Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with VEXAS syndrome.

ABSTRACT: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, caused by somatic mutations in UBA1, is an autoinflammatory disorder with diverse systemic manifestations. Thrombosis is a prominent clinical feature of VEXAS syndrome. The risk factors and frequency of thrombosis in VEXAS syndrome are not well described, due to the disease's recent discovery and the paucity of large databases. We evaluated 119 patients with VEXAS syndrome for venous and arterial thrombosis and correlated their presence with clinical outcomes and survival. Thrombosis occurred in 49% of patients, mostly venous thromboembolism (VTE; 41%). Almost two-thirds of VTEs were unprovoked, 41% were recurrent, and 20% occurred despite anticoagulation. The cumulative incidence of VTE was 17% at 1 year from symptom onset and 40% by 5 years. Cardiac and pulmonary inflammatory manifestations were associated with time to VTE. M41L was positively associated specifically with pulmonary embolism by univariate (odds ratio [OR]: 4.58, confidence interval [CI] 1.28-16.21, P = .02) and multivariate (OR: 16.94, CI 1.99-144.3, P = .01) logistic regression. The cumulative incidence of arterial thrombosis was 6% at 1 year and 11% at 5 years. The overall survival of the entire patient cohort at median follow-up time of 4.8 years was 88%, and there was no difference in survival between patients with or without thrombosis (P = .8). Patients with VEXAS syndrome are at high risk of VTE; thromboprophylaxis should administered be in high-risk settings unless strongly contraindicated.

Safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy for elderly patients with severe aplastic anaemia.

Uncertainty remains regarding the safety and tolerability of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CSA) in older patients. We retrospectively analysed two prospective clinical trials of IST in treatment-naïve severe aplastic anaemia (SAA) to assess safety in older compared to younger patients. Patients ≥18 years of age who had received IST with ATG and CSA +/- eltrombopag (EPAG) were included. Pre-treatment baseline characteristics and co-morbidities were assessed as predictors of therapy-related complications in younger (<60 years) versus older (≥60 years) patients. Out of 245 eligible patients, 54 were older and 191 were younger. Older patients had a similar frequency of SAEs, ICU admissions and hospital length of stay compared to younger patients. Older patients had a higher frequency of cardiac events related to IST, but none resulted in death. Older patients had worse long-term overall survival, and more relapse and clonal evolution post-IST. However, older patients who responded to IST had a similar survival at a median follow-up to younger patients. Disease-related factors and limited therapeutic options in refractory disease likely contribute to poorer outcomes in older patients, not complications of upfront IST. Therefore, IST should be considered first-line therapy for most older SAA patients.

Skin Manifestations of VEXAS Syndrome and Associated Genotypes.

Importance: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a newly defined genetic disease with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 4269 men older than 50 years and is marked by systemic inflammation, progressive bone marrow failure, and inflammatory cutaneous manifestations. Objective: To define the spectrum of cutaneous manifestations in VEXAS syndrome and the association of these findings with clinical, genetic, and histological features. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study included data from 112 patients who were diagnosed with VEXAS-defining genetic variants in UBA1 between 2019 and 2023. Data were collected from medical record review or from patients with VEXAS directly evaluated at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. Main Outcomes and Measures: To define the spectrum of cutaneous manifestations in VEXAS in association with genetic, histological, and other clinical findings. A secondary outcome was cutaneous response to treatment in VEXAS. Results: Among the 112 patients (median [range] age, 69 [39-79] years; 111 [99%] male), skin involvement was common (93 [83%]), and the most frequent presenting feature of disease (68 [61%]). Of 64 histopathologic reports available from 60 patients, predominant skin histopathologic findings were leukocytoclastic vasculitis (23 [36%]), neutrophilic dermatosis (22 [34%]), and perivascular dermatitis (19 [30%]). Distinct pathogenic genetic variants were associated with specific cutaneous manifestations. The p.Met41Leu variant was most frequently associated with neutrophilic dermal infiltrates (14 of 17 patients [82%]), often resembling histiocytoid Sweet syndrome. In contrast, the p.Met41Val variant was associated with vasculitic lesions (11 of 20 patients [55%]) with a mixed leukocytic infiltrate (17 of 20 patients [85%]). Oral prednisone improved skin manifestations in 67 of 73 patients (92%). Patients with VEXAS treated with anakinra frequently developed severe injection-site reactions (12 of 16 [75%]), including ulceration (2 of 12 [17%]) and abscess formation (1 of 12 [8%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study show that skin manifestations are a common and early manifestation of VEXAS syndrome. Genetic evaluation for VEXAS should be considered in older male patients with cutaneous vasculitis, neutrophilic dermatoses, or chondritis. Awareness of VEXAS among dermatologists is critical to facilitate early diagnosis.

Opportunistic Infections, Mortality Risk, and Prevention Strategies in Patients With Vacuoles, E1 Enzyme, X-Linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) Syndrome.

Background: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure and systemic inflammation, putting patients at risk for infections. This study comprehensively examines the prevalence of opportunistic infections in patients with VEXAS, evaluating their impact on clinical outcomes and potential preventive measures. Methods: Patients with confirmed VEXAS were included. Survival analysis and logistic regression were used to identify associations between opportunistic infections and mortality. Infection rates (IRs) for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and alphaherpesviruses were calculated over a prospective 8-month observation period in relationship to prophylaxis. Results: Of 94 patients with VEXAS, 6% developed PJP; 15% had alphaherpesvirus reactivation, with varicella zoster virus (VZV) being the most common herpesvirus; and 10% contracted a nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection. Risk of death was significantly increased per month following a diagnosis of PJP (hazard ratio [HR], 72.41 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 13.67-533.70]) or NTM (HR, 29.09 [95% CI, 9.51-88.79]). Increased odds for death were also observed in patients with a history of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation (odds ratio [OR], 12.10 [95% CI, 1.29-114.80]) but not in patients with VZV (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, .30-2.59]). Prophylaxis for PJP (IR, 0.001 vs 0 per person-day, P < .01) and VZV (IR, 0.006 vs 0 per person-day, P = .04) markedly decreased infection rates with a number needed to treat of 4 and 7, respectively. Conclusions: Opportunistic infections are common in patients with VEXAS. Patients who develop PJP, HSV, or NTM are at increased risk for death. Prophylaxis against PJP and VZV is highly effective.

Immune-monitoring of myelodysplastic neoplasms: Recommendations from the i4MDS consortium.

Advancements in comprehending myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfolded significantly in recent years, elucidating a myriad of cellular and molecular underpinnings integral to disease progression. While molecular inclusions into prognostic models have substantively advanced risk stratification, recent revelations have emphasized the pivotal role of immune dysregulation within the bone marrow milieu during MDS evolution. Nonetheless, immunotherapy for MDS has not experienced breakthroughs seen in other malignancies, partly attributable to the absence of an immune classification that could stratify patients toward optimally targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. A pivotal obstacle to establishing "immune classes" among MDS patients is the absence of validated accepted immune panels suitable for routine application in clinical laboratories. In response, we formed International Integrative Innovative Immunology for MDS (i4MDS), a consortium of multidisciplinary experts, and created the following recommendations for standardized methodologies to monitor immune responses in MDS. A central goal of i4MDS is the development of an immune score that could be incorporated into current clinical risk stratification models. This position paper first consolidates current knowledge on MDS immunology. Subsequently, in collaboration with clinical and laboratory specialists, we introduce flow cytometry panels and cytokine assays, meticulously devised for clinical laboratories, aiming to monitor the immune status of MDS patients, evaluating both immune fitness and identifying potential immune "risk factors." By amalgamating this immunological characterization data and molecular data, we aim to enhance patient stratification, identify predictive markers for treatment responsiveness, and accelerate the development of systems immunology tools and innovative immunotherapies.