Determine safety of outpatient chemotherapy and autotransplants using refrigerated, non-frozen grafts in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Persons with multiple sclerosis are increasingly treated with intermediate- or high-dose chemotherapy and a hematopoietic cell autotransplant. This is often done in an inpatient setting using frozen blood cell grafts. OBJECTIVE: Determine if chemotherapy and a hematopoietic cell autotransplant can be safely done in an outpatient setting using refrigerated, non-frozen grafts. METHODS: We developed an autotransplant protocol actionable in an outpatient setting using a refrigerated, non-frozen blood graft collected after giving cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/kg/d × 2 days and filgrastim, 10 µg/kg/d. A second identical course was given 9 days later followed by infusion of blood cells stored at 4°C for 1-4 days. The co-primary outcomes were rates of granulocyte and platelet recovery and therapy-related mortality. RESULTS: We treated 426 consecutive subjects. Median age was 47 years (range, 21-68 years). A total of 145 (34%) were male. Median graft refrigeration time was 1 day (range, 1-4 days). Median interval to granulocytes >0.5 × 10E + 9/L was 8 days (range, 2-12) and to platelets >20 × 10E + 9/L, 8 days (range, 1-12). Only 15 subjects (4%) were hospitalized, predominately for iatrogenic pneumothorax (N = 5) and neutropenic fever (N = 4). There was only 1 early death from infection. CONCLUSION: Intermediate-dose chemotherapy and a hematopoietic cell autotransplant can be safely done in an outpatient setting using, refrigerated, non-frozen grafts.

Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study.

BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. METHODS: The search was based on the term "Wuhan Coronavirus" on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. RESULTS: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.