The influence of defaecating proctograms on clinical decision-making in pelvic floor disorders.

AIM: Defaecating proctogram (DP) studies have become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor disorders. However, their impact on treatment decision-making remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of decision-making by colorectal surgeons and the role of the DP in this process. METHOD: Four colorectal surgeons were presented with online surveys containing the complete history, examination and investigations of 106 de-identified pelvic floor patients who had received one of three treatment options: physiotherapy only, anterior Delorme's procedure or anterior mesh rectopexy. The survey assessed the management decisions made by each of the surgeons for the three treatments both before and after the addition of the DP to the diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: After the addition of the DP results; treatment choice changed in 219 (52%) of 424 surgical decisions and interrater agreement improved significantly from κ = 0.26 to κ = 0.39. Three of the four surgeons reported a significant increase in confidence. Agreement with the actual treatments patients received increased from κ = 0.21 to κ = 0.28. Intra-anal rectal prolapse on DP was a significant predictor of a decision to perform anterior mesh rectopexy. CONCLUSION: The DP improves interclinician agreement in the management of pelvic floor disorders and enhances the confidence in treatment decisions. Intra-anal rectal prolapse was the most influential DP parameter in treatment decision-making.

Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Ileocolic anastomoses are commonly performed for right-sided colon cancer and Crohn's disease. The anastomosis may be constructed using a linear cutter stapler or by suturing. Individual trials comparing stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomoses have found little difference in the complication rate but they have lacked adequate power to detect potential small difference. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of ileocolic anastomoses performed using stapling and handsewn techniques. The hypothesis tested was that the stapling technique is associated with fewer complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group specialised register SR-COLOCA, Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing use of a linear cuter stapler with any type of suturing technique for ileocolic anastomoses in adults from 1970 to 2005 and were updated in December 2010. Abstracts presented to the following society meetings between 1970 and 2010 were handsearched: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, European Association of Coloproctology. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing use of linear cutter stapler (isoperistaltic side to side or functional end to end) with any type of suturing technique in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were selected and their methodological quality assessed. Relevant results were extracted and missing data sought from the authors. RevMan 5 was used to perform meta-analysis when there were sufficient data. Sub-group analyses for cancer inflammatory bowel disease as indication for ileocolic anastomoses were performed. MAIN RESULTS: After obtaining individual data from authors for studies that include other anastomoses, seven trials (including one unpublished) with 1125 ileocolic participants (441 stapled, 684 handsewn) were included. The five largest trials had adequate allocation concealment.Stapled anastomosis was associated with significantly fewer anastomotic leaks compared with handsewn (S=11/441, HS=42/684, OR 0.48 [0.24, 0.95] p=0.03). One study performed routine radiology to detect asymptomatic leaks. For the sub-group of 825 cancer patients in four studies, stapled anastomosis led to significantly fewer anastomotic leaks (S=4/300, HS=35/525, OR 0.28 [0.10, 0.75] p=0.01). In subgroup analysis of non-cancer patients (3 studies, 264 patients) there were no differences for any reported outcomes. All other outcomes: stricture, anastomotic haemorrhage, anastomotic time, re-operation, mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, length of stay, showed no significant difference. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Stapled functional end to end ileocolic anastomosis is associated with fewer leaks than handsewn anastomosis.

Design and validation of a comprehensive fecal incontinence questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence can have a profound effect on quality of life. Its prevalence remains uncertain because of stigma, lack of consistent definition, and dearth of validated measures. This study was designed to develop a valid clinical and epidemiologic questionnaire, building on current literature and expertise. METHODS: Patients and experts undertook face validity testing. Construct validity, criterion validity, and test-retest reliability was undertaken. Construct validity comprised factor analysis and internal consistency of the quality of life scale. The validity of known groups was tested against 77 control subjects by using regression models. Questionnaire results were compared with a stool diary for criterion validity. Test-retest reliability was calculated from repeated questionnaire completion. RESULTS: The questionnaire achieved good face validity. It was completed by 104 patients. The quality of life scale had four underlying traits (factor analysis) and high internal consistency (overall Cronbach alpha = 0.97). Patients and control subjects answered the questionnaire significantly differently (P < 0.01) in known-groups validity testing. Criterion validity assessment found mean differences close to zero. Median reliability for the whole questionnaire was 0.79 (range, 0.35-1). CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire compares favorably with other available instruments, although the interpretation of stool consistency requires further research. Its sensitivity to treatment still needs to be investigated.

Judgment analysis of surgeons' prioritization of patients for elective general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Access to elective general surgery in New Zealand is governed by clinicians' judgment of priority using a visual analog scale (VAS). This has been criticized as lacking reliability and transparency. Our objective was to describe this judgment in terms of previously elicited cues. METHODS: We asked 60 general surgeons in New Zealand to assess patient vignettes using 8 VAS scales to determine priority. They then conducted judgment analysis to determine agreement between surgeons. Cluster analysis was performed to identify groups of surgeons who used different cues. Multiple regression for the combined surgeons was undertaken to determine the predictability of the 8-scale VAS. RESULTS: Agreement between surgeons was poor (ra=0.48). The cause of poor agreement was mostly due to poor consensus (G) between surgeons in how they weighted criteria. Using cluster analysis, we classified the surgeons into 2 groups: 1 took more account of quality of life and diagnosis, whereas the other group placed more weight on the influence of treatment. The 8-scale VAS showed good predictability in assigning a priority score (R2=0.66). DISCUSSION: The level of agreement reflects surgeons' practice variation. This is exemplified by 2 distinct surgeon groups that differ in how criteria were weighted.

Experience with the use of vacuum dressings in the management of acute enterocutaneous fistulas.

High-output enterocutaneous fistulas involving an open abdominal wound are a difficult management problem. We report our experience on the use of vacuum dressings. The potential benefits, problems and new recommendations for the use of vacuum dressings in the management of enterocutaneous fistulas are discussed.

Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication specific to intestinal surgery. The aim of this study was to review the anastomotic leakage rates in a single Colorectal Unit and to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis. METHODS: A total of 541 consecutive operations involving anastomoses of the colon and rectum that were carried out between 1999 and 2004 at a single colorectal unit were reviewed. Data concerning 35 variables, relating to patient, tumour and surgical factors, were recorded. Outcomes with respect to anastomotic leakage and mortality were recorded. Data were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses and odds ratios (OR) calculated. RESULTS: The overall rate of anastomotic leakage was 6.5% (35 of 541). The most frequently carried out operations were right hemicolectomy and anterior resection of the rectum, with leak rates of 2.2 and 7.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that male gender (OR = 3.5), previous abdominal surgery (OR = 2.4), Crohn's disease (OR = 3.3), rectal cancer < or =12 cm from the anal verge (OR = 5.4) and prolonged operating time (OR = 2.8) were factors significantly associated with anastomotic leakage. Male gender, a history of previous abdominal surgery and the presence of a low cancer remained significant after multivariate analysis. The risk of anastomotic leakage increased when two or more risk factors were present (P < 0.01). The overall mortality was 3.7% and was higher in patients with anastomotic leakage (14.3%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, previous abdominal surgery and low rectal cancer are associated with increased anastomotic leakage rates. These have important implications during preoperative patient counselling and decision-making regarding defunctioning stoma formation.

Clinical variables associated with positive angiographic localization of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Localizing the source of severe lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is often difficult but is important to plan the extent of colonic resection. The purpose of the present paper was to audit the Auckland Hospital experience of selective angiography, in localizing lower GI bleeding. METHODS: Patients admitted to Auckland Hospital with rectal bleeding and who subsequently had angiography were evaluated by reviewing their clinical notes and radiological results during a 7-year period (1997-2003). Data collected included demographic details, haemodynamic parameters, change in haemoglobin level, requirement of blood transfusion within 24 h before the procedure, site of the bleeding and pathology. RESULTS: The notes of 88 patients (male, n = 51; median age 69 years, range 8-99 years) were available for review and analysis. The site of bleeding was localized in 38 (51%); 30 of them had bleeding in the right colon or small bowel and eight in the left colon. Positive localization correlated with: haemodynamic instability P < 0.0001; drop in haemoglobin level of > or =50 from previous admission (P = 0.02); transfusion requirement of > or =5 units of blood within 24 h (P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed transfusion requirement of > or =5 units to achieve haemodynamic stability to be the most powerful predictor of accurate localization (odds ratio, 40). CONCLUSION: Catheter angiography for acute lower GI bleeding will successfully localize a point of bleeding in approximately 50% of patients. The most useful clinical indicator for positive angiography was haemodynamic instability particularly in those who require transfusion of > or =5 units of blood to achieve haemodynamic stability.

Long-term outcome of postanal repair in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic faecal incontinence is a common debilitating problem; the results of surgical treatment are variable with only a small proportion of patients achieving full continence. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of postanal repair in idiopathic faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had postanal repair in Auckland between 1994 and 2001 were identified and mailed faecal incontinence severity index (FISI) and faecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) questionnaires. Preoperative and postoperative incontinence scores were compared and postoperative quality of life scores were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-seven of the 66 patients who had undergone postanal repair from 1994 to 2001 completed the FIQOL questionnaire. FISI scores were complete on 44 patients. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative FISI scores revealed an improvement with mean scores of 34 and 23, respectively (P = 0.0001). Thirty (68%) patients had improved, including four who were fully continent. Fourteen patients were the same or worse. CONCLUSIONS: Postanal repair provides lasting benefit for the majority of patients with faecal incontinence.

Priority assessment of patients for elective general surgery: game on?

BACKGROUND: Clinical priority assessment criteria (CPAC) are used to generate a score by which patients are prioritized and rationed for elective surgery. It is widely believed that surgeons elevate scores to ensure their patients' acceptance for elective surgery, colloquially called gaming. The purpose of the present paper was therefore to investigate whether there was a temporal trend to an increase in the assigned priority score from the inception of CPAC to the present. METHODS: Priority and weighted inlier equivalent separations (WIES) scores between 23 April 1999 and 23 July 2002 were collected for elective general surgical cases at Auckland Hospital. A total of 5440 cases was retrospectively analysed using multiple regression techniques. Priority score was included as the dependent variable and time as an independent variable. Any change in case complexity over that period was accounted for by including the WIES score as a covariate. Multiple regression was undertaken for the combined surgeons and for individuals. RESULTS: The combined model was statistically significant but accounted for only 17% of the priority score variance. An increase of one WIES unit leads to an increase of 2.7 in priority score (P=0.0001). The relationship of priority score with time was dependent on the surgeon performing the prioritization. However, only half the surgeons had individual models that indicated gaming. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that gaming is occurring but that not all surgeons participate in this. The difference between surgeons' participation in gaming is a potential source of practice variation in the prioritization process.

Prioritizing patients for elective surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Priority scoring tools are moot as means for dealing with burgeoning elective surgical waiting lists. There is ongoing development work in New Zealand, Canada and the UK. This emerging international perspective is invaluable in determining the application of these tools and addressing any pitfalls. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature review was performed. Information was also retrieved using a search of reference lists of all papers included in the review and contact with those who were involved in the development of such criteria. RESULTS: The ethical basis of prioritization differed among priority scoring tools and in a number was not stated. The majority of tools covered criteria for specific procedures. Delphi consensus methods and regression were the predominant methods for -deter-mining -specific criteria. Authors' opinions were the main source of generic criteria. Linear and non-linear models or matrices sum-mated criteria. CONCLUSION: There is debate over the ethical basis for prioritization. It is a concern that it is not addressed in many studies. The development of generic criteria showed a dearth of consensus approaches that represents a significant gap in our knowledge. On the aspects of summation and weighting, the impact of assumptions on the prioritization of patients may not have been fully explored.

Prioritizing patients for elective surgery: clinical judgement summarized by a Linear Analogue Scale.

BACKGROUND: The New Zealand health reforms have resulted in the requirement that surgeons utilize Clinical Priority Access Criteria (CPAC) to ration patient access to elective surgery. The validity of the tools used as CPAC has been challenged. An alter-native tool, the Linear Analogue Scale (LAS), is therefore used in our institution. Our objectives were to determine the variables that influence the priority score generated using the LAS, and the length of time waited by patients awaiting general surgical procedures. METHODS: A cohort of 918 patients who were listed for elective general surgical procedures at Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand between 1 July 1998 and 31 March 1999 were studied. Patients were given a priority score generated using the LAS. For each patient, the time from assessment until his or her procedure was documented. Linear and logistic regression models were used to investigate variables (age, gender, diagnosis and surgical team) that influence priority score. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate variables (priority score, age, gender, and diagnosis) that influence the length of time waited. RESULTS: Graphical presentation showed a pattern of priority scores falling into 'bands' for different diagnoses. Diagnosis, and to a lesser extent surgical team, influenced priority score. Survival analysis showed 'time waited' to be influenced by priority score, diagnosis, and patient age and gender. CONCLUSION: The LAS may have a useful role in the difficult sphere of patient prioritization. Its strength lies in its simplicity. Further investigation of reliability and effect on patient outcomes is required.

Complex anal fistulas: plug or flap?

BACKGROUND: Rectal mucosal advancement flaps (RMAF) and fistula plugs (FP) are techniques used to manage complex anal fistulas. The purpose of this study was to review and compare the results of these methods of repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of all complex anal fistulas treated by either a RMAF or a FP at Auckland City Hospital from 2004 to 2008. Comparisons were made in terms of successful healing rates, time to failure and the use of magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Overall, 70 operations were performed on 55 patients (55.7% male). The mean age was 44.9 years. Twenty-one patients (30%) had had at least one previous unsuccessful repair. Indications for repair included 57 high cryptoglandular anal (81%), 4 Crohn's anal (6%), 7 rectovaginal (10%), 1 rectourethral (1%) and 1 pouch-vaginal fistula (1%). All patients were followed up with a mean of 4.5 months. Forty-eight RMAFs (69% of total) were performed with 16 successful repairs (33%). Twenty-two FPs (31% of total) were performed with 7 successful repairs (32%, P = 0.9). In failed repairs, there was no difference in terms of mean time to failure (RMAF 4.8 months versus FP 4.1 months, P = 0.62). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 21 patients (37%) before the repair. The success rate in these patients was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment of complex anal fistulas are disappointing. The choice of operation of either a RMAF or a FP did not alter the poor healing rates of about one third of patients in each group.

Adult total parenteral nutrition at Auckland City Hospital: a 6-year review.

AIM: To summarise and evaluate data on the use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and associated septic complications at Auckland City Hospital (Auckland, New Zealand) over a 6-year period beginning with appointment of a specialist TPN nurse. METHODS: For each adult patient requiring TPN on an inpatient basis (excluding those in critical care) between January 1998 and December 2003 demographic data, reason for TPN requirement, number of days of TPN administration, type of central venous line used for administration, and frequency of infectious complications were collected prospectively. RESULTS: 498 episodes of TPN were recorded in 484 patients (202 male, median age 60, range 15-89 y). Median duration of TPN administration was 11 (range 1-326) d. Over the 6-year period the number of episodes of TPN per year did not change significantly while median duration of TPN decreased from 14.5 d in 1998 to 8 d in 2003 (p<0.0001). Paralytic ileus following abdominal surgery was the predominant indication for TPN. After 1998, the rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections stabilised at 2 per 1000 TPN days. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a benchmark for infection rates associated with administration of TPN managed by a Nutrition Support Team in a New Zealand tertiary care hospital.

The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Reported prevalence estimates for fecal incontinence among community-dwelling adults vary widely. A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the studied prevalence of fecal incontinence in the community and explore the heterogeneity of study designs and sources of bias that may explain variability in estimates. METHODS: A predetermined search strategy was used to locate all studies published that reported the prevalence of fecal incontinence in a community-based sample of adults. Data were extracted onto a proforma for sampling frame and method, sample size, response rate, definition of fecal incontinence used, data-collection method, and prevalence rates. Included studies were critically appraised for possible sources of selection bias, information bias, and imprecision. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. These could be grouped into definitions of incontinence that included or excluded incontinence of flatus. The estimated prevalence of anal incontinence (including flatus incontinence) varied from 2 to 24 percent, and the estimated prevalence of fecal incontinence (excluding flatus incontinence) varied from 0.4 to 18 percent. Only three studies were found to have a study design that minimized significant sources of bias, and only one of these used a validated instrument for data collection. The prevalence estimate of fecal incontinence from these studies was 11 to 15 percent. No pooling of estimates was undertaken because there was wide variation in study design. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus definition of fecal incontinence is needed that accounts for alterations in quality of life. Further cross-sectional studies are required that minimize bias in their design and use validated self-administered questionnaires.