Self-report instruments for measuring patient dignity: A psychometric systematic review.

AIMS: To synthesize and evaluate the psychometric properties of self-report instruments that measure patient dignity. DESIGN: A psychometric systematic review. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of studies published from inception until February 17, 2022, was performed using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: The methodological quality of the psychometric studies was evaluated following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: Eleven self-report instruments that evaluate dignity were identified. For most instruments, psychometric properties, including reliability, cross-cultural validity, responsiveness, and measurement error, had not been adequately examined. The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), the Jacelon's Attributed Dignity Scale (JADS), and the Inpatient Dignity Scale (IPDS) had acceptable content validity, structure validity, and internal consistency to measure dignity among adult patients under palliative care, community-dwelling older adults, and inpatients receiving daily care. CONCLUSION: The PDI, the JADS, and the IPDS are recommended for future clinical practice and research to measure dignity among adult patients under palliative care, community-dwelling older adults, and inpatients receiving daily care. Early identification of patients' dignity-related problems in nursing care can prevent negative health outcomes and help develop a timely intervention to promote patients' health and recovery. IMPACT: Given that the psychometric properties of the existing self-report dignity instruments have not been systematically assessed, the present review utilized comprehensive methods according to COSMIN to evaluate and determine the most appropriate measure for research and practice. The PDI, the JADS, and the IPDS demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and are, thus, recommended for clinical and research applications. Nursing professionals can employ these instruments to assess and promptly identify dignity issues among both young and older adults in hospitals and communities.

Self-Management Behaviors in Relation to Psychological Factors and Interdialytic Weight Gain Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis in Indonesia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand the influence of demographic and psychological factors on self-management behaviors and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) as a fluid adherence marker among patients undergoing hemodialysis in Indonesia. DESIGN: A quantitative correlational study. METHOD: A convenience sample of 145 patients undergoing hemodialysis was recruited from the dialysis units in two hospitals in Jakarta from September to December 2015. Questionnaires were used to examine self-management behaviors, depression, anxiety, and stress. Data for IDWG were obtained by subtracting the individual's predialysis weight from his or her postdialysis weight from the previous session. Hierarchical multiple linear regression identified the predictors of IDWG. RESULTS: Self-advocacy was ranked the least performed self-management behavior, while medication adherence was ranked the most likely to be performed. Among the subscales of the Self-Management Behavior Indices, positive correlations were found between the communication dimension with all psychological factors (depression, anxiety, and stress), while self-advocacy had positive correlation with anxiety. Subjects gained a mean of 4.5% of their postdialysis weight, with over 50% exceeding the recommended 4% IDWG. Overall, 53.6% of the IDWG was explained by the weekly duration of hemodialysis, level of depression, communication, partnership in care, and self-advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management behaviors are potential predictors that can be modified by nephrology nurses in order to enhance clinical outcomes, with the specific outcome being IDWG. Self-management behaviors contribute to the promotion of appropriate IDWG. Depressed patients are less likely to adhere to weight gain restrictions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Education combined with training in self-management behaviors-particularly communication, becoming a partner in care, and advocating for care-may improve adherence to IDWG guidelines among Indonesian hemodialysis patients. Interventions targeting depressed patients are needed.

Development of theoretical framework and digital competence assessment checklist (DCAC) for nursing students.

Background: The rapid development of digital technology impacts all aspects, including nursing education. Nursing programs are tasked with equipping graduates with both clinical skills and digital competence. However, inconsistencies in the conceptual understanding of digital competence in nursing literature, underscore the need to refine the concept. Design: This study involved two phases including a modified Delphi approach and psychometric testing. In Phase 1, the panel of experts in nursing was invited to evaluate the theoretical framework, domain, and item of assessment checklist. In Phase 2, the psychometric properties of the assessment checklist were tested using a quantitative survey. Setting: The study was conducted in Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Participant: Participants included 12 nursing experts from Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam during the development phase and 417 nursing students from these countries in the validation phase. Methods: Phase 1 utilized a modified Delphi approach establishing a theoretical framework and assessment checklist. Experts provided feedback on a Likert scale, aiming for consensus. Phase 2 involved a quantitative survey where graduate nursing students rated the DCAC. The analysis process following the recommendation of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Results: The theoretical framework defined digital competence across four domains. In the first Delphi round, all items were rated above the consensus threshold. After two rounds, the CVI ranged from .8 to 1.0, suggesting strong agreement among experts. The second phase revealed high discriminant validity among survey items, with Cronbach's alpha indicating high internal consistency. The refined 22-item DCAC showed improved fit indices, confirming the assessment checklist's structure. Conclusion: The developed 22-item DCAC is a valid and reliable tool for measuring digital competence among nursing students. Integration of digital competence into nursing education is essential for preparing students to excel in the healthcare environment.

Effects of helping relationships on health-promoting lifestyles among patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Healthy behaviors can slow the progression of chronic kidney disease. Professional healthcare providers deliver education, physical exercise programs, motivation consultations, and stage-tailored strategies for improving health behaviors, but their effectiveness reported mixed. The helping relationships of significant others based on the transtheoretical model have been shown to be beneficial in facilitating and practicing health-promoting behaviors. However, few studies have examined the effects of helping relationships on health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the intervention strategies of significant others in their helping relationships with patients to advance stages of exercise and diet behaviors, and to improve health-promoting lifestyles. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTINGS: Two outpatient nephrology clinics in southern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty participants in each of the two groups. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 60) whose significant others received strategies for helping relationships for 12 months, or the control group (n = 60). The Stage of Change of Exercise and Diet Behaviors, and Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II Chinese version were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after receiving the helping relationship interventions tailored to stage of change from significant others. RESULTS: Generalized estimating equation analyzes revealed that the intervention group, when compared to the control group, had significantly advanced stages of change in exercise and diet, and improvement in health-promoting lifestyle over time. Adult children and spouses were the most common significant others to help patients practice healthy behaviors, compared to previous studies where professional healthcare providers were the significant others. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized plans for healthy behaviors should take into consideration patients' readiness for adopting stage-tailored strategies of helping relationships of significant others to adhere to the health-promoting lifestyle. To promote a healthier lifestyle, significant others, such as spouses and adult children, should be included in treatment programs.

Helping Relationships From Significant Others Scale: Chinese Version.

Using the helping relationships from significant others (HRSO) scale assists patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), in adopting a healthy lifestyle to decelerate disease progression, complications, and mortality. To study the efficacy of the scale, we recruited a convenience sample (n = 250) of patients with CKD from a nephrology clinic in southern Taiwan. Principal axis factor analysis and a promax rotation revealed a 15-item, three-factor explanation of 68.44 % of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. The Composite reliability was .91, .89, and .92 in the same factors. Cronbach's alpha was .90 for the 15-item scale, with the 3 subscales ranging from .86 to .91. The split reliability was .73. The HRSO is a valid and reliable scale to measure significant others' support of patients with CKD in maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Development of the Adherence to Healthy Behaviors Scale.

Adherence to healthy behaviors is a protective factor in the disease progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Measuring adherence can lead to the recognition of unhealthy behaviors and the suggestion of programs to prevent poor health outcomes. An assessment measurement for patients with CKD not requiring dialysis was developed and psychometrically tested. A convenience sample (n = 330) of patients with CKD attending a nephrology clinic in southern Taiwan completed the 13-item Adherence to Healthy Behaviors Scale (AHBS). A principal axis factor analysis and a parallel analysis demonstrated a three-factor structure accounting for 47.16% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. The criterion-related validity was adequate (r = .51; p < .000), with a Cronbach's alpha of .70; the test-retest reliability demonstrated good stability (r = .70; p < .000). The AHBS is a valid, reliable instrument to assess adherence to healthy behaviors among patients with CKD.