Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 19347, 2023 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37935875

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to present the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and PET/CT in the evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Data of 114 patients who underwent MRI and PET/CT prior to surgery in the time period between January 2010 and September 2021 in our center is analyzed retrospectively. Histopathological results of surgical preparations serve as the gold standard. The mean time from MRI to surgery is 22.9 (± 18.7) days, and from PET/CT to surgery 21.7 (± 19.9) days. Sensitivities of 80.4% and 80.4%, specificities of 85.7% and 87.3%, PPVs of 82.0% and 83.7% and NPVs of 84.4% and 84.6% are registered for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. 37 false results are further analyzed with respect to side and level of the affected lymph node, as well as intersections of the two imaging modalities. In 29 patients (25.4%), additional findings are described in PET/CT, 7 (6.1%) of which were histologically confirmed to be further malignancies. A combination of both MRI and PET/CT imaging modalities could improve diagnostic accuracy, especially with regard to sensitivity. A notable number of additional findings in whole body acquisition leads to the potential diagnosis of further malignancies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos
2.
J Pers Med ; 13(6)2023 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37373894

RESUMO

In post-mortem analyses, SARS-CoV-2 was found in the middle ear of some, but not all, patients with COVID-19. It is not clear whether SARS-CoV-2 penetrated the ear passively post mortem, or existed in the middle ear of living patients during, and perhaps also after, infection. This study investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the middle ear of living patients during ear surgery. Swabs from the nasopharynx, the filter connected to the tracheal tube and secretions from the middle ear were collected during middle ear surgery. All samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR. History of vaccination, COVID-19 history and contact with SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals were recorded preoperatively. Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection was noted at the follow-up visit. Overall, 63 participants (62%) were children and 39 (38%) were adults. SARS-CoV-2 was found in the middle ear and in the nasopharynx of two and four CovEar study participants, respectively. The filter connected to the tracheal tube was sterile in all cases. Cycle threshold (ct) values of the PCR test were between 25.94 and 37.06. SARS-CoV-2 penetrated the middle ear of living patients and was found in asymptomatic patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the middle ear may have implications for ear surgery and can pose a risk of infection for operating room staff. It may also directly affect the audio-vestibular system.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA