Identifying High-Risk Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Opportunity for Intervention Within the Primary Care Setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are likely to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which can progress to advanced fibrosis. Early recognition of those at highest risk may ameliorate outcomes. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment through validated scoring systems such as the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is helpful to identify these high-risk patients, with the process ideally beginning in the primary care setting. The primary objective of this study was to determine rates of disease recognition and initial management of patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in a diverse primary care setting. The secondary objective was to define demographic and clinical predictors of NAFLD identification and management in this population. METHODS: Medical charts from patients seen at three university-based primary care practices in New York City from January 2016 to December 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of: age 18 years and above, persistent alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation (2 values ≥40 IU/mL ≥6 mo apart), and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Patients with viral hepatitis or alcohol misuse were excluded. Patients were defined as likely having NAFLD if they met 2 of the following criteria indicating MetS: systolic blood pressure >135 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >85 mm Hg or active treatment for hypertension; high-density lipoprotein <40 g/dL; triglycerides >150 mg/dL or active treatment for hyperlipidemia; or hemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% or active treatment for insulin resistance. The primary study endpoints were the frequency of providers' recognition of NAFLD and referral to specialist and/or for imaging based on visit diagnosis codes or chart documentation. The secondary endpoints were frequency of detecting those with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis utilizing previously defined FIB-4 index cutoffs as well as predictors of disease recognition and management. Analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and logistical regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients were identified as having persistently elevated ALT, a body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 , and MetS consistent with likely NAFLD diagnosis. In patients meeting these criteria, ALT elevation was documented by primary care providers in 129 patients (43.7%), NAFLD was noted in chart documentation in 76 patients (25.8%), and a NAFLD ICD-10 diagnosis was assigned to 7 patients (2.4%). 50 patients (16.9%) were referred for ultrasound. Among 51 patients (17.2%) at high risk for advanced fibrosis based on FIB-4 >3.25, 23 patients (45.1%) had NAFLD recognized by their provider and 3 (5.9%) were referred to a specialist. On logistic regression, female gender, dyslipidemia, and private insurance were predictors of disease identification by the primary care physician. CONCLUSION: ALT elevation and NAFLD are under recognized among patients with MetS in the primary care setting. Importantly, while 17.2% of patients with likely NAFLD in our cohort were high risk for advanced fibrosis, less than half of this group had a NAFLD diagnosis recognized by their primary care provider and only three were referred to a liver specialist. Further investigation of disease recognition and management algorithms in the primary care setting are necessary to enhance NAFLD detection, implement clinical care pathways, and reduce disease progression and complications.

Postinduction therapy pulmonary function retesting is necessary before surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Pretreatment-predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) has been associated with operative mortality in patients who receive induction therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is unknown whether a reduction in pulmonary function after induction therapy and before surgery affects the risk of morbidity or mortality. We sought to determine the relationship between induction therapy and perioperative outcomes as a function of postinduction pulmonary status in patients who underwent surgical resection for NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data for 1001 patients with pathologic stage I, II, or III NSCLC who received induction therapy before lung resection. Pulmonary function was defined according to American College of Surgeons Oncology Group major criteria: DLCO ≥50% = normal; DLCO <50% = impaired. Patients were categorized into 5 subgroups according to combined pre- and postinduction DLCO status: normal-normal, normal-impaired, impaired-normal, impaired-impaired, and preinduction only (without postinduction pulmonary function test measurements). Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify the relationship between DLCO categories and dichotomous end points. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, normal-impaired DLCO status was associated with an increased risk of respiratory complications (odds ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.12-4.49]; P = .02) and in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.55-5.26]; P < .001). Type of neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with an increased risk of complications, compared with conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced postinduction DLCO might predict perioperative outcomes. The use of repeat pulmonary function testing might identify patients at higher risk of morbidity or mortality.

Prognostic factors following complete resection of non-superior sulcus lung cancer invading the chest wall.

OBJECTIVES: Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chest wall invasion carries a high risk of recurrence and portends poor survival (30-40% and 20-50%, respectively). No studies have identified prognostic factors in patients who underwent R0 resection for non-superior sulcus NSCLC. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all chest wall resections for NSCLC from 2004 to 2018. Patients with superior sulcus tumours, partial (<1 rib) or incomplete (R1/R2) resection or distant metastasis were excluded. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine factors associated with DFS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria. Seventy-three (73%) patients underwent induction therapy, and all but 12 (16%) patients experienced a partial radiological response. A median of 3 ribs was resected (range 1-7), and 67 (67%) patients underwent chest wall reconstruction. The 5-year DFS and OS were 36% and 45%, respectively. Pathological N2 status [hazard ratio (HR) 3.12, confidence interval (CI) 1.56-6.25; P = 0.001], intraoperative blood transfusion (HR 2.24, CI 1.28-3.92; P = 0.005) and preoperative forced vital capacity (per % forced vital capacity, HR 0.97, CI 0.96-0.99; P = 0.013) were associated with DFS. Increasing pathological stage, lack of radiological response to induction therapy (HR 7.35, CI 2.35-22.99; P = 0.001) and cardiovascular comorbidity (HR 2.43, CI 1.36-4.36; P = 0.003) were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that blood transfusion and forced vital capacity are associated with DFS after R0 resection for non-superior sulcus NSCLC, while radiological response to induction therapy greatly influences OS. We confirm that pathological nodal status and pathological stage are reproducible determinants of DFS and OS, respectively.

Esophageal IgE, IgG4, and mucosal eosinophilia in individuals with dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an inflammatory disease of the esophagus, producing failure to thrive in infants and dysphagia with food impaction in older children and adults. Although most people with EoE manifest atopic/allergic disease, the specific allergens to which immunoglobulin E (IgE) is directed, if any, have not yet been characterized. METHODS: Mucosal brush biopsy (MBB) and solid tissue biopsy (STB) specimens were prospectively obtained from 25 individuals with dysphagia and suspicion of EoE. Specific IgE (sIgE) against 112 epitopes from airborne and food proteins, antigens known to cause a polyclonal IgE response and IgG4 to food allergens, were measured. RESULTS: There was no difference in total IgE harvested between the 2 biopsy methods (p > 0.05) or between the EoE-positive (N = 12) and EoE-negative (N = 13) groups (p > 0.05). None of the samples in either group contained measurable serum IgE to any of the airborne or food proteins tested, but low levels of IgE specific to Candida and Staphylococcus enterotoxins were detected. Low levels of IgG4 specific to wheat, soy, peanut, and egg were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both MBB and STB are able to harvest measureable levels of IgE and IgG4 from the esophageal mucosa. Low levels of serum-specific IgE suggest that other inflammatory mechanisms, besides type I, IgE-mediated, allergen-specific hypersensitivity, may act as the primary catalyst for mucosal eosinophilia. Clarifying the role of both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated inflammatory mechanisms will help identify more targeted diagnostic and treatment strategies for individuals who present with dysphagia and esophageal eosinophilia.