Global herpes zoster burden in adults with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common respiratory disease, which may be associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ), often a debilitating disease associated with severe pain. This is the first systematic review with the objective of summarising evidence on HZ burden in adults with asthma. METHODS: A global systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted (MEDLINE and Embase, 2003-2024) on HZ burden (incidence, risk and complications) in adults (≥18 years) with asthma. RESULTS: There were 19 studies included on HZ outcomes in adults with asthma. Pooled HZ incidence per 1000 person-years was 5.71 (95% CI 4.68-6.96) in adults aged ≥18 years (4.20 (95% CI 3.09-5.70) in those aged <60 years versus 10.33 (95% CI 9.17-11.64) in those aged ≥60 years). The pooled rate ratio for developing HZ was 1.23 (95% CI 1.11-1.35) in those aged ≥18 years and 1.36 (95% CI 1.15-1.61) in those aged ≥50 years. The risk of HZ was higher in people with asthma using systemic corticosteroids, long-acting ß-agonists plus inhaled corticosteroids and "add-on therapy". Asthma was also associated with an increased risk of post-herpetic neuralgia (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.37) and HZ ophthalmicus (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Differences in study design, setting, case definitions and follow-up durations led to heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic literature review and meta-analysis found that adults with asthma have an increased risk of HZ, with higher risks in older age groups and in those on certain treatments, such as oral corticosteroids. HZ vaccines are available for adults, including those with comorbidities such as asthma, and can be considered as part of integrated respiratory care.

Measuring Air Quality for Advocacy in Africa (MA3): Feasibility and Practicality of Longitudinal Ambient PM2.5 Measurement Using Low-Cost Sensors.

Ambient air pollution in urban cities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is an important public health problem with models and limited monitoring data indicating high concentrations of pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5). On most global air quality index maps, however, information about ambient pollution from SSA is scarce. We evaluated the feasibility and practicality of longitudinal measurements of ambient PM2.5 using low-cost air quality sensors (Purple Air-II-SD) across thirteen locations in seven countries in SSA. Devices were used to gather data over a 30-day period with the aim of assessing the efficiency of its data recovery rate and identifying challenges experienced by users in each location. The median data recovery rate was 94% (range: 72% to 100%). The mean 24 h concentration measured across all sites was 38 µg/m3 with the highest PM2.5 period average concentration of 91 µg/m3 measured in Kampala, Uganda and lowest concentrations of 15 µg/m3 measured in Faraja, The Gambia. Kampala in Uganda and Nnewi in Nigeria recorded the longest periods with concentrations >250µg/m3. Power outages, SD memory card issues, internet connectivity problems and device safety concerns were important challenges experienced when using Purple Air-II-SD sensors. Despite some operational challenges, this study demonstrated that it is reasonably practicable and feasible to establish a network of low-cost devices to provide data on local PM2.5 concentrations in SSA countries. Such data are crucially needed to raise public, societal and policymaker awareness about air pollution across SSA.

Systemic and bronchodilator effects of inhaled rac-formoterol in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a dose-response study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: The long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist formoterol has systemic effects when taken in high doses. It can be used as relief medication in asthma and there is interest in this approach in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Relief medication can involve high doses, and in subjects with COPD who have limited ability to bronchodilate the adverse effects can outweigh the benefits. There are concerns with the overall safety of high-dose beta(2)-agonists in subjects with COPD, and this study looks at the balance of beneficial and adverse effects of a range of doses of inhaled formoterol. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Among subjects with COPD, high-dose inhaled formoterol produced a dose-related increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s without a corresponding reduction in dyspnoea or increase in walk distance. Systemic effects were modest, however, and high doses did not appear to reduce patient satisfaction. Although further safety data are needed, inhaled formoterol may have a role as relief medication in COPD. AIMS Rac-formoterol is effective as maintenance treatment for both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is now used as relief therapy in asthma. Using rac-formoterol for relief and maintenance treatment could involve inhalation of high doses, and whether this is of benefit in COPD is uncertain. Our aim was to determine whether higher doses of inhaled rac-formoterol produce systemic adverse effects that outweigh the limited bronchodilator benefit seen in subjects with COPD. METHODS: We examined airway and systemic effects of 6, 12, 24 and 48 microg rac-formoterol and placebo on separate days in 20 subjects with symptomatic COPD [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 47% predicted]. FEV(1), oxygen saturation, dyspnoea, 6-min walk distance, patient satisfaction and systemic effects were measured and treatment was assessed against placebo and for dose-response effects. RESULTS: FEV(1)[area under the time-response curve (AUC)] and satisfaction scores increased with all formoterol doses compared with placebo, as did AUC tremor with the 24- and 48-microg doses and AUC heart rate with the 48-microg dose. A dose-response relationship was seen with FEV(1) and tremor, but not with satisfaction scores. There was no difference between placebo and rac-formoterol for other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in patients with COPD rac-formoterol improves FEV(1) and patient satisfaction without a corresponding reduction in dyspnoea. Since the systemic effects from a relatively high dose were minimal, its use as relief medication in COPD merits further evaluation.

Benefit versus risk for oral, inhaled, and nasal glucocorticosteroids.

Many factors affect the benefit-to-risk analysis of the use of the glucocorticosteroids in the treatment of allergic inflammation. For most patients the benefit-to-risk ratio favors topical over oral administration, but in severe disease oral administration may be required. It is clear from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies that inhaled glucocorticosteroids in particular are absorbed into the systemic circulation and that they can have clinical adverse effects when given in high doses. Therefore, with inhaled and nasal glucocorticosteroids, the dose that will achieve the optimal benefit/risk ratio is the lowest dose that controls symptoms and prevents exacerbations requiring treatment with oral glucocorticosteroids. This optimal dose needs to be determined on an individual basis and is likely to vary as disease severity changes over time.

Plasma concentrations of fluticasone propionate and budesonide following inhalation: effect of induced bronchoconstriction.

AIMS: To determine whether and to what extent bronchoconstriction affects plasma concentrations of fluticasone and budesonide following inhalation. METHODS: Twenty people with mild asthma inhaled 1000 microg fluticasone (Accuhaler) plus 800 microg budesonide (Turbohaler) on two visits. On one occasion, prior to drug inhalation, FEV(1) was decreased by at least 25% using inhaled methacholine. Plasma drug concentrations were measured for each drug over 5 h and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0,5 h)) compared between visits. RESULTS: The mean difference in FEV(1) prior to drug inhalation on the 2 days was 33%. AUC(0,5 h) values for fluticasone and budesonide were lower by a median of 60% (IQR 36-75) and 29% (IQR 2-44), respectively, when administered following bronchoconstriction; the reduction was greater for fluticasone than for budesonide, P = 0.007. CONCLUSIONS: The lower plasma concentrations of fluticasone and, to a lesser extent, budesonide seen when the drugs were inhaled following induced bronchoconstriction, is likely to reflect variations that will occur with fluctuations in airway caliber in asthma.

Plasma concentrations of inhaled corticosteroids in relation to airflow obstruction in asthma.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of beclometasone, budesonide, fluticasone and mometasone following inhalation in patients with asthma, and explore the relationship between lung function and plasma drug concentrations. METHODS: Thirty subjects with asthma and a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ranging from 36 to 138% predicted, inhaled 800 microg beclometasone, budesonide and mometasone and 1000 microg fluticasone in random order. Plasma drug concentrations were measured over 8 h and the relationship between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-8)) and lung function was modelled using linear regression. Estimated AUC(0-8) values at 50 and 100% predicted FEV(1) were compared for each drug. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic profiles differed markedly between the drugs. Correlation coefficients for the relation between FEV(1)% predicted and AUC(0-8) values for beclometasone, budesonide, fluticasone and mometasone were 0.37 (P = 0.05), 0.33 (P = 0.08), 0.25 (P = 0.2) and 0.52 (P = 0.004), respectively, and estimated AUC(0-8) values were 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0, 1.8], 1.3 (95% CI 1.0, 1.8), 1.4 (95% CI 0.9, 2.2) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.3, 3.5) times higher for the four drugs, respectively, at 100 compared with 50% predicted FEV(1.) CONCLUSION: The higher plasma concentrations of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with a higher FEV(1)% predicted suggests that, for any given dose, these patients will be at greater risk of developing adverse systemic effects with long-term use.