Reduced psychosocial functioning in subacromial pain syndrome is associated with persistence of complaints after 4 years.

BACKGROUND: Patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) frequently present with coexisting psychosocial problems; however, whether this also associates with long-term outcome is currently unknown. We assessed whether psychosocial functioning in patients with SAPS is associated with persistence of complaints after 4 years of routine care. METHODS: In a longitudinal study, 34 patients with SAPS were selected after clinical and radiologic evaluation and assessed at baseline and after 4 years. For the assessment of psychosocial functioning, the RAND-36 questionnaire domains of social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, mental health, vitality, and general health were evaluated. Complaint persistence at follow-up was assessed by (1) an anchor question (reduced, persistent, or increased symptoms), (2) change in pain (change in visual analog scale score), and (3) change in quality of life (change in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index score). RESULTS: Lower baseline mental health (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.98; P = .013), vitality (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P = .011), and general health (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98; P = .009) were associated with persistent complaints as reported by the anchor question, change in visual analog scale score, and change in Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index score. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating psychosocial functioning parallel to physical complaints is currently not standard procedure in the treatment of SAPS. In this study, we showed that factors related to psychosocial functioning are associated with long-term persistence of complaints in SAPS. Future studies may investigate whether a multimodal treatment with assessment of psychosocial functioning may facilitate pain relief and recovery in SAPS.

Altered Cocontraction Patterns of Humeral Head Depressors in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Cross-sectional Electromyography Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In approximately 29% to 34% of all patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) there is no anatomic explanation for symptoms, and behavioral aspects and/or central pain mechanisms may play a more important role than previously assumed. A possible behavioral explanation for pain in patients with SAPS is insufficient active depression of the humerus during abduction by the adductor muscles. Although the adductor muscles, specifically the teres major, have the most important contribution to depression of the humerus during abduction, these muscles have not been well studied in patients with SAPS. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Do patients with SAPS have altered contraction patterns of the arm adductors during abduction compared with asymptomatic people? METHODS: SAPS was defined as nonspecific shoulder pain lasting for longer than 3 months that could not be explained by specific conditions such as calcific tendinitis, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, or symptomatic acromioclavicular arthritis, as assessed with clinical examination, radiographs, and magnetic resonance arthrography. Of 85 patients with SAPS who met the prespecified inclusion criteria, 40 were eligible and agreed to participate in this study. Thirty asymptomatic spouses of patients with musculoskeletal complaints, aged 35 to 60 years, were included; the SAPS and control groups were not different with respect to age, sex, and hand dominance. With electromyography, we assessed the contraction patterns of selected muscles that directly act on the position of the humerus relative to the scapula (the latissimus dorsi, teres major, pectoralis major, and deltoid muscles). Cocontraction was quantified through the activation ratio ([AR]; range, -1 to 1). The AR indicates the task-related degree of antagonist activation relative to the same muscle's degree of agonist activation, equaling 1 in case of sole agonist muscle activation and equaling -1 in case of sole antagonistic activation (cocontraction). We compared the AR between patients with SAPS and asymptomatic controls using linear mixed-model analyses. An effect size of 0.10 < AR < 0.20 was subjectively considered to be a modest effect size. RESULTS: Patients with SAPS had a 0.11 higher AR of the teres major (95% CI, 0.01-0.21; p = 0.038), a 0.11 lower AR of the pectoralis major (95% CI, -0.18 to -0.04; p = 0.003), and a 0.12 lower AR of the deltoid muscle (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.06; p < 0.001) than control participants did. These differences were considered to be modest. With the numbers available, we found no difference in the AR of the latissimus dorsi between patients with SAPS and controls (difference = 0.05; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.12; p = 0.120). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SAPS showed an altered adductor cocontraction pattern with reduced teres major activation during abduction. The consequent reduction of caudally directed forces on the humerus may lead to repetitive overloading of the subacromial tissues and perpetuate symptoms in patients with SAPS. Physical therapy programs are frequently effective in patients with SAPS, but targeted approaches are lacking. Clinicians and scientists may use the findings of this study to assess if actively training adductor cocontraction in patients with SAPS to unload the subacromial tissues is clinically effective. The efficacy of training protocols may be enhanced by using electromyography monitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

What Factors Are Associated With Disability After Upper Extremity Injuries? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors are key determinants of health after upper extremity injuries. However, a systematic review is needed to understand which psychosocial factors are most consistently associated with disability and how the language, conceptualization, and types of measures used to assess disability impact these associations in upper extremity injuries. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What factors are most consistently associated with disability after upper extremity injuries in adults? (2) What are the trends in types of outcome measures and conceptualization of disability in patients' upper extremity injuries? METHODS: We searched multiple electronic databases (PubMED, OVIDSP, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science) between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2016, using terms related to the "upper extremity", "outcome measurement", and "impairment, psychological, social or symptomatic" variables. We included all studies involving adult patients with any musculoskeletal injury and excluded those that did not use patient-reported outcome measures. We identified and screened 9339 studies. Of these, we retained 41 studies that involved conditions ranging from fractures to soft tissue injuries in various regions of the arm. We conducted quality assessment using a 10-item validated checklist and a five-tier strength of evidence assessment. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria and registered the review before performing our search (PROSPERO: CRD42017054048). None of the authors received any funding to perform this work. RESULTS: Disability after upper extremity injury was most consistently associated with depression (21 cohorts), catastrophic thinking (13 cohorts), anxiety (11 cohorts), pain self-efficacy (eight cohorts), and pain interference (seven cohorts). Social and demographic factors were also associated with disability. Measures of impairment such as ROM and injury severity were least associated with disability. There has been a gradual increase in use of region or condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures and measures of psychological, social, and symptomatic factors over a period since the introduction of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) around 2000. Approximately 17% of studies (n = 454 of 2628) had instances of unclear, conflicting, or inappropriate terminology and 11% of studies (n = 257 of 2628) involved misrepresentations of outcome measures related to disability. CONCLUSIONS: Psychologic and social factors are most consistently associated with disability than factors related to impairment. Further research involving the assessment of depression, anxiety, and coping strategies in cohorts with specific injuries may support decision-making regarding the provision of emotional support and psychologic therapies during recovery. Using the WHO ICF framework to conceptualize disability is key in increasing strength of evidence and allowing accurate comparisons of research in this field. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Increased co-contraction of arm adductors is associated with a favorable course in subacromial pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Enhancement of arm adductor activity during abduction (ie, adductor co-contraction), may be effective in the treatment of subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). We assessed whether an increase of adductor co-contraction is associated with a favorable course of SAPS. METHODS: At baseline and after nearly 4 years of follow-up, electromyography of the latissimus dorsi (LD), teres major (TM), pectoralis major, and deltoid muscle was obtained during isometric abduction and adduction tasks in 26 patients with SAPS. Changes in co-contraction were assessed with change in the activation ratio (ΔAR). The AR ranges between -1 and 1, where lower values indicate more co-contraction. Clinical course was determined from an anchor question (reduced, persistent, or increased complaints), the visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (WORC). RESULTS: In patients indicating persistent complaints (31%), the VAS and WORC remained stable. In patients who indicated reduced complaints (69%), the VAS reduced (z score, -3.4; P = .001) and WORC increased (z score, 3.6; P < .001). Unchanged ARs associated with complaints persistence, whereas decreased AR of the LD (ΔARLD, -0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.36 to -0.06) and TM (ΔARTM, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.00) coincided with reduced complaints. There was a significant between-group difference in ΔARLD (-0.35; 95% CI, -0.60 to 0.10) and ΔARTM (-0.36; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased co-contraction of the LD and TM is associated with a favorable course of SAPS. This may be explained by widening of the subacromial space accomplished by adductor co-contraction.

Factors Associated With Met Expectations in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Disorders: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The degree to which patients' expectations are met during an office visit consistently correlates with patients' satisfaction, whereas the relationship between previsit expectations and satisfaction varies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to preliminarily assess the relationship of psychosocial factors, pain intensity, and magnitude of disability to previsit expectations, met expectations, and satisfaction with medical care in patients with hand and upper extremity conditions in a surgical outpatient clinic. METHODS: A cohort of 85 outpatients with upper extremity illnesses indicated their previsit expectations (Patients Intention Questionnaire), degree to which these expectations were met (Expectations Met Questionnaire), level of depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), confidence about the ability to achieve one's goals in spite of pain (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale for pain), disability (Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand, short version; QuickDASH), and satisfaction with the medical visit (Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale). RESULTS: Higher previsit expectations were associated with more depressive symptoms, lower pain self-efficacy, higher pain intensity, and fewer years of education. Patients in the low and moderate met expectations categories had significantly more symptoms of depression, fewer years of education, and more pain compared to those in the high-met expectations category. Fewer years of education and higher pain intensity predicted higher previsit expectations and explained 19% of variance. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors affect both previsit expectations and met expectations during an outpatient visit to a hand surgeon. Met expectations, but not previsit expectations, affect satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level II.

The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.

BACKGROUND: To assess disability more efficiently with less burden on the patient, the National Institutes of Health has developed the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function-an instrument based on item response theory and using computer adaptive testing (CAT). Initially, upper and lower extremity disabilities were not separated and we were curious if the PROMIS Physical Function CAT could measure upper extremity disability and the Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to find correlation between the PROMIS Physical Function and the QuickDASH questionnaires in patients with upper extremity illness. Secondarily, we addressed whether the PROMIS Physical Function and QuickDASH correlate with the PROMIS Depression CAT and PROMIS Pain Interference CAT instruments. Finally, we assessed factors associated with QuickDASH and PROMIS Physical Function in multivariable analysis. METHODS: A cohort of 93 outpatients with upper extremity illnesses completed the QuickDASH and three PROMIS CAT questionnaires: Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression. Pain intensity was measured with an 11-point ordinal measure (0-10 numeric rating scale). Correlation between PROMIS Physical Function and the QuickDASH was assessed. Factors that correlated with the PROMIS Physical Function and QuickDASH were assessed in multivariable regression analysis after initial bivariate analysis. RESULTS: There was a moderate correlation between the PROMIS Physical Function and the QuickDASH questionnaire (r=-0.55, p<0.001). Greater disability as measured with the PROMIS and QuickDASH correlated most strongly with PROMIS Depression (r=-0.35, p<0.001 and r=0.34, p<0.001 respectively) and Pain Interference (r=-0.51, p<0.001 and r=0.74, p<0.001 respectively). The factors accounting for the variability in PROMIS scores are comparable to those for the QuickDASH except that the PROMIS Physical Function is influenced by other pain conditions while the QuickDASH is not. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS Physical Function instrument may be used as an upper extremity disability measure, as it correlates with the QuickDASH questionnaire, and both instruments are influenced most strongly by the degree to which pain interferes with achieving goals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ageing and joint position sense of the asymptomatic shoulder: An observational study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the extent to which age was associated with joint position sense (JPS) of the asymptomatic shoulder as measured by joint position reproduction (JPR) tasks and assess the reproducibility of these tasks. METHODS: 120 Asymptomatic participants aged 18-70 years each performed 10 JPR-tasks. Both contralateral and ipsilateral JPR-tasks were evaluated on accuracy of JPR under active- and passive conditions at two levels within the shoulder forward flexion trajectory. Each task was performed three times. In a subgroup of 40 participants, the reproducibility of JPR-tasks was assessed one week after initial measurement. Reproducibility of JPR-tasks was evaluated by both reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC's)) and agreement (standard error of measurement (SEM)) measures. RESULTS: Age was not associated with increased JPR-errors for any of the contralateral or ipsilateral JPR-tasks. ICC's ranged between 0.63 and 0.80 for contralateral JPR-tasks, and from 0.32 to 0.48 for ipsilateral tasks, except for one ipsilateral task where the reliability was similar to contralateral tasks (0.79). The SEM was comparable and small for all JPR-tasks, ranging between 1.1 and 2.1. CONCLUSION: No age-related decline in JPS of the asymptomatic shoulder was found, and good agreement between test and re-test measurements for all JPR-tasks as indicated by the small SEM.

Pain does not explain reduced teres major co-contraction during abduction in patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome show reduced co-contraction of the teres major during abduction. Consequent insufficient humeral depressor function may contribute to painful irritation of subacromial tissues and offers a potential target for therapy. A crucial gap in knowledge is whether the degree of teres major co-contraction in these patients is influenced by pain itself. To gain insight into this matter, we assessed whether relief of subacromial pain with local analgesics leads to increased adductor co-contraction in 34 patients with subacromial pain. METHODS: In a single-arm interventional study with 34 patients, electromyographic activity of the latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major, teres major and deltoid was assessed during isometric force tasks in 24 directions before and after subacromial Lidocaine injection. Co-contraction was quantified using the activation ratio; range [-1 (sole antagonistic activation, i.e. co-contraction) to 1 (sole agonistic activation)]. FINDINGS: There were no changes in activation ratio of the teres major after the intervention (Z-score: -0.6, p = 0.569). The activation ratio of the latissimus dorsi increased to 0.38 (quartiles: 0.13-0.76), indicating decreased co-contraction (Z-score: -2.0, p = 0.045). INTERPRETATION: Subacromial analgesics led to a decrease in co-contraction of the latissimus dorsi, whereas no change in the degree of teres major co-contraction was observed. This study shows that decreased teres major co-contraction in patients with subacromial pain, likely is not the consequence of pain itself, opening a window for physical therapy with training of teres major co-contraction to reduce subacromial irritation and pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II treatment study.

Kinematics and muscle activation in subacromial pain syndrome patients and asymptomatic controls.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting theories exist about the underlying cause of chronic subacromial pain in the middle-aged population. We aim to improve our understanding of kinematics and muscle activation in subacromial pain syndrome to provide insight in its pathophysiology. METHODS: In a cross-sectional comparison of 40 patients with subacromial pain syndrome and 30 asymptomatic controls, three-dimensional shoulder kinematics and electromyography-based co-contraction in 10 shoulder muscles were independently recorded. Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic kinematics were evaluated during abduction and forward flexion. Co-contraction was expressed as an activation ratio, specifying the relative agonistic and antagonistic muscle activity in each muscle. FINDINGS: During abduction and forward flexion, the contribution of glenohumeral motion to elevation and glenohumeral external rotation was lower in subacromial pain syndrome (at 1200 abduction: -9°, 95% CI -14°- -3°; and - 8°, 95% CI -13°--3°, respectively), and was compensated by more scapulothoracic motion. The pectoralis major's activation ratio was significantly lower (Z-score: -2.657, P = 0.008) and teres major's activation ratio significantly higher (Z-score: -4.088, P < 0.001) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome compared to the control group. INTERPRETATION: Reduced glenohumeral elevation and external rotation in subacromial pain syndrome coincided with less teres major antagonistic activity during elevation. These biomechanical findings provide a scientific basis for intervention studies directed at stretching exercises to reduce glenohumeral stiffness in the treatment of subacromial pain syndrome, and teres major strengthening to improve humeral head depressor function.

Shoulder movement complexity in the aging shoulder: A cross-sectional analysis and reliability assessment.

Healthy individuals perform a task such as hitting the head of a nail with an infinite coordination spectrum. This motor redundancy is healthy and allows for learning through exploration and uniform load distribution across muscles. Assessing movement complexity within repetitive movement trajectories may provide insight into the available motor redundancy during aging. We quantified complexity of repetitive arm elevation trajectories in the aging shoulder and assessed test-retest reliability of this quantification. In a cross-sectional study using 3D-electromagnetic tracking, 120 asymptomatic subjects, aged between 18 and 70 years performed repetitive abduction and forward/anteflexion movements. Movement complexity was calculated using the Approximate Entropy (ApEn-value): [0,2], where lower values indicate reduced complexity. Thirty-three participants performed the protocol twice, to determine reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). The association between age and ApEn was corrected for task characteristics (e.g., sample length) with multiple linear regression analysis. Reproducibility was determined using scatter plots and ICC's. Higher age was associated with lower ApEn-values during abduction (unstandardized estimate: -0.003/year; 95% confidence interval: [-0.005; -0.002]; p < .001). ICC's revealed poor to good reliability depending on differences in sample length between repeated measurements. The results may imply more stereotype movement during abduction in the ageing shoulder, making this movement prone to the development of shoulder complaints. Future studies may investigate the pathophysiology and clinical course of shoulder complaints by assessment of movement complexity. To this end, the ApEn-value calculated over repetitive movement trajectories may be used, although biasing factors such as sample length should be taken into account.

Reduced force entropy in subacromial pain syndrome: A cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Generating a force at the hand requires moments about multiple joints by a theoretically infinite number of arm and shoulder muscle force combinations. This allows for learning and adaptation and can possibly be captured using the complexity (entropy) of an isometrically generated force curve. Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome have difficulty to explore alternative, pain-avoiding, motor strategies and we questioned whether loss of motor complexity may contribute to this. We assessed whether patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome have reduced entropy of an isometrically generated abduction and adduction force curve. METHODS: Forty patients and thirty controls generated submaximal isometric ab- and adduction force at the wrist. The force curve was characterized by the magnitude of force variability [standard deviation and coefficient of variation], and the entropy (complexity) of force variability [approximate entropy]. FINDINGS: Patients showed reduced entropy both during the abduction (-0.16, confidence interval: [-0.33; -0.00], p: 0.048) and adduction task (-0.20, confidence interval: [-0.37; -0.03], p: 0.024) and reduced force variability during abduction (standard deviation: -0.006, confidence interval: [-0.011; -0.001], p: 0.013 and coefficient of variation: -0.51, confidence interval: [-0.93; -0. 10], p: 0.016). INTERPRETATIONS: Isometric force curves of patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome show reduced complexity compared to asymptomatic controls, which may indicate more narrow and stereotype use of motor options. In future studies, it should be investigated whether the finding of reduced force (motor) entropy indicates functional decline, contributing to decreased ability to acquire and optimize motor strategies in Subacromial Pain Syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II prognostic study.

Reliability and discriminative accuracy of 5 measures for craniocaudal humeral position: an assessment on conventional radiographs.

HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to examine the reliability and diagnostic discriminative accuracy of 5 different methods that quantity the craniocaudal humeral position with respect to the scapula on conventional radiographs. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study, 2 observers randomly assessed the conventional anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 280 subjects with rotator cuff imaging for the (1) acromiohumeral (AH) interval, (2) upward migration index (UMI), (3) glenohumeral center-to-center measurement (GHCC), (4) glenohumeral arc measurement (GHa), and (5) scapular spine-humeral head center method (SHC). Reliability was assessed by means of relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient) and absolute consistency. Discriminative accuracy for detecting a rotator cuff tear was calculated. RESULTS: Relative consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient) for the AH interval, UMI, GHCC, GHa, and SHC was 0.961, 0.913, 0.806, 0.924, and 0.726, respectively. The AH interval had the highest absolute consistency with a random residual measurement error of 0.58 mm compared with 1.0-3.2 mm for the other measurements. The discriminative accuracy of the AH interval did not significantly differ from that of the UMI (-0.010; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.042 to 0.022; P = .545) but was significantly better than that of the GHCC (0.112; 95% CI, 0.043-0.181; P = .001), GHa (0.074; 95% CI, 0.009-0.139; P = .027), and SHC (0.178; 95% CI, 0.100-0.256; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Assessment of the craniocaudal humeral position is performed with good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. The discriminative accuracy for detecting a rotator cuff tear on a single radiograph was highest for the AH interval and UMI. We recommend using the AH interval or UMI as an indirect measure of the presence of a rotator cuff tear on conventional radiographs.

Middle-aged adults cocontract with arm ADductors during arm ABduction, while young adults do not. Adaptations to preserve pain-free function?

Middle-aged individuals cocontract with adductor muscles during abduction. This may be crucial for counteracting deltoid forces, depressing the humerus and ensuring free passage of subacromial tissues underneath the acromion during abduction. We questioned whether adductor co-contraction is always present, or develops during ageing, in which case it may explain the age-related character of common shoulder conditions such as Subacromial Pain Syndrome. In a cross-sectional analysis with electromyography (EMG), activation patterns of the latissimus dorsi, teres major, pectoralis major and deltoid muscle were assessed during isometric force tasks in 60 asymptomatic individuals between 21 and 60 years old. Cocontraction was expressed as the degree of antagonistic activation relative to the same muscle's degree of agonistic activation, resulting in an activation ratio between -1 and 1, where lower values indicate more cocontraction. Using linear regression analyses, we found age-related decreases in the activation ratio of the latissimus dorsi (regression estimate: -0.004, 95% CI: -0.007 to 0.0, p-value: 0.042) and teres major (regression estimate: -0.013, 95% CI: -0.019 to -0.008, p-value: <0.001). In contrast to young individuals, middle-aged individuals showed a high degree of adductor cocontraction during abduction. This may indicate that during ageing, alterations in activation patterns are required for preserving pain-free shoulder function.

Patient Complaints Emphasize Non-Technical Aspects of Care at a Tertiary Referral Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Patient concerns represent opportunities for improvement in orthopaedic care. This study's objective is to identify the nature and prevalence of unsolicited patient complaints regarding orthopaedic care at a tertiary referral hospital. The primary null hypothesis that there are no demographic factors associated with complaint types was tested. Secondarily we determined if the overall complaint number and types differed by year. METHODS: Complaints to the hospital ombudsperson by orthopaedic patients between January 1997 and June 2013 were reviewed. All 1118 complaints were categorized: access and availability, humaneness and disrespect, communication, expectations of care and treatment, distrust, billing and research. RESULTS: Patients between 40 and 60 years of age filed the most complaints in all categories except distrust (more common in patients over age 80) and research. Women were slightly more likely to address access and availability, humaneness, disrespect, and billing compared to men. The overall number of complaints peaked in 1999. The most common issue was access and availability followed by communication, and humaneness/disrespect. CONCLUSION: Half of concerns voiced by patients addressed interpersonal issues. The largest category was related to access and availability. Quality improvement efforts can address technology to improve access and availability as well as empathy and communication strategies.

A Slightly Dorsally Tilted Lunate on MRI can be Considered Normal.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal angulation of the lunate can be an indication of intercarpal pathology. On magnetic resonance images (MRIs) the lunate often looks dorsally angulated, even in healthy wrists. The tilt on individual slices can also be different and might be misinterpreted as pathological, contributing to inaccurate diagnoses and unnecessary surgery. The primary aim of this study was to determine the average radiolunate angle on sagittal wrist MRI images as well as the radiolunate angle in the most radial, central and most ulnar part of the lunate; also the interobserver reliability was determined. METHODS: 140 MRIs from adult, non-pregnant patients presenting to the outpatient hand and upper extremity service between 2010 and 2013 with wrist pain were used for this retrospective study. One author measured the radiolunate and capitolunate angle (i.e., tangential and axial method) in all MRIs. Additionally, two authors measured the same angles independently in 46 MRIs to analyze interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average radiolunate angle was 8.7 degrees dorsal. There were no significant differences in the radiolunate angles between the different parts of the lunate. A very good interrater agreement was measured considering the radiolunate angle and capitolunate angle (tangential and axial method). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the lunate appears slightly dorsally angulated on an MRI of a healthy wrist. Regarding the radiolunate angle, 10 to 15 degrees of dorsal tilt can be considered normal. This study provides reference information of normal anatomy for carpal axial alignment that may facilitate diagnoses of wrist pathology.

Heterogeneous MR arthrography findings in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome - Diagnostic subgroups?

BACKGROUND: Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS) is frequently diagnosed, but treatment results vary greatly. It is increasingly reported that SIS symptoms are caused by various underlying mechanisms that need distinctive treatment strategies. We evaluated a set of specific MRI Arthrography (MRA) characteristics that have been related with underlying mechanisms for SIS in the literature, in patients with SIS. METHODS: In 47 patients diagnosed with SIS, MRA characteristics were evaluated and categorized into categories of potential underlying mechanisms: (1) extrinsic: e.g. acromion shape; (2) intrinsic: e.g. tendinosis; (3) dynamic: e.g. signs of glenohumeral (micro-)instability. Control values were obtained from the literature. With cluster analysis, potential patient subgroups were assessed. RESULTS: In 17 (36.2%) patients originally diagnosed with SIS, specific other conditions were found, including rotator cuff tears and labrum lesions. In the remaining 30, all had positive signs of at least one of the predefined underlying mechanisms. Patients could be categorized into 2 groups: predominantly findings corresponding with extrinsic/structural causes, or with dynamic/(micro)instability. CONCLUSIONS: MRA characteristics in patients with SIS symptoms are heterogeneous and many patients have specific other shoulder conditions causing symptoms. Patients without specific other conditions have MRA characteristics associated with either extrinsic (structural), or dynamic (e.g. micro-instability) underlying mechanisms.

Relationship of age on enjoyment of physical activity in upper extremity illness.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons often work under the assumption that patients over 60 are low-demand individuals. This study addressed the primary null hypothesis that older age does not correlate with the enjoyment of physical activities in patients with upper extremity illness. Secondary analyses sought factors associated with enjoyment of physical activity, activity level and magnitude of disability. METHODS: A cohort of 98 new and follow-up outpatients with upper extremity illnesses completed a measure of enjoyment of physical activity (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)), were categorized into one of three levels of activity after interview, and completed measures of general disability (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function CAT), upper extremity-specific disability (Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score), coping responses to pain (PROMIS Pain Interference CAT), and symptoms of depression (PROMIS Depression CAT). RESULTS: Greater enjoyment of physical activity correlated with older age (r = 0.29, p = 0.0039) but not with other explanatory variables. The final multivariable model of factors associated with greater physical activity included older age and male sex. The final multivariable model of factors associated with diminished PROMIS Physical Function included greater PROMIS Pain Interference, male sex, other pain conditions, and separated/divorced and single marital status and accounted for 34 % of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Enjoyment of physical activity does not decrease with age. Patient-specific expectations, goals and preferences for physical activity should be assessed prior to decision-making on treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Prognostic Study case series.

A threshold disability score corresponds with an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression in patients with upper extremity disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether there is a threshold Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score among patients with common hand diagnoses that corresponds with an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-nine patients with one of five common upper extremity disorders completed a measure of upper extremity-specific disability (QuickDASH or DASH) and a questionnaire assessing depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the discriminatory value of a threshold DASH score for an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression was assessed. The threshold DASH score with the highest positive predictive value for an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression was selected. In bivariate analysis, the association between demographic factors, disease factors, and an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression was examined. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for a threshold DASH value diagnostic of an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression was 0.75, indicating clinical usefulness for a threshold DASH score as a screening test for depression. The highest positive predictive value of 72 % occurred at a threshold QuickDASH/DASH score of 55. In bivariate analysis, only diagnosis and years of education were significantly different between patients with and without an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression. CONCLUSION: A DASH score of 55 or greater in patients with common upper extremity disorders has an acceptable area under the curve and positive predictive value for an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, diagnostic study.