High Interobserver Variability Among Pathologists Using Combined Positive Score to Evaluate PD-L1 Expression in Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Reliable, reproducible methods to interpret programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC) are needed for pathologists to inform decisions associated with checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Our international study compared interpathologist agreement of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS) under standardized conditions on samples from patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal adenocarcinoma. Tissue sections from 100 adenocarcinoma pretreatment biopsies were stained in a single laboratory using the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 28-8 and 22C3 (Agilent) pharmDx immunohistochemical assays. PD-L1 CPS was evaluated by 12 pathologists on scanned whole slide images of these biopsies before and after a 2-hour CPS training session by Agilent. Additionally, pathologists determined PD-L1-positive TC, IC, and total viable TC on a single tissue fragment from 35 of 100 biopsy samples. Scoring agreement among pathologists was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interobserver variability for CPS for 100 biopsies was high, with only fair agreement among pathologists both pre- (range, 0.45-0.55) and posttraining (range, 0.56-0.57) for both assays. For the 35 single biopsy samples, poor/fair agreement was also observed for the total number of viable TC (ICC, 0.09), number of PD-L1-positive IC (ICC, 0.19), number of PD-L1-positive TC (ICC, 0.54), and calculated CPS (ICC, 0.14), whereas calculated TC score (positive TC/total TC) showed excellent agreement (ICC, 0.82). Retrospective histologic review of samples with the poorest interpathologist agreement revealed the following as possible confounding factors: (1) ambiguous identification of positively staining stromal cells, (2) faint or variable intensity of staining, (3) difficulty in distinguishing membranous from cytoplasmic tumor staining, and (4) cautery and crush artifacts. These results emphasize the need for objective techniques to standardize the interpretation of PD-L1 expression when using the CPS methodology on gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer biopsies to accurately identify patients most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

High interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists assessing PD-L1 CPS across multiple indications.

AIMS: A common concern among pathologists scoring PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining is interobserver and intraobserver variability. We assessed the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of PD-L1 scoring among trained pathologists using a combined positive score (CPS; tumour cell and tumour-associated immune cell staining). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected for 2 years (2017-2019) from 456 pathologists worldwide. Digital training encompassed unique, tumour-specific training, and test sets. Samples were stained using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and evaluated at specific CPS cutoffs for gastric cancer (GC), cervical cancer (CC), urothelial cancer (UC), oesophageal cancer (OC), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Pathologists underwent expert-to-peer training and scored 20 blinded samples on day 1 and 25 blinded samples on day 2 (including 15 of the day 1 samples). Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed. For GC (120 observers) and CC (32 observers) samples assessed at CPS ≥1, average interobserver agreement was 91.5% and 91.0%, respectively, and average intraobserver agreement was 90.2% and 96.6%, respectively. For UC (139 observers) and OC (52 observers) samples measured at CPS ≥10, average interobserver agreement was 93.4% and 93.7%, respectively, and average intraobserver agreement was 92.0% and 92.5%, respectively. For HNSCC samples (113 observers), average interobserver agreement was 94.1% at CPS ≥1 and 86.5% at CPS ≥20; intraobserver agreement was 94.7% at CPS ≥1 and 90.5% at CPS ≥20. CONCLUSION: The consistently high interobserver and intraobserver concordance rates support the effectiveness of face-to-face training of many global pathologists for scoring PD-L1 CPS across multiple indications at several specific cutoffs.

Comprehensive analysis of the ErbB receptor family in pediatric nervous system tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of knowledge regarding pediatric biomarkers, including the relevance of ErbB pathway aberrations in pediatric tumors. We investigated the occurrence of ErbB receptor aberrations across different pediatric malignancies, to identify patterns of ErbB dysregulation and define biomarkers suitable for patient enrichment in clinical studies. PROCEDURE: Tissue samples from 297 patients with nervous system tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma were analyzed for immunohistochemical expression or gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Exploratory analyses of HER3/HER4 expression, and mRNA expression of ErbB receptors/ligands (NanoString) were performed. Assay validation followed general procedures, with additional validation to address Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) requirements. RESULTS: In most tumor types, samples with high ErbB receptor expression were found with heterogeneous distribution. We considered increased/aberrant ErbB pathway activation when greater than or equal to two EGFR/HER2 markers were simultaneously upregulated. ErbB pathway dysregulation was identified in ∼20%-30% of samples for most tumor types (medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors 31.1%, high-grade glioma 27.1%, neuroblastoma 22.7%, rhabdomyosarcoma 23.1%, ependymoma 18.8%), 4.2% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas, and no recurrent or refractory low-grade astrocytomas. In medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors and neuroblastoma, this was attributed mainly to high EGFR polysomy/HER2 amplification, whereas EGFR gene amplification was observed in some high-grade glioma samples. EGFR/HER2 overexpression was most prevalent in ependymoma. CONCLUSIONS: Overexpression and/or amplification of EGFR/HER2 were identified as potential enrichment biomarkers for clinical trials of ErbB-targeted drugs.

TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1 (TGIF) expression in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent female cancer and preferentially metastasizes to bone. The transcription factor TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1 (TGIF) is involved in bone metabolism. However, it is not yet known whether TGIF is associated with BC bone metastasis or patient outcome and thus of potential interest. METHODS: TGIF expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 1197 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from BC patients treated in the GAIN (German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive) study with two adjuvant dose-dense schedules of chemotherapy with or without bisphosphonate ibandronate. TGIF expression was categorized into negative/low and moderate/strong staining. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and time to primary bone metastasis as first site of relapse (TTPBM). RESULTS: We found associations of higher TGIF protein expression with smaller tumor size (p = 0.015), well differentiated phenotype (p < 0.001) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC (p < 0.001). Patients with higher TGIF expression levels showed a significantly longer disease-free (DFS: HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.59-0.95], log-rank p = 0.019) and overall survival (OS: HR 0.69 [95%CI 0.50-0.94], log-rank p = 0.019), but no association with TTPBM (HR 0.77 [95%CI 0.51-1.16]; p = 0.213). Univariate analysis in molecular subgroups emphasized that elevated TGIF expression was prognostic for both DFS and OS in ER-positive BC patients (DFS: HR 0.68 [95%CI 0.51-0.91]; log-rank p = 0.009, interaction p = 0.130; OS: HR 0.60 [95%CI 0.41-0.88], log-rank p = 0.008, interaction p = 0.107) and in the HER2-negative subgroup (DFS:HR 0.67 [95%CI 0.50-0.88], log-rank p = 0.004, interaction p = 0.034; OS: HR 0.57 [95%CI 0.40-0.81], log-rank p = 0.002, interaction p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that moderate to high TGIF expression is a common feature of breast cancer cells and that this is not associated with bone metastases as first site of relapse. However, a reduced expression is linked to tumor progression, especially in HER2-negative breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ; registration number: NCT00196872 .

ISH-based HER2 diagnostics.

A prerequisite for all HER2 directed therapies is the demonstration of HER2 receptor protein overexpression and/or gene amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). ASCO and CAP have published several HER2 test guidelines over the past 15 years for both breast and gastric cancer. The latest version for breast cancer (2018) focuses on special issues of ISH related to the definitions of special diagnostic groups (1-5). The guidelines for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (2017), essentially based on ToGA trial data, are now also being used for other tumors such as pancreas, gallbladder, and non-small-cell lung cancer. For colorectal cancer, a modified testing procedure has been proposed. Recently, besides overexpression and amplification, a third type of HER gene alteration, namely mutation, has gained much interest. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows detection of both amplification and mutation of the HER2 gene providing new options of therapy especially in the case of activating mutations.

[Quality assurance in dMMR and MSI diagnostics]. / Qualitätssicherung in der dMMR- und MSI-Diagnostik.

Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) have therapeutic relevance not only for colorectal carcinomas but also for carcinomas of other entities (endometrium, biliary tract, pancreas). In order to guarantee the knowledge and good technical quality necessary for adequate implementation of the corresponding analyses in pathology institutes, the Pathology Quality Assurance Initiative ("Die Qualitätssicherung-Initiative Pathologie") has been offering proficiency tests (PT) for years. It has been shown for the dMMR PT that various antibody clones from different manufacturers provide comparable results in immunohistological examinations, except for slight variations. The difficulty lies in the staining protocol (intensity of staining) and the interpretation of the staining results. The molecular pathological MSI PT has shown a positive trend at a high-quality level over the last three years. Success rates increased from 89 (2018) to 97% (2019/2020). The choice of assay, whether commercial or in-house tests with the designated cutoffs for this purpose, has not been shown to have a significant impact on the PTs in the selected EQA samples.

MSI testing : What's new? What should be considered?

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD­1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI­H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI­H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI­H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

[MSI testing : What is new? What should be considered? German version]. / MSI-Testung : Was ist neu? Was ist zu beachten?

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD­1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI­H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI­H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI­H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

[ISH-based HER2 diagnostics]. / ISH-basierte HER2-Diagnostik.

A prerequisite for all HER2 directed therapies is the demonstration of HER2 receptor protein overexpression and/or gene amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). ASCO and CAP have published several HER2 test guidelines over the past 15 years for both breast and gastric cancer. The latest version for breast cancer (2018) focuses on special issues of ISH related to the definitions of special diagnostic groups (1-5). The guidelines for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (2017), essentially based on ToGA trial data, are now also being used for other tumors such as pancreas, gallbladder, and non-small-cell lung cancer. For colorectal cancer, a modified testing procedure has been proposed. Recently, besides overexpression and amplification, a third type of HER gene alteration, namely mutation, has gained much interest. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows detection of both amplification and mutation of the HER2 gene providing new options of therapy especially in the case of activating mutations.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive digestive tumors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This manuscript aims at providing an update and overview on the role of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing and HER2-directed therapies in digestive tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: Phase 3 trial data demonstrating a survival benefit of HER2-targeting treatments are limited to gastric cancer. However, HER2 positivity is also found in 5-6% of colorectal, 7% of pancreatic, and 16% of extrahepatic biliary cancers. Although phase 2 trial data support the use of the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib with chemotherapy in HER2-positive colorectal cancer, the patient's benefit from targeted treatment of HER2-positive biliary or pancreatic neoplasms is currently unclear, and further clinical trials are necessary. SUMMARY: With the exception of gastric cancer, there are currently no defined guidelines for HER2 testing in other digestive tumors. Various HER2-targeting therapies, which are standard of care in HER2-positive breast cancer, failed in HER2-positive gastric cancers. Thus, the predictive value of HER2 overexpression depends on the tumor type, and results of breast cancer trials cannot a priori be extrapolated to digestive cancers. Next-generation sequencing panel diagnostics may furthermore identify targetable activating mutations in gastric, extrahepatic biliary, and colorectal cancer, particularly if traditional testing (immunohistochemistry/in-situ hybridization) is negative. However, their clinical relevance needs to be determined.

Optimization and validation of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining protocols using the antibody clone 28-8 on different staining platforms.

Several immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed to assess tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in patients who are candidates for programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. The PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx kit is FDA-approved as a complementary diagnostic and CE-marked as an in vitro diagnostic device for nivolumab therapy in melanoma and specific lung cancer subtypes (and for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck/urothelial carcinoma in Europe only). Kit availability is limited outside the United States, and its use requires the Dako Autostainer Link 48 platform, which is unavailable in many laboratories. Validated laboratory-developed tests based on 28-8 concentrated antibody outside the kit are needed. This study compared the results from PD-L1 expression level analysis across four immunohistochemistry platforms (Dako Autostainer Link 48, Dako Omnis, Leica Bond-III, and Ventana BenchMark ULTRA) with the 28-8 pharmDx kit in lung cancer (multiple histologies), melanoma, and head and neck cancer (multiple histologies). Samples were prepared per protocol for each platform and stained using PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx kit on Dako Autostainer Link 48, and per protocol for each platform. The control samples (tonsil and placenta tissue; cell lines with prespecified PD-L1 expression levels) were tested to evaluate the specificity and the sensitivity of test assays. An agreement level of 0.90 with the pharmDx kit was set for each platform. Inter- and intra-assay reliability were assessed. Evaluable samples were lung cancer = 29; melanoma = 31; head and neck cancer = 30. Mean agreement was calculated for PD-L1 expression levels of ≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥50%. Mean overall agreement for all indications was 0.87-0.99. Inter- and intra-assay of scoring/classification repeatability was 100%. Analysis of PD-L1 expression levels using laboratory-developed immunohistochemistry assays with 28-8 antibody may be permissible if the platform is validated using reference samples with defined expression levels.

Interlaboratory concordance of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for non-small-cell lung cancer.

AIMS: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry has become a mandatory diagnostic test in the treatment of lung cancer. Several research initiatives have started to harmonise the five PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays that have been used in clinical trials. Here, we report data on interlaboratory and interassay concordance for commercial assays ('assays') and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) at 10 German testing sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: To assess interlaboratory concordance, a tissue microarray containing 21 pulmonary carcinoma specimens was centrally prepared. Pre-cut sections were stained at 10 sites by the use of assays 28-8, 22C3, SP263, and SP142, as well as 11 LDTs. Assay performance was evaluated with a second tissue microarray containing 11 cell lines with defined PD-L1 expression. Quality control was centrally performed by manual and digital analyses. The assays yielded reproducible IHC staining patterns at all sites. In agreement with previous studies, 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 showed similar staining patterns, whereas SP142 was distinct. Among the LDTs, six of 11 protocols showed staining patterns similar to those of assays 22C3 and 28-8. Interlaboratory concordance of tumour cell scoring by use of a six-step system was moderate (Light's κ = 0.43-0.69), whereas the clinically approved cut-offs of ≥1% and ≥50% showed substantial concordance (κ = 0.73-0.89). Immune cell scoring by the use of SP142 yielded moderate concordance (κ = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the previously described staining patterns of the assays, and show that they can be reproducibly employed at different sites. LDTs with staining results similar to those of the assays are implementable, but have to be carefully validated.

Assessing HER2 testing quality in breast cancer: variables that influence HER2 positivity rate from a large, multicenter, observational study in Germany.

Despite >10 years of routine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer, testing quality is still an issue. Guidelines recommend assessing HER2 positivity rates as a quality indicator; however, the extent to which patient- or tumor-related factors influence HER2 positivity is still unknown. The present study analyzed these influences to identify pathology centers with HER2 positivity rates unexplained by patient- or tumor-related factors. This observational, prospective study monitored routine HER2 testing at 57 institutes of pathology in Germany (January 2013-August 2014). Data collected included HER2 test result, patient- and tumor-related factors, sample source, and method of sample retrieval. Factors influencing HER2 positivity rates were identified by multiple logistic regression. Individual center effects were assessed in an extended multiple logistic regression model by their statistical significance after adjusting for the combined effect of patient- or tumor-related covariates and multiple testing. Analyses included 15 332 invasive breast cancer samples. Histologic grade showed the strongest influence on HER2 positivity, followed by hormone receptor status, histologic subtype, age, and nodal status (all P<0.0001). The overall HER2 positivity rate across centers was 14.4% (range 7.1-27.3%). A statistically significant center effect on the HER2 positivity rate was identified for three centers (P<0.05), with a trend toward a center effect for a further three (P<0.2). This study, the first of its kind, highlights that assessing HER2 testing quality with HER2 positivity rates should include standardized assessment of patient- or tumor-related characteristics to identify centers with HER2 testing quality issues more effectively. As treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer continue to evolve, identifying the right patients is key.

Harmonized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for pulmonary squamous-cell and adenocarcinomas.

Immunohistochemistry of the PD-L1 protein may be predictive for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pulmonary adenocarcinoma and in clinically unselected cohorts of so-called non-small-cell lung cancer. Several PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays with custom reagents and scoring-criteria are developed in parallel. Biomarker testing and clinical decision making would profit from harmonized PD-L1 diagnostics. To assess interobserver concordance and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining patterns, 15 pulmonary carcinoma resection specimens (adenocarcinoma: n=11, squamous-cell carcinoma: n=4) were centrally stained with the assays 28-8, 22C3, SP142, and SP263 according to clinical trial protocols. The slides were evaluated independently by nine pathologists. Proportions of PD-L1-positive carcinoma cells and immune cells were scored according to a 6-step system that integrates the criteria employed by the four PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays. Proportion scoring of PD-L1-positive carcinoma cells showed moderate interobserver concordance coefficients for the 6-step scoring system (Light's kappa=0.47-0.50). The integrated dichotomous proportion cut-offs (≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥50%) showed good concordance coefficients (κ=0.6-0.8). Proportion scoring of PD-L1-positive immune cells yielded low interobserver concordance coefficients both for the 6-step-score (κ<0.2) and the dichotomous cut-offs (κ=0.12-0.25). The assays 28-8 and 22C3 stained similar proportions of carcinoma cells in 12 of 15 cases. SP142 stained fewer carcinoma cells compared to 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 in four cases, whereas SP263 stained more carcinoma cells in nine cases. SP142 and SP263 stained immune cells more intensely. The data indicate that carcinoma cells can be reproducibly scored in PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma. No differences in interobserver concordance were noticed among the tested assays. The scoring of immune cells yielded low concordance rates and might require specific standardization. The four tested PD-L1 assays did not show comparable staining patterns in all cases. Thus, studies that correlate staining patterns and response to immunotherapy are required to test the significance of the observed differences.

Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer--re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data.

Recently the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists have updated their clinical practice guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer. In order to evaluate these new recommendations, we have re-assessed the HER2 status of 6018 breast cancer cases of the screening population for the HERceptin adjuvant (HERA) trial that were originally centrally tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization based on the FDA-released test guidelines. According to the most recent 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations, 3380 (56.2%) cases were classified as HER2 positive compared with 3359 (55.8%) applying the HERA/FDA scheme and 3339 (55.5%) applying the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Twenty-one cases switched from negative (HERA/FDA scheme) to positive (2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines). This group is characterized by a mean HER2 gene copy number of ≥6.0, polysomy or co-amplification of CEP17 with an average CEP17 count of 5, and with HER2 receptor overexpression in 75% of cases. On the basis of the HER2 gene copy number alone, we observe 494 cases (8.2%) that are in the equivocal range. Most of these cases (>80%) were also nondecisive by immunohistochemistry (score 2+) irrespective of whether ratio was <2.0>. The number of equivocal cases that would require HER2 reflex testing decreases to 113 (1.9%) if in addition to the HER2 gene copy number also the ratio of HER2 and CEP17 copy numbers is considered via dual-color in situ hybridization. The combination of applying the HER2 mean gene copy number as well as the HER2/CEP17 ratio to define equivocal test decisions by fluorescence in situ hybridization as proposed by the current ASCO/CAP guidelines appears to be a more optimum approach to adopt in order to avoid or minimize reporting of false negative results. Using the mean HER2 gene copy number alone for decision making results in a significant increase of equivocal cases.

HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the Trastuzumab for GAstric cancer (ToGA) study, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy improved median overall survival by 2.7 months in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+/fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive] gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer compared with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.74). Post hoc exploratory analyses in patients expressing higher HER2 levels (IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive or IHC 3+) demonstrated a 4.2-month improvement in median overall survival with trastuzumab (hazard ratio 0.65). The ToGA study provides the largest screening dataset available on HER2 overexpression/amplification in this indication. We further analyzed correlation(s) of HER2 overexpression/amplification with clinical and epidemiological factors. METHODS: HER2-positivity was analyzed by histological subtype, tumor location, geographic region, and specimen type. Exploratory efficacy analyses were performed. RESULTS: The HER2-positivity rate was 22.1 % across analyzed tumor samples. Rates were similar between European and Asian patients (23.6 % vs. 23.9 %), but higher in intestinal- vs. diffuse-type (31.8 % vs. 6.1 %), and gastroesophageal junction cancer versus gastric tumors (32.2 % vs. 21.4 %). Across all IHC scores, variability in HER2 staining (≤30 % stained cells) was observed in almost 50 % of cases, with increasing rates in lower IHC categories, and did not affect treatment outcome. The polysomy rate was 4 %. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 expression varies by tumor location and type. All patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer should be tested for HER2 status, preferably using IHC initially. Due to the unique characteristics of gastric cancer, specific testing/scoring guidelines should be adhered to.

HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity.

Trastuzumab-containing therapy is a standard of care for patients with HER2+ breast cancer. HER2 status is routinely assigned using in situ hybridization to assess HER2 gene amplification, but interpretation of in situ hybridization results may be challenging in tumors with chromosome 17 polysomy or intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Apparent chromosome 17 polysomy, defined by increased chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) signal number, is a common genetic aberration in breast cancer and represents an alternative mechanism for increasing HER2 copy number. Some studies have linked elevated CEP17 count ('polysomy') with adverse clinicopathologic features and HER2 overexpression, although there are numerous discrepancies in the literature. There is evidence that elevated CEP17 ('polysomy') count might account for trastuzumab response in tumors with normal HER2:CEP17 ratios. Nonetheless, recent studies establish that apparent 'polysomy' (CEP17 increase) is usually related to focal pericentromeric gains rather than true polysomy. Assigning HER2 status may also be complex where multiple cell subclones with distinct HER2 amplification characteristics coexist within the same tumor. Such genetic heterogeneity affects up to 40% of breast cancers when assessed according to a College of American Pathologists guideline, although other definitions have been proposed. Recent data have associated heterogeneity with unfavorable clinicopathologic variables and poor prognosis. Genetically heterogeneous tumors harboring HER2-amplified subclones have the potential to benefit from trastuzumab, but this has yet to be evaluated in clinical studies. In this review, we discuss the implications of apparent polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity for assigning HER2 status in clinical practice. Among our recommendations, we support the use of mean HER2 copy number rather than HER2:CEP17 ratio to define HER2 positivity in cases where coamplification of the centromere might mask HER2 amplification. We also highlight a need to harmonize in situ hybridization scoring methodology to support accurate HER2 status determination, particularly where there is evidence of heterogeneity.