Real-world assessment of the impact of "OFF" episodes on health-related quality of life among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who receive carbidopa/levodopa experience symptom reemergence or worsening, or "OFF" episodes. This study assessed the association of "OFF" episodes with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: US-specific data from the 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, a real-world cross-sectional survey, were used. Neurologists provided data for 10-12 consecutive patients with PD who completed the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D). Data were grouped by patients who experienced "OFF" episodes versus those who did not and by average hours of daily "OFF" time. Differences between patient groups were assessed for demographics and clinical characteristics; regression analyses were used to model the relationship between HRQoL and "OFF" episodes with age, sex, body mass index, current PD stage on the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and number of concomitant conditions related and unrelated to mobility as covariates. RESULTS: Data from 722 patients were analyzed. Overall, 321 patients (44%) had "OFF" episodes (mean of 2.9 h of daily "OFF" time). Patients who experienced "OFF" episodes were less likely to work full-time and more likely to live with family members other than their spouse/partner or reside in a long-term care facility than those without "OFF" episodes. The presence of "OFF" episodes, regardless of the average hours of daily "OFF" time, was significantly associated with high scores (reflecting poor HRQoL) on most PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index and low scores (reflecting poor health status) on the EQ-5D health utility index, visual analog scale (VAS), and all dimensions. Furthermore, increased average hours of daily "OFF" time was significantly correlated with higher scores for all PDQ-39 dimensions and the summary index, as well as with the EQ-5D health utility index and VAS scores. Patients with "OFF" episodes experienced reduced HRQoL even after correcting for potentially confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the occurrence of "OFF" episodes in patients with PD is associated with reduced HRQoL and that the impact on HRQoL increased incrementally with increasing average hours of daily "OFF" time.

Motor response with apomorphine sublingual film and levodopa in patients with OFF episodes.

Aim: Evaluate timing of motor improvement with carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) and apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO) in patients with Parkinson's disease and OFF episodes. Methods: A post hoc pooled analysis from two studies assessed Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) scores and investigator-rated FULL ON. Results: At 15 and 30 min following the prescribed first daily CD/LD dose, mean improvements in MDS-UPDRS-III scores were -6.7 and -16.3, respectively, and FULL ON was achieved by 6.5 and 41.8% of patients. Following an optimized SL-APO dose, mean improvements in MDS-UPDRS-III scores were -13.9 and -22.9, and FULL ON was achieved by 34.7 and 81.0% of patients. Conclusion: Concomitant administration of SL-APO with carbidopa/levodopa may be useful for delayed ON.

Dose Optimization of Apomorphine Sublingual Film for OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Is the Prophylactic Use of an Antiemetic Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Nausea is common upon initiating dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD); however, pretreatment with an antiemetic is recommended only when initiating apomorphine formulations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the need for prophylactic antiemetic use during dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO). METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a Phase III study evaluated nausea and vomiting treatment-emergent adverse events in patients with PD who underwent SL-APO dose optimization (10-35 mg; 5-mg increments) to achieve a tolerable FULL ON. Frequencies of nausea and vomiting were described for patients who did versus did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization and by patient subgroups based on extrinsic and intrinsic factors. RESULTS: Overall, 43.7% (196/449) of patients did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization; most of these patients (86.2% [169/196]) achieved an effective and tolerable SL-APO dose. In patients who did not use an antiemetic, nausea (12.2% [24/196]) and vomiting (0.5% [1/196]) were uncommon. An antiemetic was used in 56.3% (253/449) of patients, with 17.0% (43/253) and 2.4% (6/253) experiencing nausea and vomiting, respectively. All events of nausea (14.9% [67/449]) and vomiting (1.6% [7/449]) were of mild-to-moderate severity except for 1 event each. Irrespective of antiemetic use, among patients without baseline dopamine agonist use, nausea and vomiting rates were 25.2% (40/159) and 3.8% (6/159); in those already using dopamine agonists, rates were 9.3% (27/290) and 0.3% (1/290). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with an antiemetic is not necessary for most patients who initiate SL-APO for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD.

Apomorphine Sublingual Film Compared with Subcutaneous Apomorphine for OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: Apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO) and subcutaneous apomorphine (SC-APO) have been used for the treatment of OFF episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD). No study has prospectively compared efficacy and safety of these formulations. OBJECTIVE: To compare SL-APO with SC-APO for treatment of OFF episodes in PD. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, crossover study assessed SL-APO versus SC-APO in patients with PD and OFF episodes (N = 113). Doses were optimized in randomly assigned order. SL-APO dose initiation (10 mg) occurred in clinic; further dose optimization (15-30 mg; 5-mg increments) occurred primarily at home. SC-APO dosing (2-6 mg; 1-mg increments) occurred entirely in clinic. After a 3-7-day washout, patients were randomized 1 : 1 to 4 weeks of treatment with their optimized dose of SL-APO or SC-APO, followed by washout and 4 weeks of crossover treatment. RESULTS: Propensity score matching applied on 159 patients (STN-DBS n = 75, MED n = 84) resulted in 40 patients in each treatment group. At 36-month follow-up, STN-DBS led to significantly better PDSS and PDQ-8 change scores, which were significantly correlated. We observed no significant effects for HADS and no significant correlations between change scores in PDSS, HADS, and LEDD. CONCLUSIONS: We report Class IIb evidence of beneficial effects of STN-DBS on quality of sleep at 36-month follow-up, which were associated with QoL improvement independent of depression and dopaminergic medication. Our study highlights the importance of sleep for assessments of DBS outcomes. RESULTS: No difference was observed between SL-APO and SC-APO for change from predose to 90 minutes postdose in Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III score at week 4 (primary endpoint), assessed by a blinded rater (-13.6 vs. -13.8, respectively; p = NS). Overall, 72.2% of patients preferred SL-APO compared with SC-APO/no preference (p = 0.0002) per the Treatment Preference Questionnaire (secondary endpoint). Patients reported greater satisfaction with SL-APO compared with SC-APO, per mean scores of convenience (73.7 vs. 53.5) and global satisfaction (63.9 vs. 57.6) on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (other endpoint). The safety profiles of both treatments were generally comparable and were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported overall preference for and greater satisfaction with SL-APO over SC-APO.

Feasibility of home dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film in Parkinson's disease patients with OFF episodes: results from the dose-optimization phase of an open-label, randomized crossover study.

Background: Dose optimization of sublingual apomorphine (SL-APO), a dopamine agonist for the treatment of OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), has been performed under clinical supervision in clinical trials. SL-APO may be a candidate for home dosing optimization which would be less burdensome for patients. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of home optimization of SL-APO in patients with PD and OFF episodes. Design: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study comparing SL-APO with subcutaneous apomorphine was conducted, comprising an open-label dose-optimization phase and a treatment phase. This non-comparative analysis focuses on the outcomes of the dose-optimization phase with SL-APO only. Methods: Patients with PD and OFF episodes received SL-APO at an initial dose of 10 mg in the clinic (open-label). Further optimization could continue at home in 5 mg increments during subsequent OFF episodes (maximum dose of 30 mg). Optimization and tolerability were assessed daily by patient-reported feedback via telephone. Patients reporting a FULL ON returned to the clinic for a dose-confirmation visit (DCV). In patients with inadequate response as determined during the DCV, the dose could be further optimized at home. Results: Home optimization was continued by 81.4% (83/102) of patients. Of these, 80.7% identified an effective, tolerable dose. Mean time between initial clinic visit and DCV 1 was 6.8 days, and the final optimized dose of SL-APO was 30 mg (mode). In total, 62.7% of patients reported ⩾1 adverse event; the most common included nausea (31.4%), dizziness (9.8%), somnolence (8.8%), dyskinesia (7.8%), and fatigue (5.9%). The safety profile in this study in which most patients performed home dose optimization was consistent with the study utilizing clinic-based optimization. Conclusion: After the first clinic dose, home dose optimization of SL-APO appears feasible in patients with PD and OFF episodes, with most patients identifying their optimal SL-APO dose at home. Trial registration: This study is registered with EudraCT (2016-003456-7): Clinical Trials register - Search for eudract_number:2016-003456-70.

Indirect comparison of apomorphine sublingual film and levodopa inhalation powder for Parkinson's disease 'OFF' episodes.

Aim: To compare efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film (APL) and levodopa inhalation powder (CVT-301) for 'on-demand' treatment of Parkinson's disease 'OFF' episodes. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from an APL pivotal study were re-weighted to match average baseline characteristics from a CVT-301 study (SPAN-PD). Placebo-adjusted treatments were compared at week 12. Results: Improvements in predose Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scores were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 at 60 min postdose (least squares mean difference-in-difference: -8.82; p = 0.002); difference at 30 min favored APL but was not statistically significant (-4.46; p = 0.103). Total daily 'OFF' time reductions were significantly larger for APL versus CVT-301 (-1.31 h; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Results suggest APL treatment may lead to improved efficacy versus CVT-301.

A double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of naftifine 2% cream in tinea cruris.

OBJECTIVE: Naftifine HCl 2% cream (NAFT-2%) is a topical allylamine antifungal preparation under development in the U.S. The objective of this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a two-week course of once-daily NAFT-2% vs. vehicle in the treatment of Tinea cruris ("jock itch"). METHODS: A total of 334 subjects with T. cruris were enrolled and randomly assigned to NAFT-2% (n=166) or vehicle (n=168), which was applied once daily for 14 days. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at week 2 (end of treatment) and week 4. Efficacy measures included complete cure, treatment effectiveness, mycological cure, clinical cure, and clinical success and were analyzed only in subjects with a positive potassium hydroxide (KOH) and dermatophyte culture at baseline (n=75, naftifine; n=71, vehicle). Safety was assessed by adverse events and changes from baseline in clinical status and laboratory studies. RESULTS: At week 4, 25 percent of naftifine-treated subjects achieved complete cure vs. three percent of vehicle subjects and 72 percent achieved mycological cure vs. 16 percent of vehicle treated subjects (one-sided, P<0.001). Treatment effectiveness was achieved in 60 percent of NAFT-2% subjects vs. 10 percent of vehicle subjects (one-sided, P<0.001). Clinical cure rate and clinical success rate were 33 percent and 84 percent in NAFT-2% subjects, respectively vs. 10 percent and 46 percent in vehicle subjects (both P is less than 0.001, 2-sided). Week 2 efficacy response rates in NAFT-2% subjects were all lower than at week 4 but were significantly higher than week 2 vehicle-treated counterparts (P<0.025). Treatment-related AE occurred in 11 subjects (7 NAFT-2%, 4 vehicle) during the study. The most common AE in both groups were contact dermatitis (2 NAFT-2%), pruritus (2 vehicle), and application site reaction (1 per group). CONCLUSION: NAFT-2% applied once daily for two weeks (one-half the treatment duration for naftifine 1% cream) is efficacious and safe for the treatment of T. cruris.

An open-label study of naftifine hydrochloride 1% gel in the treatment of tinea versicolor.

Tinea versicolor (TV) is a superficial cutaneous fungal infection characterized by cutaneous pigment changes, pruritus, scaling, and erythema. This open-label, single-center pilot study evaluated the efficacy and safety of naftifine 1% gel applied twice daily for 2 weeks in 10 men and women (median age 38 years) with TV. Baseline mycology status was determined by potassium hydroxide (KOH) and microscopy and clinical symptom severity (CSS) scored by the investigator using a 0 to 9 scale (0=absent, 9=worst). Patients applied naftifine HCI 1% gel to the affected area twice daily for 14 days. They returned for follow-up efficacy and safety assessments at the end of treatment (week 2), 2 weeks after treatment (week 4), and 6 weeks after treatment (week 8). All patients had a positive mycology at baseline; one was KOH negative at week 2, two were negative at week 4, and five (50%) were negative at week 8. Mean investigator total CSS score decreased from a baseline value of 4.7 to 3.2 at week 2 (32% improvement), 2.6 at week 4 (45% improvement), and 2.7 at week 8 (43% improvement). The patients rated their symptoms to be improved at all follow-up visits. There were no treatment-related adverse events during the study. These results suggest that naftifine 1% gel is a safe and efficacious topical treatment for TV.

Patient Preferences for Treating "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Several on-demand treatments are available for management of "OFF" episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We evaluated patients' preferences for features of theoretical on-demand treatment options. METHODS: In a discrete choice experiment, US adults with self-reported PD of ≥5 years, or <5 years with "OFF" episodes, taking oral carbidopa/levodopa, selected between pairs of theoretical on-demand treatments that varied by mode of administration (with and without mode-specific adverse events [AEs]), time to FULL "ON," duration of "ON," and out-of-pocket cost for a 30-day supply. Data were analyzed with a random parameters logit model; results were used to calculate relative importance of treatment attributes, preference shares, and willingness to pay. RESULTS: Among 300 respondents, 98% had "OFF" episodes. Across the range of attribute levels included in the survey, avoiding $90 cost was most important to respondents, followed by a preferable mode of administration with associated AEs and decreasing time to FULL "ON." Duration of "ON" was relatively less important. On average, respondents preferred a theoretical dissolvable sublingual film versus other theoretical treatments with alternative modes of administration. Respondents were willing to pay $28-$52 US dollars to switch from least- to more-preferred mode of administration with associated AEs, $58 to reach FULL "ON" in 15 versus 60 min, and $9 to increase duration of FULL "ON" from 1 to 2 h. CONCLUSION: Respondents with PD valued lower out-of-pocket cost and a sublingual mode of administration with its associated AEs when choosing an on-demand treatment for "OFF" episodes.

Cost-Effectiveness of Apomorphine Sublingual Film as an "On-Demand" Treatment for "OFF" Episodes in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Background: "On-demand" treatments approved in the United States (US) for "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) include apomorphine hydrochloride injection (SC-APO), apomorphine sublingual film (APL), and levodopa inhalation powder (CVT-301). APL received US approval in 2020, and its cost-effectiveness has not been compared with SC-APO and CVT-301. Objective: To develop a cost-effectiveness analysis model comparing APL versus SC-APO and CVT-301 for treatment of patients with PD experiencing "OFF" episodes from a US payer perspective. Methods: The model estimated total costs and effectiveness for each comparator arm, informed from the treatments' pivotal studies or literature, over a 10-year horizon. Total and incremental patient costs (in 2020 US dollars), total time spent without "OFF" episode symptoms, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained were summarized and compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for APL versus SC-APO and CVT-301 were estimated and expressed as incremental patient costs per patient QALY gained and incremental cost per "OFF" hour avoided. Scenario analyses varying inputs and including caregiver costs were also conducted. Results: In the base case, APL had the lowest total "on-demand" treatment costs ($42,095) compared with SC-APO ($276,320; difference: -$234,225) and CVT-301 ($69,577; difference: -$27,482) over the 10-year horizon. APL was also associated with the highest utility, with incremental QALYs of 0.019 versus SC-APO and 0.235 versus CVT-301. APL was dominant over CVT-301 in terms of incremental cost per "OFF" hour, and dominant over both CVT-301 and SC-APO in terms of incremental cost per QALY gained. In all scenario analyses, APL was dominant against both SC-APO and CVT-301, confirming the robustness of the base-case results. Discussion: APL was dominant compared with both comparator arms, being less costly and more effective on average than SC-APO and CVT-301 in terms of QALYs. For SC-APO, cost-effectiveness of APL was driven by lower "on-demand" treatment costs and adverse event-related disutilities. For CVT-301, cost-effectiveness of APL was driven by lower "on-demand" treatment costs and substantially higher efficacy. Conclusions: From a US payer perspective, APL represents a cost-effective option compared with SC-APO and CVT-301 for treatment of "OFF" episodes in patients with PD.

Real-world assessment of "OFF" episode-related healthcare resource utilization among patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States.

AIMS: Within 5 years of initiating carbidopa/levodopa, ∼50% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience "OFF" episodes; little is known about the cost burden. We investigated the association of "OFF" episodes with patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs. METHODS: Analyses used neurologist-provided data from the US-specific 2017 and 2019 Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for PD, including duration of "OFF" episodes and HCRU for 10-12 consecutive patients. Patients were grouped by presence/absence of "OFF" episodes and by average hours of daily "OFF" time. Between-group differences were assessed for demographics, personal circumstances, and clinical characteristics. Regression analyses modeled the relationship of "OFF" episodes with HCRU and costs. RESULTS: Of 1,309 patients, 41% experienced "OFF" episodes, 25% of whom were "OFF" ≥4 h/day. Patients having "OFF" episodes had more severe PD, were diagnosed for longer, and were younger than those without "OFF" (p < .0001). "OFF" episodes were associated with a greater number of prescribed PD drugs (p < .0001). Patients without "OFF" episodes were more likely to have full-time employment and less likely to be retired or unemployed because of PD (p < .001). Patients with and without "OFF" episodes had different living situations (p < .001): patients experiencing "OFF" were less likely to live alone and more likely to live in a nursing home and have a professional caregiver (p < .001). In the past 12 months, the number of hospitalizations, intensive care admissions, and emergency room visits; nights hospitalized; costs of consultations and hospitalizations; and total direct costs were all higher for patients experiencing "OFF" episodes (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with PD and "OFF" episodes had higher HCRU and costs than those without "OFF," suggesting that "OFF" episodes contribute to the economic burden of PD. Further research is warranted to examine the extent that current PD treatments and treatment patterns impact HCRU and costs.

Improvement in nasolabial folds with a hyaluronic acid filler using a cohesive polydensified matrix technology: results from an 18-month open-label extension trial.

BACKGROUND: Repeat treatments of nonpermanent dermal fillers are used in the long-term treatment of wrinkles and folds and to volumize. OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and effectiveness of a nonanimal-sourced hyaluronic acid (HA) (which uses a cohesive polydensified matrix (CPM) technology [CPMHA]) for the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs) during an 18-month open-label extension trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-five of 118 subjects continued with this optional open-label extension of a split-face, double-blind trial. All subjects received CPMHA in both NLFs at 24 weeks after treatment in this study and were assessed at weeks 32, 48, 72, and 96. Touch-ups were allowed for optimal correction. Safety was assessed according to reported adverse events (AEs) and serum antibody measurement. RESULTS: At all four post-week 24 time points, the severity of the NLFs showed a decrease from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale. The effects persisted in the majority (∼80%) of subjects without repeat treatment for at least one interval of 48 weeks. The study filler was well tolerated, with only one related AE (injection site bruising) reported. Little potential for immunogenic reactions was identified. CONCLUSION: This CPMHA is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for at least 48 weeks in the majority of subjects for the correction of moderate to severe NLFs with repeat injections given over an 18-month period.

An open-label, sequential dose-escalation, safety, and tolerability study of rimabotulinumtoxinb in subjects with cervical dystonia.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of a sequential dose escalation of rimabotulinumtoxinB (BoNT-B) in cervical dystonia (CD) subjects. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, within-subject, sequential dose-escalation study (BoNT-B dosed at 10,000, 12,500, and 15,000 Units) evaluated subjects over each phase of treatment at preinjection and at periodic intervals postinjection. Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory results were recorded. Efficacy measures included the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and three visual analog scales (VASs). RESULTS: 119 out of 145 CD subjects received all three doses in sequence. Dry mouth and dysphagia were the most common adverse events, and both decreased in frequency by the final injection, despite the increasing doses of the escalation. TWSTRS-Total and subscale scores demonstrated significant improvements following all doses at the week 2, 4, 8, and 12 assessments, with the exception of disability and pain at week 12 with the lowest dose. All VAS scores demonstrated similar improvements following all doses. The mean number of weeks in each phase of the study was 12.1 weeks (10,000 Units), 12.9 weeks (12,500 Units), and 13.9 weeks (15,000 Units). CONCLUSION: BoNT-B was well tolerated and efficacious at 10,000, 12,500, and 15,000 Units in this within-subject, sequential dose-escalation study in CD subjects.

Evaluation of an onion extract, Centella asiatica, and hyaluronic acid cream in the appearance of striae rubra.

This study evaluated the effect of an onion extract cream with Centella asiatica and hyaluronic acid in improving the appearance of striae rubra (SR). Women participants with bilateral, outer aspect of the thigh SR were randomized to apply a quarter-sized amount of the onion extract cream twice daily for 12 weeks to the randomized left or right, outer aspect of the thigh. No treatment was administered to the contralateral side. Participants were evaluated at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Primary efficacy endpoints included color, texture, softness, and overall appearance of SR by the participant and investigator at week 12. The treated thigh demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the mean change in participant and investigator evaluations in overall appearance, texture, color, and softness compared with the untreated thigh at week 12. No adverse events occurred during the study. The onion extract cream was well tolerated and significantly improved the appearance of SR in women.

Open-label titration of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson's disease and "OFF" episodes.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of apomorphine sublingual film (APL-130277; APL) for the on-demand treatment of "OFF" episodes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) was demonstrated in a double-blind trial. Herein we describe the ability of patients to receive effective and tolerable APL dose titration during the open-label titration phase. METHODS: Adult patients with levodopa-responsive PD and "OFF" episodes were enrolled. In practically defined "OFF," patients were observed for a FULL "ON" after their usual morning carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) dose and then after titration with APL following each increasing dose (10-35 mg). Antiemetic medication was administered for 3 days before initiation of titration and was continued throughout titration. Motor responses were evaluated predose and postdose using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score. Safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 141 patients who enrolled in the study and received APL during open-label titration, 109 (77.3%) achieved a FULL "ON" (66.1% at 10-20 mg) and 10 did not. Patients who successfully completed APL dose titration tended to be younger, had a longer mean time since PD diagnosis, and had lower levodopa requirements than those who discontinued during titration for any reason. Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from predose to 30 min postdose after titration with the effective dose of APL (n = 109) was similar across all dose groups. In a post hoc analysis, the magnitude of motor response with APL was ~2-fold higher than with CD/LD 15 min postdose, and the observed peak response occurred earlier with APL than with the trend seen for CD/LD (45 vs 90 min, respectively). Overall, the most common (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during APL dose titration were nausea (20.6%), yawning (12.1%), dizziness (11.3%), and somnolence (11.3%). Twelve patients discontinued due to TEAEs during APL dose titration, most commonly (≥2%) because of dizziness (2.8%), nausea (2.1%), and somnolence (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Among eligible patients with PD and "OFF" episodes who had their APL dose successfully titrated to an effective and tolerable level, most were able to do so within the first 3 titrated doses but some required further dose escalations. The use of APL can provide benefit for the treatment of "OFF" episodes.

Botulinum toxin type B vs. type A in toxin-naïve patients with cervical dystonia: Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.

The objective of this study was to compare efficacy, safety, and duration of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B) in toxin-naïve cervical dystonia (CD) subjects. BoNT-naïve CD subjects were randomized to BoNT-A or BoNT-B and evaluated in a double-blind trial at baseline and every 4-weeks following one treatment. The primary measure was the change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) from baseline to week 4 post-injection. Secondary measures included change in TWSTRS-subscale scores, pain, global impressions, and duration of response and safety assessments. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial of BoNT-B to BoNT-A. 111 subjects were randomized (55 BoNT-A; 56 BoNT-B). Improvement in TWSTRS-total scores 4 weeks after BoNT-B was noninferior to BoNT-A (adjusted means 11.0 (SE 1.2) and 8.8 (SE 1.2), respectively; per-protocol-population (PPP)). The median duration of effect of BoNT-A and BoNT-B was not different (13.1 vs. 13.7 weeks, respectively; P-value = 0.833; PPP). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of injection site pain and dysphagia. Mild dry mouth was more frequent with BoNT-B but there were no differences for moderate/severe dry mouth. In this study, both BoNT-A and B were shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of toxin-naive CD subjects.

Botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc) in subjects with hemifacial spasm: results from an open-label, dose-escalation safety study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT-B) in subjects with hemifacial spasm (HFS). METHODS: This open-label, sequential dose-escalation study evaluated BoNT-B in subjects with HFS. Eligible subjects were enrolled and received a single injection of one of four sequential BoNT-B doses (100, 200, 400, or 800 U). Following injection, subjects were evaluated in person at Weeks 2 and 8 and by phone at Weeks 1, 4, and 10 and every 2 weeks thereafter until benefit was lost. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), vital signs and clinical laboratory evaluation. The severity of HFS was assessed using a patient social impairment visual analog scale (VAS), subject severity of contraction VAS, the HFS physician assessment, and subject HFS frequency and severity assessment. RESULTS: Nineteen predominately Caucasian (92%) and female (67%) subjects (aged 36-80 years) with HFS participated in this study. Subjects remained in the study an average of 88 days (range of 41-332 days) after receiving a single dose of BoNT-B. No deaths, serious AEs or AEs leading to trial discontinuation occurred during the study period. Two subjects in the 400 U dose group requested early withdrawal, whereas all other subjects completed the study. A reduction in HFS severity was observed in subjects treated with doses of 200 U or more. Improvements in subject HFS assessments tended to return to baseline values by 8 weeks following injection. CONCLUSION: BoNT-B was well-tolerated and reduced HFS severity in subjects who received injections of 200 to 800 U. Additional investigation is necessary to confirm the findings from this open-label study.

Buccal mucosal irritation studies of sublingual apomorphine film (APL-130277) in Syrian golden hamsters.

AIM: Determine the potential for cheek pouch buccal mucosa irritation in hamsters following administration of apomorphine hydrochloride film (APL-130277). METHODS: Three studies were conducted with Syrian golden hamsters. (First study, four hamsters received APL-130277 three times a day [TID] for 7 days. Second study, four hamsters received APL-130277 once a day [QD] for days 1-3, twice a day [BID] for days 4-7 and TID for days 8-21. Third study, 32 hamsters received either a placebo strip or APL-130277-dosed TID for 28 days). For all the studies, the macroscopic appearance of the buccal cavities was evaluated throughout the study. In the third study, all animals were necropsied on day 29, and macroscopic and histopathological examinations were performed. RESULTS: In the first and second studies, the buccal mucosa of the cheek pouch did not show any signs of irritation. In the third study, administration of APL-130277-dosed TID for 28 consecutive days did not result in observable local irritation of the buccal mucosa. CONCLUSION: In all the studies, APL-130277 produced no irritation of the cheek pouch buccal mucosa.

Toxin-induced movement disorders.

Toxins can be cited as a cause of several movement disorders, but this association is rare and the resultant syndromes usually include additional signs that are not typical for the idiopathic movement disorders. Most instances of confirmed toxin-induced movement disorders show lesions on CT and MRI scans of cortical or subcortical structures. A common underlying element in these toxin-induced syndromes is the development of lesions primarily in the pallidum and striatum. Because many toxins result in lesions affecting these structures, a selective vulnerability to hypoxic or metabolic insults has long been postulated. The susceptibility of these structures may relate to a number of factors, including the pattern of oxidative metabolism, heavy metal concentration, vascular perfusion, and neuronal innervation. Finally, in addition to causing disability, certain neurotoxins have led to a better understanding of human disease through the development of research models. As an example, the MPTP model has not only provided an animal model to study therapeutic strategies in PD but has also contributed important insights into the mechanism of neuronal degeneration.

Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia: the science of dosing.

The first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD) is botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), which has been established as a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy. However, this treatment is also complex and challenging to apply in clinical practice. Approximately 20% of patients discontinue therapy due to treatment failure, adverse effects, and other reasons. In addition, expert consensus recommendations are lacking to guide physicians in the optimal use of BoNT-A for CD. Among the issues still to be clarified is the optimal dosing frequency. The generally accepted standard for intervals between BoNT-A injections is ≥12 weeks; however, this standard is based primarily on the methodology of pivotal trials for the BoNT-A products, rather than on evidence that it is optimal in comparison to other intervals. While some retrospective, observational studies of BoNT-A used in clinical practice appear to support the use of ≥12-week dosing intervals, it is often unclear in these studies how the need for reinjection was determined. In contrast, a prospective dose-ranging trial in which patients were allowed to request reinjection as early as 8 weeks showed that about half of patients receiving abobotulinumtoxinA, at the currently recommended initial dose of 500 U, requested reinjection at 8 weeks. Moreover, results from an open-label, 68-week extension phase of the pivotal trial of incobotulinumtoxinA showed that 47.1% of patients had received reinjection at ≤12 weeks. Ongoing studies, such as the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of BOTOX® Efficacy (CD PROBE), may help clarify this question of optimal dosing intervals for BoNT-A in CD.