Safe Implementation of a Next-Generation Surgical Robot: First Analysis of 2,083 Cases in the Versius Surgical Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To present the first report of data from the Versius Surgical Registry, a prospective, multicenter data registry with ongoing collection across numerous surgical indications, developed to accompany the Versius Robotic Surgical System into clinical practice. BACKGROUND: A data registry can be utilized to minimize risk to patients by establishing the safety and effectiveness of innovative medical devices and generating a thorough evidence base of real-world data. METHODS: Surgical outcome data were collected and inputted through a secure online platform. Preoperative data included patient age, sex, body mass index, surgical history, and planned procedures. Intraoperative data included operative time, complications during surgery, conversion from robot-assisted surgery to an alternative surgical technique, and blood loss. Postoperative outcome data included length of hospital stay, complications following surgery, serious adverse events, return to the operating room, readmission to the hospital, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: This registry analysis included 2083 cases spanning general, colorectal, hernia, gynecologic, urological, and thoracic indications. A considerable number of cases were recorded for cholecystectomy (n=539), anterior resection (n=162), and total laparoscopic hysterocolpectomy (n=324) procedures. The rates of conversion to an alternative technique, serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality were low for all procedures across all surgical indications. CONCLUSIONS: We report the large-scale analysis of the first 2083 cases recorded in this surgical registry, with substantial data collected for cholecystectomies, anterior resections, and total laparoscopic hysterectomies. The extensive surgical outcome data reported here provide real-world evidence for the safe implementation of the surgical robot into clinical practice.

Supplementing prediction by EuroSCORE with social and patient-reported measures among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of poor outcomes is traditionally attributed to biological and physiological processes in cardiac surgery. However, evidence exists that other factors, such as emotional, behavioral, social, and functional, are predictive of poor outcomes. Objectives were to evaluate the predictive value of several emotional, social, functional, and behavioral factors on four outcomes: death within 90 days, prolonged stay in intensive care, prolonged hospital admission, and readmission within 90 days following cardiac surgery. METHODS: This prospective study included adults undergoing cardiac surgery 2013-2014, including information on register-based socioeconomic factors and self-reported health in a nested subsample. Logistic regression analyses to determine the association and incremental value of each candidate predictor variable were conducted. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine the incremental value of each candidate predictor variable, as well as discrimination and calibration based on the area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. RESULTS: Of 3217 patients, 3% died, 9% had prolonged intensive care stay, 51% had prolonged hospital admission, and 39% were readmitted to hospital. Patients living alone (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.38), with lower educational levels (1.27; 1.04-1.54) and low health-related quality of life (1.43; 1.02-2.01) had prolonged hospital admission. Analyses revealed living alone as predictive of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay (Brier, 0.08; AUC, 0.68), death (0.03; 0.71), and prolonged hospital admission (0.24; 0.62). CONCLUSION: Living alone was found to supplement EuroSCORE in predicting death, prolonged hospital admission, and prolonged ICU stay following cardiac surgery. Low educational level and impaired health-related quality of life were, furthermore, predictive of prolonged hospital admission.

Does the "Weekend Effect" for Postoperative Mortality Stand Up to Scrutiny? Association for Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Critical Care Cohort Study of 110,728 Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Ongoing debate focuses on whether patients admitted to the hospital on weekends have higher mortality than those admitted on weekdays. Whether this apparent "weekend effect" reflects differing patient risk, care quality differences, or inadequate adjustment for risk during analysis remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the existence of a "weekend effect" for risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cardiac registry data. SETTING: Ten UK specialist cardiac centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 110,728 cases, undertaken by 127 consultant surgeons and 190 consultant anesthetists between April 2002 and March 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Major risk-stratified cardiac surgical operations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Crude in-hospital mortality rate was 3.1%. Multilevel multivariable models were employed to estimate the effect of operative day on in-hospital mortality, adjusting for center, surgeon, anesthetist, patient risk, and procedure priority. Weekend elective cases had significantly lower mortality risk compared to Monday elective cases (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42, 0.96) following risk adjustment by the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and procedure priority; differences between weekend and Monday for urgent and emergency/salvage cases were not significant (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.73, 1.72, and 1.07, 95% CI 0.79, 1.45 respectively). Considering only the logistic EuroSCORE but not procedure priority yielded 29% higher odds of death for weekend cases compared to Monday operations (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08, 1.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that undergoing cardiac surgery during the weekend does not affect negatively patient survival, and highlights the importance of comprehensive risk adjustment to avoid detecting spurious "weekend effects."

Acute Risk Change: An Innovative Measure of Operative Adverse Events and Perioperative Team Performance.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac surgical risk models predict mortality preoperatively, whereas intensive care unit (ICU) models predict mortality postoperatively. Finding a large difference between the 2 (an acute risk change [ARC]) may reflect an alteration in the status of the patient related to the surgery. An adverse ARC was associated with morbidity and mortality in an Australian population. The aims of this study were to validate ARC in a UK population and to investigate the possible mechanisms behind ARC. DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Single, high-volume cardiothoracic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 4,842 cardiac surgical patients were collected between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: EuroSCORE was recalibrated to each preceding year's data. ARC was defined as postoperative minus preoperative percentage mortality risk. Association among ARC, morbidity, and mortality was tested. Cases with large adverse ARC (greater than +15%) were compared with cases with large favorable ARC (less than -10%) with regard to intraoperative adverse events, unmeasured patient risk factors, and postoperative events. Adverse ARC was associated with hospital mortality, ICU stay, ICU readmission, renal support, prolonged intubation and return to the operating room (p < 0.001). Intraoperative adverse events occurred in 23 of 33 patients with adverse ARC; however, only 2 of 17 patients with favorable ARC reported adverse events (p < 0.001). Unmeasured risk factors were present in 48% of patients in the adverse ARC group. CONCLUSION: ARC is a readily available and sensitive marker that correlates strongly with morbidity and mortality. The use of ARC in local and national quality monitoring could identify areas for improvement of the quality of cardiac surgical care.

The effect of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on the need for haemofiltration in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on renal function and the need for haemofiltration in patients with preoperative renal impairment undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Clinical data were collected prospectively for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulsatile CPB (Group A, n=66) and compared to matched patients with standard non-pulsatile CPB (Group B, n=66). Patients included in the study had mild renal impairment and at least moderate risk from surgery as defined by logistic EuroSCORE. Emergency operations were excluded. RESULTS: Patients in Groups A and B had similar age (71 ± 10 versus 70 ± 10 years), sex distribution, mean preoperative renal function (creatinine clearance 63.9 ± 28 versus 67.7 ± 27.3 ml/min) and overall risk profile as predicted by the logistic EuroSCORE (8 ± 8.3 versus 11.05±13.3, p=0.122). Intraoperative variables were comparable with respect to bypass and cross-clamp times (96 ± 37 minutes and 64 ± 28 minutes versus 103 ± 40 minutes and 70 ± 33 minutes in Groups A and B, respectively). A smaller proportion of patients in Group A (4.5% versus 15%, p=0.076) required haemofiltration in the postoperative period. Postoperative mortality was low in both groups (Group A 1.54% versus Group B 3.03%, p=1.00). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations imposed by retrospective analyses, our study demonstrates that pulsatile CPB may confer a reno-protective effect in higher-risk patients with pre-existing mild renal dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery.

Impact of the anesthesiologist and surgeon on cardiac surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and their monthly caseload volume on mortality after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Ten-year audit of prospectively collected cardiac surgical data. SETTING: Large adult cardiothoracic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 18,569 cardiac surgical patients in the decade from April 2002 through March 2012, plus 21 consultant surgeons and 29 consultant anesthesiologists. INTERVENTIONS: Major risk-stratified cardiac surgical operations. METHODS: The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Random intercept models for the surgeon and anesthesiologist cluster, respectively, were fitted, achieving risk-adjustment through the logistic EuroSCORE. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) subsequently was used to measure the amount of outcome variation due to clustering. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After exclusions (duplicates, very-short-term appointments, and cases performed by more than one consultant), there were 18,426 patients with 581 (3.15%) in-hospital deaths. The overwhelming factor associated with outcome variation was the patient risk profile, accounting for 97.14% of the variation. The impact of the surgeon was small (ICC = 2.78%), and the impact of the anesthesiologist was negligible (ICC = 0.08%). Low monthly surgeon volume of surgery, adjusted for average case mix, was associated with higher risk-adjusted mortality (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome was determined primarily by the patient. There were small but significant differences in outcome between surgeons. The attending anesthesiologist did not affect patient outcome in this institution. Low average monthly surgeon volume was a significant risk factor. In contrast, low average monthly anesthesiologist volume had no effect.

Predictive role of cardiopulmonary bypass exposure indexed to body surface area on postoperative organ dysfunction: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Long cardiopulmonary bypass times are associated with adverse postoperative outcomes and increased healthcare resource use. It is likely that this effect is pronounced in smaller patients. Previous studies have been criticized for not taking into consideration that prolonged bypass times are often due to higher complexity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between bypass index (bypass time/body surface area) and adverse postoperative events. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study including 2413 patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass from June 2018 to April 2020. Length of hospital stay, as surrogate marker of postoperative morbidity, was selected as primary outcome. The strength of association between bypass index and the primary outcome was assessed with linear regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included new onset renal, pulmonary or cardiac rhythm dysfunction. The predictive value of bypass index was assessed with linear regression analysis; univariate and multiple regression were used to assess the strength of association between Bi and the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Bypass index was predictive for length of stay at univariate (Relative Risk (RR): 1.004, P < 0.001) and at multivariable (RR: 1.003, P < 0.001) analysis. The association between bypass index and new renal (mean difference: 14.1 min/m2, P < 0.001) and cardiac rhythm dysfunction (mean difference: 12.6 min/m2) was significant. This was not true of postoperative lung dysfunction (mean difference: -1.5 min/m2, P = 0.293). CONCLUSIONS: Bypass index, calculated as total bypass time/patient body surface area, is predictive of postoperative morbidity and resource utilization after cardiac surgery on pump.

Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in the heart failure population.

Surgery to correct a structural heart valve problem can restore sinus rhythm in approximately one-fifth of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and the addition of a maze procedure will increase this proportion. Evidence shows that the maze procedure may restore atrial function in some patients and may have beneficial effects on functional symptoms and prognosis. The role of the maze procedure as an isolated treatment for lone AF in the context of heart failure with no structurally correctable cause is unknown. Future progress will determine the appropriate indications for treatment and the risks and benefits of any intervention.

Safe implementation of surgical innovation: a prospective registry of the Versius Robotic Surgical System.

Objectives: To describe a new, international, prospective surgical registry developed to accompany the clinical implementation of the Versius Robotic Surgical System by accumulating real-world evidence of its safety and effectiveness. Interventions: This robotic surgical system was introduced in 2019 for its first live-human case. With its introduction, cumulative database enrollment was initiated across several surgical specialties, with systematic data collection via a secure online platform. Main outcome measures: Pre-operative data include diagnosis, planned procedure(s), characteristics (age, sex, body mass index and disease status) and surgical history. Peri-operative data include operative time, intra-operative blood loss and use of blood transfusion products, intra-operative complications, conversion to an alternative technique, return to the operating room prior to discharge and length of hospital stay. Complications and mortality within 90 days of surgery are also recorded. Results: The data collected in the registry are analyzed as comparative performance metrics, by meta-analyses or by individual surgeon performance using control method analysis. Continual monitoring of key performance indicators, using various types of analyses and outputs within the registry, have provided meaningful insights that help institutions, teams and individual surgeons to perform most effectively and ensure optimal patient safety. Conclusions: Harnessing the power of large-scale, real-world registry data for routine surveillance of device performance in live-human surgery from first use will enhance the safety and efficacy outcomes of innovative surgical techniques. Data are crucial to driving the evolution of robot-assisted minimal access surgery while minimizing risk to patients. Trial registration number: CTRI/2019/02/017872.

Formal consensus study on surgery to replace the aortic valve in adults aged 18-60 years.

OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty about surgical procedures for adult patients aged 18-60 years undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Options include conventional AVR (mechanical, mAVR; tissue, tAVR), the pulmonary autograft (Ross) and aortic valve neocuspidisation (Ozaki). Transcatheter treatment may be an option for selected patients. We used formal consensus methodology to make recommendations about the suitability of each procedure. METHODS: A working group, supported by a patient advisory group, developed a list of clinical scenarios across seven domains (anatomy, presentation, cardiac/non-cardiac comorbidities, concurrent treatments, lifestyle, preferences). A consensus group of 12 clinicians rated the appropriateness of each surgical procedure for each scenario on a 9-point Likert scale on two separate occasions (before and after a 1-day meeting). RESULTS: There was a consensus that each procedure was appropriate (A) or inappropriate (I) for all clinical scenarios as follows: mAVR: total 76% (57% A, 19% I); tAVR: total 68% (68% A, 0% I); Ross: total 66% (39% A, 27% I); Ozaki: total 31% (3% A, 28% I). The remainder of percentages to 100% reflects the degree of uncertainty. There was a consensus that transcatheter aortic valve implantation is appropriate for 5 of 68 (7%) of all clinical scenarios (including frailty, prohibitive surgical risk and very limited life span). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based expert opinion emerging from a formal consensus process indicates that besides conventional AVR options, there is a high degree of certainty about the suitability of the Ross procedure in patients aged 18-60 years. Future clinical guidelines should include the option of the Ross procedure in aortic prosthetic valve selection.

Selenoprotein deficiency disorder predisposes to aortic aneurysm formation.

Aortic aneurysms, which may dissect or rupture acutely and be lethal, can be a part of multisystem disorders that have a heritable basis. We report four patients with deficiency of selenocysteine-containing proteins due to selenocysteine Insertion Sequence Binding Protein 2 (SECISBP2) mutations who show early-onset, progressive, aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta due to cystic medial necrosis. Zebrafish and male mice with global or vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC)-targeted disruption of Secisbp2 respectively show similar aortopathy. Aortas from patients and animal models exhibit raised cellular reactive oxygen species, oxidative DNA damage and VSMC apoptosis. Antioxidant exposure or chelation of iron prevents oxidative damage in patient's cells and aortopathy in the zebrafish model. Our observations suggest a key role for oxidative stress and cell death, including via ferroptosis, in mediating aortic degeneration.

Social and emotional factors as predictors of poor outcomes following cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Existing risk prediction models in cardiac surgery stratify individuals based on their predicted risk, including only medical and physiological factors. However, the complex nature of risk assessment and the lack of parameters representing non-medical aspects of patients' lives point towards the need for a broader paradigm in cardiac surgery. Objectives were to evaluate the predictive value of emotional and social factors on 4 outcomes; death within 90 days, prolonged stay in intensive care (≥72 h), prolonged hospital admission (≥10 days) and readmission within 90 days following cardiac surgery, as a supplement to traditional risk assessment by European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE). METHODS: The study included adults undergoing cardiac surgery in Denmark 2014-2017 including information on register-based socio-economic factors, and, in a nested subsample, self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusted for EuroSCORE, of variables reflecting social and emotional factors. RESULTS: Amongst 7874 included patients, lower educational level (odds ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.51) and living alone (1.25; 1.14-1.38) were associated with prolonged hospital admission after adjustment for EuroSCORE. Lower educational level was also associated with prolonged intensive care unit stay (1.27; 1.00-1.63). Having a high income was associated with decreased odds of prolonged hospital admission (0.78; 0.70-0.87). No associations or predictive value for symptoms of anxiety or depression were found on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Social disparity is predictive of poor outcomes following cardiac surgery. Symptoms of anxiety and depression are frequent especially amongst patients with a high-risk profile according to EuroSCORE. SUBJ COLLECTION: 105, 123.

Five-year results of Amaze: a randomized controlled trial of adjunct surgery for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The Amaze trial showed that adding atrial fibrillation (AF) surgery to cardiac operations increased return to sinus rhythm (SR) without impact on quality of life or survival at 2 years. We report outcomes to 5 years. METHODS: In a multicentre, phase III, pragmatic, double-blind, randomized controlled superiority trial, cardiac surgery patients with >3 months of AF were randomized 1:1 to adjunct AF surgery or control. Primary outcomes of 1-year SR restoration and 2-year quality-adjusted survival were already reported. This study reports on rhythm, survival, quality-adjusted survival, stroke, medication and safety to 5 years. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, 352 patients were randomized. By 5 years 79 died, 58 withdrew, 34 were lost to follow-up and the remaining 182 provided data. AF surgery significantly increased the odds of remaining in SR at 5 years {odds ratio = 2.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23, 7.17], P = 0.015}. There was a non-significant decrease in stroke incidence [odds ratio = 0.605 (95% CI 0.284, 1.287), P = 0.19], but no improved survival [5-year survival: AF surgery 77.3% (95% CI 71.1%, 83.5%), controls 77.8% (95% CI 71.7%, 84.0%), P = 0.85]. Quality-adjusted survival difference was negligible (-0.03; 95% CI -0.33, 0.27, P = 0.85). The composite of survival free of stroke and AF was better in the AF surgery group [odds ratio = 2.34 (95% CI 1.03, 5.31)]. There were no other differences. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct AF surgery confers a higher rate of SR to 5 years and a better composite outcome of survival free of stroke and AF but has no impact on overall or quality-adjusted survival or other clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82731440.

A clinico-pathological conference on constrictive pericarditis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis: a case report with expert commentary and review of the literature.

Constrictive pericarditis is the commonest cardiac complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Two percent of patients with RA develop significant clinical symptoms of pericarditis, which may not correlate with joint disease duration or severity. Symptoms are often vague and non-specific, which frequently delays the diagnosis and subsequent management. Surgical excision of the pericardium is the only definitive treatment option. We present the case of a 60 year-old lady with RA who presented with symptoms due to pericardial constriction and underwent radical pericardectomy.

Inferior outcomes following cardiac surgery in patients with a functioning renal allograft.

OBJECTIVES: Renal transplantation is an effective treatment for end-stage renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes for these patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified patients with a functioning renal allograft at the time of surgery. A 2:1 propensity matching was performed. Patients were matched on: age, sex, left ventricle function, body mass index, preoperative creatinine, operation priority, operation category and logistic EuroSCORE. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing surgery with a functioning renal allograft were identified. The mean age was 62.4 years and 66% were male. A total of 44.7% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 26.3% underwent a single valve procedure. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 10.65. The control population of 76 patients was well matched. Patients undergoing surgery following renal transplantation had a prolonged length of intensive care unit (3.19 vs 1.02 days, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (10.3 vs 7.17 days, P = 0.05). There was a higher in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 1.3%, P = 0.0027). Longer-term survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis was also inferior (P < 0.001). One-year survival was 78.9% vs 96.1% and 5-year survival was 63.2% vs 90.8%. A further subpopulation of 11 patients with a failed renal allograft was identified and excluded from the main analysis; we report demographic and outcome data for them. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a functioning renal allograft are at higher risk of perioperative mortality and inferior long-term survival following cardiac surgery. Patients in this population should be appropriately informed at the time of consent and should be managed cautiously in the perioperative period with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Increases Early and Late Mortality in Low Risk Aortic Valve Replacement.

The concept of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) has gained much attention since first described 40 years ago. Previous studies have shown conflicting evidence regarding increased early and late morbidity and mortality with PPM after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PPM on short- and long-term mortality in low-risk patients after isolated AVR. A retrospective, single-center study involving 1707 consecutive patients ≤80 years of age with preserved left ventricular systolic function who underwent elective, primary isolated AVR operations from 2008 to 2018. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to the presence of PPM (n = 96), defined as effective orifice area index <0.85 cm2/m2 body surface area, and no-PPM (n = 1611). The effect of PPM on mortality was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. 30-day mortality was 0.8% (4.2% in PPM group vs 0.6 in no-PPM group; P = 0.005). PPM occurred more in female gender, obese and older patients. PPM was highly associated with long-term all-cause mortality (median 4 years [Q1-Q3 2-7]; HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.27-2.55, P = 0.002), and remained strongly and independently associated after adjustment for other risk factors (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.10-2.34, P = 0.014). In propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted mortality risk was higher in PPM group (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.22-3.39, P = 0.006) compared to no-PPM group. In a single-centre observational study, PPM increased early mortality and was independently associated with long-term all-cause mortality after low-risk, primary isolated AVR operations. Strategies to avoid PPM should be explored and implemented.

Cardiac surgery in nonagenarians: single-centre series and review.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is widely believed to be an excessively high-risk intervention for very elderly patients with coronary artery or valvular disease. However, as life expectancy and the prospect of sustained quality of life into older age increase, this assumption should be challenged so that surgery is not denied to patients who may derive significant symptomatic benefit with acceptable levels of operative risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes from cardiac surgery in nonagenarian patients. DESIGN: Analysis of prospectively collected single-centre data and review of outcomes reported in the literature. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (13 males) aged 90 years or more underwent open cardiac surgery between 1998 and 2007. Four patients died within 30 days of surgery (surgical mortality 17.4%) and all-cause in-hospital morbidity was 74%. Actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was estimated at 72 and 54%, respectively. Comparison of patients' survival against age-matched life tables for the English population found a standardised mortality ratio of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.24-0.99; one-sample log-rank test chi(2) = 3.93; p < 0.05) representing a significant survival benefit associated with surgery. The majority of patients reported symptomatic improvement reflected by significant decreases in angina and dyspnoea scores. Six single-centre series of nonagenarians and 3 reviews from national databases in the US and UK were identified in the literature. Pooled surgical mortality was 12.7% (95% CI: 8.7-17.3%) with no significant heterogeneity (chi(2) = 4.12; p = 0.77; I(2) = 0). CONCLUSION: Cardiac surgery in the elderly carries higher operative risk than in younger patients. However, in selected nonagenarians, surgery can be performed with acceptable morbidity and early mortality, and patients gain significant symptomatic relief and survival benefit.