Bulbar impairment score and survival of stable amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients after noninvasive ventilation initiation.

There is general agreement that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) prolongs survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and that the main cause of NIV failure is the severity of bulbar dysfunction. However, there is no evidence that bulbar impairment is a contraindication for NIV. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of bulbar impairment on survival in ALS patients with NIV. ALS patients for whom NIV was indicated were included. Those patients who refused NIV were taken as the control group. 120 patients who underwent NIV and 20 who refused NIV were included. The NIV group presented longer survival (median 18.50 months, 95% CI 12.62-24.38 months) than the no-NIV group (3.00 months, 95% CI 0.82-5.18 months) (p<0.001) and also in those patients with severe bulbar dysfunction (13.00 months (95% CI 9.49-16.50 months) versus 3.00 months (95% CI 0.85-5.15 months), p<0.001). Prognostic factors for ALS using NIV, adjusted for NIV failure, were severity of bulbar dysfunction (hazard ratio (HR) 0.5, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; p=0.001) and time spent with oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry <90% (%sleepSpO2 <90) using NIV (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24; p=0.02). Severe bulbar impairment in ALS does not always prevent NIV from being used, but the severity of bulbar dysfunction at NIV initiation and %sleepSpO2 <90 while using NIV appear to be the main prognostic factors of NIV failure in ALS.

Adherence to aspirin in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Compliance with antiplatelet therapy is essential for the efficiency of secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to aspirin treatment in patients with ischemic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied outpatients of 5 neurological ambulatory centers in an urban city, Valencia, all with a history of ischemic stroke who had received aspirin for at least 6 months. A personal interview was carried out in all cases, during which the patients were questioned about adherence to treatment. Platelet thromboxane A2 synthesis was assessed in a single laboratory for the biochemical determination in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients (mean age 67) were studied, with a mean duration of aspirin therapy of 25.4 months (range 6-144 months). Sixty-six patients (90.4%) were included in laboratory tests. All showed inhibition of thromboxane A2 synthesis, consistent with adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin compliance was found to be excellent. All the patients who presented themselves for laboratory tests were taking aspirin. Even if the patients who failed to show up for laboratory testing are regarded as noncompliants, at least 90% of all patients were compliants--in agreement with the findings of the recent literature. Personal interview plus biochemical determination of platelet thromboxane A2 synthesis seem adequate for assessing adherence to aspirin.

Topiramate in the prophylactic treatment of cluster headache.

OBJECTIVE: The role of topiramate in the prophylactic treatment of cluster headache is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of topiramate in a group of patients with refractory episodic or chronic cluster headache. BACKGROUND: Proof of efficacy of preventive treatment of cluster headache is limited, especially for the chronic form of the disorder. There are very few randomized clinical trials on this condition with topiramate or other new anticonvulsant agents. Recent case reports and series involving topiramate have shown good results. The mechanism of action of topiramate is unknown, but is presumably mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with episodic (n = 12) or chronic (n = 14) cluster headache were studied prospectively. All patients had been treated with some preventive treatment, with poor or no response. Treatment with topiramate was initiated with 25 mg once a day, and the dose was titrated every 3 to 7 days to a maximum of 200 mg, according to clinical response and tolerability. RESULTS: Topiramate rapidly induced cluster remission in 15 patients, reduced the number of attacks more than 50% in 6 patients, and reduced the cluster period duration in 12. The mean time to remission was 14 days (range, 1 to 27), but in 7 patients remission was obtained within the first days of treatment with very low doses (25 to 75 mg a day). Tolerability was good within the lower range of doses used. Six patients discontinued treatment due to side effects (all with daily doses over 100 mg) or lack of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that topiramate can be an effective option for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache.