Hospital-level variation in hospitalization costs for spinal fusion in the United States.

BACKGROUND: With a growing emphasis on value of care, understanding factors associated with rising healthcare costs is increasingly important. In this national study, we evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of spinal fusion. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective spinal fusion were identified in the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Multilevel mixed-effect models were used to rank hospitals based on risk-adjusted costs. The interclass coefficient (ICC) was utilized to tabulate the amount of variation attributable to hospital-level characteristics. The association of high cost-hospital (HCH) status with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and overall resource utilization was analyzed. Predictors of increased costs were secondarily explored. RESULTS: An estimated 1,541,740 patients underwent spinal fusion, and HCH performed an average of 9.5% of annual cases. HCH were more likely to be small (36.8 vs 30.5%, p<0.001), rural (10.1 vs 8.8%, p<0.001), and located in the Western geographic region (49.9 vs 16.7%, p<0.001). The ICC demonstrated 32% of variation in cost was attributable to the hospital, independent of patient-level characteristics. Patients who received a spinal fusion at a HCH faced similar odds of mortality (0.74 [0.48-1.15], p = 0.18) and perioperative complications (1.04 [0.93-1.16], p = 0.52), but increased odds of non-home discharge (1.30 [1.17-1.45], p<0.001) and prolonged length of stay (ß 0.34 [0.26-0.42] days, p = 0.18). Patient factors such as gender, race, and income quartile significantly impacted costs. CONCLUSION: The present analysis identified 32% of the observed variation to be attributable to hospital-level characteristics. HCH status was not associated with increased mortality or perioperative complications.

Center-level variation in hospitalization costs of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a highly morbid operation with significant resource utilization. Using a national cohort, we examined the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization cost in the United States. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in the setting of pancreatic cancer were tabulated from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. A 2-level mixed-effects model was developed to evaluate the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs. Institutions within the top decile of risk-adjusted expenditures were defined as high-cost hospitals. Multivariable regression models were fitted to examine the association between high-cost hospital status and outcomes of interest. To account for the effects of complications on expenditures, a subgroup analysis comprising of patients with no adverse events was conducted. RESULTS: The study included an estimated 24,779 patients with a median hospitalization cost of $38,800. After mixed-effects modeling, 40.9% of the cost variation was attributable to hospital, rather than patient, factors. Multivariable regression models revealed an association between high-cost hospital status and greater odds of complications and longer length of stay. Among patients without an adverse event, interhospital cost variation remained significant at 61.0%, and treatment at high-cost hospitals was similarly linked to longer length of stay. CONCLUSION: Our study identified significant interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs in the United States. Although high-cost hospital status was associated with increased odds of complications, variation remained significant even among patients without an adverse event. These results suggest the important role of hospital practices as contributors to expenditures. Further efforts to identify drivers of costs and standardize pancreatic surgical care are warranted.

First in Human Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Irradiation to Achieve Lung Volume Reduction (SILVR) in Severe Emphysema.

PURPOSE: Only a subset of patients with severe emphysema qualify for lung volume reduction surgery or endobronchial valves. We previously demonstrated that stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors reduces lung volume in treated lobes by creating localized lung fibrosis. We aimed to determine the safety and secondarily explore the efficacy of stereotactic irradiation for lung volume reduction (SILVR) over 18 months after intervention in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-arm, prospective clinical trial in eligible patients with severe emphysema treated with unilateral stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (45 Gy in 3 fractions) to a target within the most emphysematous region. The primary outcome was safety in terms of incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events, and the secondary outcome was efficacy. RESULTS: Eight patients received the intervention. Median (range) baseline characteristics were age 73 years (63-78); forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent of predicted value (FEV1%) 28.5% (19.0-42.0); diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide percent of predicted value 40% (24.0-67.0); and body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index 5.5 (5-9). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 3 of 8 (37.5%). The relative change in target lobe volume was -23.1% (-1.6 to -41.5) and -26.5% (-20.6 to -40.8) at 6 and 18 months, respectively. The absolute ΔFEV1% was greater in patients with a BODE index ≤5 versus ≥6 (+12.0% vs -2.0%). The mean baseline lung density (in Hounsfield units, reflecting the amount of preserved parenchyma) within the intermediate dose volume (V60BED3) correlated with the absolute change in target lobe volume at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: SILVR appears to be safe, with a signal for efficacy as a novel therapeutic alternative for patients with severe emphysema. SILVR may be most safe and effective in patients with a lower BODE index and/or less parenchymal destruction.

Surgical resection of mediastinal ectopic thyroid tissue: a case series.

Background: Ectopic thyroid tissue (ETT) is characterized by the presence of thyroid tissue in any location other than its normal anatomic position. Mediastinal ectopic thyroid gland is a rare entity, accounting for 1% of all ETT cases. In this article, we present seven cases with mediastinal ETT over the last 26 years admitted to Stanford hospital. Case Description: Searching Stanford pathology database for specimens that contained term "ectopic thyroid" between 1996 and 2021, a total of 202 patients were collected. Among those seven were classified as mediastinal ETT. Patients' electronic medical records were reviewed for data collection purposes. The mean age of our seven cases was 54 years on the day of surgery, and four were female. Chest pressure, cough, and neck pain were most reported presenting symptoms. Four of our patients had thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) checks all within normal limits. All patients in our study had computed tomography (CT) imaging of the chest detecting the mediastinal mass. Histopathology of the mass revealed ectopic thyroid tissue negative for malignancy in all cases. Conclusions: Ectopic mediastinal thyroid tissue is a rare clinical entity that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all mediastinal masses as it usually requires different management and treatment.

Improving lung cancer screening rates among patients with head and neck cancer in a radiation oncology clinic.

Background: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends lung cancer screening via annual low dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high risk patients. Despite the strong evidence of a mortality benefit from several randomized clinical trials, rates of lung cancer screening remain low. We plan to assess how screening guidelines are implemented in a radiation oncology clinic for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: A single institution, retrospective chart review was used to identify patients with head and neck cancer seen in a radiation oncology clinic who were potentially eligible for lung cancer screening under the current USPSTF guidelines. Patients who were potentially screening-eligible were enrolled in a phone survey to assess their knowledge about lung cancer screening and willingness to be screened. Results: Of the 184 patients with head and neck cancer seen in the clinic, 8 (4%) patients were eligible for lung cancer screening under the previous USPSTF recommendations, including 1 (0.5%) patient already being screened. One patient (0.5%) became eligible under the expanded guidelines. All 184 patients had smoking history documented. Of the 87 current or former smokers, there were 24 (28%) who did not have pack-years documented; of the 82 former smokers, there were 8 (10%) who did not have quit date documented. Among the 16 phone survey participants (response rate: 70%) only 6 (38%) were aware there is a way to screen for lung cancer and 12 (75%) patients would be interested in screening if they are found to be eligible. Conclusions: These findings highlight a potential opportunity to increase rates of lung cancer screening among patients with head and neck cancer by both enhancing provider awareness as well as patient education at the community level.

Rationale and design of a mechanistic clinical trial of JAK inhibition to prevent ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) is an important phenomenon that has been repeatedly demonstrated in experimental and clinical models of mechanical ventilation. Even a few hours of MV initiates signaling cascades that result in, first, reduced specific force, and later, atrophy of diaphragm muscle fibers. This severe, progressive weakness of the critical ventilatory muscle results in increased duration of MV and thus increased MV-associated complications/deaths. A drug that could prevent VIDD would likely have a major positive impact on intensive care unit outcomes. We identified the JAK/STAT pathway as important in VIDD and then demonstrated that JAK inhibition prevents VIDD in rats. We subsequently developed a clinical model of VIDD demonstrating reduced contractile force of isolated diaphragm fibers harvested after ∼7 vs ∼1 h of MV during a thoracic surgical procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NIH-funded clinical trial that has been initiated is a prospective, placebo controlled trial: subjects undergoing esophagectomy are randomized to receive 6 preoperative doses of the FDA-approved JAK inhibitor Tofacitinib (commonly used for rheumatoid arthritis) vs. placebo. The primary outcome variable will be the difference in the reduction that occurs in force generation of diaphragm single muscle fibers (normalized to their cross-sectional area), in the Tofacitinib vs. placebo subjects, over 6 h of MV. DISCUSSION: This trial represents a first-in-human, mechanistic clinical trial of a drug to prevent VIDD. It will provide proof-of-concept in human subjects whether JAK inhibition prevents clinical VIDD, and if successful, will support an ICU-based clinical trial that would determine whether JAK inhibition impacts clinical outcome variables such as duration of MV and mortality.