RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the overall impact of Panax ginseng on lipid profile by synthesizing existing evidence. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly population, and serum lipids play a crucial role in its development. Maintaining optimal levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol is essential in reducing the risk of CVD. Ginsenosides, the active constituents in ginseng, have shown positive effects on lipid metabolism. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits of ginseng in managing dyslipidemia, which could have significant implications for the prevention and treatment of CVD. METHODS: A comprehensive analysis of 29 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the effects of ginseng supplementation on lipid profile, including Triglyceride (TG), Total Cholesterol (TC), High- -density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), and Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. A systematic search was done in online databases, such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, using relevant keywords and MeSH terms to identify relevant studies until January 2024. RESULTS: The Weighted Mean Differences (WMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for TG, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C did not show significant changes with ginseng supplementation. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the results, using ginseng did not have a statistically significant influence on lipid profile parameters in individuals with different health conditions. Further, well-designed RCTs focusing on specific diseases are needed to clarify the potential beneficial effects of ginseng and its derivatives on lipid profile.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vaccination protects against severe COVID-19 manifestations. For those with post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC) or long COVID, the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the evolution of symptoms, immune responses, and viral persistence is unclear. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we evaluated the number of PCC symptoms, affected organ systems, and psychological well-being scores before and after patients with PCC received COVID-19 vaccination. We simultaneously evaluated biomarkers of systemic inflammation and levels of plasma cytokines/chemokines. We measured plasma and intracellular levels of SARS-CoV-2 antigens, and immunoreactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in blood. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with decreases in number of PCC symptoms (pre-vaccination: 6.56 ± 3.1 vs post-vaccination: 3.92 ± 4.02; P <0.001) and affected organ systems (pre-vaccination: 3.19 ± 1.04 vs post-vaccination: 1.89 ± 1.12; P <0.001), and increases in World Health Organization (WHO)-5 Well-Being Index Scores (pre-vaccination: 42.67 ± 22.76 vs post-vaccination: 56.15 ± 22.83; P <0.001). Patients with PCC also had significantly decreased levels of several pro-inflammatory plasma cytokines/chemokines after COVID-19 vaccination including sCD40L, GRO-âº, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1âº, interleukin (IL)-12p40, G-colony stimulating factor (CSF), M-CSF, IL-1ß, and stem cell factor (SCF). PCC participants presented a certain level of immunoreactivity toward SARS-CoV-2, that was boosted with vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 S1 antigen persisted in the blood of PCC participants, mostly in non-classical monocytes, regardless of participants receiving vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows higher pro-inflammatory responses associated with PCC symptoms and brings forward a possible role for vaccination in mitigating PCC symptoms by decreasing systemic inflammation. We also observed persistence of viral products independent of vaccination that could be involved in perpetuating inflammation through non-classical monocytes.