Effect of storage of platelet concentrates in PAS-B, PAS-C, or plasma on transfusion reactions.

BACKGROUND: Reports on the clinical consequences of longer storage time of platelet concentrates are contradictory. The objective of this study was to assess whether longer storage times are associated with a higher risk of transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We gathered storage times of pooled platelet concentrates related to transfusion reactions reported to the national hemovigilance office from 2004 to 2015. These were combined with storage times of platelet concentrates in the reference population to compare incidences of transfusion-associated circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, allergic reactions, febrile nonhemolytic reactions, and "other" reactions between storage time categories. RESULTS: A total of 567,053 platelet concentrates and 1870 transfusion reactions were analyzed. Among platelet additive solution (PAS)-B platelet recipients, the odds ratio of a storage time of 4 to 5 days compared to 1 to 3 days was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.18) for allergic, and 1.47 (1.09-1.98) for febrile reactions. For PAS-C platelet recipients, the odds ratio for allergic reactions was 3.78 (95% CI, 1.31-10.9) for 4 to 5 days, and 4.57 (95% CI, 1.57-13.4) for 6- to 7-day-old platelets when compared to 1- to 3-day-old units. In all other studied reaction types, no statistically significant association was observed in platelets in plasma, PAS-B, and PAS-C. CONCLUSIONS: In plasma platelets, longer storage time was not associated with a higher incidence of transfusion reactions. In PAS platelets, longer storage time was associated with higher transfusion reaction incidences, in particular for allergic reactions with both PAS fluids and febrile reactions with PAS-B. This indicates that the effect of storage time is different for different reaction types and depends on the storage fluid.

Prophylactic radiologic interventions to reduce postpartum hemorrhage in women with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum disorder: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between prophylactic radiologic interventions and perioperative blood loss in women with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study of women with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum disorder who underwent planned cesarean section in 69 Dutch hospitals between 2008 and 2013. All women had two risk factors for PAS: placenta previa/anterior low-lying placenta and a history of cesarean section(s). Women with and without ultrasonographic signs of PAS were studied as two separate groups. We compared the total blood loss of women with prophylactic radiologic interventions, defined as preoperative placement of balloon catheters or sheaths in the internal iliac or uterine arteries, with that of a control group consisting of women without prophylactic radiologic interventions using multivariable regression. We evaluated maternal morbidity by the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused within 24 h following childbirth (categories: 0, 1-3, >4), duration of hospital admission, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: A total of 350 women with placenta previa/anterior low-lying placenta and history of cesarean section(s) were included: 289 with normal ultrasonography, of whom 21 received prophylactic radiologic intervention, and 61 had abnormal ultrasonography, of whom 22 received prophylactic intervention. Among women with normal ultrasonography without prophylactic intervention (n = 268), the median blood loss was 725 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 500-1500) vs. 1000 mL (IQR 550-1750) in women with intervention (n = 21); the adjusted difference in blood loss was 9 mL (95% confidence interval (CI) -315-513), p = .97). Among women with abnormal ultrasonography, those without prophylactic intervention (n = 39) had a median blood loss of 2500 mL (IQR 1200-5000) vs. 1750 mL (IQR 775-4000) in women with intervention (n = 22); the adjusted difference in blood loss was -1141 mL (95% CI -1694- -219, p = .02). Results of outcomes on maternal morbidity were comparable among women with and without prophylactic intervention. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that prophylactic radiologic interventions prior to planned cesarean section may help to limit perioperative blood loss in women with clear signs of placenta accreta spectrum disorder on ultrasonography, but there was no evidence of a difference within the subgroup without such ultrasonographic signs. The use of these interventions should be discussed in a multidisciplinary shared decision-making process, including discussions of potential benefits and possible complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/28238, identifier NL4210 (NTR4363).