Silent mutations reveal therapeutic vulnerability in RAS Q61 cancers.

RAS family members are the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancers. Although KRAS(G12C)-specific inhibitors show clinical activity in patients with cancer1-3, there are no direct inhibitors of NRAS, HRAS or non-G12C KRAS variants. Here we uncover the requirement of the silent KRASG60G mutation for cells to produce a functional KRAS(Q61K). In the absence of this G60G mutation in KRASQ61K, a cryptic splice donor site is formed, promoting alternative splicing and premature protein termination. A G60G silent mutation eliminates the splice donor site, yielding a functional KRAS(Q61K) variant. We detected a concordance of KRASQ61K and a G60G/A59A silent mutation in three independent pan-cancer cohorts. The region around RAS Q61 is enriched in exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) motifs and we designed mutant-specific oligonucleotides to interfere with ESE-mediated splicing, rendering the RAS(Q61) protein non-functional in a mutant-selective manner. The induction of aberrant splicing by antisense oligonucleotides demonstrated therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. By studying the splicing necessary for a functional KRAS(Q61K), we uncover a mutant-selective treatment strategy for RASQ61 cancer and expose a mutant-specific vulnerability, which could potentially be exploited for therapy in other genetic contexts.

Serial ctDNA analysis predicts clinical progression in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Targeted sequencing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising tool to monitor dynamic changes in the variant allele frequencies (VAF) of genomic alterations and predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: We performed targeted sequencing of 182 serial ctDNA samples from 53 patients with advanced UC. RESULTS: Serial ctDNA-derived metrics predicted the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced UC. Combining serial ctDNA aggregate VAF (aVAF) values with clinical factors, including age, sex, and liver metastasis, improved the performance of prognostic models. An increase of the ctDNA aVAF by ≥1 in serial ctDNA samples predicted disease progression within 6 months in 90% of patients. The majority of patients with aVAFs ≤0.7 in three consecutive ctDNA samples achieved durable clinical responses (≥6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Serial ctDNA analysis predicts disease progression and enables dynamic monitoring to guide precision medicine in patients with advanced UC.

Minimal Residual Disease using a Plasma-Only Circulating Tumor DNA Assay to Predict Recurrence of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Following Curative Intent Treatment.

PURPOSE: Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection identifies patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) likely to recur following definitive treatment. We evaluated a plasma only MRD assay to predict recurrence and survival in metastatic CRC patients undergoing curative intent procedures (surgery and/or radiotherapy), with or without (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary objective of this study was to assess the correlation of post-procedure tumor cfDNA detection status with radiographic disease recurrence (RFS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pre- and post-procedure longitudinal samples were collected from 53 patients and analyzed with a multiomic MRD assay detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from genomic and epigenomic signals. Pre- and post-procedure ctDNA detection correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS: 230/233 samples from 52 patients were successfully analyzed. At the time of data cutoff, 36 (69.2%) patients recurred with median follow-up of 31 months. 19/42 patients (45.2%) with ctDNA analyzed 3 weeks post-procedure had detectable ctDNA. ctDNA detection 3 weeks post-procedure was associated with shorter median RFS (HR 5.27; 95% CI, 2.31-12.0, p<0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 12.83; 95% CI, 3.6-45.9, p<0.0001). Pre-procedure ctDNA detection status was not associated with RFS but was associated with improved OS (HR 4.65; 95% CI, 1.4-15.2, p=0.0111). Undetectable ctDNA pre-procedure had notable long-term overall survival, >90% 3 years post-procedure. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of oligometastatic CRC, detection of ctDNA pre- or post-procedure was associated with inferior outcomes even after accounting for prognostic clinicopathologic variables. This suggests ctDNA may enhance current risk stratification methods helping evaluate novel treatments and surveillance strategies toward improving patient outcomes.

Drug Sensitivity and Allele Specificity of First-Line Osimertinib Resistance EGFR Mutations.

Osimertinib, a mutant-specific third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is emerging as the preferred first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant lung cancer, yet resistance inevitably develops in patients. We modeled acquired resistance to osimertinib in transgenic mouse models of EGFRL858R -induced lung adenocarcinoma and found that it is mediated largely through secondary mutations in EGFR-either C797S or L718V/Q. Analysis of circulating free DNA data from patients revealed that L718Q/V mutations almost always occur in the context of an L858R driver mutation. Therapeutic testing in mice revealed that both erlotinib and afatinib caused regression of osimertinib-resistant C797S-containing tumors, whereas only afatinib was effective on L718Q mutant tumors. Combination first-line osimertinib plus erlotinib treatment prevented the emergence of secondary mutations in EGFR. These findings highlight how knowledge of the specific characteristics of resistance mutations is important for determining potential subsequent treatment approaches and suggest strategies to overcome or prevent osimertinib resistance in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insight into the biological and molecular properties of osimertinib resistance EGFR mutations and evaluates therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/80/10/2017/F1.large.jpg.

Molecular Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with MET Exon 14-Mutant NSCLC.

PURPOSE: Molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are poorly understood. We aimed to characterize the genomic mechanisms of resistance to type I and type II MET TKIs and their impact on sequential MET TKI therapy outcomes in patients with metastatic MET exon 14-mutant NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Genomic alterations occurring at the time of progression on MET TKIs were studied using plasma and tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients had tissue or plasma available for analysis at the time of acquired resistance to a MET TKI. Genomic alterations known or suspected to be mechanisms of resistance were detected in 15 patients (75%). On-target acquired mechanisms of resistance, including single and polyclonal MET kinase domain mutations in codons H1094, G1163, L1195, D1228, Y1230, and high levels of amplification of the MET exon 14-mutant allele, were observed in 7 patients (35%). A number of off-target mechanisms of resistance were detected in 9 patients (45%), including KRAS mutations and amplifications in KRAS, EGFR, HER3, and BRAF; one case displayed both on- and off-target mechanisms of resistance. In 2 patients with on-target resistant mutations, switching between type I and type II MET TKIs resulted in second partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: On-target secondary mutations and activation of bypass signaling drive resistance to MET TKIs. A deeper understanding of these molecular mechanisms can support the development of sequential or combinatorial therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance.

Genomic Profiling for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, Microsatellite Instability, and Mismatch Repair Deficiency Among Patients With Metastatic Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: Genomic testing is recognized in national guidelines as essential to guide appropriate therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer. Previous studies report adherence to testing guidelines is suboptimal, but current testing rates have not been assessed. This study reports testing rates in metastatic colon cancer (mCC) for guideline-recommended biomarkers in a US-based population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of data extracted from electronic medical records was performed to identify patients with pathologically confirmed mCC and describe patterns of guideline-aligned biomarker testing. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 1,497 patients treated at 23 practices across the United States. Both community and academic centers were represented. RESULTS: A total of 1,497 patients with mCC diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Guideline-aligned biomarker testing rates for RAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency over this study period were 41%, 43%, and 51%, respectively. Patients were more likely to have guideline-aligned testing for RAS and BRAF if they were treated at an academic center, were diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease, and were female. In addition, patients < 65 years of age were more likely to have guideline-aligned RAS testing. Of the 177 patients (12% of cohort) who received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, only 50 (28%) had complete guideline-aligned biomarker testing. CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations and significant therapeutic implications, overall biomarker testing rates in mCC remain suboptimal. Adherence to guideline-recommended biomarker testing would potentially reduce exposure to expensive and ineffective therapies, resulting in improved patient outcomes.

Inherited Cancer in the Age of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the ability to test for multiple cancer susceptibility genes simultaneously without significantly increasing cost or turnaround time. With growing usage of multigene testing for inherited cancer, ongoing education for nurses and other health-care providers about hereditary cancer screening is imperative to ensure appropriate testing candidate identification, test selection, and posttest management. The purpose of this review article is to (1) provide an overview of how NGS works to detect germline mutations, (2) summarize the benefits and limitations of multigene panel testing, (3) describe risk categories of cancer susceptibility genes, and (4) highlight the counseling considerations for patients pursuing multigene testing.