The animal naming test: An easy tool for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Screening for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) that does not cause obvious disorientation or asterixis (minimal HE [MHE]/grade 1 HE) is important. We examined if the animal naming test (ANT1 ) (maximum number of animals listed in 1 minute) is useful in this context. In total, 208 healthy controls, 40 controls with inflammatory bowel disease, and 327 consecutive patients with cirrhosis underwent the ANT1 . Patients were tested for MHE by the psychometric HE score, and 146 were assessed by electroencephalography; 202 patients were followed up regarding the occurrence of overt HE and death. In the healthy controls, ANT1 was influenced by limited education (<8 years) and advanced age (>80 years, P < 0.001). Using an age and education adjusting procedure, the simplified ANT1 (S-ANT1 ) was obtained. An S-ANT1 of <10 animals was abnormal. Of the patients, 169 were considered unimpaired, 32 as having HE ≥grade 2, and 126 as having MHE/grade 1 HE. This group had lower S-ANT1 than unimpaired patients (12 ± 0.4 versus 16 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and higher S-ANT1 than those with HE ≥grade 2 (4 ± 0.9). In grade 1 HE the S-ANT1 was lower than in MHE. Following receiver operating characteristic analysis (Youden's index), 15 animals produced the best discrimination between unimpaired and MHE/grade 1 HE patients. Thus, a three-level score (0 for S-ANT1 ≥15, 1 for 10 ≤ S-ANT1 < 15, 2 for S-ANT1 <10) was obtained. This score was correlated both to the psychometric HE score (P < 0.0001) and to electroencephalography (P = 0.007). By sample random split validation, both S-ANT1 and its three-level score showed prognostic value regarding the 1-year risk of overt HE and death. No inflammatory bowel disease control had S-ANT <15. CONCLUSION: The S-ANT1 is an easily obtainable measure useful for the assessment of HE. (Hepatology 2017;66:198-208).

Cognitive Impairment Predicts The Occurrence Of Hepatic Encephalopathy After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major problem in patients treated with TIPS. The aim of the study was to establish whether pre-TIPS covert HE is an independent risk factor for the development of HE after TIPS. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive cirrhotic patients submitted to TIPS were included. All patients underwent the PHES to identify those affected by covert HE before a TIPS. The incidence of the first episode of HE was estimated, taking into account the nature of the competing risks in the data (death or liver transplantation). RESULTS: Thirty-five (43%) patients developed overt HE. The difference of post-TIPS HE was highly significant (P=0.0003) among patients with or without covert HE before a TIPS. Seventy-seven percent of patients with post-TIPS HE were classified as affected by covert HE before TIPS. Age: (sHR 1.05, CI 1.02-1.08, P=0.002); Child-Pugh score: (sHR 1.29, CI 1.06-1.56, P=0.01); and covert HE: (sHR 3.16, CI: 1.43-6.99 P=0.004) were associated with post-TIPS HE. Taking into consideration only the results of PHES evaluation, the negative predicting value was 0.80 for all patients and 0.88 for the patients submitted to TIPS because of refractory ascites. Thus, a patient with refractory ascites, without covert HE before a TIPS, has almost 90% probability of being free of HE after TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: Psychometric evaluation before TIPS is able to identify most of the patients who will develop HE after a TIPS and can be used to select patients in order to have the lowest incidence of this important complication.

No effect of albumin infusion on the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major problem in patients submitted to TIPS. Previous studies identified low albumin as a factor associated to post-TIPS HE. In cirrhotics with diuretic-induced HE and hypovolemia, albumin infusion reduced plasma ammonia and improved HE. Our aim was to evaluate if the incidence of overt HE (grade II or more according to WH) and the modifications of venous blood ammonia and psychometric tests during the first month after TIPS can be prevented by albumin infusion. Twenty-three patients consecutively submitted to TIPS were enrolled and treated with 1 g/Kg BW of albumin for the first 2 days after TIPS followed by 0,5 g/Kg BW at day 4th and 7th and then once a week for 3 weeks. Forty-five patients included in a previous RCT (Riggio et al. 2010) followed with the same protocol and submitted to no pharmacological treatment for the prevention of HE, were used as historical controls. No differences in the incidence of overt HE were observed between the group of patients treated with albumin and historical controls during the first month (34 vs 31 %) or during the follow-up (39 vs 48 %). Two patients in the albumin group and three in historical controls needed the reduction of the stent diameter for persistent HE. Venous blood ammonia levels and psychometric tests were also similarly modified in the two groups. Survival was also similar. Albumin infusion has not a role in the prevention of post-TIPS HE.

A Model for Predicting Development of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) affects patients' quantity and quality of life and places a burden on families. There is evidence that overt HE might be prevented pharmacologically, but prophylaxis would be justified and cost effective only for patients at risk. We aimed to identify patients with cirrhosis at risk for overt HE. METHODS: We collected data from October 2009 through December 2012 for 216 consecutive patients with cirrhosis (based on liver biopsy, 96 patients with minimal HE), admitted to the Gastroenterology Unit at the University of Rome. Patients were followed up and evaluated for an average of 14.7 ± 11.6 months; development of overt HE was recorded. We analyzed end-stage liver disease scores, shunt placement, previous overt or minimal HE, psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), and levels of albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, and sodium to develop a prediction model. We validated the model in 112 patients with cirrhosis seen at the University of Padua and followed up for 12 ± 9.5 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 68 patients (32%) developed at least 1 episode of overt HE. Based on multivariate analysis, the development of overt HE was associated with previous HE, minimal HE (based on PHES), and level of albumin less than 3.5 g/dL (area under curve [AUC], 0.74). A model that excluded minimal HE but included albumin level and previous HE also identified patients who would develop overt HE (AUC, 0.71); this difference in AUC values was not statistically significant (P = .104). Both models were validated in the independent group of patients (3 variables: AUC, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.83; and 2 variables: AUC, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a model to identify patients with cirrhosis at risk for overt HE based on previous HE, albumin levels, and PHES. If PHES was not available, previous HE and albumin levels still can identify patients at risk. Psychometric evaluation is essential for patients with no history of HE. These findings should aid in planning studies of pharmacologic prevention of overt HE.

Increased risk of cognitive impairment in cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A causal relationship between infection, systemic inflammation, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has been suggested in cirrhosis. No study, however, has specifically examined, in cirrhotic patients with infection, the complete pattern of clinical and subclinical cognitive alterations and its reversibility after resolution. Our investigation was aimed at describing the characteristics of cognitive impairment in hospitalized cirrhotic patients, in comparison with patients without liver disease, with and without infection. METHODS: One hundred and fifty cirrhotic patients were prospectively enrolled. Eighty-one patients without liver disease constituted the control group. Bacterial infections and sepsis were actively searched in all patients independently of their clinical evidence at entry. Neurological and psychometric assessment was performed at admission and in case of nosocomial infection. The patients were re-evaluated after the resolution of the infection and 3months later. RESULTS: Cognitive impairment (overt or subclinical) was recorded in 42% of cirrhotics without infection, in 79% with infection without SIRS and in 90% with sepsis. The impairment was only subclinical in controls and occurred only in patients with sepsis (42%). Multivariate analysis selected infection as the only independent predictor of cognitive impairment (OR 9.5; 95% CI 3.5-26.2; p=0.00001) in cirrhosis. The subclinical alterations detected by psychometric tests were also strongly related to the infectious episode and reversible after its resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Infections are associated with a worse cognitive impairment in cirrhotics compared to patients without liver disease. The search and treatment of infections are crucial to ameliorate both clinical and subclinical cognitive impairment of cirrhotic patients.

Depression, anxiety and alexithymia symptoms are major determinants of health related quality of life (HRQoL) in cirrhotic patients.

HRQoL is impaired in cirrhosis. Establishing the relevance of depression, anxiety, alexithymia and cirrhosis stage on the patients' HRQoL. Sixty cirrhotics underwent a neuropsychological assessment, including ZUNG-SDS, STAI Y1-Y2 and TAS-20. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) was detected by PHES, HRQoL by Short-Form-36 (SF-36). Depression was detected in 34 patients (57 %, 95%CI = 44-70 %), state-anxiety in 16 (27 %, 95%CI = 15-38 %), trait-anxiety in 17 (28 %, 95%CI = 17-40 %), alexithymia in 14 (31 % 95%CI = 16-46 %) and MHE in 22 (37 %, 95%CI = 24-49 %). Neuropsychological symptoms were unrelated to cirrhosis stage, hepatocellular carcinoma or MHE. A significant correlation was observed among psychological test scores and summary components of SF-36. At multiple linear regression analysis including Child-Pugh and MELD scores, previous-HE and the psychological test scores as possible covariates, alexithymia and depression as well as to the Child-Pugh score were significantly related to the SF-36 mental component; while trait-anxiety was the only variable significantly and independently related to the SF-36 physical component. Depression, state and trait-anxiety and alexithymia symptoms are frequent in cirrhotics and are among the major determinants of the altered HRQoL.

Muscle depletion increases the risk of overt and minimal hepatic encephalopathy: results of a prospective study.

Muscle depletion is frequently encountered in cirrhotic patients. As muscle may represents an alternative site of ammonia detoxification in liver diseases, our study was aimed at investigating whether a decrease in muscle mass or function may independently influence the prevalence of neurocognitive alterations in cirrhosis. Three-hundred consecutive hospitalized cirrhotic patients were prospectively enrolled. Liver function, a complete neurocognitive assessment for the diagnosis of clinical or subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and parameters of nutritional status and muscle function were evaluated in each patient at admission. Clinically overt HE, at admission or in the last 12 months, or a diagnosis of minimal HE were significantly higher in cirrhotic patients with muscle depletion or decreased muscle strength. The fasting venous blood ammonia concentrations were also higher in this group. Muscle depletion was an independent risk factor at multivariate analysis both for overt and minimal HE. In conclusion cirrhotic patients with muscle depletion are at higher risk of HE and the amelioration of nutritional status is a possible goal to decrease the prevalence of neurocognitive alterations in these patients.

A Case of Gastroallergic and Intestinal Anisakiasis in Italy: Diagnosis Based on Double Endoscopy and Molecular Identification.

Nematodes of the genus Anisakis (Rhabditida, Anisakidae) are zoonotic fish-borne parasites and cause anisakiasis, a disease with mild to severe acute or chronic gastrointestinal and allergic symptoms and signs. Anisakiasis can potentially lead to misdiagnosis or delay in diagnosis, and it has been suggested as a risk factor for gastrointestinal tumors. Here, we describe a case report of a 25-year-old woman who presented with gastrointestinal (abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea) and allergic (diffuse skin rash) symptoms and reported ingestion of raw fish contaminated by worms. Gastro and colon endoscopy allowed the visualization and removal of nematodes and collection of bioptic tissue from ulcers and polyps. The removed nematodes were molecularly identified as Anisakis pegreffii. The patient was treated with chlorphenamine maleate, betamethasone, omeprazole, paracetamol, albendazole. We conclude that an upper endoscopy matched with a colonoscopy and molecular characterization of the pathogen yields the most reliable diagnosis and treatment for human anisakiasis, enabling the complete removal of the larvae and preventing chronic inflammation and damage.

Evidence of persistent cognitive impairment after resolution of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Inhibitory Control Test has been proposed as a tool to detect the persistence of cognitive defects after the resolution of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). We tested learning abilities of cirrhotic patients using the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES). METHODS: One hundred six cirrhotic patients who agreed to be examined twice within 3 days were studied using the PHES. Twenty-seven patients had previous OHE; of the remaining 79 patients, 34 were affected by minimal HE and 45 were normal. RESULTS: Among patients without previous OHE, PHESs significantly improved at the second examination; this learning effect was present in the patients with or without minimal HE. To the contrary, learning ability was lost in patients with previous OHE. Even among the 8 patients with history of HE and normal PHESs in the first examination, repeated testing showed a lack of learning capacity. CONCLUSIONS: HE is not a fully reversible condition. Residual cognitive impairments should be evaluated by specific tests, based on patients' learning capacities.

A simplified psychometric evaluation for the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), which includes 5 psychometric tests, is a standard for the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE). We investigated whether a simplified PHES (SPHES) is as useful as the whole PHES. METHODS: The PHES was determined for 79 cirrhotic patients (the training group), who were followed up for the development of overt HE. Backward logistic regression was performed by eliminating stepwise variables--removal did not impair regression. A separate series of 65 patients was used as a validation group. RESULTS: The PHES was abnormal in 45 patients. The SPHES, determined from the digit symbol, serial dotting, and line tracing tests, did not differ significantly from the full PHES; 24 of the 79 patients developed overt HE. The likelihood of developing overt HE was higher among patients with an abnormal PHES (log-rank P = .003) or SPHES (P = .004). By using Cox regression and model for end-stage liver disease scores to analyze data from patients with previous HE and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, PHES (relative risk, 4.16; P = .003) and SPHES (relative risk, 3.70; P = .004) were the only variables associated with the development of overt HE. The accuracy of the SPHES was confirmed in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified PHES is as good as the PHES in diagnosing minimal HE and in predicting the occurrence of overt HE.

Improving the inhibitory control task to detect minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Quantification of the number of noninhibited responses (lures) in the inhibitory control task (ICT) has been proposed for the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). We assessed the efficacy of ICT compared with recommended diagnostic standards. METHODS: We studied patients with cirrhosis and healthy individuals (controls) who underwent the ICT at 2 centers (center A: n=51 patients and 41 controls, center B: n=24 patients and 14 controls). Subjects were evaluated for MHE by psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). Patients from center B also were assessed for MHE by critical flicker frequency and spectral electroencephalogram analyses. RESULTS: Patients with cirrhosis had higher ICT lures (23.2+/-12.8 vs 12.9+/-5.8, respectively, P<.01) and lower ICT target accuracy (0.88+/-0.17 vs 0.96+/-0.03, respectively, P<.01) compared with controls. However, lures were comparable (25.2+/-12.5 vs 21.4+/-13.9, respectively, P=.32) among patients with/without altered PHES (center A). There was a reverse, U-shaped relationship between ICT lure and target accuracy; a variable adjusting lures was devised based on target accuracy (weighted lures at center B). This variable differed between patients with and without MHE. The variable weighted lures was then validated from data collected at center A by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis; it discriminated between patients with and without PHES alterations (area under the curve=0.71+/-0.07). However, target accuracy alone was as effective as a stand-alone variable (area under the curve=0.81+/-0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The ICT is not useful for the diagnosis of MHE, unless adjusted by target accuracy. Testing inhibition (lures) does not seem to be superior to testing attention (target accuracy) for the detection of MHE.

Previous overt hepatic encephalopathy rather than minimal hepatic encephalopathy impairs health-related quality of life in cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been observed that overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is accompanied by a persistent cognitive defect, suggesting that HE may not be fully reversible. The health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) has been shown to be impaired by cirrhosis, and, according to some reports, influenced by minimal HE. Little is known about the effect of previous HE on HRQoL. AIM: To investigate the relative impact of previous HE and minimal HE on HRQoL in a group of consecutively hospitalized cirrhotic patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: Seventy five consecutive cirrhotic patients were evaluated using the Psychometric HE Score (PHES) and simplified Psychometric HE Score (SPHES) to detect the presence of minimal HE and using SF-36 to assess the HRQoL, both corrected for age and education. Eighteen of them had previous bouts of overt HE. RESULTS: Minimal HE was significantly more frequent in patients with previous HE than in those without (p < 0.001), independently on the method used for the diagnosis (PHES or SPHES). A deeper impairment in several domains of SF-36 was observed in patients with previous bouts of overt HE, in those with ascites, as well as in those with decompensated cirrhosis. At multivariate analysis, ascites, MELD score and previous HE were independently related to the mental-component-summary (MCS) of SF-36, whereas ascites was the only variable independently associated with the physical-component-summary (PCS) of SF-36. Minimal HE (independently on the method used for its diagnosis) impaired only one domain of SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that previous bouts of HE, despite their complete clinical resolution, play an independent role in producing a persistent impairment in HRQoL of cirrhotics.

Natural history of patients with non cirrhotic portal hypertension: Comparison with patients with compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The knowledge of natural history of patients with portal hypertension (PH) not due to cirrhosis is less well known than that of cirrhotic patients. AIM: To describe the clinical presentation and the outcomes of 89 patients with non-cirrhotic PH (25 with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, INCPH, and 64 with chronic portal vein thrombosis, PVT) in comparison with 77 patients with Child A cirrhosis. METHODS: The patients were submitted to a standardized clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic and endoscopic follow-up. Variceal progression, incidence of variceal bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, ascites and survival were recorded. RESULTS: At presentation, the prevalence of varices, variceal bleeding and ascites was similar in the 3 groups. During follow-up, the rate of progression to varices at risk of bleeding (p < 0.0001) and the incidence of first variceal bleeding (p = 0.02) were significantly higher in non-cirrhotic then in cirrhotic patients. A PVT developed in 32% of INCPH patients and in 18% of cirrhotics (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with non-cirrhotic PH variceal progression is more rapid and bleeding more frequent than in cirrhotics. Patients with INCPH are particularly prompt to develop PVT. This observational study suggests that the management of patients with non-cirrhotic PH should take into consideration the natural history of portal hypertension in these patients and cannot be simply derived by the observation of cirrhotic patients.

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension: current perspectives.

The term idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) has been recently proposed to replace terms, such as hepatoportal sclerosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, incomplete septal cirrhosis, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia, used to describe patients with a hepatic presinusoidal cause of portal hypertension of unknown etiology, characterized by features of portal hypertension (esophageal varices, nonmalignant ascites, porto-venous collaterals), splenomegaly, patent portal, and hepatic veins and no clinical and histological signs of cirrhosis. Physicians should learn to look for this condition in a number of clinical settings, including cryptogenic cirrhosis, a disease known to be associated with INCPH, drug administration, and even chronic alterations in liver function tests. Once INCPH is clinically suspected, liver histology becomes mandatory for the correct diagnosis. However, pathologists should be familiar with the histological features of INCPH, especially in cases in which histology is not only requested to exclude liver cirrhosis.

Hepatic encephalopathy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: Description, prevalence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of cirrhosis but it is less studied in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). AIMS: To describe the prevalence of cognitive impairment (overt and covert HE) in NCPH patients and to identify the risk factors for its development. METHODS: 51 patients with NCPH, 35 with chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and 16 with idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH), were evaluated for the presence of previous or present overt HE (OHE). The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score and the SCAN battery were used to detect the presence of covert HE (CHE). 34 compensated cirrhotic patients were used as control. In NCPH patients, abdominal scans were performed to detect the presence of shunts. RESULTS: None of the patients experienced OHE at evaluation while 5.7% of PVT and 12.5% of INCPH patients referred at least one documented episode of previous OHE, similarly to patients with cirrhosis (14.7%). Even if lower than in patients with cirrhosis (64.7%), a considerable proportion of patients with chronic PVT (34.3%) and INCPH (25%) had CHE (p=0.008). The presence of a large portal-systemic shunt was the only factor significantly correlated to cognitive impairment in NCPH patients. CONCLUSION: HE is a tangible complication of NCPH and is mainly related to the presence of portal-systemic shunts.

Idiopathic non cirrhotic portal hypertension and spleno-portal axis abnormalities in patients with severe primary antibody deficiencies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Portal hypertension has been reported in association with acquired and primary immune deficiencies without a comprehensive description of associated spleno-portal axis abnormalities. Pathological mechanisms are poorly defined. METHODS: Observational, single centre study with the aim of assessing the prevalence of spleno-portal axis abnormalities in an unselected cohort of 123 patients with primary antibody deficiencies and without known causes of liver diseases regularly followed up for a mean time of 18 ± 14 years. A cumulative period of 1867 patients-year was analysed. Clinical and immunological data, abdominal ultrasounds, CT scans, and endoscopy features were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of patients with primary antibody deficiencies had signs of portal vein enlargement but only 4% of them had portal hypertension, with portal systemic collaterals. Liver biopsies showed liver sinusoids congestive dilatation, endothelization, and micronodularity fulfilling the criteria for noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Patients with portal vein enlargement had severe clinical and immunological phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In primary antibody deficient patients, infections, inflammations, splenomegaly, increased blood venous flow, and lymphocyte abnormalities contribute to establishment of liver damage possibly leading to noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Patients with primary antibody deficiency should be considered a good model to give insight into the pathological mechanisms underlying noncirrhotic portal hypertension.