Onconephrology: The intersections between the kidney and cancer.

Onconephrology is a new subspecialty of nephrology that recognizes the important intersections of kidney disease with cancer. This intersection takes many forms and includes drug-induced nephrotoxicity, electrolyte disorders, paraneoplastic glomerulonephritis, and the interactions of chronic kidney disease with cancer. Data clearly demonstrate that, when patients with cancer develop acute or chronic kidney disease, outcomes are inferior, and the promise of curative therapeutic regimens is lessened. This highlights the imperative for collaborative care between oncologists and nephrologists in recognizing and treating kidney disease in patients with cancer. In response to this need, specific training programs in onconephrology as well as dedicated onconephrology clinics have appeared. This comprehensive review covers many of the critical topics in onconephrology, with a focus on acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, drug-induced nephrotoxicity, kidney disease in stem cell transplantation, and electrolyte disorders in patients with cancer.

Toxic Nephropathies of the Tubulointerstitium: Core Curriculum 2024.

Toxic nephropathies are a clinically common group of disorders characterized by toxin-induced renal injury that can affect the glomerulus, vasculature, or tubulointerstitium. Various endogenous (eg, myoglobin, hemoglobin, monoclonal light chains, and lysozymes) and exogenous toxins (eg, therapeutic drugs, herbal medications, heavy metals, radiocontrast, intoxicants, and environmental exposures) have been implicated. The kidney's primary role of metabolism and excretion of substances via glomerular filtration and tubular secretion increases its susceptibility to their adverse effects. The structure, dose, metabolic handling, and excretory pathway of the drug/toxin through the kidney determines its nephrotoxic risk. Patient characteristics that impact risk include genetic determinants of drug metabolism, transport and excretion, immune response genes, and comorbid conditions. Clinical manifestations depend on site and severity of renal injury. Toxin-induced tubulointerstitial injury often presents as a decline in renal function and/or solute transport defects and renal solute wasting. Injury is often reversible with limited toxin exposure; however, irreversible renal injury can occur with prolonged exposure. In this Core Curriculum, we will focus on discussing mechanisms of common toxin-induced tubulointerstitial renal injury and review their causes, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management.

Development and external validation of a diagnostic model for biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis using electronic health record data.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) can present without typical clinical features, leading to a delay in diagnosis and treatment. We therefore developed and validated a diagnostic model to identify patients at risk of AIN using variables from the electronic health record. METHODS: In patients who underwent a kidney biopsy at Yale University between 2013 and 2018, we tested the association of >150 variables with AIN, including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs and laboratory tests (training set 70%). We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methodology to select prebiopsy features associated with AIN. We performed area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis with internal (held-out test set 30%) and external validation (Biopsy Biobank Cohort of Indiana). We tested the change in model performance after the addition of urine biomarkers in the Yale AIN study. RESULTS: We included 393 patients (AIN 22%) in the training set, 158 patients (AIN 27%) in the test set, 1118 patients (AIN 11%) in the validation set and 265 patients (AIN 11%) in the Yale AIN study. Variables in the selected model included serum creatinine {adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-3.76]}, blood urea nitrogen:creatinine ratio [aOR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.78)] and urine dipstick specific gravity [aOR 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99)] and protein [aOR 0.39 (95% CI 0.23-0.68)]. This model showed an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.81) in the test set, which was similar to the AUC in the external validation cohort [0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.79)]. The AUC improved to 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.91) upon the addition of urine interleukin-9 and tumor necrosis factor-α. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a statistical model that showed a modest AUC for AIN diagnosis, which improved upon the addition of urine biomarkers. Future studies could evaluate this model and biomarkers to identify unrecognized cases of AIN.

Use of Intravenous Gadolinium-based Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation.

Inaugural consensus statements were developed and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Kidney Foundation to improve and standardize the care of patients with kidney disease who have indication(s) to receive ACR-designated group II or group III intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM). The risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) from group II GBCM in patients with advanced kidney disease is thought to be very low (zero events following 4931 administrations to patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2; upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals: 0.07% overall, 0.2% for stage 5D chronic kidney disease [CKD], 0.5% for stage 5 CKD and no dialysis). No unconfounded cases of NSF have been reported for the only available group III GBCM (gadoxetate disodium). Depending on the clinical indication, the potential harms of delaying or withholding group II or group III GBCM for an MRI in a patient with acute kidney injury or eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 should be balanced against and may outweigh the risk of NSF. Dialysis initiation or alteration is likely unnecessary based on group II or group III GBCM administration. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and Kidney Medicine. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article.

Urine interleukin-9 and tumor necrosis factor-α for prognosis of human acute interstitial nephritis.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that urine interleukin (IL)-9 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α can distinguish acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) from other causes of acute kidney injury. Here we evaluated the role of these biomarkers to prognosticate kidney function in patients with AIN. METHODS: In a cohort of participants with biopsy-proven, adjudicated AIN, we tested the association of histological features and urine biomarkers (IL-9 and TNF-α) with estimated glomerular filtration rate measured 6 months after diagnosis (6 m-eGFR) controlling for eGFR before AIN and albuminuria. We also evaluated subgroups in whom corticosteroid use was associated with 6 m-eGFR. RESULTS: In the 51 (93%) of the 55 participants with complete data, median (interquartile range) eGFR before and 6 m after AIN were 41 (27-69) and 28 (13-47) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Patients with higher severity of interstitial fibrosis had lower 6 m-eGFR, whereas those with higher tubulointerstitial infiltrate had higher 6 m-eGFR. IL-9 levels were associated with lower 6 m-eGFR only in the subset of patients who did not receive corticosteroids [6m-eGFR per doubling of IL-9, -6.0 (-9.4 to -2.6) mL/min/1.73 m2]. Corticosteroid use was associated with higher 6 m-eGFR [20.9 (0.2, 41.6) mL/min/1.73 m2] only in those with urine IL-9 above the median (>0.66 ng/g) but not in others. CONCLUSIONS: Urine IL-9 was associated with lower 6 m-eGFR only in participants not treated with corticosteroids. Corticosteroid use was associated with higher 6 m-eGFR in those with high urine IL-9. These findings provide a framework for IL-9-guided clinical trials to test efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with AIN.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity: what do we know and what should we do?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically improved cancer therapy for many patients. These humanized monoclonal antibodies against various immune checkpoints (receptors and ligands) effectively treat a number of malignancies by unleashing the immune system to destroy cancer cells. These drugs are not excreted by the kidneys or liver, have a long half-life, and undergo receptor-mediated clearance. Although these agents have greatly improved the prognosis of many cancers, immune-related end organ injury is a complication that has come to light in clinical practice. Although less common than other organ involvement, kidney lesions resulting in acute kidney injury and/or proteinuria are being described. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis is the most common lesion seen on kidney biopsy, while acute tubular injury and glomerular lesions occur less commonly. Clinical findings and laboratory tests are suboptimal in predicting the underlying renal lesion, making kidney biopsy necessary in the majority of cases to definitely diagnose the lesion and potentially guide therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation and corticosteroid therapy are recommended for acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. Based on a handful of cases, re-exposure to these drugs in patients who previously developed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis has been mixed. Although it is unclear whether re-exposure is appropriate, it should perhaps be considered in patients with limited options. When this approach is taken, patients should be closely monitored for recurrence of acute kidney injury. Treatment of cancer in patients with a kidney transplant with immune checkpoint inhibitors risks the development of acute rejection in some patients and requires close surveillance.

Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference.

The worldwide burden of kidney disease is rising, but public awareness remains limited, underscoring the need for more effective communication by stakeholders in the kidney health community. Despite this need for clarity, the nomenclature for describing kidney function and disease lacks uniformity. In June 2019, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened a Consensus Conference with the goal of standardizing and refining the nomenclature used in the English language to describe kidney function and disease, and of developing a glossary that could be used in scientific publications. Guiding principles of the conference were that the revised nomenclature should be patient-centered, precise, and consistent with nomenclature used in the KDIGO guidelines. Conference attendees reached general consensus on the following recommendations: (i) to use "kidney" rather than "renal" or "nephro-" when referring to kidney disease and kidney function; (ii) to use "kidney failure" with appropriate descriptions of presence or absence of symptoms, signs, and treatment, rather than "end-stage kidney disease"; (iii) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of acute kidney diseases and disorders (AKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI), rather than alternative descriptions, to define and classify severity of AKD and AKI; (iv) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) rather than alternative descriptions to define and classify severity of CKD; and (v) to use specific kidney measures, such as albuminuria or decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), rather than "abnormal" or "reduced" kidney function to describe alterations in kidney structure and function. A proposed 5-part glossary contains specific items for which there was general agreement. Conference attendees acknowledged limitations of the recommendations and glossary, but they considered standardization of scientific nomenclature to be essential for improving communication.

Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation.

Intravenous iodinated contrast media are commonly used with CT to evaluate disease and to determine treatment response. The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) developing in patients with reduced kidney function following exposure to intravenous iodinated contrast media has been overstated. This is due primarily to historic lack of control groups sufficient to separate contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI; ie, AKI caused by contrast media administration) from contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI; ie, AKI coincident to contrast media administration). Although the true risk of CI-AKI remains uncertain for patients with severe kidney disease, prophylaxis with intravenous normal saline is indicated for patients who have AKI or an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 who are not undergoing maintenance dialysis. In individual high-risk circumstances, prophylaxis may be considered in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the discretion of the ordering clinician. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and Kidney Medicine. The articles are identical except for stylistic changes in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article.

NSAIDs in CKD: Are They Safe?

The management of pain in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging for many reasons. These patients have increased susceptibility to adverse drug effects due to altered drug metabolism and excretion, and there are limited safety data for use in this population despite a high pain burden. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have long been regarded as dangerous for use in patients with CKD because of their risk for nephrotoxicity and thus alternative classes of analgesics, including opioids, have become more commonly used for pain control in this population. Given the well-established risks that opioids and other analgesics pose, further characterization of the risk posed by NSAIDs in patients with CKD is warranted. NSAID use has been associated with acute kidney injury, progressive loss of glomerular filtration rate in CKD, electrolyte derangements, and hypervolemia with worsening of heart failure and hypertension. The risk for these nephrotoxicity syndromes is modified by many comorbid conditions, risk factors, and characteristics of use, and in patients with CKD, the risk differs between levels of glomerular filtration rate. In this review, we offer recommendations for the cautious use of NSAIDs in the CKD population after careful consideration of these risk factors on an individualized basis.

Summary of the International Conference on Onco-Nephrology: an emerging field in medicine.

Onco-nephrology is an emerging field in medicine. Patients with cancer may suffer from kidney diseases because of the cancer itself and cancer-related therapy. It is critical for nephrologists to be knowledgeable of cancer biology and therapy in order to be fully integrated in the multidisciplinary team and optimally manage patients with cancer and kidney diseases. In a recent international meeting, the key issues in this challenging clinical interface were addressed, including many unresolved basic science questions, such as the high tumor incidence in kidney transplant recipients. To this end, 70 highly qualified faculty members were gathered from all over the world to discuss these issues in 8 plenary sessions, including 5 keynote lectures. In addition, 48 young nephrologists and oncologists were invited to present their original observations that were highlighted in 2 large poster sessions.

Urine Sediment Examination in the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Disease: Core Curriculum 2019.

Automated urine technology and centralized laboratory testing are becoming the standard for providing urinalysis data to clinicians, including nephrologists. This trend has had the unintended consequence of making examination of urine sediment by nephrologists a relatively rare event. In addition, the nephrology community appears to have lost interest in and forgotten the utility of provider-performed urine microscopy. However, it is critical to remember that urine sediment examination remains a time-honored test that provides a wealth of information about the patient's underlying kidney disease. This test performs very favorably as a urinary "biomarker" for a number of acute kidney diseases. When used properly, urine sediment findings alert health care providers to the presence of kidney disease, while also providing diagnostic information that often identifies the compartment of kidney injury. Urine sediment findings may also guide therapy and assist in prognostication. In this review of the role of urine sediment examination in the diagnosis and management of kidney disease, we seek to help experienced nephrologists maintain their competency in performing this test and encourage ongoing training of nephrology fellows and others less experienced in such analyses.

Drug-induced acute kidney injury: diverse mechanisms of tubular injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medications are a relatively common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in hospitalized patients who are exposed to numerous agents. Drug-related acute tubular/tubulointerstitial injury is the most common cause of AKI associated with these agents. Toxic effects of drugs and their renal handling often lead to various forms of AKI. RECENT FINDINGS: The inherent nephrotoxicity of drugs and their transport and metabolism by the kidneys play an important role in the occurrence of acute tubular injury. Apical transport of the aminoglycosides by endocytosis and apical pinocytosis of filtered hydroxyethyl starch into cells lead to acute tubular dysfunction. Transport of tenofovir and cisplatin by organic anion and cation transporters in the basolateral surface of the proximal tubule, respectively, are associated with intracellular drug accumulation and injury. Intratubular deposition of drug crystals with associated AKI occurs with several drugs, in particular the anticancer agent methotrexate. A potentially new mechanism of drug-induced AKI was described with vancomycin - acute vancomycin-related cast nephropathy. Immune-mediated acute tubulointerstitial injury is another cause of drug-induced AKI, as seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors. SUMMARY: Drugs lead to AKI through mechanisms that involve their inherent toxicity as well as their transport and handling by the kidneys.

Telavancin-associated acute kidney injury
.

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide semi-synthetic derivative of vancomycin used for select infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus. Human clinical trials suggest that telavancin is potentially nephrotoxic, however there is no histopathologic description of acute kidney injury (AKI) in humans. An animal model has recently characterized the histologic changes associated with telavancin-induced AKI as proximal tubular injury with numerous phagolysosomes. We present a case of a 47-year-old man with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with telavancin, who developed AKI after 5 weeks of intravenous therapy. Acute tubular injury with lysosomal proliferation and acute interstitial nephritis were observed on kidney biopsy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of AKI due to telavancin that has documented kidney histopathology.
.

Utility of a urine sediment score in hyperbilirubinemia/hyperbilirubinuria
.

AIMS: Acute and chronic kidney dysfunction is common in patients with end-stage liver disease. Differentiation between acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) remains difficult, however urine cast scoring systems using renal tubular epithelial cells (RTECs) and granular casts (GCs) can help to identify intrinsic kidney diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the urine sediment profile of patients with liver disease and hyperbilirubinemia/hyperbilirubinuria and the use of a urine sediment scoring system to identify the most common score in AKI patients and high urine bilirubin concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study in the database of a large laboratory that assists a hospital-complex in Brazil was performed. RESULTS: Urinary casts, in particular GCs, as well as RTECs were observed more frequently in patients with hyperbilirubinemia/hyperbilirubinuria, while hyaline casts were observed in patients without hyperbilirubinemia/hyperbilirubinuria. Regardless of the AKI or non-AKI condition, the relative risk for scores 2 or 3 (sediment consistent with tubular damage, with GCs and/or RTECs in different quantities) in group 4 was 3.61 times higher compared to patients in group 1. CONCLUSION: In patients with higher urinary bilirubin levels, the urine sediment had greater numbers of GCs and RTECs and higher urine sediment scores (scores 2 or 3). The presence of a larger number of urine particles (RTECs and GCs) originating in the kidneys in the groups with higher levels of urinary bilirubin suggests an association between hyperbilirubinemia/hyperbilirubinuria and tubular injury independent of AKI or non-AKI.

Nephrotoxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies: Past, Present and Future.

Nephrotoxicity from cancer therapies is common and increasingly encountered in clinical practice, such that the subfield of "onco-nephrology" has emerged. Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs and novel agents targeting specific genes/proteins are effective cancer therapies but suffer from a number of adverse kidney effects. An effective avenue of cancer treatment is immunotherapy, which uses drugs that augment immune system-mediated recognition and targeting of tumor cells. As such, leveraging the immune system to target malignant cells represents an important modality in eradicating cancer. IFN and high-dose IL-2 are older immunotherapies used in clinical practice to treat various malignancies, whereas new cancer immunotherapies have emerged over the past decade that offer even more effective treatment options. The immune checkpoint inhibitors are an exciting addition to the cancer immunotherapy armamentarium. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are also a new immunotherapy used to treat various hematologic malignancies. However, as with the conventional and targeted cancer agents, the immunotherapies are also associated with immune-related adverse effects, which includes nephrotoxicity.

Renal cell carcinoma for the nephrologist.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a malignancy whose incidence is increasing, is frequently encountered in general nephrology practice when acute and chronic kidney disease occurs in the course of disease. Importantly, when kidney disease develops in the setting of RCC, mortality is significantly increased with patients often dying of a non-cancer-related complication of kidney disease. As such, practicing nephrologists need to have a working knowledge of this cancer's biology, treatment, and complications. Nephrologists should be involved in all aspects of the care of patients with RCC including in the acute setting prior to nephrectomy and in the chronic setting for patients with post-nephrectomy chronic kidney disease and those receiving potentially nephrotoxic anti-cancer agents. This collaborative approach to RCC care will hopefully improve patient outcomes.

Opening an onconephrology clinic: recommendations and basic requirements.

Onconephrology is a rapidly evolving subspeciality that covers all areas of renal involvement in cancer patients. The complexity of the field may benefit from well-defined multidisciplinary management administered by a dedicated team. Since there is an increasing need to address the needs of this population in dedicated outpatient clinics, it is critical to highlight basic characteristics and to suggest areas of development. In this brief perspective article, we analyse the requirements of an onconephrology clinic in terms of logistics, critical mass of patients and building a multidisciplinary team. We will further discuss which patients to refer and which conditions to treat. The last part of the article is dedicated to education and performance indicators and to analysis of the potential advantages of applying the hub-and-spoke model to this field. The ultimate aim of this experience-based article is to initiate debate about what an onconephrology outpatient clinic might look like in order to ensure the highest quality of care for this growing population of patients.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cancer.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in cancer patients and occurs in up to 30% of patients during their disease course. Multiple myeloma, leukemia/lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are commonly associated with the development of AKI. Drugs used to treat various malignancies are also a common and notable cause of AKI in this population. Nephrology consultation is important to ensure proper and rapid diagnosis, as well as appropriate therapy and follow-up. In particular, knowledge of the nephrotoxicity of the various anticancer regimens employed is critical. This is a rapidly evolving area that requires continuous updating as new drugs are released into clinical practice and nephrotoxicity is observed.