Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pain Med ; 22(3): 677-686, 2021 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155049

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy worldwide. Breast surgery and adjuvant oncological therapies are often required to increase survival. Treatment-related pain may persist and evolve into postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) in a significant subset of breast cancer survivors. In this retrospective investigation, we will present our experience in applying an interventional algorithmic approach to treat PMPS. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: An academic cancer hospital. SUBJECTS: Adult females with PMPS diagnosis. METHODS: We reviewed 169 records with the diagnosis of PMPS from 2015 to 2019 within our health system. Pre- and post-injection pain scores, relief duration, and medication usage changes were collected. The decision to perform each procedure was based on the anatomic location of the painful area with the corresponding peripheral sensory innervation. Decision-making flow diagrams were created to present our experience in managing PMPS beyond peripheral nerve blocks. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block results (n=350) were analyzed. The mean baseline pain score was 7, compared with the post-treatment mean score of 3 (95% confidence interval: 3.58 to 3.98, P = 0.0001). Among the responders, the mean pain relief duration was 45 days, with a median of 84 days. Opioid medication consumption was reduced by 11% (t = 0.72, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks of this area could be performed safely and effectively after breast surgeries. We also present our proposed algorithm to provide a stepwise application for selecting the appropriate therapies in the management of more complex PMPS.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Adulto , Algoritmos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(7): 46, 2021 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970352

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although opioids are excellent analgesics, they are associated with severe short- and long-term side effects that are especially concerning for the treatment of chronic pain. Peripherally acting opioid receptor agonists promise to mitigate the more serious centrally mediated side effects of opioids, and the goal of this paper is to identify and elaborate on recent advances in these peripheral opioid receptor therapeutics. RECENT FINDINGS: Peripheral opioid receptor agonists are effective analgesics that at the same time circumvent the problem of centrally mediated opioid side effects by (1) preferentially targeting peripheral opioid receptors that are often the source of the pain and (2) their markedly diminished permeability or activity across the blood-brain barrier. Recent novel bottom-up approaches have been notable for the design of therapeutics that are either active only at inflamed tissue, as in the case of fentanyl-derived pH-sensitive opioid ligands, or too bulky or hydrophilic to cross the blood-brain barrier, as in the case of morphine covalently bound to hyperbranched polyglycerols. Recent innovations in peripheral opioid receptor therapeutics of pH-sensitive opioid ligands and limiting opioid permeability across the blood-brain barrier have had promising results in animal models. While this is grounds for optimism that some of these therapeutics will be efficacious in human subjects at a future date, each drug must undergo individualized testing for specific chronic pain syndromes to establish not only the nuances of each drug's therapeutic effect but also a comprehensive safety profile.


Assuntos
Receptores Opioides/agonistas , Receptores Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos
3.
BMC Emerg Med ; 16(1): 43, 2016 11 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27829367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been well studied for its efficacy as an analgesic agent. However, intranasal (IN) administration of ketamine has only recently been studied in the emergency setting. The objective of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and adverse effects of a sub-dissociative dose of IN Ketamine compared to IV and IM morphine. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, prospective, parallel clinical trial of efficacy and safety of IN ketamine compared to IV and IM morphine for analgesia in the emergency department (ED). A convenience sample of 90 patients aged 18-70 experiencing moderate-severe acute traumatic pain (≥80 mm on 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) were randomized to receive either 1.0 mg/kg IN ketamine, 0.1 mg/kg IV MO or 0.15 mg/kg IM MO. Pain relief and adverse effects were recorded for 1 h post-administration. The primary outcome was efficacy of IN ketamine compared to IV and IM MO, measured by "time-to-onset" (defined as a ≥15 mm pain decrease on VAS), as well as time to and degree of maximal pain reduction. RESULTS: The 3 study groups showed a highly significant, similar maximal pain reduction of 56 ± 26 mm for IN Ketamine, and 59 ± 22 and 48 ± 30 for IV MO and IM MO, respectively. IN Ketamine provided clinically-comparable results to those of IV MO with regards to time to onset (14.3 ± 11.2 v. 8.9 ± 5.6 min, respectively) as well as in time to maximal pain reduction (40.4 ± 16.3) versus (33.4 ± 18), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IN ketamine shows efficacy and safety comparable to IV and IM MO. Given the benefits of this mode of analgesia in emergencies, it should be further studied for potential clinical applications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on 27 June 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02817477.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Pain Manag ; 10(2): 67-71, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162584

RESUMO

Aim: The aim of this case report is to describe ultrasound guidance for caudal epidural steroid injection during pregnancy. Case report: A 29-year-old, 32-week parturient presented with severe back and leg pain with MRI demonstrating herniation of the L5-S1 level. The disabling pain was refractory to conservative therapy, and an ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injection was performed. There was significant pain relief in the first week with an uneventful subsequent pregnancy. Following delivery, the patient had no further recurrence of her presenting symptoms. Conclusion: Severe radiculopathy may be encountered during pregnancy, complicated by a limited number of treatment options. Ultrasound guidance should be considered during performance of caudal epidural injections in feasible cases.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Radiculopatia/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Gravidez , Radiculopatia/etiologia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA