Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge.

In ecological risk assessment, sum-of-toxic-unit approaches based on measured water quality factors such as trace metals are used to infer ecological impacts in the environment. However, it is uncertain whether the use of such approaches yields accurate risk predictions. To address this issue, we investigated and compared (1) water quality, including trace metals, and (2) benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a northern Japanese river receiving treated discharge from an abandoned mine and in a nearby reference river. As a sum-of-toxic-unit approach, we employed a cumulative criterion unit (CCU), namely, the sum of the ratios of the dissolved concentrations of a metal (Cu, Zn, Cd, or Pb) divided by the US Environmental Protection Agency hardness-adjusted environmental water quality criterion for that metal. Compared with the reference sites, at the metal-contaminated sites, the richness, abundance, and structure of macroinvertebrate communities were little affected, with CCUs of 1.7 to 7.4, suggesting that CCU values exceeding 1 do not always indicate marked adverse impacts on these metrics. Further study is still required to derive a more compelling conclusion on the generally applicable relationships between CCUs and ecological impacts on river invertebrates. This would lead to better ecological risk assessments based on sum-of-toxic-unit approaches.

Comparing impacts of metal contamination on macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in a northern Japanese river.

Researchers have long assessed the ecological impacts of metals in running waters, but few such studies investigated multiple biological groups. Our goals in this study were to assess the ecological impacts of metal contamination on macroinvertebrates and fishes in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge and to evaluate whether there was any difference between the metrics based on macroinvertebrates and those based on fishes in assessing these impacts. Macroinvertebrate communities and fish populations were little affected at the downstream contaminated sites where concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd were 0.1-1.5 times higher than water-quality criteria established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We detected a significant reduction in a few macroinvertebrate metrics such as mayfly abundance and the abundance of heptageniid mayflies at the two most upstream contaminated sites with metal concentrations 0.8-3.7 times higher than the water-quality criteria. There were, however, no remarkable effects on the abundance or condition factor of the four dominant fishes, including masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). These results suggest that the richness and abundance of macroinvertebrates are more sensitive to metal contamination than abundance and condition factor of fishes in the studied river. Because the sensitivity to metal contamination can depend on the biological metrics used, and fish-based metrics in this study were limited, it would be valuable to accumulate empirical evidence for ecological indicators sensitive to metal contamination within and among biological groups to help in choosing which groups to survey for general environmental impact assessments in metal-contaminated rivers.