[Venous thromboembolic disease : diagnostic pathways and follow-up]. / Maladie thromboembolique veineuse : démarche diagnostique et suivi.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and its diagnosis and risk stratification remain a challenge. Therapy and follow-up are also essential in the management of this pathology. The aim of this article is to summarize the most recent recommendations in the diagnostic pathway, risk stratification and follow-up of the more severe and frequent forms of VTE, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs.

La maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV) constitue l'une des principales causes de morbimortalité dans le monde. Le diagnostic et la stratification du risque demeurent des défis importants. La thérapie et le suivi sont également essentiels dans la prise en charge de cette pathologie. Cet article résume les recommandations les plus récentes dans la démarche diagnostique, la stratification du risque et le suivi des formes les plus graves et fréquentes de MTEV, l'embolie pulmonaire et la thrombose veineuse profonde des membres inférieurs.

[Peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs : from diagnosis to treatment]. / Maladie artérielle périphérique : du diagnostic au traitement.

Peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (PAD) is a widespread disease whose diagnosis and treatment are still inadequate, despite several available current national and international recommendations. Screening for PAD is recommended in patients presenting with lower limb symptoms (claudication) and in those at risk. For all patients with PAD, initial management measures include treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle modification, exercise training and antithrombotic therapy, at least for any symptomatic PAD. Revascularization is discussed on a case-by-case basis, depending on the stage of the disease, in a multidisciplinary setting. A diagnostic algorithm for PAD is presented, together with the basic principles of comprehensive disease management.

La maladie artérielle périphérique des membres inférieurs (MAP) est une maladie très répandue dont le diagnostic et le traitement sont encore insuffisants malgré l'existence de plusieurs recommandations nationales et internationales. Le dépistage de la MAP est recommandé chez les patients présentant des symptômes au niveau des membres inférieurs (claudication) et chez les personnes à risque. La prise en charge initiale de la MAP comprend le traitement des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire, la modification du mode de vie, l'entraînement à l'exercice physique et le traitement antithrombotique, si symptomatique. La revascularisation est discutée au cas par cas en fonction du stade de la maladie dans un cadre multidisciplinaire. Un algorithme diagnostique de la MAP ainsi que les bases de prise en charge globale de la maladie sont présentés.

[Pelvic congestion syndrome : from diagnosis to treatment]. / Syndrome de congestion pelvienne : du diagnostic au traitement.

Pelvic congestion syndrome is a debilitating condition that is often under-diagnosed and under-treated, defined by chronic pelvic pain in the presence of pelvic varicose veins in women or, more rarely, in men. The differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain is vast and often leads to lengthy and costly diagnostic procedures. Conservative treatment is often insufficient, and embolization of pelvic varices is the treatment of choice to improve symptoms. A multidisciplinary management algorithm is proposed to facilitate the clinical path for these patients.

Le syndrome de congestion pelvienne est une maladie invalidante souvent sous-diagnostiquée et sous-traitée, définie par de douleurs pelviennes chroniques, en présence de varices pelviennes chez les femmes ou plus rarement les hommes. Le diagnostic différentiel des douleurs chroniques abdominales est vaste et mène souvent à des parcours diagnostiques longs et coûteux. Le traitement conservateur est souvent insuffisant et une embolisation des varices pelviennes est le traitement de choix pour améliorer la symptomatologie. Un algorithme de prise en charge multidisciplinaire est proposé afin de faciliter le parcours de soins de ces patients.

[Role of lymphofluoroscopy in the management of lymphedema]. / Place de la lymphofluoroscopie dans la prise en charge du lymphœdème.

The lymphatic vascular system is essential for maintaining a healthy balance between interstitial fluid production and transport. Dysregulation of this balance can lead to the formation of lymphedema, a pathology that is disabling and bothersome in the daily lives of the patients. Lymphofluoroscopy is an invaluable tool that provides static and dynamic images of the superficial lymphatic vessels, with diagnostic and therapeutic implications. This diagnostic tool is beginning to take its place in the field of lymphology, as it is minimally invasive and has virtually no side effects.

Le système lymphatique vasculaire est essentiel pour maintenir un bon équilibre entre la production et le transport du liquide interstitiel. Une dysrégulation de cette balance peut amener à la formation d'un lymphœdème, pathologie invalidante et gênante dans la vie quotidienne des patients. La lymphofluoroscopie est un instrument précieux qui permet, avec des images statiques et dynamiques, d'observer le système vasculaire lymphatique superficiel, avec des implications diagnostiques et thérapeutiques importantes. Cet instrument diagnostic commence à prendre sa place dans le domaine de la lymphologie, car il est peu invasif et quasiment sans effet secondaire.

Clinical Correlates of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Background: It is reasonable to place an Inferior Vena Cava Filter (IVCF) when an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs occurs in a patient with absolute contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation. An additional potential reason for placing an IVCF is the need to stop therapeutic anticoagulation in a patient with acute DVT who must undergo urgent non-deferrable surgery. However, IVCFs are often used outside of such established indications and many authors argue about their actual utility, especially in terms of survival. In this retrospective study, we looked for clinical correlates of in-hospital mortality among patients who underwent IVCF placement, limiting our analysis to the cases for which a correct indication to IVCF placement existed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic database of our University Hospital, searching for consecutive hospitalized patients who had acute DVT and underwent IVCF placement because of an established contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation and/or because it was necessary to stop anticoagulation due to urgent surgery. The search covered the period between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Results: The search resulted in the identification of 168 individuals. An established contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation was present in 116 patients (69.0%), while urgent non-deferrable surgery was the reason for IVCF placement in 52 patients (31.0%). A total of 24 patients (14.3%) died during the same hospital stay in which the IVCF was placed. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with a contraindication to anticoagulation than in patients who underwent IVCF placement because of urgent surgery (19.0% vs. 3.8%, OD 5.85 vs. 0.17). In-hospital mortality was also significantly higher among patients with chronic kidney disease and those who needed blood cell transfusion during hospitalization. Conclusions: This study provides novel information on clinical correlates of in-hospital mortality among patients with acute DVT who undergo IVCF. Prospective observational studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban to Prevent Recurrences of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer: A Real-Life Experience with a Focus on Female Patients.

BACKGROUND: The way in which to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an unmet clinical need in cancer patients. International guidelines only provide conditional recommendations and do not specify which anticoagulant and dose should be used. In the last 2 years, we have been using low-dose rivaroxaban to prevent VTE recurrences in cancer patients. The results of this real-life experience are presented in this study. METHODS: All patients had cancer and had previously completed a cycle of at least six months of full-dose anticoagulation for the treatment of a VTE index event, before receiving a prescription of low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) for secondary prevention of VTE. Effectiveness and safety of this therapeutic regimen were evaluated in terms of VTE recurrences, major bleedings (MB), and clinically relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB). RESULTS: The analysis included 106 cancer patients. Their median age was 60 years (IQR 50-69). Metastatic cancer was present in 87 patients (82.1%). Six patients (5.7%) had brain metastases. Over a median follow-up time of 333 days (IQR 156-484), the incidence of VTE recurrences was 3.8% (95%CI 1.0-9.4), with a recurrence rate of 4.0 per 100 person-years (95%CI 1.1-10.2). We observed no MB (0.0%) and three CRNMB (2.8%) (95%CI 0.6-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose rivaroxaban is potentially effective and safe in cancer patients that require prevention of recurrent VTE. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Anticoagulant treatment for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on anticoagulant treatment for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) are largely derived from studies on usual site venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for UEDVT. PATIENTS/METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted for studies including patients with UEDVT. Primary outcomes were recurrent VTE and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically-relevant non-major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1473 patients from 11 prospective and nine retrospective studies were included. Sixty percent of patients had an indwelling catheter and 56.1% had cancer. Anticoagulant treatment consisted of direct oral anticoagulants, low molecular weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists, and low molecular weight heparin alone in 45.1%, 35.0%, and 19.9% of patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 13 months, recurrent VTE occurred in 3% of patients (95% CI: 2-4; 21/1334 patients), major bleeding in 3% (95% CI: 2%-5%; 29/1235 patients), clinically-relevant non-major bleeding in 4% (95% CI: 3-6; 40/1075 patients), and all-cause mortality in 9% (95% CI: 5-15; 108/1084 patients). Rates of these outcomes were not significantly different between patients with or without cancer, patients with or without an indwelling catheter, and among those receiving different anticoagulant treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UEDVT, anticoagulant treatment is associated with a low risk of recurrent VTE and a nonnegligible risk of major bleeding.

A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Different Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Catheter-Related Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities in Women With Gynecologic and Breast Cancer.

Background: Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) of the upper extremities is a frequent complication among cancer patients that carry a central venous catheter (CVC) and may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) and loss of CVC function. Despite its clinical impact, no anticoagulant treatment scheme has been rigorously evaluated in these patients. In addition, there is no proven evidence that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are efficacious and safe in this setting because cancer patients with CRT of the upper extremities were not included in the clinical trials that led to the approval of DOACs for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: We performed a single center retrospective cohort study on women with gynecologic or breast cancer treated with either low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux, or DOACs for CRT of the upper extremities. Only patients who received anticoagulation at the proper therapeutic dose and for at least 3 months were included in the analysis. Effectiveness was evaluated in terms of preservation of line function, residual thrombosis, and recurrence of VTE (including PE). Safety was evaluated in terms of death, major bleeding (MB), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Results: We identified 74 women who fulfilled the criteria to be included in the analysis. Of these, 31 (41.9%) had been treated with fondaparinux, 21 (28.4%) with enoxaparin, and 22 (29.7%) with the DOAC edoxaban. We found no differences between patients treated with the three different therapeutic approaches, in terms of preservation of line function, incidence of residual thrombosis, and VTE recurrence (including PE). Safety was similar as well, with no MBs recorded in any treatment group. Conclusion: These results, although retrospective and based on a relatively small sample size, indicate that, in women with gynecologic or breast cancer, CRT of the upper extremities may be treated with similar effectiveness and safety with fondaparinux, enoxaparin, and edoxaban. Further studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients: Which Diagnostic Algorithm Should We Use?

Introduction: Although pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent complication of the clinical course of COVID-19, there is a lack of explicit indications regarding the best algorithm for diagnosing PE in these patients. In particular, it is not clear how to identify subjects who should undergo computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), rather than simply X-ray and/or high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed COVID-19 patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) of our University hospital with acute respiratory failure, or that developed acute respiratory failure during hospital stay, to determine how many of them had a theoretical indication to undergo CTPA for suspected PE according to current guidelines. Next, we looked for differences between patients who underwent CTPA and those who only underwent X-ray and/or HRCT of the chest. Finally, we determined whether patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PE had specific characteristics that made them different from those with a CTPA negative for PE. Results: Out of 93 subjects with COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure, 73 (78.4%) had an indication to undergo CTPA according to the revised Geneva and Wells scores and the PERC rule-out criteria, and 54 (58%) according to the YEARS algorithm. However, in contrast with these indications, only 28 patients (30.1%) underwent CTPA. Of note, they were not clinically different from those who underwent X-ray and/or HRCT of the chest. Among the 28 subjects who underwent CTPA, there were 10 cases of PE (35.7%). They were not clinically different from those with CTPA negative for PE. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure undergo CTPA, X-ray of the chest, or HRCT without an established criterion. Nonetheless, when CTPA is performed, the diagnosis of PE is anything but rare. Validated tools for identifying COVID-19 patients who require CTPA for suspected PE are urgently needed.

Scurvy: A Disease not to be Forgotten.

An 18-year-old man presented to our hospital with muscular pain, diffuse petechiae, spontaneous thigh ecchymosis, edema and pain of the right knee, bilateral pretibial subcutaneous nodules, and gingival hypertrophy and hemorrhage. His history was positive for a mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and a restrictive diet caused by self-diagnosed food allergies. Skin lesions appeared like hyperkeratotic papules with coiled hairs and perifollicular hemorrhages. A diagnosis of scurvy was made upon demonstration of low serum levels of ascorbic acid. An allergy evaluation found cross-reactivity between pollens and food, related to the presence of panallergens. Moreover, we found that our patient was also affected by celiac disease. In conclusion, scurvy should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with petechiae and ecchymosis, especially when food restriction, malabsorption, or psychiatric disorders are present.

Incidence of deep vein thrombosis among non-ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19 despite pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: A remarkably high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported among critically ill patients with COVID-19 assisted in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, VTE burden among non-ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19 that receive guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of VTE among non-ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19 that receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a systematic screening for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by lower limb vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) in consecutive non-ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19, independent of the presence of signs or symptoms of DVT. All patients were receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with either enoxaparin or fondaparinux. RESULTS: The population that we screened consisted of 84 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 67.6 ± 13.5 years and a mean Padua Prediction Score of 5.1 ± 1.6. Seventy-two patients (85.7%) had respiratory insufficiency, required oxygen supplementation, and had reduced mobility or were bedridden. In this cohort, we found 10 cases of DVT, with an incidence of 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.98-18.82). Of these, 2 were proximal DVT (incidence rate 2.4%, 95% CI -0.87-5.67) and 8 were distal DVT (incidence rate 9.5%, 95% CI 3.23-5.77). Significant differences between subjects with and without DVT were D-dimer > 3000 µg/L (P < .05), current or previous cancer (P < .05), and need of high flow nasal oxygen therapy and/or non-invasive ventilation (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: DVT may occur among non-ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19, despite guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis.

Differences in Clinical Presentation, Rate of Pulmonary Embolism, and Risk Factors Among Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis in Unusual Sites.

Unusual site deep vein thrombosis (USDVT) is an uncommon form of venous thromboembolism with heterogeneous signs and symptoms, unknown rate of pulmonary embolism (PE), and poorly defined risk factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 consecutive cases of USDVTs, discharged from our University Hospital over a period of 2 years. Patients were classified based on the site of thrombosis and distinguished between patients with cerebral vein thrombosis, jugular vein thrombosis, thrombosis of the deep veins of the upper extremities, and abdominal vein thrombosis. We found statistically significant differences between groups in terms of age (P < .0001) and gender distribution (P < .05). We also found that the rate of symptomatic patients was significantly different between groups (P < .0001). Another interesting finding was the significant difference between groups in terms of rate of PE (P < .01). Finally, we found statistically significant differences between groups in terms of risk factors for thrombosis, in particular cancer (P < .01). Unprovoked cases were differently distributed among groups (P < .0001). This study highlights differences between patients with USDVT, which depend on the site of thrombosis, and provides data which might be useful in clinical practice.