Clarifying the prevalence of OCD: A response to reader comments.

This response to a reader's comment on our paper "The Global Assessment of OCD" addresses the critique regarding the stated prevalence of OCD as the fourth most common mental disorder. We acknowledge an oversight in our initial reference, discuss the variable prevalence rates from various studies, and highlight the significant disability caused by OCD. We have requested a correction to the original citation to reflect more recent findings, aiming to ensure accuracy in the discourse on OCD's public health impact.

The global assessment of OCD.

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common mental disorder that often causes great sufferance, with substantial impairment in social functioning and quality of life and affects family and significant relationships. Notwithstanding its severity, OCD is often not adequately diagnosed, or it is diagnosed with delay, leading often to a long latency between onset of the OCD symptoms and the start of adequate treatments. Several factors contribute to the complexity of OCD's clinical picture: early age of onset, chronic course, heterogeneity of symptoms, high rate of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, slow or partial response to therapy. Therefore, it is of primary importance for clinicians involved in diagnosing OCD, to assess all aspects of the disorder. This narrative review focuses on the global assessment of OCD, highlighting crucial areas to explore, pointing out the clinical features which are relevant for the treatment of the disorder, and giving an overview of the psychometric tools that can be useful during the screening procedure.

Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in the Global Assessment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Practical Implications.

A growing body of literature suggests a link between bowel syndromes (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease), gut microbiome alterations, and psychiatric disorders. This narrative review aims to explore the potential role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to explore whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant considering gastrointestinal symptoms and their implication for the gut microbiome during the assessment and treatment of OCD. For this purpose, a PubMed search of studies focusing on OCD, gut microbiota, irritable bowel syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease was conducted by two independent reviewers. While the current literature on gut microbiome and gastrointestinal issues in OCD remains limited, emerging evidence suggests gut microbiome alterations and high rates of bowel syndromes in this population. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating comprehensive gastrointestinal assessments into the "global assessment of OCD". Such assessment should encompass various factors, including gastrointestinal physical comorbidities and symptoms, nutritional habits, bowel habits, fluid intake, exercise patterns, and potential microbiome dysfunctions and inflammation. Considering the treatment implications, interventions targeting gut health, such as probiotics and dietary modifications, may hold promise in improving symptoms in OCD patients with comorbid gastrointestinal problems. Further research in this area is warranted to better understand the interplay between gut health and OCD and to explore the effectiveness of targeted interventions in improving clinical outcomes.

Pharmacotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence-based treatment and beyond.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder associated with a significant degree of functional disability and poor quality of life. Pharmacotherapy may have a substantial impact on the course and outcome of OCD. METHOD: We review the evidence supporting available strategies for the pharmacological treatment of OCD. RESULTS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) remain the pharmacological treatment of choice and are associated with improved health-related quality of life. Discontinuation is associated with relapse and loss of quality of life, implying treatment should continue long-term. A substantial minority of patients who fail to respond to SSRI may benefit from dose elevation or adjunctive antipsychotics, though long-term trials validating the effectiveness and tolerability of these strategies are relatively lacking. CONCLUSION: The pharmacological evidence-base for the treatment of OCD is becoming increasingly robust. Treatment with SSRIs and clomipramine remains uncontroversial and improvements are sustained over time. Newer compounds targeting serotonin receptor subtypes and other neurotransmitter systems are undergoing evaluation.

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Pharmacological strategies for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) continue to develop apace but deficiencies remain. We present an updated literature review of the evidence supporting available strategies. We aim to answer key questions including: (1) What are the first-line treatments? (2) Does pharmacotherapy improve health-related quality of life? (3) How do we evaluate clinical response and relapse? (4) How long should treatment continue? (5) Can we predict treatment outcomes? (6) What is the management of treatment-refractory OCD? Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) remain the pharmacological treatment of choice for most patients and are associated with improved health-related quality of life. However, discontinuation is associated with relapse and loss of quality of life, implying treatment should continue long term. A substantial minority of patients fail to respond to SSRI. Such patients may respond to strategies such as dose elevation or adjunctive antipsychotic, although long-term trials validating the effectiveness and tolerability of these strategies are relatively lacking. Newer compounds targeting other neurotransmitter systems, such as glutamate, are undergoing evaluation.

Optimal treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled feasibility study of the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and their combination in the management of obsessive compulsive disorder.

Established treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) include cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication. Combined treatment may outperform monotherapy, but few studies have investigated this. A total of 49 community-based adults with OCD were randomly assigned to CBT, SSRI, or SSRI+CBT. Sertraline (50-200 mg/day) was given as the SSRI for 52 weeks. A 16-h-manualized individual CBT was delivered over 8 weeks with four follow-up sessions. Assessors were 'blinded' to treatment allocation. A preliminary health economic evaluation was conducted. At week 16, combined treatment (n=13) was associated with the largest improvement, sertraline (n=7) the next largest and CBT (n=9) the smallest on the observed case analysis. The effect size (Cohen's d) comparing the improvement in Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale on CBT versus combined treatment was -0.39 and versus sertraline was -0.27. Between 16 and 52 weeks, the greatest clinical improvement was seen with sertraline, but participant discontinuation prevented reliable analysis. Compared with sertraline, the mean costs were higher for CBT and for combined treatment. The mean Quality Adjusted Life Year scores for sertraline were 0.1823 (95% confidence interval: 0.0447-0.3199) greater than for CBT and 0.1135 (95% confidence interval: -0.0290-0.2560), greater than for combined treatment. Combined treatment appeared the most clinically effective option, especially over CBT, but the advantages over SSRI monotherapy were not sustained beyond 16 weeks. SSRI monotherapy was the most cost-effective. A definitive study can and should be conducted.

Sustained response versus relapse: the pharmacotherapeutic goal for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Convincing evidence from placebo-referenced randomized controlled trials supports efficacy for clomipramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for acute treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. It remains less conclusively understood whether these agents maintain efficacy over the longer term. This paper systematically reviews long-term medication studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Studies of clomipramine, fluoxetine and sertraline investigated 'responders' from acute treatment trials and extended treatment up to 12 months versus placebo. Responses to medication were sustained. A 24-week placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram (10 mg or 20 mg/day) and paroxetine (40 mg/day) demonstrated ongoing efficacy for all three treatments. Studies that randomized treated cases to placebo demonstrated reemergence of symptoms in the placebo-treated cohort. Six relapse prevention trials were found by systematic search. Some, but not all, revealed significant advantages for remaining on medication. Paroxetine (20-60 mg/day) and escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day) were each found to outperform placebo in preventing relapse during 24 weeks of double-blind, randomized follow-up. Meta-analysis, using Review Manager software (4.2.8), detected overall superiority of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to placebo in preventing relapse among adult treatment-responders. Worsening by five Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale points emerged from the review as a suggested threshold for relapse. Viewed collectively, these results suggest that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective long-term treatments and relapse prevention represents the treatment target for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Motor cortex excitability correlates with novelty seeking in social anxiety: a transcranial magnetic stimulation investigation.

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterised by fear of scrutiny by other people, avoidance of social situations and vegetative/motor symptomatology. The correlation between reduced striatal dopaminergic (DA) function, SAD motor symptoms and the high occurrence of SAD in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), suggests a link between SAD and movement diseases caused by dopamine dysfunction. However, little is known about the electrophysiological aspects of SAD. We applied single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms of the primary motor cortex (M1) in 15 SAD patients and the relationship between these neurophysiological measures and clinical symptoms or temperamental traits. Data were compared with those obtained in 15 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. SAD patients showed significantly higher harm avoidance scores and lower novelty seeking scores when compared to controls. TMS measures did not significantly differ between groups. However, in SAD patients the cortical silent period (CSP) duration and the amount of long-interstimulus interval intracortical inhibition were significantly correlated with the NS score. Accordingly with NS reduction and CSP shortening reported in PD, the relationship between NS levels and the excitability of inhibitory circuits of the M1 may support the hypothesis that DA dysfunction could underlie NS deficits in SAD. Furthermore, these data suggest that "trait variables" (i.e., NS) are more closely related to neurophysiological measures than SAD symptoms, which represent "state variables" linked to social performance.