Phase III trial of gabapentin alone or in conjunction with an antidepressant in the management of hot flashes in women who have inadequate control with an antidepressant alone: NCCTG N03C5.

PURPOSE: Despite the utility of newer antidepressants for alleviating hot flashes, antidepressants do not work adequately enough in many patients. Gabapentin is a nonhormonal agent that also can reduce hot flashes. No data have been available to address whether the combination of both agents would more effectively alleviate hot flashes, compared with gabapentin alone, in patients with inadequate hot flash control with an antidepressant alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized trial in which 118 patients with inadequate hot flash control on an antidepressant were randomly assigned to receive both an antidepressant and gabapentin versus being weaned off the antidepressant and receiving gabapentin alone. Patients were observed for 5 weeks (including a baseline week in which patients continued on their current antidepressant without gabapentin) during which time they completed validated daily hot flash diaries. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients provided complete data at the 5-week assessment. Regardless of whether or not the antidepressant was continued when gabapentin was started, there was an approximately 50% median reduction in hot flash frequencies (54%; 95% CI, 34% to 70% for combined treatment v 49%; 95% CI, 26% to 58% for gabapentin alone) and scores (56%; 95% CI, 26% to 71% for combined treatment v 60%; 95% CI, 33% to 73% for gabapentin alone). CONCLUSION: Gabapentin seems to decrease hot flashes by approximately 50% in women with inadequate hot flash control who were using an antidepressant. This study saw no significant additional hot flash reduction from continuation of the antidepressant.

Phase III comparison of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) vs. doxorubicin and cisplatin (AC) in women with advanced primary or recurrent metastatic carcinoma of the uterine endometrium.

OBJECTIVES: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III trial compared efficacy of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) with doxorubicin plus cisplatin (AC) for patients with advanced endometrial cancer. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to treatment with doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 + cisplatin 70 mg/m2 IV q 4 weeks vs. methotrexate 30 mg/m2 IV days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 IV days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 IV day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 of a 4-week cycle. The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow accrual. RESULTS: Prior to early closure of the protocol, there were 15 patients entered on the AC regimen and 13 to the MVAC regimen. There were 3 PR (20%) for AC and 3 CR (23%) and 3 PR (23%) for MVAC. Median PFS was 4.0 months for AC and 6.9 months for MVAC. Median survival was 13.2 months for AC and 16.8 months for MVAC. Toxicity was substantial for MVAC vs. AC with severe leukopenia seen in 69% vs. 33% of patients and severe thrombocytopenia 23% vs. 0%. No treatment-related deaths were seen. DISCUSSION: MVAC and AC are active regimens in the treatment of advanced/recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer. The premature closure of the protocol resulted in small patient numbers that left the protocol underpowered to address the primary objective of demonstrating improved CR rate for MVAC over AC. MVAC has substantial toxicity compared to AC and is not substantially superior to AC. MVAC cannot be considered as a standard for treatment in this patient population.