Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 100(2): 77-83, 2024 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124133

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Pregnant and postpartum women (PPW) in Southern Africa are at increased risk of acquiring HIV and curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is safe and effective to use during pregnancy to reduce HIV acquisition and vertical transmission. Point-of-care (POC) STI testing can identify PPW at risk of HIV and facilitate risk-differentiated and person-centred counselling to improve PrEP initiation, persistence and adherence. We evaluated the impact of POC STI testing compared with STI syndromic management on PrEP outcomes among PPW in Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS: The STI and PrEP in Pregnancy Study enrolled PPW without HIV and ≤34 weeks pregnant at their regular antenatal care visit with follow-up after 1 month. PPW were randomised to receive POC STI testing or STI syndromic management. PPW randomised to POC STI testing self-collected vaginal swabs for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis (Cepheid GeneXpert) testing and were offered same-day treatment if diagnosed. We compared PrEP initiation at baseline, PrEP prescription refill at 1 month (persistence) and adherence through tenofovir-diphosphate detection in dried blood spots by randomisation arm. In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the association between an STI diagnosis (positive STI test or reporting STI symptoms) with PrEP outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomised 268 pregnant women. Twenty-eight per cent of women were diagnosed with ≥1 STI. Overall, 65% of women initiated and 79% persisted on PrEP with no significant differences by randomisation arm. Secondary analysis demonstrated that an STI diagnosis (positive STI test or reporting STI symptoms) was associated with higher PrEP initiation (adjusted relative risk=1.28; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.52), controlling for arm, maternal and gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: POC STI testing was not associated with PrEP initiation or persistence relative to syndromic management. However, improving STI diagnosis by supplementing syndromic management with POC STI testing could improve PrEP initiation among PPW. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03902418; Clinical Trials.gov; 1 April 2019.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Gestantes , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Testes Imediatos
2.
Sex Transm Infect ; 98(7): 484-491, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887350

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: STIs remain a global public health problem with a high burden among pregnant women. STIs in pregnant women may lead to various adverse pregnancy outcomes. In most sub-Saharan African countries, syndromic management is used for screening and treatment of STIs. We aimed to update and summarise pooled prevalence of curable STIs and bacterial vaginosis (BV) among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Electronic databases and reference lists of relevant published and unpublished studies were searched from March 2015 to October 2020. Studies were included if they estimated prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Treponema pallidum (syphilis), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) and BV among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. Meta-analyses were performed with observed prevalences corrected for diagnostic errors to estimate the pooled prevalence of diagnosed infections by region. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing 85-point prevalence estimates for curable STIs and BV. Pooled prevalence estimates (with 95% CI and number of women tested) were as follows: MG: 13.5% (4.0-27.2, n=1076); CT: 10.8% (6.9-15.5, n=6700); TV: 13.8% (10.0-18.0, n=9264); NG: 3.3% (2.1-4.7, n=6019); syphilis: 2.9% (2.0-4.0, n=95 308) and BV: 36.6% (27.1-46.6, n=5042). By region, BV was the most prevalent and ranged from 28.5% (24.5-32.8, n=1030) in Eastern Africa to 52.4% (33.5-70.9, n=2305) in Southern Africa; NG had the lowest prevalence, ranging from 1.4% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.1, n=367) in Central Africa to 4.4% (95% CI 2.6 to 6.4, n=4042) in Southern Africa. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of curable STIs and BV in sub-Saharan Africa is substantial in pregnant women but most prevalent in Southern Africa where HIV prevalence is highest. It is crucial to integrate screening of curable STIs into antenatal care programmes that have previously focused on diagnosis and treatment of syphilis and HIV.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Sífilis , Trichomonas vaginalis , Vaginose Bacteriana , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Vaginose Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Vaginose Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Chlamydia trachomatis , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia
3.
Sex Transm Infect ; 97(5): 375-381, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33004610

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: STIs during pregnancy increase adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes and may increase HIV risk. STI syndromic management is standard of care in South Africa. Our study evaluated the prevalence and incidence of STIs in pregnant women and the associated risk factors. METHODS: We combined data from two prospective observational studies of pregnant women enrolled while attending their first antenatal clinic (ANC) visit in Tshwane District and Cape Town. Women ≥18 years were tested at first ANC visit and at their first postpartum visit for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis using Xpert assays (Cepheid, USA). We evaluated the prevalence and incidence of STI and the associated risk factors using multivariable regression models. RESULTS: We enrolled 669 pregnant women, 64% (n=427) from Tshwane District and 36% (n=242) from Cape Town; 80% (n=534) were women living with HIV (WLHIV) and 20% (n=135) without HIV. At enrolment, 37% (n=250) were diagnosed with at least one STI, of which 76% (n=190) were asymptomatic. STI prevalence was 40% (n=213) in WLHIV and 27% (n=37) in women without HIV (p=0.01). Baseline STI infection was associated with younger age (OR=0.95 per year, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), higher gestational age (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.03 per week, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05), single relationship status (aOR=1.53, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.15) and HIV status (aOR=1.86, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.95). Of 419 participants with no STI at baseline, 21 had an incident STI during follow-up, with a mean follow-up time of 140 days. The incidence rate of STI during pregnancy and early post partum was 15 infections per 100 women-years (95% CI 9 to 23). Younger age was associated with STI incidence. CONCLUSION: Our study shows high prevalence and incidence of STIs in pregnancy, especially in WLHIV, demonstrating the need for STI screening in ANC to prevent adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Most STI cases were asymptomatic and would have gone untreated with syndromic management. Aetiological STI screening is urgently needed to reduce the burden of STIs in pregnancy.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , África do Sul/epidemiologia
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(2): 92-97, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36630416

RESUMO

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs present a platform for diagnostic sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing in low- and middle-income countries, and availability of targeted STI testing has been hypothesized to influence PrEP use. We evaluated the association of STI testing modality and PrEP uptake among pregnant women in antenatal care. We enrolled pregnant, HIV-uninfected women (16 years or older) at their first antenatal visit with follow-up through 12 months postpartum. Women were offered oral PrEP and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using a point-of-care (POC; Cepheid, August 2019­November 2020) or laboratory-based (Thermofisher, December 2020­October 2021) test. We compared the proportion of women initiating and continuing PrEP by STI test adjusting for confounders. We evaluated 1194 women (median age, 26 years [interquartile range, 22­31 years]) with an STI result (46% POC and 54% laboratory-based). The prevalence of any STI was the same in POC-tested (28%) and laboratory-tested (28%) women­25% versus 23% for C. trachomatis ( P = 0.35) and 7% versus 9% for N. gonorrhoeae ( P = 0.11). Mean time from testing to result was 0 day for POC and 26 days for laboratory testing, and mean time from testing to treatment was 3 days for POC and 38 days for laboratory testing. Receiving a POC STI test was associated with higher PrEP initiation compared with women receiving a laboratory-based test (90% vs. 78%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5­2.9), controlling for age, gravidity, STI diagnosis, intimate partner violence, gestational age, employment, HIV risk perception, and cohabiting status. Point-of-care STI testing, offering same-day results and treatment initiation, may increase PrEP initiation among pregnant women in antenatal care.


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Gestantes , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA