Towards improving hospital workflows: An evaluation of resources to mobilize patients.

AIM: To characterize resources to safely mobilize different types of hospitalized patients. BACKGROUND: Current approaches to determine nurse-patient ratios do not always include information regarding the specific demands of patients who require extra resources to mobilize. Workflows must be designed with knowledge of resource requirements to integrate patient mobility into the daily nursing team care plan. METHODS: Nurse-led mobility sessions were evaluated on two adult hospital units, which consisted of nurse-patient encounters focused on patient mobility only. The resources assessed for each session were time-to-mobilize patient, time-to-document, need for additional staff support, and the need for assistive devices. Mobility sessions were also categorized by patient ambulation status, level of mobility limitations (low, medium and high) and diagnosis. RESULTS: In 212 total mobility sessions, the median time-to-mobilize and time-to-document were 7.75 and 1.27 min, respectively. Additional staff support was required for 87% and 92% of patients with medium and high mobility limitations, respectively. All patients with low mobility limitations ambulated, and only 14% required additional staff. Ambulating patients with high mobility limitations was the most time-intensive (median 12.55 min). Ambulating stroke patients required one additional staff and an assistive device in 92% and 69% of the sessions, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study describes the resources associated with mobilizing inpatients with different levels of mobility impairments and diagnoses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: These results could assist nursing management with facilitating appropriate daily nurse-patient ratios and justify the need for assistive devices and staff support to safely mobilize patients.

Regionalization of care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is it too soon?

Interest in regionalization of the care of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has gained momentum recently. Optimal treatment of STEMI involves balancing time to treatment and reperfusion options. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, when performed in a timely fashion, has been shown to be more effective than fibrinolysis. However, numerous practical barriers prevent many STEMI patients from receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In an effort to increase beneficial primary percutaneous coronary intervention administration to STEMI patients, health care leaders have proposed regionalized STEMI care networks with advanced emergency medical services (EMS) involvement. Constructing regionalized STEMI networks presents a policy challenge because this shift in STEMI care would require changes in current EMS and emergency medicine practices. Therefore, we present various perspectives and issues that decisionmakers and system organizers must address properly before deciding whether to adopt this new model of care. Reorganizing STEMI care in a manner analogous to how trauma and stroke care are currently triaged and treated appeals intuitively; however, given the absence of evidence that STEMI regionalization actually improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective, more research is needed to determine whether STEMI regionalization is an efficient model for providing evidence-based care. The concept of STEMI regionalization represents an effort to inform policy according to evidence-based medicine, but real-world quality, geospatial, financial, cost, business, resource, and practice barriers present obstacles to implementing this concept efficiently and effectively.

Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) to Improve Patient Experience: How a Hospital Enhanced Care Transitions and Discharge Processes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) teams could be used to enhance patient experience by improving care transitions and discharge processes in a 318-bed community hospital. METHODS: In 2015, CUSP teams produced feasible solutions by participating in a design-thinking initiative, coupled with performance improvement tools involving data analytics and peer-learning communities. Teams completed a 90-day sprint challenge, involving weekly meetings, monthly department leader meetings, and progress trackers. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey was used, and the percent top (best) scores were reported for overall hospital ratings, discharge information, and care transitions. RESULTS: The percentage of patients choosing the top score increased from 61.0% preintervention to 68.0% postintervention for overall hospital rating and from 71.4% to 80.7% for recommending the hospital. The top scores increased from 76.0% preintervention to 84.5% postintervention for the discharge information domain and from 49.2% to 53.6% for the care transitions domain. CONCLUSION: CUSP teams improved patient experience. The teams could expand their scope to be the unit-level resource focused not only on safety but also on external quality measures to which patient experience is a broad category for HCAHPS scores, and potentially on value in future work.

The modern acute care surgeon: characterization of an evolving surgical niche.

BACKGROUND: Trauma and emergency surgery continues to evolve as a surgical niche. The simple fact that The Journal of Trauma is now entitled The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery captures this reality. We sought to characterize the niche that trauma and emergency surgeons have occupied during the maturation of the acute care surgery model. METHODS: We analyzed the University Health System Consortium-Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Practice Solutions Center database for the years 2007 to 2012 for specific current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. This database includes coding and billing data for more than 90 academic medical centers throughout the United States. We analyzed frequency counts and work relative value units (wRVUs) generated for specific codes to characterize the average trauma and emergency surgeon's work experience over time. RESULTS: We found that acute care surgeons generated 42.4% of wRVUs from procedural work and 57.6% from cognitive work. For cognitive work, critical care services generated the most wRVUs per year (25.2% of total), and subsequent hospital care was the most frequently performed activity (1,236.6 codes generated per year). For procedural work, laparoscopic cholecystectomies produced the most wRVUs per year (2.4% of total), and placement of a nontunneled catheter was the most frequently performed procedure (42.2 times per year). The average acute care surgeon performed the following numbers of procedures per year: 29.6 cholecystectomies and 20.0 appendectomies; 7.7 wound vacuum device changes; 5.9 implantation of mesh procedures; 4.9 splenectomies and 0.4 splenorrhaphies; 2.6 perirectal abscess drainage procedures; less than one component separation fascial hernia repair; and less than one video-assisted thoracic surgery. CONCLUSION: The modern acute care surgeon is a hybrid of critical care medicine physician and ever-evolving surgical interventionist. Acute care surgeons continue to do traditional trauma work while increasingly performing acute care surgeries. The work of acute care surgeons serves a growing role and fills a valuable niche in our health care system.

From heart beats to health recipes: The role of fractal physiology in the Ancestral Health movement.

The human body-an amazing biological system that scales up fractally from its cellular building blocks-exhibits an incredible ability to self heal. Why then, are chronic diseases and degeneration on the rise in the population? Why are we sicker, more obese, and more depressed and stressed than ever before in human history? Why can't we heal? The answers to these questions may lie in our ancestry, and modern departure from the human ecological niche. The ability to heal requires proper spatio-temporal inputs-nutrition, sleep, stress, activity, and socialization-in order for cellular signaling to occur properly across semi-permeable cell membranes. We first review key steps in the evolutionary history of multicellular life, focusing on the fundamental role of cell-cell interactions. Next, we present this as an important framework by which to understand how the entrainment of physiological signals in homeostatic mechanisms reveals new insights into the processes of disease. Examples are drawn from the evolution of metabolism, nutrition, and respiration in multicellular life. We argue that disease processes result from a mismatch between the physiological inputs an individual receives and their optimal amount and fractal distribution as determined by an individual's ancestry. A comparative analysis is a useful tool by which to illuminate deep homologies that reveal a mechanistic account for disease processes. This cell-molecular approach provides a useful contrast to the traditional reductionist approach to disease exemplified by the human genome project. As an example, we describe how cell-cell communication drives the ontogeny and phylogeny of physiology, producing the tissues, organs, and organ systems that hierarchically serve human physiology on various levels. Modern society, with its disconnected and stress-riddled lifestyle, is increasingly failing to provide the proper inputs for healthy gene expression and physiological function. Thus, the answers to our modern health woes-physical, mental, and social-may lie in acknowledging the powerful roles that our past has played in shaping our bodies. Finding ways to provide the proper inputs of the human ecological niche in the modern day may lead to significant, perhaps staggering improvements in our health and wellness. The fractal mathematics underpinning these dynamics also serves as a metaphor for the Ancestral Health Movement, which is currently arising as a multi-cultural, multi-national grass-roots pluralistic phenomenon.