival of the 540 patients in the full cohort (enrolled + anonymized). Baseline characteristics included a mean age of 55.6 ± 11.7 years, 89% male, 48% ischaemic aetiology, and 70% on inotropes. The majority of patients (66%) were bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) and 32% were INTERMACS profile 1-2. Full cohort survival at 6 months was 82 ± 2%. In the enrolled primary implant patients, there was no incidence of pump thrombosis, major bleeding was 25%, major infection 35%, and any stroke type 5%. Functional capacity improved significantly (Δ6MWD 230 ± 191 m) as did QOL (ΔVAS 31 ± 23). Freedom from unplanned rehospitalizations at 6 months was 68 ± 2%. Conclusion: The 6-month outcomes of the HM3 LVAD demonstrate a highly reliable, thrombosis free, device with low incidence of stroke and improved functional capacity, and QOL. ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT02497950.

Defibrillator-Heart Pump: An Implantable Ventricular Assist Device With Integrated Defibrillator Component-The First In Vitro Testing.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an important therapeutic option for patients with end-stage heart failure waiting for heart transplantation or in older patients as definite therapy for heart failure. Interestingly, about 62% of patients receiving LVADs do not have an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) at the time of implantation, although these patients have increased risk of being confronted with dangerous arrhythmia. Therefore, an LVAD system including AICD function is a reasonable alternative for such heart failure patients thereby avoiding a second surgical intervention for AICD implantation. In this article, a newly developed system including LVAD and AICD function is introduced, and we also report its first in vitro testing.

Understanding Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term mechanical assist devices are now commonly used in the treatment of severe heart failure to unload the failing ventricle, maintain sufficient end-organ perfusion and improve functional capacity. Depending on the assisted ventricles, 3 categories of long-term assist devices are available: left ventricular assist device (LVAD), biventricular assist device and total artificial heart. Improvements in technology, especially the advent of smaller, durable continuous flow pumps, have led to the use of LVADs in a much broader population of patients in the last 10 years. Both the number of patients living with LVADs and the life expectancy of these patients are increasing. Regarding this growing number of patients with LVAD, intensivists need to understand the physiology of the devices, their functioning, potential complications and their management. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of relevant medical literature regarding the physiology of patients with LVAD and management of common complications relevant to the critical care physicians. RESULTS: The most frequent complications occurring in the LVAD patients after the post-operative period are bleeding, driveline infections, thrombosis, device malfunction, right ventricular failure and arrhythmias. Bleeding is the most frequent adverse event in LVAD due to a combination of anticoagulation and acquired von Willebrand disease secondary to shear stress produced within the pump. Their management includes antiplatelet therapy arrest, reduction of the anticoagulation regimen and specific therapy if feasible. Infection is the second most common cause of death after cardiac failure in LVAD patients. All infections must be aggressively treated to avoid seeding the device. Device thrombosis can develop even when patients are adequately anticoagulated and taking antiplatelet therapy because the LVAD is responsible for a chronic hypercoagulable state. CONCLUSION: Management of these unique patients in the ICU is best accomplished with a multidisciplinary team that includes specialists in advanced heart failure, LVAD nurse coordinators and intensivists.

Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in Pediatric Patients.

This retrospective study reviews our results regarding the long-term support in pediatric patients using two ventricular assist systems between January 2008 and April 2014. We implanted the Berlin Heart EXCOR in 29 patients (median age 3.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 0.2-16.5], median weight 13 kg [IQR 4.2-67.2]). Twenty-two patients (75.8%) received a left ventricular assist device. Three patients (10.3%) had single-ventricle physiology. One patient (3.4%) had mechanical mitral valve prosthesis. The HeartWare System was implanted in nine patients. The median age was 15.6 years (IQR 12.2-17.9), and the median weight was 54.9 kg (IQR 27.7-66). In the Berlin Heart group, the median support time was 65 days (IQR 4-619), with 3647 days of cardiac support. Nineteen patients (65.5%) were transplanted, six patients (20.7%) recovered, one patient (3.4%) is on support, and three patients (10.3%) died on support. Survival rate was 89.7%. Fourteen blood pumps had been exchanged. Four patients (13.8%) had local signs of infection, and three patients (10.3%) had neurological complications. In the HeartWare group, the median support time was 180 days (IQR 1-1124), with 2839 days of cardiac support. Four patients (44.4%) had local signs of infection, and three (33.3%) had neurological complications. Eight patients (88.9%) have been transplanted, and one patient (11.1%) died on support. Survival rate was 88.9%. Excellent survival is possible after long-term mechanical circulatory support in patients with two- and single-ventricle physiology with a low rate of adverse events.

One-Year Clinical Outcome after Left Ventricular Assist Device Malfunction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants bear the risk of driveline/device infections and technical failures. METHODS: We assessed clinical outcome in LVAD patients with device-related complications. Group 1 (n = 12) received device exchange (DEx) as destination therapy (DT), group 2 (n = 15) received DEx as a bridge to transplant (BTT), group 3 (n = 34) was allocated to receive high-urgency (HU) heart transplantation (HTx), and group 4 (n = 27) had device-related complications that could only be solved by HTx. Primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival. RESULTS: Age and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II differed significantly between groups and were highest in group 1, lowest in group 3. One-year survival in groups 1 to 4 was 66.7, 60.0, 82.4, and 70.4% (p = 0.30). Covariate-adjusted odds ratio of 1-year survival (reference: group 1) was for group 2 = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-5.57), for group 3 = 1.13 (95% CI: 0.28-4.56), and for group 4 = 1.89 (95% CI: 0.51-7.04; p for trend 0.70). Clinical complications (need of mechanical ventilator support, extracorporeal circulatory membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implants, kidney/liver dialysis) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Data indicate similar 1-year clinical outcomes in LVAD patients with device-related complications receiving DEx or HTx.

Ventricular assist devices in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy: new modalities.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity is a fatal complication of chemotherapeutic agents in which the implantation of a mechanical circulatory support system (MCS) can be a life-saving modality. The aim of this article is to analyse this available therapeutic option for patients with cardiotoxicity induced by treatment of malignancy in the light of current literature. We analysed our recent experience with MCS implantations in patients who have advanced heart failure associated with chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Methods In the hospital registries of 386 adult cardiomyopathy patients who were supported with a long-term impantable MCS in our institution between January 2008 and June 2012, were retrospectively evaluated. In 11 of these patients (mean age ?SD years; overall %; female/male (n); 42 +/- 14, 2.8%, 4/7) MCS was implemented due to chemotherapeutic drug-induced cardiomyopathy (CDIC). Pre-operative and post-operative data of CDIC patients were analysed. RESULTS: In this cohort of CDIC patients, mean duration of circulatory support was 413 ?445 days. One of the patients was successfully bridged to heart transplantation (HTx) after exclusion of possible contraindications. In one patient, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was successfully explanted after myocardial recovery. In the late post-operative period, five patients expired due to multi-organ failure and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The remaining 4 patients are still under follow-up on LVAD-support. One of these patients was listed for high-urgency HTx because of device-related infection. CONCLUSION: Cardiotoxicity leading to advanced heart failure is a serious complication of chemotherapeutic agents with a high risk of mortality. In our series LVAD therapy seems to be a beneficial and safe option. LVAD therapy is an acceptable option in chemotherapy-induced, advanced cardiomyopathy.