The Effectiveness of a Multi-Sensory Sleep-Promotion Program on Sleep Quality among Hospitalized Older Adults of Thailand: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Older adults suffer from sleep disturbances, especially during hospitalization, affecting their health condition, recovery, and in-hospital mortality. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of a multi-sensory sleep-promotion program on sleep quality among hospitalized Thai older adults. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental study, the 52 eligible older adults in a private medical ward were equally assigned into two groups. The experimental group received a sleep quality assessment after the first night of admission, the 60-minute multi-sensory sleep-promotion program for three nights, and an outcome evaluation on the last night after the intervention. In contrast, the control group received routine care for the same period. Sleep quality was measured by the Verran and Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale (Thai version). In addition, independent and paired samples t-tests compared the sleep quality between and within the two groups. RESULTS: The older adults in the experimental group had better sleep quality than those who did not (p < .001). Those who participated in the multi-sensory sleep-promotion program markedly improved their sleep quality over five days (p < .001). CONCLUSION: A multi-sensory sleep-promotion program can promote the sleep quality of older adults. The five alternative methods to promote sleep are effective without the deleterious effects of hypnotics and sedatives often experienced among older adults. Therefore, nurses and other healthcare professionals can implement this program as standard practice. In addition, they may adjust it to fit the acuity level and care dependencies of older adults in other cultures to promote sleep quality.

Study of medication use and effects of medication among hospitalized older Buddhist monks: An embedded mixed-method study.

AIM: The aim was to study medication use, effects of medication and perspective of participants involved in medication use among hospitalized older Buddhist monks. DESIGN: An embedded mixed-method study. METHODS: This study included 71 hospitalized older Buddhist monks and 23 participants involved in medication use. Quantitative data were collected from medical and medication records. Meanwhile, qualitative data were collected by using in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. The study lasted from February to July 2021. RESULTS: Over 77% of the monks had chronic diseases. The median of medicine use was seven medicines/person and 6 days of use. Effects of the medication were as expected (52.04%), not as expected (2.22%) and unmeasurable results (45.74%). Unexpected results were hypo-hyperglycaemia, nausea/vomiting, high blood pressure and confusion. From the interview, participants perceived and did not perceive unique practices and medication use in Buddhist monks. In addition, the Buddhist monks received medication following standards and Buddhist doctrine. Finally, recommendations for medication use were adhering to the standard, following Buddhist doctrine and being flexible as deemed necessary. CONCLUSION: The results revealed medication use problems and medication effects among hospitalized older Buddhist monks. IMPACT: Older adults and Buddhist monks have specific needs and practices related to culture and religion, affecting typical treatment, especially medication use. Cultural diversity and sensitivity should be a concern for healthcare staff. The results can be utilized to promote an understanding of cultural diversity and increase the safety of medication administration for hospitalized older Buddhist monks. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public contributions were involved in this study. Participants involved in medication use were interviewed to answer the research objective. Moreover, a senior Buddhist monk at Wat Thai Washington D.C. reviewed content related to the Pali Canon for the final draft of the manuscript. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://osf.io/b6p3e.

A qualitative study of older adults seeking appropriate treatment to self-manage their chronic pain in rural North-East Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Many older adults suffer from chronic pain which decreases their functional capacity and reduces quality of life. Health behaviours and self-care during chronic illness and chronic pain can exert an important influence on health outcomes. The aims of this study were to (a) understand how older adult Thai individuals seek appropriate treatment to self-manage their chronic pain, and (b) to identify factors that contribute to effective pain self-management. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 older adults living in villages in north-east Thailand. Observations were also conducted with consenting individuals. Most interviews were audio-recorded and transcripts were coded and analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Six contextual determinants affected the way participants choose to self-manage their chronic pain, including: priority accorded to pain management; information and resource seeking skills; critical appraisal skills; access to pain-related information; access to treatment; and satisfaction and preferences for practitioners. Participants used several strategies to inform and develop their self-management plans: accessing and responding to information, sourcing resources, trial and error, evaluating treatment and evaluating practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Attempts to increase accessibility, affordability and acceptability of pain treatment can promote pain self-management in older Thais. These findings have important implications for health professionals and government organisations seeking to enhance the self-management of pain and quality of life in this population.

Factors related to changes in severity among adult and older adult patients at an internal medicine department clinic: an embedded mixed-method study.

The changes in aging plus the pathology of diseases can influence the changes in severity levels. This study aimed to examine the changes in levels of severity in patients while waiting to see a doctor. The study was conducted at an outpatient clinic in northeastern Thailand with a total of 421 patients who were assessed twice for levels of severity using the Emergency Severity Index. The 38 triage nurses screened patients, and 18 were interviewed when severity level changes were observed. Data were collected April 1-30, 2021. Quantitative data were analyzed by Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. Qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Most patients were female, between 18 and 59 years old. Most patients did not change their level of severity. However, increasing levels of severity were found in older adults. Factors related to the changes in severity levels were age group, chronic disease, chief complaint, educational level, the duration of travel to the outpatient clinic, type of vehicle, aging process and comorbidity, pathology of diseases, reassessment interval, nurse's experience, bypassing the patient triage process, patient's self-preparation, management of triage nurses, and assignment of direct healthcare staff until the end of the treatment. Increased severity was more frequently found in older adults, so closely monitored during waiting times at a clinic is needed. Setting rescreening as a policy and having sensitive screening guidelines and tools specific to older adults would contribute to early detection and immediate treatment of deteriorating symptoms and illness to help reduce complications and morbidity.Trial registration: https://osf.io/fp3j2 .

Effects of symptom management program on selected health outcomes among older people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a quasi-experimental study.

Older adults have limitations from their aging process and chronic disease, so developed interventions must pay attention and concern to their aging degeneration and needs. This study aims to study the effects of a symptom management program on selected health outcomes among older people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quasi-experimental research included the 15 older patients in the control group receiving routine nursing care, while the other 15 in the experimental group received a 4-week symptom management program. First, the general information was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Next, the average health outcomes were analyzed using independent and dependent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U Test, and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. In addition, the readmission rate was compared using Fisher's Exact Test. Results revealed that most of the older patients were men (96.7%), aged 60-88 years (Mean = 71.57, SD = 7.75), with a smoking history (93.3%). The improvements were found in dyspnea (p < .01), its severity during activities (p < .01), and the quality of life (p = .04) among patients who attended the program. However, both groups did not have a different pulmonary function (p = .25) and the proportion of readmission within 28 days (p = .50). This study shows that the symptom management program can reduce dyspnea and severity during activities and improve the quality of life. Older people suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, especially when experiencing dyspnea. Therefore, it is crucial to have a symptom management program for older patients, especially a program developed to respond to changes in the aging process and the limitations of older people. This developed program was age-friendly to deal with symptoms and improve quality of life. However, this program should be explored in typical situations without the effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition, more extensive population-based studies and randomized controlled trials should be adopted to increase credibility and ensure generalization.Clinical Trial Registration Number: https://osf.io/6sj7y (October 4, 2021).

Prevention and Care for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The prevalent rate of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) trends upward in older populations. Skin breakdown from IAD impacts the quality of life of older adults and reflects the quality of care in hospitals and long-term care facilities. Specific and appropriate interventions for prevention and care are needed. This systematic review aims to review optimal strategies for prevention and care for older adults with IAD. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Medline, ProQuest, ThaiLIS, ThaiJo, and E-Thesis were searched for articles published between January 2010 and December 2020. Only articles focusing on older adults were included for the review. RESULTS: Eleven articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Interventions for the prevention and care of IAD among older adults were categorized as assessment, incontinence management/causative factors management, cleansing, application of medical products for both skin moisturizing and skin barrier, body positioning, nutrition promotion, health education and training, and outcome evaluation. Specific prevention and care strategies for older adults with IAD included using specific assessment tools, applying skin cleansing pH from 4.0 to 6.8, body positioning, and promoting food with high protein. Other strategies were similar to those reported for adult patients. CONCLUSION: The systematic review extracted current and specific prevention and care strategies for IAD in older adults. The prevention and care strategies from this systematic review should be applied in clinical practice. However, more rigorous research methodology is recommended in future studies, especially in examining intervention outcomes. Nurses and other health professionals should be educated and trained to understand the causes of IAD in older adults and the specific prevention and care strategies for this population. Because older adults are prone to skin damage, and this type of skin breakdown differs from pressure ulcers, the tools for assessment and evaluation, and the strategies for prevention and care require special attention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021251711.

Effects of sunlight exposure and vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D levels in postmenopausal women in rural Thailand: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the abundant sunlight in Thailand, vitamin D deficiency is common in premenopausal and postmenopausal Thai women. Sunlight exposure is a natural way to increase one's intake of vitamin D. However, limited research has been conducted regarding natural exposure to sunlight as a strategy to improve vitamin D status in postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effects of sunlight exposure compared with oral supplementation with vitamin D2 (weekly 20,000 IU) in combination with sunlight exposure on 25(OH)D levels. METHODS: A 12-week randomized controlled trial was conducted in 52 postmenopausal women, age 50-70 years. The participants were randomized to either the sunlight exposure group or the sunlight exposure with vitamin D supplementation group. Serum 25(OH)D concentration and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured using standard assays at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, mean serum 25(OH)D had decreased from 32.3 to 29.7 ng/ml in the sunlight exposure group, but significantly increased in the combination group (from 29.9 to 32.4 ng/ml). At the end of the study, 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in the sunlight exposure with vitamin D supplementation group compared with the sunlight exposure group. However, this difference was not observed in women aged >60 years. Serum PTH had decreased in both groups, but not to a significant extent. CONCLUSION: A combination of weekly vitamin D2 supplementation at a dose of 20,000 IU with sunlight exposure is more effective than sunlight exposure alone in postmenopausal Thai women. Sunlight exposure alone is not sufficient to maintain 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in this setting.