Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection may not alter the clinical course of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: In the general population, prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 reduces the risk of severe COVID-19; however, studies in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are lacking. We sought to describe the clinical course of COVID-19 recurrence and compare outcomes between the first and second episodes of COVID-19 in LTRs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of LTRs with COVID-19 between January 1, 2022, and September 30, 2022, during the Omicron wave. We compared the clinical course of a second episode of COVID-19 to that of the patients' own first episode and to that of LTRs who developed a first episode during the study period. RESULTS: During the study period, we identified 24 LTRs with COVID-19 recurrence and another 75 LTRs with a first episode of COVID-19. LTRs who survived the initial episode of COVID-19 had a similar disease course with recurrence, with a trend toward reduced hospitalization (10 (41.6%) vs. 4 (16.7%), p = .114). Furthermore, compared to LTRs with a primary infection during the Omicron wave, those with a reinfection had a non-statistically significant trend toward reduced hospitalizations (aOR .391, 95% CI [.115-1.321], p = .131), shorter lengths-of-stay (median, 4 vs. 9 days, p = .181), and reduced intensive care unit admissions, intubations, and COVID-19-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LTRs who survive the first episode of COVID-19 are likely to have a similar clinical course with recurrent episodes. Although recurrent COVID-19 may be milder, larger, well-powered studies are needed to confirm this observation. Ongoing precautions are warranted.

Morbidity of antireflux surgery in lung transplant and matched nontransplant cohorts is comparable.

BACKGROUND: Safety data on perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) after lung transplantation (LT) are lacking. We compared the 30-day readmission rate and short-term morbidity after LARS between LT recipients and matched nontransplant (NT) controls. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent LARS between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, were included. The participants were divided into two groups: LT recipients and NT controls. First, we compared 30-day readmission rates after LARS between the LT and NT cohorts. Next, we compared 30-day morbidity after LARS between the LT cohort and a 1-to-2 propensity score-matched NT cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1328 patients (55 LT recipients and 1273 NT controls) were included. The post-LARS 30-day readmission rate was higher in LT recipients than in the overall NT controls (14.5% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). Compared to matched NT controls, LT recipients had a lower prevalence of paraesophageal hernia, a smaller median hernia size, and higher peristaltic vigor. Also compared to the matched NT controls, the LT recipients had a lower median operative time but a longer median length of hospital stay. The proportion of patients with a post-LARS event within 30 postoperative days was comparable between the LT and matched NT cohorts (21.8% vs 14.5%, p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher perceived risk of comorbidity burden, LT recipients and matched NT controls had similar rates of post-LARS 30-day morbidity at our large-volume center with expertise in transplant and foregut surgery. LARS after LT is safe.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS: The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Association of Bolus Transit Time on Barium Esophagram With Esophageal Peristalsis on High-resolution Manometry and Nonobstructive Dysphagia.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to correlate upright and prone bolus transit time (BTT) on barium esophagography (BE) with esophageal peristalsis on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and self-reported dysphagia in patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters on HRM. BACKGROUND: BTT on BE could be the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of esophageal peristalsis if it can be quantified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters and standard-protocol BE from 2017 to 2020 were included. Patients were divided, based on the number of normal swallows (distal contractile integral >450 mm Hg-s-cm), into 11 groups (10 normal swallows to 0 normal swallows). Liquid barium swallows in prone position were objectively evaluated for prone BTT. Patients reported difficulty in swallowing on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Fractional polynomial and logistic regression analysis were used to study the association (along with the rate of change) between BTT, peristalsis, and dysphagia. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included. Prone BTT increased as the number of normal swallows decreased ( P <0.001). Two deflection points were noted on the association between peristalsis and prone BTT at 50% normal swallows, 40 seconds and 30% normal swallows, 80 seconds, after which peristaltic function declined independently of prone BTT. Patients with prone BTT>40 seconds had nearly 6-fold higher odds of 0% normal swallows on HRM than patients with prone BTT<40 seconds ( P =0.002). Increasing prone BTT was associated with increasing dysphagia grades 1 and 2 ( P ≤0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal motility can be quantified by BE. Prone BTT correlates with the proportion of normal esophageal swallows and dysphagia.

Redo fundoplication and early Roux-en-Y diversion for failed fundoplication: a 3-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Redo fundoplication (RF) and Roux-en-Y diversion (RNY) are both accepted surgical treatments after failed fundoplication. However, due to higher reported morbidity, RNY is more commonly performed only after several surgical failures. In our experience, RNY at an earlier point of the disease progression seems to be related with better outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate this aspect by comparing the results between RF and RNY performed by a single surgeon over 3 years at our institution. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent RF or RNY at our institution between 2016 and 2019 by a single surgeon (author SKM). Patients with previous bariatric surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Of 43 patients, 28 underwent RF and 15 underwent RNY (mean body mass index 28.6 and 32.7 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.01). The number of previous antireflux surgeries for the RF and RNY groups was 1 (82% vs 80%, p > 0.99), 2 (18% vs 7%, p = 0.4), and more than 2 (0% vs 13%, p = 0.1). RNY took longer than RF (median, 165 vs 137 min, p = 0.02), but both groups had a median estimated blood loss of 50 ml (p = 0.82). There was no difference in intraoperative complications (25% vs 20% for RF and RYN, respectively, p > 0.99). Postoperative complications were more common in the RF than in the RYN group (21% vs 7%, p = 0.39). Median hospital stay was 3 days for both groups (p = 0.78). At short-term follow-up, the mean quality of life score was similar for the RF and RYN groups (11.5 vs 12.2, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: RNY diversion, if performed by experienced hands and at an earlier point of disease progression, has comparable perioperative morbidity to RF and should be considered as a feasible and safe option for definitive treatment of failed antireflux surgery.

Pulmonary and esophageal function in lung transplantation: Fundamental principles and clinical application.

The lungs and esophagus have a close anatomical and physiological relationship. Over the years, reflux-induced pulmonary injury has gained wider recognition, but the full effects of pulmonary disease on esophageal function are still unknown. Intrathoracic pressure dynamics potentially affect esophageal function, especially in patients with end-stage lung disease, both obstructive and restrictive. Lung transplantation is the only viable option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease and has provided us with a unique opportunity to study these effects as transplantation restores the intrathoracic environment. Esophageal and foregut functional testing before and after transplantation provide insights into the pathophysiology of the foregut-pulmonary axis, such as how underlying pulmonary disease and intrathoracic pressure changes affect esophageal physiology. This review summarizes the available literature and shares the research experience of a lung transplant center, covering topics such as pre- and posttransplant foregut function, esophageal motility in lung transplant recipients, immune-mediated mechanisms of graft rejection associated with gastroesophageal reflux, and the role of antireflux surgery in this population.

Evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the disease course has changed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have mutated. We compared COVID-19-related clinical outcomes in LTRs at different stages of the pandemic. We also identified risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 independent of the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study of LTRs with COVID-19 used Cox regression analyses and bootstrapping to identify factors affecting COVID-19 severity. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and August 2022, 195 LTRs were diagnosed with COVID-19, almost half (89 [45.6%]) during the Omicron period. A total of 113 (58.5%) LTRs were hospitalized and 47 (24.1%) died. Age >65 years increased the risk of hospitalization and death. Although infection with the Omicron variant was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization, the median length of hospital stay (10 days, [interquartile range, 5-19]) was similar between the variants. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death were more common with the Delta variant but comparable between the original, Alpha, and Omicron variants. Remdesivir and molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization, and monoclonal antibody therapy reduced the risk of ICU admission, intubation, and death. Vaccination and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab-cilgavimab did not significantly reduce COVID-19-related ICU admission, intubation, or mortality among LTRs. CONCLUSIONS: LTRs with COVID-19 continue to have high hospitalization rates and prolonged hospital stays, despite the reduced virulence of the Omicron variant. More effective PrEP and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 among vulnerable patient groups are needed.

Surgical Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Insight from a High-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted hiatal hernia (HH) repair is safe and effective; however, it is unclear whether hernia size affects perioperative outcomes and whether a watch-and-wait strategy is appropriate for patients with asymptomatic large HHs. We aimed to investigate these issues. METHODS: After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent primary laparoscopic HH repair at our center between August 2016 and December 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (SKM). According to the intraoperative findings, HHs were divided into four groups: small (S-HH), medium (M-HH), large (L-HH), or giant (G-HH) when the percentage of herniated stomach was 0% (sliding), < 50%, 50-75%, or > 75%, respectively. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were grouped: S-HH (n = 46), M-HH (n = 69), L-HH (n = 20), and G-HH (n = 35) with mean age of 58.5.6 ± 11.0, 61.9 ± 11.3, 70.7 ± 10.3, and 72.6 ± 9.7 years (p < 0.001), respectively. Compared to M-HH patients, L-HH patients had significantly longer hospital stays (mean 2.8 ± 3.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.91 days; p = 0.001) and more postoperative complications (6/20 [30.0%] vs 3/69 [4.3%]; OR 6.9, 95% CI 5.4-8.4, p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up time of 43.1 ± 25.0 and 43.5 ± 21.6 months for the combined S/M-HH and L/G-HH groups, GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life scores were comparable (S/M-HH: 6.5 ± 10.9 vs L/G-HH: 7.1 ± 11.3; p = 0.63). There was no perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HHs likely grow with age, reflecting their progressive nature. Laparoscopic L-HH repair was associated with higher morbidity than M-HH repair. Thus, patients with M-HH, even if less symptomatic, should be evaluated by a foregut surgeon. Regardless of HH size, good mid- and long-term quality of life outcomes can be achieved.

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis with Tixagevimab-cilgavimab did not Reduce Severity of COVID-19 in Lung Transplant Recipients with Breakthrough Infection.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) have an increased risk of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (tix-cil) is a long-acting monoclonal antibody combination granted Emergency Use Authorization approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in immunocompromised patients. We sought to determine whether tix-cil 300-300 mg reduced the incidence and disease severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in LTRs during the Omicron wave. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of LTRs who had received a COVID-19 diagnosis between December 2021 and August 2022. We compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes after COVID-19 between LTRs who received tix-cil PrEP and those who did not. We then conducted propensity-score matching based on baseline characteristics and therapeutic interventions and compared clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Results: Of 203 LTRs who received tix-cil PrEP and 343 who did not, 24 (11.8%) and 57 (16.6%), respectively, developed symptomatic COVID-19 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.669; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.415-1.079; P = 0.099). The hospitalization rate of LTRs with COVID-19 during the Omicron wave trended lower in the tix-cil group than in the non-tix-cil group (20.8% versus 43.1%; HR, 0.430; 95% CI, 0.165-1.118; P = 0.083). In propensity-matched analyses, 17 LTRs who received tix-cil and 17 LTRs who did not had similar rates of hospitalization (HR, 0.468; 95% CI, 0.156-1.402; P = 0.175), intensive care unit admission (HR, 3.096; 95% CI, 0.322-29.771; P = 0.328), mechanical ventilation (HR, 1.958; 95% CI, 0.177-21.596; P = 0.583), and survival (HR, 1.015; 95% CI, 0.143-7.209; P = 0.988). COVID-19-related mortality was high in both propensity-score-matched groups (11.8%). Conclusions: Breakthrough COVID-19 was common among LTRs despite tix-cil PrEP, possibly due to reduced efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against the Omicron variant. Tix-cil PrEP may reduce the incidence of COVID-19 in LTRs, but it did not reduce disease severity during the Omicron wave.

Association Between Antibodies Against Lung Self-Antigens and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Lung Transplant Candidates.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and pretransplant antibodies against lung self-antigens (SAbs) collagen-V and/or k-alpha 1 tubulin are both independently associated with allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation (LTx). The role of GER in inducing lung injury and SAbs is unknown. We aimed to study the association between pre-LTx GER and SAbs. After IRB approval, we retrieved SAb assays conducted between 2015 and 2019 and collected 24 hour GER data for these patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: no reflux (GER-) and pathologic reflux (GER+) to compare the prevalence of SAbs. Multivariate analysis was used to study the association between GER and SAbs in the whole cohort and in restrictive lung disease (RLD) and obstructive lung disease (OLD) subsets. Proximal esophageal reflux (PER) events ≥5 was considered abnormal. Patients (n = 134; 73 men) were divided into groups: GER- (54.5%, n = 73) and GER+ (45.5%, n = 61). The prevalence of GER was higher in the RLD than in the OLD subset (p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of SAbs was 53.7% (n = 72), higher in the GER+ than the GER- group (65.6% vs 43.8%, p = 0.012), but comparable between RLD and OLD subsets. Overall, SAbs were associated with GER (p = 0.012) and abnormal PER (p = 0.017). GER and abnormal PER increased the odds of SAbs in the RLD subset (OR [95% CI]: 2.825 [1.033-7.725], p = 0.040 and OR [95% CI]: 3.551 [1.271-9.925], p = 0.014, respectively) but not in the OLD subset. LTx candidates have a high prevalence of SAbs, which are significantly associated with GER and abnormal PER in patients with RLD.

Antireflux surgery versus medical management of gastro-oesophageal reflux after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after lung transplantation may be associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Aspiration may continue on medical management of reflux, but antireflux surgery potentially reduces all reflux. We compared outcomes between medical and surgical management of reflux in lung recipients. METHODS: Lung recipients with an elevated DeMeester score (≥14.72) on post-transplant reflux testing between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (underwent surgery) and group B (medically managed). Endpoints were pulmonary function, allograft dysfunction-free survival and overall survival. Further analysis included subgroups: A1 (early surgery, <6 months) and A2 (late surgery, >6 months), and B1 (DeMeester <29.9) and B2 (DeMeester ≥30). RESULTS: A total of 186 included subjects were divided into groups A [n = 46 (A1, n = 36; A2, n = 10)] and B [n = 140 (B1, n = 78; B2, n = 62)]. Compared to medically managed patients, patients who underwent surgery had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia (P < 0.001) and a lower prevalence of oesophageal motility disorders (P = 0.036). Recipients who underwent surgery had superior pulmonary function at 5 years compared to group B (P < 0.05) and longer allograft dysfunction-free survival than subgroup B2 (P = 0.028). Furthermore, early surgery was associated with longer survival than late surgery (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery in recipients with reflux improved long-term allograft function, and early surgery showed a survival benefit. Allograft dysfunction-free survival of lung recipients who underwent surgery was significantly better than that of medically managed patients with DeMeester ≥30. We present an algorithm for appropriate selection of candidates for antireflux surgery after lung transplantation.

Hospitalized patients with irreversible lung injury from COVID-19 have higher morbidity but similar 1-year survival after lung transplant compared to hospitalized patients transplanted for restrictive lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized lung transplant (LT) recipients (LTRs) have higher post-LT morbidity and mortality than those who are well enough to wait for transplant at home. Outcomes after LT for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) may be even worse; thus, we compared post-LT outcomes between hospitalized LTRs transplanted for CARDS and those transplanted for restrictive lung disease (RLD). METHODS: Between 2014 and 2021, hospitalized LTRs ≥18 years old with CARDS or RLD were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year post-LT survival and postoperative morbidity. For each patient in the CARDS group, an analysis of 1-to-1 matched patients from the RLD group was performed using logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Of 764 LTRs, 163 (21.3%) were hospitalized at the time of LT; 132 met the inclusion criteria: 11 (8.3%) were transplanted for CARDS and 121 (91.7%) for RLD. LTRs with CARDS were younger with longer pre-LT hospitalization stays and higher rates of pretransplant mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and ECMO as a bridge to transplant. A propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable rates of intrathoracic adhesions, posttransplant duration of mechanical ventilation, PGD3 at 72 hours, and delayed chest closure. Compared to LTRs with RLD, those with CARDS had significantly longer posttransplant hospital stays and a higher prevalence of ACR ≥A2 and DSA >2000 MFI, but comparable 1-year survival rates. CONCLUSION: Even with careful selection, LT for patients with CARDS was associated with significant morbidity; however, 1-year survival of recipients with CARDS was comparable to that of matched hospitalized recipients with RLD.

Carfilzomib versus rituximab for treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: De novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Both carfilzomib (CFZ) and rituximab (RTX) lower the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DSAs, but comparative data are lacking. We compared CLAD-free survival and the degree and duration of DSA depletion after treatment of LTRs with CFZ or RTX. METHODS: LTRs that received CFZ or RTX for DSA depletion between 08/01/2015 and 08/31/2020 were included. The primary outcome was CLAD-free survival. Secondary outcomes were change in MFI at corresponding loci within 6 months of treatment (ΔMFI), time to DSA rebound, and change in % predicted FEV1 6 months after treatment (ΔFEV1). RESULTS: Forty-four LTRs were identified, 7 of whom had ≥2 drug events; therefore, 53 drug events were divided into 2 groups, CFZ (n = 17) and RTX (n = 36). Use of plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin, and mycophenolate augmentation was equivalent in both groups. CLAD-free survival with a single RTX event was superior to that after ≥2 drug events (p = 0.001) but comparable to that with a single CFZ event (p = 0.399). Both drugs significantly lowered the MFI at DQ locus, and the median ΔMFI was comparable. Compared to the RTX group, the CFZ group had a shorter median interval to DSA rebound (p = 0.015) and a lower ΔFEV1 at 6 months (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Although both CFZ and RTX reduced the MFI of circulating DSAs, RTX prolonged the time to DSA rebound. Despite more pronounced improvement in FEV1 with RTX, comparable CLAD-free survival between the 2 groups suggests that both drugs offer a reasonable treatment strategy for DSAs in LTRs.

Lung Transplant Candidates With Pretransplant Gastroesophageal Reflux and Antibodies to Lung Self-antigens Have Shorter CLAD-free Survival After Transplant.

Pre-lung transplant (LTx) gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and circulating antibodies against the lung self-antigens (SAbs) collagen V and K-alpha-1 tubulin may predispose recipients to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We aimed to study the association of pre-LTx GER or pre-LTx SAbs with CLAD. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LTx between 2015 and 2019, pre-LTx GER and SAbs were dichotomously defined as present or absent. The study group comprised recipients with either GER' SAbs, or both, and the control group comprised recipients without GER or SAbs. Endpoints included CLAD and survival. RESULTS: Ninety-five LTx recipients were divided into a study group (n = 71; 75%) and a control group (n = 24; 25%). Pretransplant GER was associated with pre-LTx SAbs (odds ratio [95% confidence intervals], 5.022 [1.419-17.770]; P = 0.012). In addition, the study group (either GER' SAbs, or both) had a higher risk of CLAD (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals], 8.787 [1.694-45.567]; P = 0.010) and lower CLAD-free survival after LTx than the control group (P = 0.007); however, overall survival was similar between the 2 groups (P = 0.618). CONCLUSIONS: GER was associated with elevated SAbs in LTx candidates, and either GER, SAbs, or both were associated with CLAD in LTx recipients. This association suggests that GER may cause an immune response to normally sequestered lung-associated self-antigens that drives ongoing lung injury.

Factors associated with esophageal motility improvement after bilateral lung transplant in patients with an aperistaltic esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: We reported that esophageal peristalsis can improve after lung transplant (LTx), even in patients with pretransplant esophageal aperistalsis. This improvement was associated with better outcomes. We analyzed preoperative factors and sought to predict persistent aperistalsis or motility improvement in patients with pre-LTx esophageal aperistalsis. METHODS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis who underwent LTx between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Preoperative barium esophagrams were blinded and re-examined; subjective scores were assigned to motility and dilation patterns. Postoperative high-resolution manometry was used to divide patients into 2 groups: persistent esophageal aperistalsis (PEA) or improved esophageal peristalsis (IEP). RESULTS: We identified 29 patients: 20 with restrictive lung disease, 7 with obstructive lung disease, and 2 with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Post-LTx, 10 patients had PEA and 19 had IEP (mean age, 53.3 ± 6.6 years and 61.2 ± 10.6 years, respectively; P = .04). All 9 patients (100%) with obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension but only 10 of 20 patients (50%) with restrictive lung disease had IEP post-LTx (P = .01). All 4 patients with scleroderma had PEA. Nearly absent contractility on preoperative esophagrams was more prevalent in the PEA group than in the IEP group (100% vs 58.8%; P = .06). No further differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis and obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not patients with restrictive lung disease and scleroderma, are likely to have IEP post-LTx. Additional studies may determine whether subjective esophagram assessment can help predict IEP post-LTx in patients with restrictive lung disease without scleroderma.

Bilateral Lung Transplant for a Connective Tissue Disorder: Esophageal Motility and 3-year Survival.

Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) are associated with esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease, which may diminish survival after lung transplantation (LTx). We studied LTx outcomes in patients with a CTD stratified by esophageal motility. We identified patients who underwent bilateral LTx from 2012 to 2017. Patients with a CTD were classified by pre-LTx diagnosis: absent esophageal motility (AEM), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), or preserved esophageal motility (PEM). The primary endpoint was 3-year survival. Sub-analysis compared survival between the AEM group and a propensity-matched (lung allocation score), non-CTD control group. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. In total, 495 patients underwent LTx; 33 (6.7%) had a CTD. Median (IQR) age was 62 years (55.5-67.0); 24 (72.7%) were women. Survival trended lower for recipients with a CTD than without a CTD at 1-year (84.8% vs 91.8%; p = 0.2) and 3-years (66.7% vs 73.5%; p = 0.5). Within the CTD cohort, 1- and 3-year survival was significantly higher in the PEM (100%, 87.5%) and IEM (100%, 85.7%) groups than in the AEM group (50%, 20%; p < 0.001). The AEM group had significantly lower survival at 1-year (50% vs 92.5%) and 3-years (20% vs 65%) than a lung allocation score-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. LTx recipients with a CTD and AEM had significantly lower survival than those with PEM or IEM as well as significantly lower survival than that of a propensity-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. Patients with a CTD and AEM should be considered for LTx with extreme caution and counseled appropriately.

Incidentally Detected Malignancies in Lung Explants.

Introduction: Incidentally detected malignancies in lung explants portend risk of early cancer recurrence and metastases with posttransplant immunosuppression. We present a series of lung transplant recipients with previously unverified malignancies in native lung explants. Design: We reviewed the histopathology, radiographic imaging, and management of lung explant malignancies at our institution over 10 years (2011-2020). Endpoints were survival and allograft rejection. Results: An explant malignancy was found in 1.3% (11/855) of lung transplant recipients (6 [55%] men; median age 68 years; 6 [55%] ex-smokers [median pack-years, 25]). Nine (82%) were adenocarcinoma, 1 (9%) was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 1 (9%) was follicular lymphoma. Three patients (27%) had multifocal involvement (≥3 lobes), 4 (36%) had nodal involvement, and the median (range) tumor size was 2.7 (0.4-19) cm. The median interval between last imaging and transplant was 58 (29-144) days. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued or reduced in all; everolimus was used in 2 patients, and cisplatin-pemetrexed chemotherapy was used in 2 patients. The prevalence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection was 27% and 9%, respectively. Lung recipients with cancer had significantly lower survival than those without (36.4% vs 67.3%, p = 0.002); median survival was 27 (17, 65) months in 4 recipients who were alive and cancer-free at the end of the study period. Conclusions: Unidentified malignancies, commonly adenocarcinoma, can be detected in explanted native lungs. Pneumonectomy may be curative in SCC, lymphoproliferative disorders, and stage I adenocarcinoma. Modulating immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection and tumor proliferation is warranted.

Orthostatic Hypotension and Concurrent Autonomic Dysfunction: A Novel Complication of Lung Transplantation.

Background: Persistent orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a lesser-known complication of lung transplantation (LTx). In this retrospective case series, we describe the clinical manifestations, complications, and treatment of persistent OH in 13 LTx recipients. Methods: We identified LTx recipients who underwent transplantation between March 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020, with persistent symptomatic OH and retrospectively queried the records for clinical information. Results: Thirteen patients were included in the analysis, 9 (69%) had underlying pulmonary fibrosis, and 12 (92%) were male. The median age, height, and body mass index at LTx were 68 years, 70 inches, and 27 kg/m2, respectively. Six (46%) patients were deceased at the time of chart abstraction with a median (IQR) posttransplant survival of 12.6 months (6, 21); the 7 remaining living patients were a median of 19.6 months (18, 32) posttransplant. Signs and symptoms of OH developed a median of 60 (7, 75) days after transplant. Patients were treated with pharmacological agents and underwent extensive physical therapy. Most patients required inpatient rehabilitation (n = 10, 77%), and patients commonly developed comorbid conditions including weight loss, renal insufficiency with eGFR <50 (n = 13, 100%), gastroparesis (n = 7, 54%), and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (n = 2, 15%). Falls were common (n = 10, 77%). The incidence of OH in LTx recipients at our center during the study period was 5.6% (13/234). Conclusions: Persistent OH is a lesser-known complication of LTx that impacts posttransplant rehabilitation and may lead to comorbidities and shortened survival. In addition, most LTx recipients with OH at our center were tall, thin men with underlying pulmonary fibrosis, which may offer an opportunity to instate pretransplant OH screening of at-risk patients.