Peripheral access size evaluation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Peripheral access vessel dimensions in the general patient population screened for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can offer insight into the indications for pre-TAVR computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment. We seek to determine peripheral access vessel sizes in patients screened for TAVR and association with patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis screened for TAVR at a high-volume center from April 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, contrast-enhanced CTA was used to determine the minimal luminal diameters (MLDs) of the transfemoral access vessels, as measured between the inguinal ligament and the deep femoral artery for the femoral artery, and proximal to the inguinal ligament for the external and common iliac arteries, respectively. Paired and independent samples t-tests were used to compare means and regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with MLD. RESULTS: A total of 1049 screened patients were included of which 826 (78.7%) underwent TAVR and 551 (52.5%) were male. The mean age was 80.6 (±9.6) years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.7 (±5.9) kg/m2 . About 152 (14.5%) had peripheral vascular disease and 153 (14.6%) had chronic kidney disease. The mean (±2 standard deviations) MLDs of the right and left femoral arteries were 7.73 mm (4.68-10.78) and 7.68 mm (4.63-10.72), respectively. Male sex and BMI were associated with larger average femoral MLD while hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease were inversely associated. CONCLUSION: Most patients screened for TAVR have minimum peripheral access vessel sizes exceeding the recommended minimum access route diameters of modern transcatheter heart valves. As sheath sizes decrease, clinicians must carefully judge patient individual risk factors to determine whether a pre-TAVR CTA assessing peripheral access vessel dimensions and anatomical contraindications is indicated. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are required to compare the outcomes of TAVR with and without preoperative CTA.

Alternate accesses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: When transfemoral (TF) access is contraindicated in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), alternate access strategies are considered. The choice of one alternate access over the other remains controversial. METHODS: Following a comprehensive literature search, studies comparing any combination of TF, transapical (TA), transaortic (TAo), transcarotid (TC), and trans-subclavian (TS) TAVR were identified. Data were pooled using fixed- and random-effects network meta-analysis. Rank scores with probability ranks of different treatment groups were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-four studies (26,449 patients) were included. Compared to TF access, TA and TAo accesses were associated with higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.94; OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.21-2.66, respectively), while the TC and TS showed no difference (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.64-1.95; OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.67-2.27, respectively); TF access ranked best followed by TC. There was no significant difference in 30-day stroke; TC access ranked best followed by TS. At a weighted mean follow-up of 1.6 years, TA and TAo accesses were associated with higher long-term mortality versus TF (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.18-1.45; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.79, respectively); there was no difference between TC and TS versus TF access (IRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.70-1.47; IRR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82-1.66, respectively); TF access ranked best followed by TC. At a weighted mean follow-up of 1.4 years, only TA access was associated with higher long-term stroke compared to TF (IRR 3.01, 95% CI 1.15-7.87); TF access ranked as the best strategy followed by TAo. CONCLUSION: TC and TS approaches are associated with superior postoperative outcomes compared to other TAVR alternate access strategies. Randomized trials definitively assessing the safety and efficacy of alternate access strategies are needed.