Time reference in nonfluent and fluent aphasia: a cross-linguistic test of the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis.

Recent studies by Bastiaanse and colleagues found that time reference is selectively impaired in people with nonfluent agrammatic aphasia, with reference to the past being more difficult to process than reference to the present or to the future. To account for this dissociation, they formulated the PAst DIscourse LInking Hypothesis (PADILIH), which posits that past reference is more demanding than present/future reference because it involves discourse linking. There is some evidence that this hypothesis can be applied to people with fluent aphasia as well. However, the existing evidence for the PADILIH is contradictory, and most of it has been provided by employing a test that predominantly taps retrieval processes, leaving largely unexplored the underlying ability to encode time reference-related prephonological features. Within a cross-linguistic approach, this study tests the PADILIH by means of a sentence completion task that 'equally' taps encoding and retrieval abilities. This study also investigates if the PADILIH's scope can be extended to fluent aphasia. Greek- and Italian-speaking individuals with aphasia participated in the study. The Greek group consisted of both individuals with nonfluent agrammatic aphasia and individuals with fluent aphasia, who also presented signs of agrammatism. The Italian group consisted of individuals with agrammatic nonfluent aphasia only. The two Greek subgroups performed similarly. Neither language group of participants with aphasia exhibited a pattern of performance consistent with the predictions of the PADILIH. However, a double dissociation observed within the Greek group suggests a hypothesis that may reconcile the present results with the PADILIH.

Use of the Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Protocol to Improve Function of the Predominant Arm on a Patient With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

ABSTRACT: In this case study, an off label modified constraint induced movement therapy protocol was applied in a 28-year male patient with incomplete tetraplegia C5 American Spinal Cord Injury Association D as a facilitator to enhance predominant upper arm function and regain important activities of daily living. The patient was ambulatory for short distances with arm crutches but could not perform important activities of daily living because of the involvement of his right arm, autonomy, and function were impaired. A 10-wk protocol of modified constraint induced movement therapy was performed, with two daily sessions for 30 mins each, a sling was used to constrain the less affected arm, and exercises of the predominant hand were performed. Spasticity was managed with botulinum toxin injections. After 5 wks, the patient was able to use a spoon, perform intermittent catheterization, dress upper body, and use the right arm to feed himself. The protocol was concluded without further amelioration. The modified constraint induced movement therapy is also a valuable facilitator for incomplete tetraplegia.