Methods for studying medication safety following electronic health record implementation in acute care: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this scoping review is to map methods used to study medication safety following electronic health record (EHR) implementation. Patterns and methodological gaps can provide insight for future research design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and a custom data extraction table to summarize the following data: (1) study demographics (year, country, setting); (2) study design, study period, data sources, and measures; (3) analysis strategy; (4) identified limitations or recommendations; (5) quality appraisal; and (6) if a Safety-I or Safety-II perspective was employed. RESULTS: We screened 5879 articles. One hundred and fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria and were assessed for eligibility by full-text review. Twenty-seven articles were eligible for extraction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found little consistency in how medication safety following EHR implementation was studied. Three study designs, 7 study settings, and 10 data sources were used across 27 articles. None of the articles shared the same combination of design, data sources, study periods, and research settings. Outcome measures were neither defined nor measured consistently. It may be difficult for researchers to aggregate and synthesize medication safety findings following EHR implementation research. All studies but one used a Safety-I perspective to study medication safety. We offer a conceptual model to support a more consistent approach to studying medication safety following EHR implementation.

The second victim requires more than Medice Cura Te Ipsum.

Burnout has attained epidemic proportions in all reaches of society. Only recently, has its impact in healthcare become a burning platform. Second victim syndrome, a consequence of an unforeseen adverse event, often precipitated by an error, can lead to a post-traumatic stress-like reaction, that is unique to healthcare workers. Often, the second victim suffers in silence, forced to rely on resilience. Peer support has been demonstrated to be beneficial in assisting healthcare workers in recovering from both burnout and second victim syndrome. Institutions and organizations must be more influential and responsive in supporting physicians and other healthcare workers in need.

A Peer and Volunteer Program for Patients and Their Families in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Program Evaluation.

Introduction: Patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are at risk of developing long-term morbidities following recovery from their critical illness. One such health outcome is called post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). PICS in pediatrics may be mitigated by interventions that facilitate adjustment to the PICU setting. Methods: The PICU implemented a two-pronged Peer and Volunteer (P/V) Program to help: (a) families adjust to the PICU experience with the support of a peer mentor (PM); and (b) patients receive non-medical interaction from trained volunteers (V). We designed a mixed-methods program evaluation targeting perspectives and feedback from PICU families and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Results: All stakeholder groups agreed that the PICU P/V Program was a valuable resource for PICU patients and their families. HCPs reported that they lack both time and training to provide regular developmental care to patients. However, the P/V Program may influence both families' and HCP's confidence in their ability to offer non-medical interaction to children in the PICU. Discussion: Important initial and on-going strengths and barriers to successful implementation were identified, including the need to clarify roles and intervention scope. The program evaluation served as a change management strategy and also helped to identify both areas for improvement and strategies for on-going sustainability. HCP's exposure to the program and modeling by PMs may have helped HCPs to feel that it is within their job description and capacity to provide emotional support and guidance to families.

Optimizing preoperative requirements for outpatient cataract surgery at the Royal Alexandra Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preoperative testing for cataract surgery, implement stakeholder-driven change, and increase the number of patients who arrived for surgery with complete preoperative requirements, for the purpose of delivering safe, high-quality, and cost-effective care for patients. DESIGN: Quality improvement. PARTICIPANTS: Cataract surgery patients, health care staff in Ophthalmology Day Surgery, an Ophthalmology improvement team, the Clinical Section Heads of Ophthalmology and Anaesthesia, Quality Consultants, and members of the Quality Council participated in this study. METHODS: A lean quality improvement approach was used to define and build understanding of the problem. Between July and November 2016, a chart-based reporting system captured all patients who arrived for cataract surgery with expired or incomplete preoperative requirements. A cost analysis was completed, and evidence was reviewed to ensure alignment with best practice preoperative recommendations. RESULTS: On average, 25% (619/2451 over a 17-week period) of patients per day arrived at the Ophthalmology Day Surgery for cataract surgery with incomplete and/or expired physical history forms and ECGs. An improvement team worked to implement a radical improvement idea and relied on an existing questionnaire to ensure patient safety preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature, best practice guidelines, and a cost analysis, it was decided that patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in Edmonton Zone Hospitals under regional anaesthesia would no longer require physician history and physicals and ECGs. Elimination of the preoperative requirements for all but select high-risk patients meant that 100% of patients who arrived for cataract surgery would not have outstanding presurgery requirements.