Early survival benefit of a low-profile endograft in blunt traumatic aortic injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a low-profile thoracic endograft (19-23 French) in subjects with blunt traumatic aortic injury. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study assessed the RelayPro thoracic endograft for the treatment of traumatic aortic injury. Fifty patients were enrolled at 16 centers in the United States between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The cohort was mostly male (74%), with a mean age of 42.4 ± 17.2 years, and treated for traumatic injuries (4% Grade 1, 8% Grade 2, 76% Grade 3, and 12% Grade 4) due to motor vehicle collision (80%). The proximal landing zone was proximal to the left subclavian artery in 42%, and access was primarily percutaneous (80%). Most (71%) were treated with a non-bare stent endograft. Technical success was 98% (one early type Ia endoleak). All-cause 30-day mortality was 2% (compared with an expected rate of 8%), with an exact two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.1%, 10.6% below the performance goal upper limit of 25%. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated freedom from all-cause mortality to be 98% at 30 days through 4 years (95% CI, 86.6%-99.7%). Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from major adverse events, all-cause mortality, paralysis, and stroke, was 98.0% at 30 days and 95.8% from 6 months to 4 years (95% CI, 84.3%-98.9%). There were no strokes and one case of paraplegia (2%) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RelayPro was safe and effective and may provide an early survival benefit in the treatment of blunt traumatic aortic injury.

Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Surgical Therapy for Popliteal Artery Injury.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal arterial injury carries an appreciable risk of limb loss and, despite advances in stent and stent-graft technology, endovascular therapy for popliteal arterial trauma is infrequently used when compared with traditional open repair. Thus, this study aims to assess outcomes of endovascular management (EM) with open surgery (OS) as a historical reference. METHODS: An electronic search was performed (from January 2010 until June 2023) using multiple databases. Initial records were screened against eligibility criteria. Next, the full-text manuscript of articles that passed the title and abstract assessment was reviewed for relevancy of data points. Data from articles passing the inclusion criteria were extracted and tabulated. Comparative analysis was completed by performing chi-square tests and 2-sampled t-tests (Welch's). RESULTS: The 24 selected studies described 864 patients (96 EM; 768 OS). In the endovascular group, patients underwent procedures primarily for blunt trauma using covered, self-expanding stents, resulting in universal technical success and patency. Patients had an average length of stay of 7.99 ± 7.5 days and follow-up time of 33.0 ± 7.0 months, with 21% undergoing fasciotomies, 6% undergoing amputation, and 4% having pseudoaneurysms. Patients in the OS group were evenly divided between blunt and penetrating trauma, chiefly undergoing vein graft interposition and exhibiting fasciotomy and amputation rates of 66% and 24%, respectively. Patients had an average length of stay of 5.66 ± 4.6 days and a 96% survival rate at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence sheds light on the nature of treatment offered by EM and OS treatment and suggests EM is associated with several important positive outcomes. Although it is difficult to directly compare endovascular and open surgical techniques, the data with respect to open surgical management of popliteal artery trauma can still provide a powerful frame of reference for the outcomes of EM to date. However, this claim is weak due to the little published data for EM of popliteal trauma, publication bias accompanying the published studies, and general, selection bias. Additional prospective data are necessary to define patients who specifically benefit from endovascular repair.

Lower Extremity Vascular Injury in the Pediatric Trauma Patient: Management and Outcomes at an Adult Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic vascular injuries of the lower extremity in the pediatric population are uncommon but can result in significant morbidity. The objective of this study is to demonstrate our experience with these injuries by describing patterns of traumatic vascular injury, the initial management, and data regarding early outcomes. METHODS: In total, 506 patients presented with lower extremity vascular injury between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2021 to Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, adult Level I trauma center in Atlanta, Georgia. Thirty-two of the 506 patients were aged less than 18 years and were evaluated for a total of 47 lower extremity vascular injuries. To fully elucidate the injury patterns and clinical course in this population, we examined patient demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vessel injured, surgical repair performed, and early outcomes and complications. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age was 16 (2) years (range, 3-17 years), and the majority were male (n = 29, 90.6%). Of the vascular injuries identified, 28 were arterial and 19 were venous. Of these injuries, 14 patients had combined arterial-venous injuries. The majority of injuries were the result of a penetrating injury (n = 28, 87.5%), and of these, all but 2 were attributed to gunshot wounds. Twenty-seven vascular interventions were performed by nonpediatric surgeons: 11 by trauma surgeons, 13 by vascular surgeons, 2 by orthopedic surgeons, and 1 by an interventional radiologist. Two patients required amputation: 1 during the index admission and 1 delayed at 3 months. Overall survival was 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular injuries as the result of trauma at any age often require early intervention, and we believe that these injuries in the pediatric population can be safely managed in adult trauma centers with a multidisciplinary team composed of trauma, vascular, and orthopedic surgeons with the potential to decrease associated morbidity and mortality from these injuries.

Aggressive Treatment Strategy at Index TEVAR Is Associated With Reduced Need For Short-Term Reintervention In Patients With Aortic Dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic endovascular aortic surgery (TEVAR) is the modern standard of treatment for patients with Type B aortic dissection, however it is unclear how the initial length of treated aorta affects long-term outcomes. This study aims to elucidate risk factors for secondary intervention after TEVAR for aortic dissection, focusing on length of aortic treatment at index operation. METHODS: A retrospective multihospital chart review was completed for patients treated between 2011 and 2022 who underwent TEVAR for aortic dissection with at least one year of post-TEVAR imaging and follow-up. Patient demographics and characteristics were analyzed. In this study, aortic zones treated only included those managed with a covered stent graft. The primary outcome measure was any need for secondary intervention. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were identified. Demographics included a mean age of 57 years, with 31.8% of the patients being female. Forty-three patients (28.5%) underwent secondary intervention after TEVAR, with a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. The most common indication for secondary intervention was aneurysmal degeneration of the residual false lumen (76%). There was a significant difference in the number of aortic zones treated in patients who did and did not require secondary intervention (2.3 ± 1 vs. 2.7 ± 1, p = 0.04). Additionally, patients with three or more aortic zones of treatment had a significant difference in the need for reintervention (32% secondary intervention vs 52% no secondary intervention, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At least three zones of aortic treatment at index TEVAR is associated with a decreased need for overall reintervention. Modern treatment of acute and subacute type B dissection should stress an aggressive initial repair, balanced by the potential increased risk of spinal cord ischemia.

Vascular surgery is the most commonly consulted specialty for emergent operative trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increasing rate of intraoperative consultation of vascular surgery (VS) for trauma patients, VS is not one of the subspecialties required for American College of Surgeons level I trauma center verification. We sought to assess the rates and patterns of emergent operative VS consultation compared with other surgical subspecialties in the trauma setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who presented with traumatic injuries requiring emergent surgical operations (<3 hours after presentation) from 2015 to 2019 at a level I trauma center. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and data on consulted surgical subspecialties were collected. The primary outcome measured was the rate of intraoperative consultation to VS and other subspecialties (OS). RESULTS: A total of 2265 patients were identified, with 221 emergent intraoperative consults to VS and 507 consults to OS. After VS (9.8%), the most common subspecialties consulted were orthopedics (9.2%) and urology (5%). Overall, VS was more likely to be consulted in immediate trauma operations (<1 hour after presentation) (65.6% vs 38.1%, P < .0001), penetrating injuries (73.3% vs 47.9%, P < .0001), and at night (60.6% vs 51.9%, P = .02) compared with OS. Time from admission to operation was shorter for cases when VS was involved compared with OS (54.1 ± 40.4 vs 80.6 ± 47.9 minutes, P < .0001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, we found that requiring an immediate operation was associated with higher odds of requiring an intraoperative vascular consult (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons are consulted intraoperatively to assist with emergent trauma at a greater rate compared with specialties that are required for level I trauma center verification. Current American College of Surgeons verification processes and site-specific policies should be re-evaluated to consider VS coverage as a requirement for trauma center verification.

Female gender is associated with increased late luminal narrowing within the stent graft after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Luminal narrowing, suspected secondary to thrombus, occurs within stent grafts at an unclear incidence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The significance of this phenomenon has not been determined, nor have the risk factors for development of intragraft luminal narrowing. Small graft diameter is hypothesized to be a risk factor for the development of ingraft stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a multicenter healthcare system including all patients who underwent TEVAR between July 2011 and July 2019 with at least 1 year of subsequently available surveillance contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging. Standard demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. Measurements were obtained via direct off-line images from computed tomography scans. Patent intragraft diameters were compared with baseline and interval change values were normalized to time to follow-up. The primary outcome measure was annual rate of intragraft luminal narrowing. RESULTS: There were 208 patients who met the inclusion criteria (94 women, 114 men) with a median follow-up of 822 days. The mean annual rate of percent intragraft diameter reduction was 10.5 ± 7.7% for women and 7.6 ± 5.6% for men (P = .0026). Multivariate analysis demonstrated female gender (P = .0283), preoperative diagnosis of hypertension (P = .0449), and need for coverage of the left subclavian artery (P = .0328) were all significant predictors of intragraft luminal narrowing. Small aortic diameters were not found to be associated independently with ingraft luminal narrowing nor was the concomitant use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications. Significant amounts of ingraft luminal narrowing, defined as a greater than 20% intragraft diameter decrease, were associated with an increased need for any reintervention, including for malperfusion, endoleak, and symptomatic aneurysm (P = .0249). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a significant gender-associated difference in high rates of intragraft luminal narrowing (P = .00189). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, female gender is shown to be a significant nonmodifiable risk factor for intragraft luminal narrowing after TEVAR. The development of this phenomenon is not benign; as such, these findings were associated with an increased need for reintervention. This finding may be attributable to differences in aortic compliance or gender-associated differences in coagulation pathways and merits further investigation. Surveillance after thoracic stent grafting must account for patient-specific variations in complication risk.

Pre-existing Systolic Dysfunction is the Most Powerful Predictor of Failed Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring hemodialysis access creation often have significant comorbid conditions, which may impact access maturation. Underlying cardiac dysfunction likely plays an important role in the maturation of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). The effect of specific parameters of cardiac function on successful AVF creation has not previously been explored. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of patients undergoing first-time AVF creation at a single center from 2011 to 2018 was performed. Patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram within the 12 months prior to surgery were included. Standard demographic and perioperative variables were collected, in addition to echocardiographic and vascular mapping data. The primary outcome was access maturation, defined as the use of the access site for hemodialysis at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients met inclusion criteria with a cumulative AVF maturation rate of 57% (69/121) in this select population. Patients with pre-existing systolic cardiac dysfunction were more than 5 times less likely to see their AVF mature by one year postsurgery (OR = 0.17, P = 0.018). Preoperative venous diameter, access site location, and the type of fistula did not differ significantly between patients with and without systolic dysfunction. Selection of the cephalic vein as the venous anastomosis and diastolic dysfunction (≥ Grade 2) were also associated with lower rates of access maturation, although these associations were less robust. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic cardiac dysfunction is the most important nonmodifiable variable associated with failed AVF maturation. Patients requiring hemodialysis with significant pre-existing cardiac dysfunction may not be appropriate for permanent access creation, and long-term catheter use should be seriously considered as an alternative.

Influence of baseline kidney dysfunction on perioperative renal outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair with suprarenal fixation.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the comparative effects of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with and without suprarenal fixation. We compare outcomes in patients treated by EVAR with baseline normal kidney function and moderate and severe chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Patients with normal kidney function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or moderate (GFR = 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2) or severe (GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) kidney disease who underwent EVAR (N = 5534) were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database (2011-2015). Groups were determined by the presence (Cook Zenith [Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind] or Medtronic Endurant [Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn]) or absence (Gore Excluder [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz]) of a suprarenal fixation system. Postoperative renal complications, defined as rise in creatinine concentration of >2 mg/dL without dialysis or new dialysis requirements, were analyzed within the first 30 days with results stratified by degree of kidney disease. RESULTS: A total of 5534 patients underwent EVAR, with 3225 (58.3%) receiving a device using a suprarenal fixation system. Suprarenal fixation systems were less commonly used for symptomatic patients (11.0% vs 13.7%; P = .002) and patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (4.5% vs 6.3%; P = .01). There was no difference in baseline kidney function between groups. EVAR with suprarenal fixation was associated with more renal complications (1.40% vs 0.65%; P = .008). In subgroup analysis, patients with moderate kidney dysfunction (n = 1780) had more renal complications (2.2% vs 0.8%; P = .02) with suprarenal fixation systems. No differences were seen in patients with normal kidney function (0.4% vs 0.2%; P = .32; n = 3597) or severe kidney dysfunction (14.3% vs 10.2%; P = .45; n = 157). This difference was driven mostly by postoperative elevation of creatinine concentration (0.6% vs 0.2%; P = .03) without requirements for new dialysis (0.8% vs 0.4%; P = .08). After adjustments with multivariate logistic regression models, EVAR with suprarenal fixation was associated with more renal complications (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-5.34). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, EVAR with suprarenal fixation devices was associated with more perioperative renal complications in patients with moderate kidney dysfunction. Long-term evaluation of these patients undergoing EVAR should be considered.

Aortic Aneurysm Natural Progression is Not Influenced by Concomitant Malignancy and Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms occur concomitantly with malignancy in approximately 1.0-17.0% of patients. There is little published information regarding the effects of subsequent oncological therapies on aortic aneurysm growth. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of chemoradiation therapies on the natural progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracic aortic aneurysm, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Patients with aortic aneurysms with and without malignancy between 2005 and 2017 were identified within institutional databases using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease codes. Inclusion criteria included complete chemotherapy documentation, a minimum of 3 multiplanar axial/coronal imaging or ultrasonography before, during, and after receiving therapy or 2 studies for patients without malignancy. Propensity matching, Cox and linear regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 159 (172 aneurysms) patients with malignancy and 127 (149 aneurysms) patients without malignancy were included. Average patient demographics were 74.4 ± 9.8-years-old, Caucasian (66.8%), male (70.3%), with hypertension (71.1%), current smoking (24.5%), coronary atherosclerotic disease (26.2%), and AAA (71.0%). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (48.4%) with most chemotherapy regimens including a platinum-based alkylating agent and concurrent antimetabolite (56.0%). The overall median follow-up time was 28.2 (range 3.1-174.4) months. Aortic aneurysms in patients without malignancy grew to larger sizes (4.43 ± 0.96 vs. 4.14 ± 1.00, P = 0.008) with similar median growth rates (0.12 vs. 0.12 cm/year, P = 0.090), had more atypical morphologic features (14.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001), more frequently underwent repair (22.1% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.001), and more frequently required emergency repair for rupture (5.4% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.087). Cox regression identified initial aortic size ≥4.0 cm (hazard ratio [HR] 3.028), AAA (HR 2.146), chronic aortic findings (3.589), and the use of topoisomerase inhibitors (HR 2.694). Linear regression demonstrated increased growth rates predicted by antimetabolite chemotherapy (ß 0.170), initial aortic size (ß 0.086), and abdominal aortic location (ß 0.139, all P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Small aortic aneurysms with concomitant malignancies are discovered at smaller initial sizes, grow at similar rates, require fewer interventions, and have fewer ruptures and acute dissections than patients without malignancy. Antimetabolite therapies modestly accelerate aneurysmal growth, and patients receiving topoisomerase inhibitors may require earlier repair. Patients with concomitant disease can be confidently treated according to standard institutional aneurysm surveillance protocols. Overall, we recommend treatment of the malignancy before small aortic aneurysm repair as these aneurysms behave similarly to those in patients without malignancy.

Early Results of Popliteal Vein External Banding for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) encompasses a myriad of clinical manifestations including lower extremity swelling and pain, ulcerations and chronic skin changes such as stasis dermatitis, and lipodermatosclerosis. CVI effects greater than 25 million Americans and has a significant socioeconomic and psychosocial impact. Treatment of CVI varies depending on the etiology. For those patients with deep venous reflux, restoration of the deep venous valvular system is critical. Popliteal vein external banding is a novel technique to treat deep venous reflux. Our study aims to retrospectively review the early outcomes for the largest U.S. series of patients undergoing popliteal vein external banding. METHODS: Patients with C4, C5, and C6 disease with underlying deep venous reflux were treated with external banding of the popliteal vein. Basic demographic, ultrasound, and procedural data were collected. Patients were seen in clinic and underwent post procedure duplex. Procedure-specific complications were also assessed. The primary outcome was improvement of symptoms or wound healing. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified. Seventy-five percent of patients had a history of DVT on the ipsilateral extremity and 66.7% (n = 6) of those patients had previous common or external iliac vein stenting for post-phlebitic syndrome. 58.3% of patients had active ulcerations (C6) at the time of popliteal vein banding and the mean VCSS score was 12.7, consistent with advanced venous disease. Patients were followed for a mean 8.62 months. Of the 8 patients that had active ulcers (C6), 75% completely healed with a mean time to healing of 3.3 months. 91.6% of patients reported clinical improvement in their symptoms (i.e., reduction in edema/swelling, pain or improvement in size of ulcer). Three patients had post-operative wound complications and 1 required oral antibiotic for associated cellulitis. CONCLUSION: Popliteal vein external banding represents a viable treatment modality for patients with venous insufficiency secondary to deep venous reflux. It is technically easier than most deep venous reconstructive options and may have an important role in the multimodal treatment of patients with advanced CVI.

Management and Outcomes after Upper Versus Lower Extremity Vascular Trauma.

BACKGROUND: While significant literature exists regarding peripheral vascular injury management, the vast majority focuses on lower extremity arterial injury. As a result, clinical management of arterial injury in the upper extremities is often guided by literature specific to lower extremity vessel injury. The purpose of this study is to use the largest series of patients reported in the literature to compare management and outcomes of upper and lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries. METHODS: Patients who underwent operative repair of traumatic vascular injuries of the extremities were identified from the trauma registry of a level I trauma center. A retrospective chart review (2011-2019) was conducted. Demographics, mechanism of injuries, operative techniques, and outcomes were compared between patients with upper versus lower extremity vascular injuries. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five patients were included with 234 (43.8%) patients undergoing repair of upper extremity vascular injuries. Patients with upper extremity vascular injuries were more likely to be female (16.7% vs. 9%, P = 0.007), have a pre-hospital tourniquet (21.8% vs. 12%,P = 0.002), have associated nerve injuries (40.2% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.0001) or present with bleeding (76.1% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.002) but were less commonly associated with concomitant fractures (25.6% vs. 39.9%, P = 0.0006). There was no difference in age, race, or mechanism of injury. In regards to operative management, upper extremity injuries were more likely to be managed with vessel ligation (38% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.0001) or primary reanastomosis (12.4% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.009) and were less frequently associated with concomitant fasciotomies (13.3% vs. 56.5%, P < 0.0001). Postoperatively, upper extremity injuries were associated with persistent nerve deficits (21.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.0002) while lower extremity injuries had a higher incidence of 30-day limb loss (5.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.008). There were no differences in mortality or graft-patency rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity injuries are associated with a lower limb-loss rate but increased prevalence of neurological deficits after vascular trauma compared to lower extremities. A high level of suspicion is paramount to intraoperative identify associated nerve injuries to improve postoperative functional outcomes.

Vascular Surgeons Carry an Increasing Responsibility in the Management of Lower Extremity Vascular Trauma.

BACKGROUND: There is preliminary evidence that vascular surgeons are increasingly relied on nationally to assist with the management of lower extremity vascular trauma. Current trauma center verification, however, does not require any level of vascular surgery coverage. We sought to assess practice patterns regarding vascular surgery consultation and temporal trends in the surgical management of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent surgical repair for vascular trauma of the lower extremity at a single, academic, public hospital from 2011 to 2018. Demographic data and procedural data were collected. Patients were assigned to a vascular surgery (VS) or nonvascular surgery (NV) group. The primary outcome measure was the rate of VS consultation. Secondary outcome measures included 30-day mortality, length-of-stay, and limb salvage. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were identified (77 VS group, 103 NV group). There was an increase in the proportion of repairs done by VS from 2011 to 2018 (P < 0.05). There were significant management differences between the 2 groups, with vascular surgeons more likely to perform primary end-to-end anastomosis for both arterial (21.33% vs. 6.90%) and venous (19.15% vs. 5.26%) injuries (both P < 0.05). Patients in the VS group were less likely to have balloon embolectomy, fasciotomy, or intravascular shunting than the NV group (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mortality (5.35% vs. 4.85%), length-of-stay (15.05 vs. 18.38 days), or limb salvage (94.81% vs. 95.15%). CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity vascular trauma is increasingly managed by vascular surgeons. Furthermore, vascular surgeons are more selective in the use of potentially unnecessary adjunctive maneuvers. Current accreditation guidelines should be revisited to mandate vascular surgery coverage in trauma centers that frequently treat this patient population.

Pharmacologic Therapy is Not Associated with Stroke Prevention in Patients with Isolated Blunt Vertebral Artery Injury.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is often grouped with carotid artery injury into a broader classification of blunt cerebrovascular injury, despite fundamental differences in mechanism of injury and outcome. This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy in preventing strokes for isolated VAI. METHODS: Patients with isolated blunt VAI (2011-2018) were identified from the trauma registry of a level I trauma center. A retrospective chart review was conducted excluding patients with concomitant carotid artery injury. Factors examined included demographics, injury characteristics, anatomic classification, and management strategy. Patients were stratified by whether they received pharmacological (antiplatelet or anticoagulation) therapy. The primary outcome was new posterior circulation stroke within 30 days of injury as confirmed by imaging studies. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients with blunt VAI were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17 and 33 (16.0%) patients presented with Glasgow Coma Scale <8. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (58.7%). The injuries were bilateral in 38 (18.5%) patients and 73 (35.4%) suffered multisegmental injuries. The anatomic severity of injuries was Grade 1 = 38.8%, Grade 2 = 25.7%, Grade 3 = 4.9%, Grade 4 = 30.6%, and Grade 5 = 0.5%. There was no correlation between anatomic grade and stroke (P = 0.11) or initiation of pharmacologic therapy (P = 0.30). In total, 172 (84%) patients received pharmacological therapy with no differences in baseline characteristics between treated and untreated patients. Overall, the 30-day stroke rate was 1.9%. There was no difference in stroke rate between patients who received medical therapy versus those who did not (5.9% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.13). In subgroup analysis by injury severity, medical therapy did not improve stroke rates. Among patients treated with aspirin, there was no difference in stroke rate between doses of 81 vs. 325 mg (1.1% vs. 0%, P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated VAI is associated with a very low risk of stroke and treatment with medical therapies including antiplatelet or anticoagulation does not improve risk of stroke.

Stent Graft Oversizing is Associated with an Increased Risk of Long-Term Left Ventricular Wall Thickening in Young Patients Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) wall thickening occurs in patients following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Clinical consequences of cardiovascular (CV) remodeling may be more significant younger patients with longer anticipated life spans. Risk factors for CV remodeling following TEVAR are unknown but may be related to graft size. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a multicenter healthcare system including patients aged ≤60 who underwent TEVAR between 2011 and 2019 with at least 1 year follow-up computed tomography angiography imaging available. Standard perioperative variables, native aortic diameter, and stent graft specifications were collected. Graft oversizing was calculated by dividing proximal graft diameter by proximal aortic diameter on preoperative imaging. Posterior LV wall thickness was measured at baseline and interval increases were normalized to time-to-follow-up. Primary outcome was annual rate of posterior LV wall thickening. RESULTS: One hundred one patients met inclusion criteria with a mean (SD) follow-up time of 1270 (693) days. Overall mean (SD) rate of LV wall thickness change was 0.534 (0.750) mm per year. Mean (SD) absolute LV wall thickness at most recent follow-up was 10.97 (2.85) mm for men, 9.69 (2.03) mm for women. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher rates of LV wall thickening were associated with narrower graft diameters (P = 0.0311). Greater absolute LV wall thickness at follow-up was associated with narrower grafts (P= 0.0155) and greater graft oversizing (P= 0.0376). Logistic regression demonstrated individuals who met criteria for LV hypertrophy were more likely to have narrower stent-grafts (P= 0.00798) and greater graft oversizing (P= 0.0315). CONCLUSIONS: LV wall thickening occurred to a greater degree in individuals with narrower stent-grafts and higher rates of graft oversizing. This has significant implications for long-term cardiovascular health in younger patients may undergo TEVAR for atypical indications. Particular attention should be paid to long-term effects of stent-graft oversizing when selecting grafts in such populations.

Lower Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Groin Wound Complications after Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after lower extremity revascularization are a common cause of increased morbidity in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Understanding the multifaceted risk factors for SSIs may suggest closer monitoring for certain patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk factors associated with incidence of SSIs, including patient demographics, operative factors, and socioeconomic status. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was queried for all patients who underwent any femoral exposure for the purposes of treating PAD from 2014 to 2017 at a single, academic, public hospital. Patient demographics, procedural data, and a variety of socioeconomic parameters were collected from chart review. Zip code geocoding was also used to obtain surrogates for local socioeconomic factors. The primary outcome measure was SSI within 90 days of operation. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were identified, of which 19 (14%) developed an SSI. The only demographic variable associated with an increased risk of infection was body mass index (24.8 vs 30.1, P < 0.05). Major preoperative comorbid conditions, smoking status, and insurance status were not associated with an increased risk of complications. In addition, the type of procedure performed [infrainguinal bypass (n = 68), femoral endarterectomy (n = 36), aortofemoral bypass (n = 17), femoral-femoral bypass (n = 8), axillofemoral bypass (n = 7)] was not associated with any trend toward SSI. Estimated blood loss (292 vs 463 mL, P < 0.05), postoperative glucose (169 vs 212, P < 0.05), and postoperative white blood cell count (13.6 vs 18.3, P < 0.05) were the only periprocedural variables associated with SSIs. Lower mean household income, mean family income, and per capita income were all associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, including poorer household income, are strongly associated with an increased risk of postoperative SSIs after lower extremity revascularization. Modifiable variables, such as preoperative optimization and procedural conduct, also display an effect on the development of an SSI. As a result, health care providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for the development of SSI in patients with lower socioeconomic status.

Performance of a rapid two-sequence screening protocol for osteomyelitis of the foot.

OBJECTIVE: Compare a two sequence protocol to a standard protocol in the detection of pedal osteomyelitis (OM) and abscesses and to identify patients that benefit from a full protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-two foot MRIs ordered to assess for OM were enrolled, and the following items were extracted from the clinical reports: use of IV contrast, the presence of OM, reactive osteitis, and a soft tissue abscess. Using only one T1 nonfat-suppressed and one fluid sensitive fat-suppressed sequences, two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed each case for the presence of OM, reactive osteitis, or an abscess. A Kappa test was calculated to assess for interobserver agreement, and diagnostic performance was determined. The McNemar test was used to assess for the effect of contrast. RESULTS: Agreement between both observers and the clinical report on the presence of osteomyelitis was substantial ( k = 0.63 and 0.72, p < 0.001), while the agreement for abscess was fair (k = 0.29 and 0.38, p < 0.001). For osteomyelitis, both observers showed good accuracy (0.85 and 0.86). When screening bone for a normal versus abnormal case, this method was highly sensitive (0.97-0.98), but was less sensitive for abscess (0.63-0.75). Fifty-one percent of exams used contrast, and it did impact the diagnosis of abscess for one observer. CONCLUSION: This rapid protocol is accurate in making the diagnosis of OM, and its high sensitivity makes it useful to screen for patients that would benefit from a full protocol.

National criteria for academic appointment in vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Advancement in academic medicine is multifactorial. Our objectives were to characterize academic appointments in vascular surgery and to investigate what factors, particularly publications, influenced academic appointment. METHODS: Academic vascular surgeons at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education vascular training programs or at primary sites of U.S. allopathic medical schools were included. Those with qualified titles, such as "adjunct" or a "clinical" prefix, were excluded. Sex, education, region, board certification, and affiliation details were recorded. Web of Science was queried for publication details and h-index. The h-index is a "personal impact factor" defined as "x" number of publications cited at least "x" number of times. After surgeons' information was deidentified, univariate and multivariable analyses were completed for academic appointment and appointment as division chief. RESULTS: There were 642 vascular surgeons who met criteria: 297 (46.3%) assistant professors, 150 (23.4%) associate professors, and 195 (30.4%) professors. There were 96 (15%) division chiefs and 10 (1.6%) chairs of surgery, and 83.2% were male. Surgeons worked in the Northeast (33.5%), Southern (32.6%), Central (20.1%), and Western (13.9%) United States. The mean (±standard deviation) number of publications was 13.7 ± 15.4 for assistant professors, 33.9 ± 28.8 for associate professors, and 86.8 ± 63.6 for professors (P < .001). Mean number of first or last author publications was 5.3 ± 6.4 for assistant professors, 12.2 ± 12.7 for associate professors, and 38.7 ± 35.3 for professors (P < .001). Mean h-index was 5.9 ± 5.4 for assistant professors, 12 ± 7.7 for associate professors, and 24.9 ± 12.6 for professors (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, vascular surgery board certification (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-32.2; P = .03), academic appointment at a public medical school (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.18-3.37; P = .01), years since medical school graduation (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.18; P < .001, per year), and number of publications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P < .001, per publication) were independently associated with associate professor. Factors independently associated with professor were years since medical school graduation (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24; P < .001, per year) and number of first or last author publications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09; P = .003, per publication). Appointment as division chief was independently associated with h-index (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .016, per point). CONCLUSIONS: Total number of publications was independently associated with associate professor, with number of first or last author publications particularly important for professor. The h-index was not independently associated with academic appointment, but it was for appointment as division chief. This study provides relevant data for promotional guidance in academic vascular surgery.

Surveillance Recommendations after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Should Be Based on Initial Indication for Repair.

BACKGROUND: Current surveillance recommendations after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) include contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans at 1-, 2-, 6-, and 12-month intervals, with annual scans thereafter. Patient compliance with such schedules remains inconsistent for all etiologies of aortic disease. It remains unclear which boundaries prevent compliance and whether compliance is associated with improved aorta-specific outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a multicenter health-care system's electronic medical records to include all patients who underwent TEVAR from July 1, 2011 to April 1, 2016. Patients were assigned a compliance score of 0 through 4 based on the number of images received at the recommended time intervals. Whether patients underwent any postoperative imaging within 1 year of discharge was also recorded. Patients who died within 12 months of discharge were excluded. Aorta-specific complications included postoperative sac expansion, rupture, or need for additional aortic intervention. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included; of whom, 203 (77.5%) received at least one postoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan. Race, insurance status, and distance to hospital were not associated with 12-month compliance or compliance score (all P > 0.05). Regarding 12-month compliance, 76.2% of aneurysm patients, 81.6% of dissection patients, 72.2% of transection patients, and 72.2% of penetrating aortic ulcer patients underwent at least 1 CT scan within the first year (all P > 0.05). There were no differences in compliance score based on indication for repair. The overall aorta-related complication rate was 34.7%. TEVAR for dissection was associated with increased long-term aorta-specific complications (49.5%, P < 0.05 when compared with other indications). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multihospital analysis of TEVAR outcomes, there was no difference in compliance among patients undergoing TEVAR for major indications, but patients with dissection who required TEVAR had a significant difference in aorta-specific complication rates. TEVAR for dissection should be subject to stricter surveillance guidelines than TEVAR for other indications.