Personalised perioperative dosing of ivabradine in noncardiac surgery: a single-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind feasibility pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery is associated with postoperative mortality. Heart rate (HR) is an independent risk factor for perioperative myocardial injury. In this pilot trial we tested the feasibility of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of personalised HR-targeted perioperative ivabradine. METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, feasibility pilot trial conducted at Geneva University Hospitals. We included patients ≥75 yr old or ≥45 yr old with cardiovascular risk factors planned for intermediate- or high-risk surgery. Patients were randomised to receive ivabradine (2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg) or placebo according to their HR, twice daily, from the morning of surgery until postoperative day 2. Primary outcomes were appropriate dosage and blinding success rates. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and January 2022, we randomised 78 patients (recruitment rate of 1.3 patients week-1). Some 439 of 444 study drug administrations were adequate (99% appropriate dosage rate). The blinding success rate was 100%. There were 137 (31%) administrations of Pill A (placebo in both groups for HR ≤70 beats min-1). Nine (11.5%) patients had a high-sensitive cardiac troponin T elevation ≥14 ng L-1 between any two measurements. The number of bradycardia episodes was eight in the placebo group and nine in the ivabradine group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of, and provides guidance for, a future trial testing the efficacy of personalised perioperative ivabradine. Future studies should include patients at higher risk of cardiac complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04436016.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Vascular Ultrasonography for Postanesthesia Induction Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypotension commonly occurs after anesthesia induction and is associated with negative clinical outcomes. Point-of-care ultrasound examination has emerged as a modality to predict postinduction hypotension (PIH). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the predictive performance of point-of-care ultrasound tests for PIH in noncardiac, nonobstetrical routine adult surgery. METHODS: Online databases were searched for diagnostic test accuracy studies of point-of-care ultrasound for predicting PIH up to March 30, 2023. The systematic review followed the Cochrane methodology. A Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis model was used, with PIH as defined by study authors as the main outcome. Risk of bias and applicability were examined through the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) score. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess evidence certainty. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies with 2631 participants were eligible for systematic review. Twenty-six studies with 2258 participants representing 8 ultrasound tests were included in the meta-analysis. Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (22 studies) sensitivity was 60% (95% credible interval [CrI], 49%-72%) and specificity was 83% (CrI, 74%-89%). Carotid artery corrected flow time (2 studies) sensitivity was 91% (CrI, 76%-98%) and specificity was 90% (CrI, 59%-98%). There were serious bias and applicability concerns due to selection bias and inappropriate blinding. The certainty of evidence was very low for all tests. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive performance of point-of-care ultrasound for PIH is uncertain. There is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials with appropriate blinding and void of selection bias.

The Effect of CytoSorb on Inflammatory Markers in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of CytoSorb at removing inflammatory mediators in critically ill patients is controversial. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of CytoSorb therapy on inflammatory parameters in critically ill patients with hyperinflammatory conditions were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened articles for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias, conflicts of interest, and certainty of evidence (CoE). The primary outcome was interleukin (IL)-6 at 1 day after initiation of the therapy. Secondary outcomes included various inflammatory markers at 1, 2, 3, and 5 days and mortality. Data were pooled if at least three trials reported the outcome of interest. We conducted meta-analyses of the data using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen trials ( n = 855) were included. Fourteen trials were judged to have notable concern about conflicts of interest. Seven trials were performed in medical ICU patients with hyperinflammatory conditions and 10 in complex cardiovascular surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb was not associated with lower IL-6 at 1 day (mean difference -5.98 [95% CI, -30.44 to 18.48] pg/mL), 2 days, 3 days, or 5 days after initiation of the treatment, as well as the concentration of procalcitionin. The levels of C-reactive protein were not lower with CytoSorb at 1, 2, and 3 days. The use of CytoSorb was associated with higher mortality at latest follow-up (relative risk = 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02-1.45]) and at 30 days. CoE ranged from low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CytoSorb hemoadsorption in a mixed population of critically ill patients with hyperinflammatory conditions does not exhibit a consistent decrease in IL-6 and other inflammatory parameters within the first 5 days of treatment. The significant uncertainty surrounding these findings highlights the need for further investigations.

Impact of pharmacological interventions on intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in adult thoracic surgery: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intrapulmonary shunt is a major determinant of oxygenation in thoracic surgery under one-lung ventilation. We reviewed the effects of available treatments on shunt, Pao2/FiO2 and haemodynamics through systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing pharmacological interventions and intrapulmonary shunt in thoracic surgery under one-lung ventilation up to March 30, 2022. Random-effects (component) network meta-analysis compared 24 treatments and 19 treatment components. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework assessed evidence certainty. The primary outcome was intrapulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 55 RCTs were eligible for systematic review (2788 participants). The addition of N2O (mean difference [MD]=-15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -25 to -5; P=0.003) or almitrine (MD=-13%; 95% CI, -20 to -6; P<0.001) to propofol anaesthesia were efficient at decreasing shunt. Combined epidural anaesthesia (MD=3%; 95% CI, 1-5; P=0.005), sevoflurane (MD=5%; 95% CI, 2-8; P<0.001), isoflurane (MD=6%; 95% CI, 4-9; P<0.001), and desflurane (MD=9%; 95% CI, 4-14; P=0.001) increased shunt vs propofol. Almitrine (MD=147 mm Hg; 95% CI, 58-236; P=0.001), dopexamine (MD=88 mm Hg; 95% CI, 4-171; P=0.039), and iloprost (MD=81 mm Hg; 95% CI, 4-158; P=0.038) improved Pao2/FiO2. Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Adding N2O or almitrine to propofol anaesthesia reduced intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation. Halogenated anaesthetics increased shunt in comparison with propofol. The effects of N2O, iloprost, and dexmedetomidine should be investigated in future research. N2O results constitute a research hypothesis currently not backed by any direct evidence. The clinical availability of almitrine is limited. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022310313.

Patent foramen ovale and perioperative stroke in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with perioperative stroke in noncardiac surgery. The magnitude of this association was assessed in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched up to June 2022 for studies assessing the association between patent foramen ovale and perioperative stroke in adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The primary analysis was limited to studies reporting effect estimates adjusted for significant clinical confounders. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We included nine retrospective and two prospective observational studies, including 21 257 082 patients. The presence of a patent foramen ovale was independently associated with stroke at 30 days after surgery (aOR=6.68 [95% CI: 3.51-12.73]; P<0.001) and at longest follow-up available (aOR=7.36 [95% CI: 3.56-15.21]; P<0.001). The odds of stroke at 30 days varied according to surgical specialty: neurosurgery (aOR=4.52 [95% CI: 3.17-6.43]), vascular surgery (aOR=7.15 [95% CI: 2.52-20.22]), thoracic surgery (aOR=10.64 [95% CI: 5.97-18.98]), orthopaedic surgery (aOR=11.85 [95% CI: 5.38-26.08]), general surgery (aOR=14.40 [95% CI: 10.88-19.06]), and genitourinary surgery (aOR=17.28 [95% CI: 10.36-28.84]). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a patent foramen ovale is associated with a large and consistent increase in odds of stroke across all explored surgical settings. Prospective trials should further explore this association by systematically assessing patent foramen ovale and stroke prevalence and identifying a specific population at risk. This is crucial for the elaboration of prevention plans and may improve perioperative outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative vitamin C in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative oxidative stress plays a role in organ injury and pain and could be improved by the antioxidant effects of vitamin C. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing perioperative vitamin C administration vs placebo or no treatment in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Thirty-seven RCTs and 2747 patients were included. Administration of vitamin C was associated with no difference in LOS (mean difference=0.02 day; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.30 to 0.35; P=0.88). Mortality did not differ between groups (relative risk=1.04; 95% CI, 0.52 to 2.08; P=0.5). No trials reported on other major postoperative complications. Vitamin C was associated with a reduction in postoperative pain score and cumulative morphine consumption up to 48 h after surgery. The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome was lower in orthopaedic patients receiving vitamin C. Adverse events were present in three RCTs (n=157), absent in 10 RCTs (n=957), and not reported in 25 RCTs (n=1570). One trial (n=20) in kidney transplantation surgery was stopped early because of safety concerns on vitamin C. The quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of vitamin C was not associated with a decrease in LOS after noncardiac surgery. The effects on morbidity and mortality are inconclusive and mostly uninvestigated. A small reduction in postoperative pain was found. Adverse events were rare but not systematically assessed. The evidence is uncertain, not supporting the use of vitamin C outside an experimental setting. STUDY PROTOCOL: PROSPERO database, CRD42021241654.

Mortality and adverse events of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The effects and safety of extracorporeal hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions are controversial. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized-controlled trials to assess the mortality and safety of CytoSorb® therapy in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions. Electronic databases were searched up to April 2022. The primary outcome was mortality at longest follow-up and secondary outcomes included various adverse event (AE) outcomes. Conflict of interest and funding of each trial were assessed. We calculated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Fourteen published (n = 764) and 4 unpublished (n = 111) trials were included. Eight trials were performed in medical ICU patients and 10 in complex cardiac surgery. Ten trials had significant industrial funding or an author conflict of interest. Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® was associated with higher mortality at latest follow-up (16 trials, n = 807, 120 of 402 [29.85%] patients in the CytoSorb® group vs. 98 of 405 [24.20%] patients in the control group, RR = 1.24 [95% CI, 1.04-1.49], p = .02, [TSA-adjusted CI, 0.92-1.68]) and at 30-days or in-hospital (11 trials, n = 727; RR = 1.41 [95% CI, 1.06-1.88], p = .02, [TSA-adjusted CI, 0.44-4.62]). Only one trial reported the definition of adverse event, while detailed results were reported in 3 trials; the risk of adverse events was not higher with CytoSorb®. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. CONCLUSION: Low certainty of evidence showed that the use of CytoSorb® might increase mortality in critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions. Adverse events were frequent but underreported and not systematically evaluated. Industrial funding and conflict of interest were common. Considerable uncertainty about the findings does not allow firm conclusions and suggests a need for high-quality randomized trials to clarify mortality and adverse events related to CytoSorb®. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® have been used in critically ill patients despite lack of high quality data from RCTs suggesting any patient-important benefits. The findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests an increased risk of adverse events including mortality. With no apparent benefits and at the same time risk of harm, use of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in daily clinical practice cannot be recommended at this time.

Therapeutic Hypothermia in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High Quality Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of the application of therapeutic hypothermia (32-35°C) on survival and major clinical endpoints in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: We searched online database and clinical trial registries dated up to April 30, 2019, and references of relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: Low risk of bias randomized trials which compared hypothermia applied for at least 24 hours and conventional therapy in critically ill patients were included. We excluded trials investigating therapeutic hypothermia in indications already supported by international guidelines (adult cardiac arrest and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy of newborns) or intraoperative hypothermia. DATA EXTRACTION: Titles and abstracts were reviewed independently by two authors. If the articles seemed eligible, full-text articles were reviewed, and data were abstracted using a structured template. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our search retained 14 low risk of bias randomized trials (2,670 patients) performed in three different settings: traumatic brain injury, serious infections, and stroke. Therapeutic hypothermia was associated with an increase in mortality at longest follow-up available (432/1,375 [31%] vs 330/1,295 [25%]; risk ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.39; p = 0.0004; I = 0%). Pooled results showed no difference of good neurologic outcome among survivors between the two treatment arms (493/1,142 [43%] vs 486/1,067 [46%]; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97-1.12; p = 0.27; I = 1%). Arrhythmias were significantly increased among patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. We found no difference between groups in pneumonia, serious infections, any infection, hemorrhage, renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, and uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality randomized evidence indicates that therapeutic hypothermia is associated with higher mortality and no difference in good neurologic outcome compared with normothermia in critically ill patients. Although there still might be a possibility that therapeutic hypothermia is beneficial in a specific setting, routine application of therapeutic hypothermia would better be avoided outside the settings indicated by international guidelines (adult cardiac arrest and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy of newborns).

Effect of Continuous Epinephrine Infusion on Survival in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine is frequently used as an inotropic and vasopressor agent in critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic support. Data from observational trials suggested that epinephrine use is associated with a worse outcome as compared with other adrenergic and nonadrenergic vasoactive drugs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of epinephrine administration on outcome of critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register were searched by two independent investigators up to March 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: administration of epinephrine as IV continuous infusion, patients admitted to an ICU or undergoing major surgery, and randomized controlled trials. Studies on epinephrine administration as bolus (e.g., during cardiopulmonary resuscitation), were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators examined and extracted data from eligible trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 5,249 studies were assessed, with a total of 12 studies (1,227 patients) finally included in the meta-analysis. The majority of the trials were performed in the setting of septic shock, and the most frequent comparator was a combination of norepinephrine plus dobutamine. We found no difference in all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available (197/579 [34.0%] in the epinephrine group vs 219/648 [33.8%] in the control group; risk ratio = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; p = 0.49; I = 0%). No differences in the need for renal replacement therapy, occurrence rate of myocardial ischemia, occurrence rate of arrhythmias, and length of ICU stay were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Current randomized evidence showed that continuous IV administration of epinephrine as inotropic/vasopressor agent is not associated with a worse outcome in critically ill patients.

Tracheal intubation in patients at risk for cervical spinal cord injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in patients at risk for secondary spinal cord injury is potentially difficult and risky. OBJECTIVES: To compare tracheal intubation techniques in adult patients at risk for secondary cervical spinal cord injury undergoing surgery. Primary outcome was first-attempt failure rate. Secondary outcomes were time to successful intubation and procedure complications. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with trial sequential analysis (TSA). DATA SOURCES: Databases searched up to July 2019. ELIGIBILITY: Randomized controlled trials comparing different intubation techniques. RESULTS: We included 18 trials enrolling 1972 patients. Four studies used the "awake" approach, but no study compared awake versus non-awake techniques. In remaining 14 RCTs, intubation was performed under general anesthesia. First-attempt failure rate was similar when comparing direct laryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy versus other techniques. A better first-attempt failure rate was found with videolaryngoscopy and when pooling all the fiberoptic techniques together. All these results appeared not significant at TSA, suggesting inconclusive evidence. Intubating lighted stylet allowed faster intubation. Postoperative neurological complications were 0.34% (no significant difference among techniques). No life-threatening adverse event was reported; mild local complications were common (19.5%). The certainty of evidence was low to very low mainly due to high imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSIONS: Videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic-assisted techniques might be associated with higher first-attempt failure rate over controls. However, low to very low certainty of evidence does not allow firm conclusions on the best tracheal intubation in patients at risk for cervical spinal cord injury.

The optimal dose of succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for the widely accepted standard regimen of succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction (1.0 mg kg- 1) remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing any succinylcholine regimen with the standard regimen (1.0 mg kg- 1) and reporting on intubating conditions and/or apnoea times. Results were expressed as absolute risk differences (ARD) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data. RESULTS: We retrieved six trials with relevant data of 864 patients (ASA 1 or 2, aged 18-65 years, body mass index < 30 kg m- 2). Four regimens (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 mg kg- 1) were compared with 1.0 mg kg- 1 in at least three trials each, and three (0.8, 1.5, 2 mg kg- 1) in one each. With 0.3 to 0.5 mg kg- 1, the likelihood of excellent intubating conditions was significantly decreased (ARD - 22% to - 67%). With 0.3 and 0.4 mg kg- 1, but not with 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1.5 and 2.0 mg kg- 1, the likelihood of unacceptable intubating conditions was significantly increased (ARD + 22% and + 32%, respectively). With 2.0 mg kg- 1, but not with 0.8 or 1.5 mg kg- 1, the likelihood of excellent intubating conditions was significantly increased (ARD + 23%). Apnoea times were significantly shorter with regimens ≤0.8 mg kg- 1 (MD - 1.0 to - 3.4 min) but were not reported with 1.5 or 2.0 mg kg- 1. CONCLUSIONS: With succinylcholine regimens ≤0.5 mg kg- 1, excellent intubating conditions are less likely and apnoea times are shorter, compared with 1 mg kg- 1. With 0.3 and 0.4 mg kg- 1, unacceptable intubating conditions are more common. Succinylcholine 1.5 mg kg- 1 does not produce more often excellent conditions compared with 1 mg kg- 1, while 2.0 mg kg- 1 does, but the database with these regimens is weak and apnoea times remain unknown. Limited information size and strong statistical heterogeneity decrease the certainty of the evidence.

The Effect of Vitamin C on Clinical Outcome in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: The effects of vitamin C administration on clinical outcome in critically ill patients remain controversial. DATA SOURCES: Online databases were searched up to October 1, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials on the use of vitamin C (any regimen) in adult critically ill patients versus placebo or no therapy. DATA EXTRACTION: Risk ratio for dichotomous outcome and standardized mean difference for continuous outcome with 95% CI were calculated using random-effects model meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-four randomized studies, 16 performed in ICU setting (2,857 patients) and 28 in cardiac surgery (3,598 patients), published between 1995 and 2018, were included in the analysis. In ICU patients, vitamin C administration was not associated with a difference in mortality (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74-1.10; p = 0.31), acute kidney injury, ICU or hospital length of stay compared with control. In cardiac surgery, vitamin C was associated to a reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78; p < 0.0001), ICU stay (standardized mean difference, -0.28 d; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.13 d; p = 0.0003), and hospital stay (standardized mean difference, -0.30 d; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.10 d; p = 0.002). Furthermore, no differences in postoperative mortality, acute kidney injury, stroke, and ventricular arrhythmia were found. CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed population of ICU patients, vitamin C administration is associated with no significant effect on survival, length of ICU or hospital stay. In cardiac surgery, beneficial effects on postoperative atrial fibrillation, ICU or hospital length of stay remain unclear. However, the quality and quantity of evidence is still insufficient to draw firm conclusions, not supporting neither discouraging the systematic administration of vitamin C in these populations. Vitamin C remains an attractive intervention for future investigations aimed to improve clinical outcome.

Blood Purification and Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are severe inflammatory conditions related to high morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess whether extracorporeal blood purification reduces mortality in this setting. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for pertinent studies up to January 2019. We included randomized controlled trials on the use of hemoperfusion, hemofiltration without a renal replacement purpose, and plasmapheresis as a blood purification technique in comparison to conventional therapy in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. We calculated relative risks and 95% CIs. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation methodology for the certainty of evidence was used. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials with 2,499 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Hemoperfusion was associated with lower mortality compared to conventional therapy (relative risk = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98], P = 0.02, very low certainty evidence). Low risk of bias trials on polymyxin B immobilized filter hemoperfusion showed no mortality difference versus control (relative risk = 1.14 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.36], P = 0.12, moderate certainty evidence), while recent trials found an increased mortality (relative risk = 1.22 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.45], P = 0.02, low certainty evidence); trials performed in the United States and Europe had no significant difference in mortality (relative risk = 1.13 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.34], P = 0.15), while trials performed in Asia had a positive treatment effect (relative risk = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.69], P < 0.001). Hemofiltration (relative risk = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.00], P = 0.05, very low certainty evidence) and plasmapheresis (relative risk = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.96], P = 0.03, very low certainty evidence) were associated with a lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Very low-quality randomized evidence demonstrates that the use of hemoperfusion, hemofiltration, or plasmapheresis may reduce mortality in sepsis or septic shock. Existing evidence of moderate quality and certainty does not provide any support for a difference in mortality using polymyxin B hemoperfusion. Further high-quality randomized trials are needed before systematic implementation of these therapies in clinical practice.

Correction to: Tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a comprehensive systematic review of randomized trials.

In the publication of this article [1], there was an error in a contributors Family Name. This has now been updated in the original article.

Intravenous Lidocaine for the Prevention of Cough: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear to what extent intravenous lidocaine prevents cough and whether there is dose-responsiveness and risk of harm. METHODS: We searched electronic databases to January 1, 2017 for randomized trials comparing intravenous lidocaine with placebo for the prevention of cough in surgical patients. Primary outcome was the incidence of cough. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: In 20 trials in adults (n = 3062) and 5 trials in children (n = 445), intravenous lidocaine 0.5-2 mg·kg was tested for the prevention of intubation-, extubation-, or opioid-induced cough. Twenty-two trials included only American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II patients; 3 trials (n = 99) also included American Society of Anesthesiologists III patients. Lidocaine was associated with a lower incidence of cough compared to placebo in adults and children, irrespective of dosage and cough etiology. Data from adults suggested dose-responsiveness; with 0.5 mg·kg, RR was 0.66 (0.50-0.88) and NNT was 8 (5.4-14.3); with 1 mg·kg, RR was 0.58 (0.49-0.69) and NNT was 7 (4.6-8.9); with 1.5 mg·kg, RR was 0.44 (0.33-0.58) and NNT was 5 (3.3-5.2); and with 2 mg·kg, RR was 0.39 (0.24-0.62) and NNT was 3 (2.0-3.4). Adverse effect reporting was sparse. CONCLUSIONS: Within a range of 0.5-2 mg·kg, intravenous lidocaine dose dependently prevents intubation-, extubation-, and opioid-induced cough in adults and children with NNTs ranging from 8 to 3. The risk of harm in high-risk patients remains unknown.

Awake Fiberoptic Intubation Protocols in the Operating Room for Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Awake fiberoptic intubation is one of the recommended strategies for surgical patients with anticipated difficult airway, especially when concurrent difficult ventilation is expected. We performed the first systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing different protocols for awake fiberoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway, including studies investigating elective awake fiberoptic intubation for scheduled surgery; randomized controlled trials comparing different methods for performing awake fiberoptic intubation; and adult patients with anticipated difficult airway. We excluded studies in the nonoperating theater settings, randomized controlled trials comparing awake fiberoptic intubation with other techniques, and studies based on simulation. Primary outcomes were success rate and death; secondary outcomes were major adverse events. Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials evaluating 2045 patients and 4 areas were identified: premedication, local anesthesia, sedation, and ancillary techniques to facilitate awake fiberoptic intubation. Quality of evidence was moderate-low and based on small-sampled randomized controlled trials. Overall, 12 of 2045 intubation failures (0.59%) and 7 of 2045 severe adverse events (0.34%) occurred, with no permanent consequences or death. All evaluated methods to achieve local anesthesia performed similarly well. No differences were observed in success rate with different sedatives. Dexmedetomidine resulted in fewer desaturation episodes compared to propofol and opioids with or without midazolam (relative risk, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.95]; P = .03); occurrence of desaturation was similar with remifentanil versus propofol, while incidence of apnoea was lower with sevoflurane versus propofol (relative risk, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.22-0.81]; P = .01). A high degree of efficacy and safety was observed with minimal differences among different protocols; dexmedetomidine might offer a better safety profile compared to other sedatives.

Nutrition in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Preoperative Evaluation, Management in the Postoperative Period, and Clinical Implications for Outcomes.

The perioperative nutritional status of patients undergoing cardiac surgery influences outcomes; therefore nutritional support is essential for these patients. Owing to the lack of solid evidence, no protocols have been established for the nutritional management of this specific population, and most of the recommendations are based on other critically ill populations. In this review of the main studies performed in this population, the importance of preoperative evaluation of nutritional status, the management of nutritional support immediately after cardiac surgery, the influence of nutrition on outcomes, and the importance of nutrition after hospital discharge are discussed. In addition, the possible influence of glycemic control and pharmaconutrition in the outcomes of these patients are described briefly.

Vasopressors During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVES: Several randomized controlled trials have compared adrenaline (epinephrine) with alternative therapies in patients with cardiac arrest with conflicting results. Recent observational studies suggest that adrenaline might increase return of spontaneous circulation but worsen neurologic outcome. We systematically compared all the vasopressors tested in randomized controlled trials in adult cardiac arrest patients in order to identify the treatment associated with the highest rate of return of spontaneous circulation, survival, and good neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Network meta-analysis. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. INTERVENTIONS: PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, and the Cochrane Central register were searched (up to April 1, 2017). We included all the randomized controlled trials comparing a vasopressor with any other therapy. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed to identify the treatment associated with the highest likelihood of survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies randomizing 14,848 patients in 12 treatment groups were included. Only a combined treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with increased likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation and survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with several other comparators, including adrenaline. Adrenaline alone was not associated with any significant difference in mortality and good neurologic outcome compared with any other comparator. CONCLUSIONS: In randomized controlled trials assessing vasopressors in adults with cardiac arrest, only a combination of adrenaline, vasopressin, and methylprednisolone was associated with improved survival with a good neurologic outcome compared with any other drug or placebo, particularly in in-hospital cardiac arrest. There was no significant randomized evidence to support neither discourage the use of adrenaline during cardiac arrest.