Low hemoglobin predicts high-platelet reactivity and major cardiovascular ischemic events at long-term follow-up among ACS patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Reduced levels of hemoglobin (Hb) represent an established marker of impaired outcomes and increased cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease, challenging the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, while anemia has emerged as an independent predictor of suboptimal platelet inhibition in patients receiving clopidogrel, no study has so far evaluated the impact of Hb levels on high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) with ticagrelor and their prognostic consequences, that were the aim of the present study. METHODS: Patients on DAPT with ASA + Ticagrelor (90 mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by multiple electrode aggregometry. Suboptimal platelet inhibition (HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome [MI], target vessel revascularization) at longest available follow-up. RESULTS: We included 397 patients that were divided according to tertiles values of Hb (< 12.7, 12-7-14.09, ≥14.1 g/dl). Patients with lower Hb were older and displayed a more severe cardiovascular risk profile. Mean levels of platelet reactivity were enhanced in patients with lower Hb after stimulation with TRAP peptide (TRAP test, p = .03) and ADP (p = .02). Elevated platelet reactivity (HRPR) on Ticagrelor was more frequent among patients with reduced Hb (16.4% vs. 12% vs. 5.4%, p = .005, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 1.71[0.996;3.01], p = .056). At a mean follow-up of 820.9 ± 553.4 days, 21.4% of the patients experienced the primary composite endpoint, with a higher rate of events in patients with lower Hb (27.6% vs. 22.6% vs. 13.5%, p = .006, adjusted HR [95%CI] = 1.51[1.12; 2.03], p = .006), mainly driven by a higher rate of recurrent ACS. After correction for baseline differences lower Hb tertiles but not HRPR emerged as independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR [95%CI] = 0.98[0.50; 1.92], p = .95). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we demonstrated that among patients on DAPT with ASA and ticagrelor after PCI for ACS, lower Hb levels are independently associated with a higher rate of HRPR and an increased rate of major ischemic events, and especially for recurrent ACS, although with no impact on survival. Neutral prognostic effect of HRPR was observed across Hb tertiles.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on immature platelet fraction and its association with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Higher prothrombotic status and alterations in platelet function and thrombopoiesis are associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). We assessed the impact of diabetes and glucose control on the immature platelet fraction (IPF) and their relationship with prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography were included. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel stenosis greater than 50%. IPF levels were measured at admission by routine blood cells count (A Sysmex XE-2100). RESULTS: We included 1781 patients, of whom 660 (37.1%) suffered from diabetes. Diabetes was associated with advanced age and a higher cardiovascular risk profile. No difference in the mean values of IPF were observed between patients with or without DM (3.6 ± 2.5 vs 3.5 ± 2.5, P = 0.39) and neither in the rate of patients with IPF above the median (2.9%) (51.6% vs 50.6%, P = 0.73). In patients with DM, the IPF levels did not relate with glucose control parameters (glycaemia: r = -0.024, P = 0.54, glycosylated haemoglobin: r = 0.11, P = 0.72). The prevalence of CAD was significantly lower in patients with DM and IPF greater than the median (80.5% vs 86.5%, P = 0.04, adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.57[0.36-0.91], P = 0.02), while not left main/three-vessel CAD (36.9% vs 38.2%, P = 0.75, adjusted OR [95%CI] = 0.91[0.64-1.28], P = 0.90). CONCLUSION: In the present study, neither DM nor glucose control are independent predictors of IPF above the median. In patients with DM, higher IPF levels were associated with a lower prevalence of CAD and with a similar extent of severe CAD and angiographic findings. Therefore, until new data become available, elevated IPF should not be systematically applied on a large scale as cardiovascular risk marker in patients with diabetes.

Homocysteine levels and platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients treated with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recurrent atherothrombotic events have been reported in certain higher risk subsets of patients even with ticagrelor, a potent first-line antiplatelet agent for the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hyperhomocysteinemia is a known determinant of platelet function abnormalities. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of homocysteine (Hcy) levels on platelet reactivity in patients receiving Ticagrelor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization and on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA + Ticagrelor (90mg/twice a day) were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA). Suboptimal platelet inhibition HRPR-high residual platelet reactivity was defined if above the lower limit of normality (417 AU*min). We included 432 patients, divided according to Hcy tertiles. Higher Hcy levels were associated with age, renal failure, creatinine levels and use diuretics (p < 0.001). Patients with higher Hcy levels displayed a higher platelet reactivity at COL test (p = 0.002), and ADP test (p = 0.04), with a linear relationship between Hcy and platelet aggregation after stimulation with collagen (r = 0.202, p < 0.001), thrombin receptor peptide (r = 0.104, p = 0.05) and ADP (r = 0.145, p = 0.006). However, Hcy levels did not significantly affect the rate of HRPR with Ticagrelor (9.9% vs 13.7% vs 10.7%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = [0.616-1.51], p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ACS, despite the elevated platelet reactivity associated to hyperhomocysteinemia, DAPT with ticagrelor could overcome such phenomenon, achieving an adequate platelet inhibition in the majority of the patients.

Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Advanced age and diabetes represent summative conditions in the determination of cardiovascular risk, and especially for the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), often requiring balancing between bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, few studies have so far evaluated the impact of age on platelet reactivity and suboptimal platelet inhibition (high-on treatment platelet reactivity-HRPR) on DAPT among diabetic patients, that was, therefore the aim of the present study. In diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). Elderly patients were considered ≥ 75 years of age. We included 462 patients, among them 149 (32.2%) were ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more often females (p = 0.006), with lower body size (p = 0.04), acute coronary syndrome at presentation and renal failure (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p = 0.002), in therapy with insulin (p = 0.02) and diuretics (p < 0.001) and lower rate of betablockers (p = 0.02). Age directly related with C reactive protein (p = 0.01), creatinine levels and inversely with hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and triglycerides (p = 0.003). No association was found at linear regression analysis for platelet reactivity and age with different activating stimuli, but for ASPI test (r = 0.12; p = 0.03). No significant difference in HAPR was found in elderly patients (2.4 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.76, OR[95% CI] = 0.45[0.1-2.11], p = 0.31). HRPR for ADP antagonists was similarly not affected by age (30.1% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.28, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.78[0.47-1.29], p = 0.33). Comparable results were obtained when considering separately the DAPT strategies with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, or when adjusting our results according to propensity score values. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, age does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of high-on treatment platelet reactivity. Similar results were obtained for ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Impact of immature platelet fraction on platelet reactivity during prasugrel maintenance treatment.

Residual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as a predictor of major ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), especially after an acute cardiovascular event. However, its determinants are still poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HTPR in patients on DAPT with ASA (100-160 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg). Platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction [IPF]) were assessed at 30-90 days after an acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HTPR was defined as ADP test > 417 AU × min. Our population is represented by 180 ACS patients undergoing stent implantation, divided according to median values of IPF (< or ≥ 2.8%). Higher IPF values were associated to lower platelet count (p < 0.001) and a higher rate of active smokers (p = 0.02). No difference was observed in terms of mean platelet reactivity, with different activating stimuli. The prevalence of HTPR on prasugrel did not significantly differ in patients with IPF < or ≥ 2.8% (8%vs. 11.8%, p = 0.46; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.89 [0.66-5.4], p = 0.24). Our study showed that in patients treated with prasugrel after PCI for ACS, the immature platelet fraction influences neither platelet reactivity nor the rate of HTPR.

Impact of adenosine A2a receptor polymorphism rs5751876 on platelet reactivity in ticagrelor treated patients.

Dual antiplatelet therapy constitutes a key point in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. In particular, ticagrelor, an ADP-antagonist, can provide a more potent and predictable platelet inhibition as compared to clopidogrel, and adenosine-mediated pathways have been involved in its beneficial effects on mortality and myocardial perfusion. However, a quote of patients still displays a suboptimal platelet inhibition on ticagrelor, and, while the role of genetics in conditioning clopidogrel resistance is well established, few data have been reported for ticagrelor. We investigated the impact of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of adenosine A2a receptor (ADORA2a) on platelet reactivity in patients during chronic treatment with ticagrelor. We included patients treated with ASA and ticagrelor for a recent ACS or elective coronary revascularization. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR for ticagrelor was defined as ADP-test results >417 AU*min. Genetic analysis was performed to assess the presence of rs5751876 C > T polymorphism of ADORA2a receptor. We included 244 patients in our study, 174 (71.3%) patients carried the polymorphism (T allele), 51 (20.9%) of them in homozygosis (T/T). C-allele carriers (homozygotes C/C and heterozygotes C/T) showed no difference in baseline characteristics but for lower HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.01). An absolute lower rate of HRPR on ticagrelor was observed in homozygotes T/T (p = 0.03). At multivariate analysis, C allele carriage was independently associated with the rate of HRPR on ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 4.63[1.02-21.01], p = 0.048). Our study results showed a significant independent association between rs5751876 allele C carriage and a higher rate of high residual platelet reactivity in patients on ticagrelor after a recent ACS or PCI.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk is still underestimated in women, experiencing higher mortality and worse prognosis after acute cardiovascular events. Gender differences have been reported in thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), thus suggesting a potential variability in platelet reactivity according to sex. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of gender on platelet function and the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during DAPT in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary revascularization. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). RESULTS: We included 541 patients on DAPT, 122 (22.6 %) of whom were females. Females were older (p < 0.001), displayed more frequently hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003), renal failure (p = 0.04), acute presentation (p < 0.001), higher cholesterol levels and platelets count (p < 0.001). Inverse association was demonstrated with smoking (p < 0.001), previous PCI (p = 0.04) and statin use (p = 0.03), creatinine and haemoglobin (p < 0.001). Female gender did not influence mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR for ASA (1.7 % vs 1.4 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.14[0.17-4.36], p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.54[0.20-11.6], p = 0.68) or ADP-antagonists (26.3 % vs 22.8 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.52-1.34], p = 0.45, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.59-1.86], p = 0.87). Results did not change when considering separately the 309 patients treated with clopidogrel (34 % vs 31.3 %, OR[95%CI] = 1.13[0.62-2.07], p = 0.76, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.35[0.63-2.9], p = 0.44 for females vs males), or patients (n = 232) on ticagrelor (20.4 % vs 11.1 %, OR[95%CI] = 2.27[0.99-5.17], p = 0.06 for females vs males), confirmed after correction for baseline differences (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.28-2.29], p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, gender does not impact on the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) with the major antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Immature platelet fraction and high-on treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) has been associated with a 2-9 fold increased risk of acute ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes or coronary stenting. However, the mechanism of suboptimal platelet inhibition are still poorly understood. Aim of present study was to evaluate the role of the percentage of reticulated platelets on HRPR with ticagrelor. In patients treated with ASA (100-160 mg) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction, IPF) were assessed at 30-90 days after acute coronary syndrome. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined as ADP test >417 AU*min. Our population is represented by 190 patients, divided according to tertiles values of IPF (<2.5; 2.5-3.99; ≥4 %). Higher IPF was associated to a larger platelet volume and lower platelets count (p < 0.001), and inversely related with a history of previous coronary revascularization (p = 0.03). Twenty-one out of 190 (11.0 %) patients displayed HRPR. No difference in the levels of circulating IPF was found in patients with or without HRPR (p = 0.25), with no correlation between the rate of reticulated platelets and platelet reactivity at ADP test (r = -0.084, p = 0.26). In fact no association was observed between high levels of IPF and the occurrence of HRPR (adjusted OR[95 % CI] = 0.69[0.34-1,37], p = 0.28), even after correction for baseline differences. In patients treated with ticagrelor, the levels of circulating reticulated platelets assessed at 30-90 days post-ACS are not associated with platelet reactivity or the occurrence of HRPR.

Impact of diabetes on immature platelets fraction and its relationship with platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Contrasting data have been reported so far on the role of reticulated platelets in suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapies. In particular, still unexplored is whether they may contribute to explain the higher risk of thrombotic complications observed in diabetic patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on the levels of reticulated platelets and its relationship with high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients treated with ASA (100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction, IPF) were assessed at 30-90 days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. We included 386 patients, 158 (40.9 %) diabetics. The percentage of IPF was similar in diabetic and non diabetic patients, both at baseline (3.5 ± 2.5 vs 3.6 ± 2.7 %, p = 0.91) and at 30-90 days re-assessment (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.5 ± 2.5 %, p = 0.30), with diabetes not emerging as an independent predictor of IPF above III tertile (adjusted OR [95 %CI] = 0.58 [0.30-1.09], p = 0.10). Diabetic patients displayed an enhanced platelet reactivity and a higher rate of HRPR with ADP antagonists (32.8 vs 22.5 %, p = 0.009). However, no association was found between the percentage of IPF and platelet function (r = -0.004; p = 0.95 for ASPI test, r = -0.04; p = 0.59 for ADP-mediated aggregation), or the rate of HRPR for ADP antagonsist across IPF tertiles. Results were similar for diabetics both receiving clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Diabetic patients display a higher platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to ADP-antagonists. However, the rate of reticulated platelets is neither influenced by diabetic status nor associated with an increased platelet reactivity among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for a recent acute coronary syndrome or PCI.

Vitamin D levels and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal platelet inhibition still represents an important challenge, especially for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, very few are known so far on the predictors of high-residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) despite antiplatelet strategies. Increasing attention has been paid in the last years to the role of vitamin D in atherothrombosis. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) after a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Platelet function was assessed by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®-Roche Diagnostics AG), HRPR was considered for ASPI test values > 862 AU*min (for ASA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). Fasting samples were obtained for main chemistry parameters and vitamin D level assessment. Our population is represented by 503 patients, who were divided according to vitamin D quartiles (≤9.1; 9.2-14.4; 14.5-21.7; >21.7 ng/ml). Lower vitamin D levels related with age (p = 0.04), diabetic status (p = 0.05), and previous coronary surgery (p = 0.007), therapy with beta-blockers and statins (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). Vitamin D inversely related to the levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.01), triglycerides (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p = 0.05), and HbA1c (p < 0.001). Significantly higher platelet reactivity was observed after platelet stimulation with ADP (p = 0.01), but not with other platelet activators. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low (1.2%) and not conditioned by Vitamin D levels (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.56[0.71-3.5], p = 0.27). HRPR with ADP-antagonists was observed in 26% of patients, and the rate increased with lower vitamin D quartiles (37.3% vs 22.2% vs 24.4% vs 20.2%, p = 0.005, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.23[1.02-1.49], p = 0.04). An absolute increase in HRPR with lower vitamin D levels was similarly observed among patients receiving ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.40[0.95-2.06], p = 0.08), and those on clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.31[0.99-1.75], p = 0.06). Thus, lower vitamin D levels are associated with higher platelet reactivity and impaired effectiveness of ADP-antagonists, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA. Future studies will tell whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce platelet reactivity, overcoming the phenomenon of resistance to antiplatelet agents.

Body Mass Index and Platelet Reactivity During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor.

INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is considered essential in clinical management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization or acute coronary syndromes. However, the optimal platelet inhibition is not always obtained, with high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) increasing stent thrombosis and recurrent ischemic events. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on platelet reactivity in patients on DAPT. METHODS: We included patients treated with acetylsalycilic acid (ASA) (100-160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) or ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) for acute coronary syndromes or drug-eluting stent implantation. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days postdischarge by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) antagonists was defined as ADP test results >417 AU*min. HRPR for ASA was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min. RESULTS: Our population is represented by 498 patients, 308 (61.8%) were treated with clopidogrel and 190 (38.2%) with ticagrelor. Overall, higher BMI was related with younger age (P = 0.003), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.017), hypertension (P < 0.001), chronic therapy with angiotensin-receptor blockers (P = 0.019), calcium channel blockers (P = 0.003). Higher values of BMI directly related with hemoglobin (P = 0.02), triglycerides (P < 0.001), glycemia (P = 0.035), HbA1c (P < 0.001), and inversely related with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.01). BMI did not influence the effectiveness of ASA, whereas it was associated to a nonsignificant trend for higher platelet reactivity (r = 0.08, P = 0.08) for ADP antagonists. In fact, 111 patients (22.3%) displayed HRPR at ADP test (>417 AU*min) with no statistically significant difference according to BMI {20.3% vs. 27.1% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.28; adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.19 [0.86-1.64], P = 0.30}. However, results were different when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel or ticagrelor. In the clopidogrel-treated subgroup, significantly higher ADP-mediated aggregation values were found in patients with higher BMI (r = 0.14, P = 0.023) that emerged as an independent predictor of HRPR with clopidogrel [OR (95% CI), 1.45 (1.01-2.12), P = 0.049]. On the contrary, no impact of BMI was observed in the ticagrelor-treated subgroup for platelet reactivity (r = -0.036, P = 0.62) or the prevalence of HRPR [adjusted OR (95% CI), 0.73 (0.39-1.36), P = 0.32]. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that among patients treated with DAPT for coronary artery disease, higher BMI is related to increased platelet reactivity and a higher prevalence of HRPR in clopidogrel-treated patients while not significantly influencing the effectiveness of ticagrelor or ASA.

Homocysteine Levels Influence Platelet Reactivity in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Treated With Acetylsalicylic Acid.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal platelet inhibition with antiplatelet treatments is associated with a severe prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and the identification of its determinants is still challenging. Homocysteine elevation has emerged as a prothrombotic factor, influencing coagulative status and endothelial function and potentially modulating platelet aggregation. We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of homocysteine (Hcy) levels on platelet reactivity in patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) with or without ADP antagonists. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary angiography and receiving ASA (100-160 mg daily) for >7 days, with or without ADP antagonists, were included. Aggregation tests were performed by multiple electrode aggregometry. Suboptimal platelet inhibition was defined as on-treatment aggregation above the lower limit of normality. RESULTS: Our population is represented by 508 ASA-treated patients, 406 (80.1%) of whom on dual antiplatelet therapy (ASA and ADP antagonists). Hcy levels above the median (15.1 nmol/mL) were associated with male gender (P = 0.04), hypertension (P = 0.004), hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.03), aging, renal failure (P < 0.001, respectively), previous coronary bypass grafting (P = 0.04), therapy with calcium antagonists (P = 0.04) and diuretics (P = 0.001), and multivessel CAD (P = 0.03). Higher Hcy is directly related with serum creatinine and uric acid (P < 0.001). Suboptimal platelet inhibition was found in 16 patients (3.2%) for ASA and for ADP antagonists in 80 patients (19.7%). Hcy levels significantly affected suboptimal response to ASA, but not to ADP-mediated aggregation. In fact, a linear relationship was found between homocysteine and platelet reactivity after stimulation with arachidonic acid (r = 0.14, P = 0.004) and collagen (r = 0.12, P = 0.02), but not with ADP (r = 0.02, P = 0.77). Moreover, after correction for baseline differences, Hcy above the median was confirmed as an independent predictor of impaired ASA response [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.7 (1.08-12.4), P = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CAD, elevated homocysteine is an independent predictor of suboptimal response to ASA, but not to ADP antagonists.

Platelet Larger Cell Ratio and High-on Treatment Platelet Reactivity During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Low response to antiplatelet agents has been associated to an increased risk of thrombotic complications and recurrent ischemic events. Platelet size has been proposed as a potential marker of platelet reactivity. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of platelet Larger Cell Ratio (p-LCR) on platelet aggregation and the prevalence of residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) or ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists) using impedance aggregometry. RESULTS: Our population consisted of 530 patients receiving DAPT, who were divided in tertiles according to values of p-LCR (< 27.6; 27.6-34.7; ≥34.7 l). p-LCR was related with use of beta-blockers (p = 0.02) and statins (p = 0.002), and inversely with acute presentation (p = 0.05). Higher platelet count (p < 0.001) and haemoglobin levels (p = 0.001) were observed in higher p-LCR tertiles. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low and not significantly different across tertiles of p-LCR (1.1 vs 1.1 vs 1.7%, p = 0.66; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.68[0.66-4.29], p = 0.27). Moreover, p-LCR did not influence the occurrence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (24.4% vs 20.9% vs 25.6 %%, p = 0.80, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.67-1.17], p = 0.38) and similar results were obtained when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.86-1.69], p = 0.29) or ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.69-2], p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving DAPT for coronary artery disease, p-LCR does not impact platelet reactivity. Larger platelets did not influence the prevalence of high-on treatment platelet reactivity with the antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Routine coagulation tests are not useful as a screening tool for the FII G20210A polymorphism.

BACKGROUND: The identification of prothrombin G20210A polymorphism (PT20210) is normally included in the thrombophilia laboratory panel and evaluated by DNA-based molecular analysis. To date, a routine coagulation test that helps to identify PT20210 carriers has not been set, in contrast to the FV Leiden mutation, for which a functional coagulation test, the Activated Protein C Resistance test (APCR), is available as a screening tool. More- over the molecular tests are expensive and are used inappropriately. The aim of the study is to characterize the effects of the prothrombin G20210A mutation on routine clotting assays in order to identify, if any, coagulation tests that can be used as a first-line cost-effective assay for prothrombin G20210A polymorphism. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 80 PT20210 polymorphism carriers and 82 age and gender matched controls. All subjects were investigated for PT-INR, aPTT, dRVVT, FII (%), and Endogenous Thrombin Potential (EPT) parameters. RESULTS: In heterozygotes and wild-type, PT, aPTT, and dRVVT values were not significantly different. The plasma activity of Factor II (%), AUC TG (%), and C max (%) of EPT were significantly higher in heterozygotes than in controls (p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). In the absence of oral anticoagulant therapy and/or heparin, lupus anticoagulants, and liver disease, the discriminating abilities of the FII, AUC TG, and C max (%) to separate properly the study population into carriers and controls were equal to 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00); 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All routine clotting assays performed in the present work are not useful as a screening tool for the G20210A prothrombin gene allele in a general population. Definitely, to date, the exclusive possible approach to identify the PT20210 mutation is molecular genetic testing, but unfortunately it is used inappropriately, contributing significantly to an uncontrolled waste of resources. It is mandatory to restrict the genetic thrombophilia test ordering to when it is actually recommended by the guidelines and to educate clinicians on the waste and danger of over-testing, particularly genetic tests, taking into account the fact that the PT20210 polymorphism is extremely variable (0.7 to 8% in Europe; 1.3-5% in the USA).

Estimating the cost of redundancy in molecular diagnostics: the case of activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden.

BACKGROUND: The activated protein C resistance--sensitivity ratio in the presence of Factor V deficient plasma (APC-SR/Factor V) exhibits a high sensitivity for factor V Leiden mutation and has been proposed as the diagnostic approach of choice, as an alternative to genetic tests, to evaluate activated protein C resistance. A survey, including 4969 requests, was performed on the activity of a typical Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory in order to estimate the costs due to reagents, instrumentation and personnel. METHODS: The global costs of three hypothetical diagnostic approaches were compared: (A) exclusive molecular test for FV Leiden; (B) APC-SR alone; (C) APC-SR and the exclusive confirmation of positive results with molecular test. RESULTS: The global cost for each patient with the three approaches investigated were respectively 42.20 euros (A), 1.09 euros (B), and 433 euros (C). The cost for finding a patient with factor V Leiden mutation was 549.00 euros for A, 14.18 euros for B, and 56.32 euros for C. It was calculated that a decrease of 97.42% and 89.74% can be obtained using the approaches B and C, respectively. The difference in cost between B and C can be justified by the avoidance of false positive cases (6%) and by the impossibility of distinguishing homozygous from heterozygous patients using APC-SR exclusively (B). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of suspected phenotype APC resistance, we suggest a laboratory approach, which provides the combined and sequential use of ProCGlobal/FV analysis and a subsequent genetic test for positive patients.

Ticagrelor and prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome: a single-arm crossover platelet reactivity study.

AIM: To compare the degree of platelet inhibition between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: Platelet function was assessed by impedance aggregometry after 30-90 days of therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor and over 15 days after switching to prasugrel. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined for ADP test results above the upper limit of normal. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included, 81.9% males and 33.3% people with diabetes, with a mean age of 60.8 ±â€Š8.1 years. Mean platelet reactivity was not significantly different between the two antiplatelet strategies, as the prevalence of HRPR (8.6 vs 12.3%, P = 0.50). Switching between the two antiplatelet agents was safe and well tolerated, and effectively reduced platelet reactivity in over 95% of the patients (only 3.8% of the study population displaying ineffective response to both drugs). CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor and prasugrel have a similar effect on platelet reactivity. Switching between the two drugs can be safely done.

Use of Metformin and Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced platelet reactivity represents one of the major determinants of cardiovascular risk among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of metformin use on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: We included diabetic patients treated with DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90 days by Multiple-electrode aggregometry. In an additional cohort of diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, we assessed platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2 (TxB2). RESULTS: We included 219 diabetic patients, 117 (53.4%) treated with metformin. Metformin was associated with younger age (p=0.03), male gender (p=0.02), lower rate of hypertension (p=0.04), active smoker (p=0.002), previous MI (p<0.001) renal failure (p<0.001), fibrinogen (p<0.001) and C-reactive protein (p=0.04), larger use of diuretics (p=0.04) calcium antagonists (p=0.05), better glycemic control (p<0.001) and higher haemoglobin (p=0.003). The prevalence of HAPR did not significantly differ according to hypoglycemic treatment (p=0.73; adjusted OR[95%CI]=5.63[0.42-76], p=0.19). Moreover, no impact of metformin was observed for HRPR (p=0.77; adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.15[0.55-2.4], p=0.71). Among an additional cohort of 42 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, we confirmed no impact of metformin or insulin on aggregation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no apparent association in diabetic patients treated with DAPT, between the use of metformin and platelet reactivity or the rate of HPR.

Impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of the adenosine deaminase gene on platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: The positive interaction of ticagrelor with the metabolism of adenosine has been claimed for the large antithrombotic and antiischemic benefits of this antiplatelet agent in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Adenosine catabolism is regulated by the activity of the adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA), for which several polymorphisms have been identified. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore the impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of ADA gene on platelet reactivity in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. METHODS: We included consecutive patients receiving ASA and ticagrelor after an ACS and coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by impedance aggregometry at 30-90 days post-discharge. The genetic analysis was carried out by PCR and RFLP. Clinical endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization at the maximum available follow-up. RESULTS: Our population is represented by 464 patients, of whom 33.4% were A-heterozygotes and 6 homozygotes. A-allele carriers showed a greater prevalence of renal failure (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of previous coronary artery bypass graft (p = 0.03) and statin treatment (p = 0.02). No differences in the mean values of platelet reactivity or HRPR on ticagrelor were found according to the ADA genotype (11.3%vs13.9%, p = 0.45; adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.17[0.64-2.14], p = 0.61). At follow up, patients carrying the A-allele showed a non-significantly lower incidence of ACS and repeated unplanned revascularization, although with no effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study the rs73598374 polymorphism of the ADA gene did not affect platelet reactivity or the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Increased comorbidities and a perceived high-bleeding risk often prevent the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in female patients. However, more aggressive antiplatelet treatment would certainly offer additional outcome benefits in coronary artery disease, especially among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the gender differences in high-residual on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients treated with DAPT. METHODS: Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort of diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel, ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry and in diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2. RESULTS: We included 472 patients, 113 (23.9%) women. Female gender was associated with more advanced age, and increased comorbidities. Mean platelet reactivity did not differ according to gender. The rate of HRPR was similar in women as compared to men (for ASA: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.59[0.27-1.33], p = 0.21, for ADP-antagonists: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.24[0.25-1.80], p = 0.27), however, the benefits of the new ADP-antagonists on platelet reactivity were lower in women than in men (p interaction = 0.01). No impact of gender on platelet reactivity was confirmed among 50 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy gender does not affect platelet reactivity or high-on treatment platelet reactivity. However, the enhanced platelet inhibition provided by the new-ADP antagonists of new-ADP antagonists could be mitigated in women.

Prevalence and predictors of high-on treatment platelet reactivity during prasugrel treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: ADP-antagonists such as prasugrel have reduced but yet not overcome the phenomenon of high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR), that has been shown to increase the rate of major cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the exact prevalence and the principal determinants of suboptimal platelet inhibition in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with prasugrel have not been completely clarified and were therefore the aim of the present study. METHODS: We included patients (<75 years and >60kg) treated with DAPT (aspirin+prasugrel) after PCI, mainly for an ACS. Platelet function test evaluation was performed at 1-3 months from discharge. HRPR was assessed by multiplate impedance aggregometry and defined for results above upper limit of normal after ADP stimulation. RESULTS: We included 190 post-ACS patients. HRPR with prasugrel was observed in 19 patients (10%). The prevalence of HRPR was stable in different high-risk subgroups of patients (female gender, hypercholesterolemic, and chronic kidney disease) whereas it was increased in diabetic patients (p=0.045), with a significant interaction between diabetic status and HRPR (p=0.04). However, at multivariate analysis, an impaired metabolic status, with higher levels of glycosylated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but not diabetic status, emerged as independent predictors of HRPR with prasugrel [OR (95% CI)=2.1 (1.32-3.33), p=0.002 and OR (95% CI)=1.03 (1.01-1.05), p=0.003, respectively], with a stronger linear relationship between ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (r=0.24, p=0.002), than for LDL-cholesterol (r=0.13, p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In post-ACS patients treated with PCI and receiving DAPT with prasugrel, HRPR is observed in about 10% of patients. Impaired metabolic status, and especially elevated glycosylated hemoglobin, emerged as independent predictors of the suboptimal effectiveness of prasugrel.