Malpractice against shoulder surgeons: what the data say.

BACKGROUND: Thousands of orthopedic surgeons in the United State face medical malpractice claims annually; however, little is known regarding the common causes for litigation against shoulder surgeons. In addition, the current analysis does not take into consideration how surgical frequency affects the litigation likelihood. The purpose of our investigation was to identify the most common causes of litigation against shoulder surgeons in the United States adjusting for surgical frequency. METHODS: The VerdictSearch database was used using the search terms "medical malpractice," "shoulder," and "NOT cancer." Results were queried, and all studies pertaining to orthopedic shoulder surgery included. Data gathered included cause of lawsuit, indemnity paid, type of surgery performed, results of the cases, verdict or settlement, and, if applicable, technical error. A query of a multisurgeon institutional database was conducted to determine how frequently surgeries were performed. Then the frequency of litigation was adjusted by the procedure frequency to determine which surgery has the greatest likelihood to be litigated relative to rotator cuff surgery. RESULTS: Forty-five cases were included in our study. After adjusting for the procedure frequency, the most likely procedure to be litigated, relative to rotator cuff repair, was manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), 251 times more likely to be litigated, and washout/lavage procedures, 17 times more likely to be litigated. Injection and total shoulder arthroplasty were 23 and 14 times less likely to be litigated relative to rotator cuff repair, respectively. In addition, the average age of the patients was 47 years, and 53% of the cases involved a male plaintiff. The most commonly litigated procedures were rotator cuff repair (42%), MUA (13%), and humeral open reduction and internal fixation (9%). The most commonly cited symptoms for litigation against shoulder surgeons were pain (60%) and loss of range of motion (40%). Of the 45 cases, 44% ended in physician loss, with the average indemnity paid via verdict being $1,118,714 vs. $416,875 for settlement. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies that MUA and lavage/washout procedures are much more likely to be litigated relative to rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff repair is actually one of the least likely procedures to be litigated. Furthermore, settlement may represent a method of decreasing the indemnity paid for malpractice cases for which surgeons are implicated.

Large Femoral Heads With Small Acetabular Components: An Examination of 10-Year Polyethylene Wear.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has improved polyethylene (PE) wear rates while decreasing osteolysis and aseptic loosening. However, concerns exist regarding the risk of mechanical failure with thin HXLPE liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our purpose was to evaluate long-term outcomes and PE wear rates in primary THAs pairing large femoral heads with small acetabular components and thin HXLPE liners. We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who underwent 33 primary THAs using large femoral heads (32 or 36 mm) with small acetabular components (48 or 50 mm) and thin HXLPE liners (3.9 or 5.9 mm) at minimum 10-year follow-up. PE liner wear was measured using a validated radiographic technique. Mean age was 66 years, 97% of the patients were women, and mean body mass index was 26.3 kg/m2. Thirty hips (90.9%) had ceramic femoral heads, and 13 hips (39%) had 36-mm femoral heads with 3.9-mm HXLPE liners. All cases used a neutral PE design. Mean linear wear rate and volumetric wear rate were 0.04 mm/year and 39.6 mm3/year, respectively, at mean 10.9-year follow-up. There were no instances of liner fracture, liner dissociation, or revision. Mean Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) was 92.1. In the largest long-term study of primary THAs using large femoral heads with small acetabular components and thin HXLPE liners, we found low linear and volumetric wear rates and no cases of liner mechanical failures. Thin HXLPE liners are a safe and viable option for THA surgeons. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):118-122.].

Surprise Billing Is Common in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Negatively Impacts Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may receive unexpected medical bills. Such "surprise" bills may cause financial hardship for patients, which prompted policymakers to pass the No Surprises Act. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of surprise bills for patients undergoing TJA and the effect of surprise billing on patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a large multi-state institution. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding the incidence of surprise bills after their surgery, details of those bills, and how the bills affected their surgical satisfaction. Independent predictors for receiving a surprise bill were assessed through a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Twelve percent of participants received at least one surprise bill after their TJA. The most common surprise bill came from the surgical facility (48%), followed by anesthesia (36%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified older age and Black race to be independent predictors of surprise billing. Furthermore, surgery occurring after the No Surprises Act bill enforcement on January 1, 2022, was found to increase a patient's likelihood of receiving a surprise bill (P=.039, effect size=0.18). Patients who received a surprise bill reported being significantly less satisfied with their surgery (P=.002, effect size=0.45). Forty-nine percent of patients with a surprise bill felt their billing negatively affected their surgical satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Surprise billing continues to occur after TJA and can negatively affect patient satisfaction. Although surgeons may be unable to limit the amount of bills patients receive postoperatively, increased communication and education regarding the perioperative billing process may prove to be beneficial for both patient satisfaction and the physician-patient relationship. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].

The Incidence of Symptomatic Mediastinal Compromise Following Medial Clavicle Fractures.

Medial clavicle fractures pose a concern for mediastinal compromise because of their proximity to the sternoclavicular joint. However, the true incidence of this complication is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fracture configuration and determine the incidence of mediastinal compromise following medial clavicle fractures. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for isolated medial one-third clavicle fractures at a single institution was performed. Patient demographics, the mechanism of injury, complications, and treatment were recorded. The fracture pattern and orientation were determined from a review of injury radiographs and computed tomography scans. The incidence of subsequent mediastinal compromise was then identified via a chart review. One hundred five patients were included for analysis. Twenty-two patients (20.8%) had computed tomography scans for review. The average age was 56 years, with 53% of patients being male. Sixty-eight percent of patients reported a high-energy mechanism of injury. No patients demonstrated evidence of mediastinal compression on physical examination. No patients required hospitalization for complications secondary to mediastinal compromise. Ninety percent (n=94) of patients were treated nonoperatively. Forty-three percent of fractures were nondisplaced. The remaining fractures demonstrated anterior or superior displacement of the lateral fragment, with a 0% incidence of posterior displacement. The most common indication for surgery was fracture displacement (n=10). A classification of medial clavicle fractures was developed using data from our cohort and a literature review. Medial clavicle fractures rarely demonstrate posterior displacement. Despite fracture proximity, mediastinal injury is exceedingly uncommon. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):e161-e166.].

Burnout Rates Among General Orthopedic Surgeons and Subspecialists: A Pilot Study.

Burnout among physicians is a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, de-personalization, and reduced sense of personal accomplishment that can negatively affect personal relationships, physician well-being, and patient outcomes. Although burnout rates of up to 50% to 60% among orthopedic surgeons have been reported, no studies have evaluated burnout among orthopedic generalists and subspecialists. The primary goal of this study was to examine the prevalence of burnout among orthopedic disciplines. We conducted a multicenter study from March 2019 through December 2019 involving 149 orthopedists. An abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey was used to measure burnout. Demographic information, personal characteristics, professional characteristics, family life and spousal support, and depression were also assessed. The mean rate of burnout among all respondents was 62%, whereas 16.77% screened positive for depression. Subspecialties with the highest rates of burnout were oncology (100%), sports medicine (68%), and trauma (63%). Similarly, trauma (50.00%), oncology (40.00%), and general orthopedics (20.00%) had the highest positive depression screening rates. In contrast, shoulder and elbow (50%), pediatric (52%), and foot and ankle (54%) specialists had the lowest rates of burnout, whereas shoulder and elbow (0.00%), spine (0.00%), and sports medicine (6.50%) specialists had the lowest rates of positive depression screening. Older age, higher debt load, and oncology subspecialty were associated with increased burnout risk. This study sought to determine burnout rates within each orthopedic discipline, with a secondary aim of disclosing contributing factors. Trauma and oncology had the highest rates of burnout and positive depression screening. Because this study represents a small orthopedic cohort, larger studies are needed to appropriately manage burnout in the future. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):333-339.].

Opioid-Free Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Rotator cuff repair is known to cause significant pain, and therefore opioids are often prescribed postoperatively. The United States is currently experiencing an opioid epidemic, and prescription opioids are considered a gateway drug to opioid abuse and addiction. Orthopedic surgeons are looking for alternative means to control pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an opioid-free postoperative pain protocol in patients following an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A prospective study of 36 consecutive patients was performed. Patient demographics, prior narcotic consumption, past medical history, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were collected. All patients received an opioid-free postoperative pain protocol, including education, premedication, interscalene nerve blockade, and intraoperative injection, and were discharged with ketorolac, zolpidem, and acetaminophen. A sealed envelope containing an oxycodone prescription was also received at discharge. Patients were instructed only to fill the oxycodone prescription if they had uncontrolled pain. The primary outcomes were filling of the oxycodone prescription and use. Secondary outcomes were VAS pain scores and patient satisfaction scores. Sixty-seven percent of patients successfully completed opioid-free arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients who did not use oxycodone had lower pain scores overall when comparing each postoperative day. By the first postoperative visit, patients who did not take oxycodone also demonstrated higher satisfaction with their pain management. This study demonstrates that with appropriate multimodal pain management, the majority of willing patients can undergo rotator cuff repair without use of opioids. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e301-e305.].