RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education can equip healthcare providers with the ability to respond to and manage stressors associated with rapidly deteriorating patient situations. However, little is known about the benefits of using virtual reality (VR) for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To compare between desktop VR and face-to-face simulation in stress responses and performance outcomes of a team-based simulation training in managing clinical deterioration. DESIGN: A randomised controlled study METHOD: The study was conducted on 120 medical and nursing students working in interprofessional teams. The teams were randomly assigned to participate in a 2-h simulation using either the desktop VR or face-to-face simulation with simulated patient (SP). Biophysiological stress response, psychological stress, and confidence levels were measured before and after the simulation. Performance outcomes were evaluated after the simulation using a deteriorating patient scenario. RESULTS: The systolic blood pressure and psychological stress response were significantly increased among participants in VR and SP groups; however, no significant differences were found between the groups. There was also no significant difference in confidence and performance outcomes between participants in the VR and SP groups for both medical and nursing students. Although the psychological stress response was negatively correlated (r = -0.43; p < 0.01) with confidence levels, there was no association between stress response and performance score. CONCLUSION: Despite being less immersive, the desktop VR was capable of inducing psychological and physiological stress responses by placing emotional, social, and cognitive demands on learners. Additionally, by ensuring close alignment between the simulation tasks and the clinical tasks (i.e. functional fidelity), the desktop VR may provide similar performance outcomes as conventional simulation training. This evidence is timely given the rise in the use of virtual learning platforms to facilitate training during the COVID-19 pandemic where face-to-face training may not be feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04330924.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Deterioração Clínica , Treinamento por Simulação , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/terapia , Simulação por Computador , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The application of intra-operative blood salvage autotransfusion(IBSA) in liver transplantation(LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) remains controversial due to the theoretical risk of tumour cell(TC) reintroduction. Current studies evaluating for presence of TC are limited by suboptimal detection techniques. This study aims to analyze the presence of TC in HCC LT autologous blood using microfluidics technology. METHODS: A prospective study of HCC patients who underwent LT from February 2018-April 2019 was conducted. Blood samples were collected peri-operatively. TCs were isolated using microfluidics technology and stained with antibody cocktails for confirmation. RESULTS: A total of 15 HCC LT patients were recruited. All recipients had tumour characteristics within the University of California, San Francisco(UCSF) criteria pre-operatively. TC was detected in all of the autologous blood samples collected from the surgical field. After IOCS wash, five patients had no detectable TC, while 10 patients had detectable TC; of these two remained positive for TC after Leukocyte Depletion Filter(LDF) filtration. CONCLUSION: The risk of tumour cell reintroduction using IBSA in HCC LT patients can be reduced with a single LDF. Future studies should evaluate the proliferation capacity and tumorigenicity of HCC TC in IBSA samples, and the effects of TC reintroduction in patients with pre-existing HCC TCs.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transplante de Fígado , Recuperação de Sangue Operatório , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Microfluídica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) has historically resulted in unpredictable and often poor outcomes. The United Kingdom experience for the period 1992-2012 is reported in this article. A retrospective analysis of patients, preoperatively fulfilling the PoPH European Respiratory Society Task Force on Pulmonary-Hepatic Vascular Disorders diagnostic criteria was conducted across all UK LT centers. Data collection included comorbidities, use of preoperative and postoperative pharmacotherapy, patient survival, and cause of death. To enable survival stratification, PoPH was classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on mean pulmonary pressure of <35 mm Hg, 35-49 mm Hg, and ≥50 mm Hg, respectively. Of 127 patients reported to have PoPH, just 28 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria (14 mild, 9 moderate, 5 severe). Twenty (71.4%) patients were male with median age and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease of 50 years (range, 23-62 years) and 18 (range, 6-43), respectively. Twelve (42.9%) patients died within 5 years of LT. The majority of deaths (10 of 12; 83%) occurred within the first 6 months after LT, aetiologies of which included right heart failure (n = 3), progressive PoPH (n = 2), and sepsis (n = 2). Of those receiving preoperative pharmacotherapy (n = 8), 5 are currently alive and were classified as mild to moderate PoPH. Both severe PoPH patients optimized preoperatively with pharmacotherapy died within a year of LT. Development of effective vasodilatory therapies in the setting of pulmonary arterial hypertension has led to a dramatic improvement in patient survival. The available data indicate that in this era of pharmacotherapy, PoPH in isolation no longer represents a valid consideration to transplant. Liver Transplantation 22 1637-1642 2016 AASLD.
Assuntos
Doença Hepática Terminal/complicações , Hipertensão Portal/cirurgia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Hipertensão Portal/mortalidade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/etiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Transplante de Fígado/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pressão Propulsora Pulmonar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The I-gel is a supraglottic airway device which is commonly used in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the speed of insertion, adequacy of ventilation, leak pressure, gastric tube insertion, and problems when using the I-gel in children. We included 70 patients aged between 1 and 16 years old with ASA physical status classification I or II, undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia, for which use of a supraglottic airway would be appropriate. The overall insertion success rate was 96 % with a median insertion time of 25 (18-34) [7-100] s. Seventeen patients (24.3 %) experienced problems including the need for change of airway device, laryngospasm, device displacement, blood on device after removal, and postoperative sore throat. In conclusion, there was a moderate rate of problems when using the I-gel in children, and it was necessary to change the airway in a few patients to optimize ventilation.
Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Adolescente , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Géis , Humanos , Lactente , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Máscaras Laríngeas , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Respiração Artificial , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists frequently use intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to aid in the diagnosis and management of hemodynamic problems during liver transplantation (LT). Although the use of TEE in US centers continues to increase, data regarding international use are lacking. METHODS: This prospective, global, survey-based study evaluates international experience with TEE for LT. Responses from 252 LT (105 US and 147 non-US) centers representing 1789 anesthesiologists were analyzed. RESULTS: Routine use of TEE in the United States has increased in the last 5 y (from 37% to 47%), but only 21% of non-US LT anesthesiologists use TEE routinely. Lack of training (44% US versus 70% non-US) and equipment (9% non-US versus 34% US) were cited as obstacles. Most survey participants preferred not to perform a complete cardiac examination but rather use only 6 of 11 basic views. Although non-US LT anesthesiologists more frequently had additional clinical training than their US counterparts, they had less TEE experience (13% versus 44%) and less frequently, TEE certification (22% versus 35%). Most LT anesthesiologists agreed that TEE certification is essential for proficiency. Of all respondents, 89% agreed or strongly agreed that TEE provides valuable information needed for immediate clinical decision-making, and >86% agreed or strongly agreed that that information could not be derived from other sources. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TEE for LT surgery in the US LT centers is currently higher compared with non-US LT centers. This may become a standard monitoring modality during LT in the near future.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Transplante de Fígado , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Anestesiologistas , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodinâmica , Competência Clínica , Anestesiologia/educação , CertificaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We sought to establish consensus on the essential skills, knowledge, and attributes that a liver transplant (LT) anesthesiologist should possess in a bid to help guide the further training process. METHODS: Consensus was achieved via a modified Delphi methodology, surveying 15 identified international experts in the fields of LT anesthesia and critical care. RESULTS: Key competencies were identified in preoperative management and optimization of a potential LT recipient; intraoperative management, including hemodynamic monitoring; coagulation and potential crisis management; and postoperative intensive and enhanced recovery care. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides an essential guide to competency-based training of an LT anesthesiologist.
Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestesiologia , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Anestesiologistas , Anestesiologia/educação , Anestesia/métodos , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Although medical curricula are now better structured for integration of biomedical sciences and clinical training, most teaching and learning activities still follow the older teacher-centric discipline-specific formats. A newer pedagogical approach, known as Collaborative Learning Cases (CLCs), was adopted in the medical school to facilitate integration and collaborative learning. Before incorporating CLCs into the curriculum of year 1 students, two pilot runs using the action research method was carried out to improve the design of CLCs. METHODS: We employed the four-phase Kemmis and McTaggart's action research spiral in two cycles to improve the design of CLCs. A class of 300 first-year medical students (for both cycles), 11 tutors (first cycle), and 16 tutors (second cycle) were involved in this research. Data was collected using the 5-points Likert scale survey, open-ended questionnaire, and observation. RESULTS: From the data collected, we learned that more effort was required to train the tutors to understand the principles of CLCs and their role in the CLCs sessions. Although action research enables the faculty to improve the design of CLCs, finding the right technology tools to support collaboration and enhance learning during the CLCs remains a challenge. CONCLUSION: The two cycles of action research was effective in helping us design a better learning environment during the CLCs by clarifying tutors' roles, improving group and time management, and meaningful use of technology.