Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma: genomic profiling of a rare histotype of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is exceedingly rare, comprising less than 0.1% of all colorectal malignancies, and is characterized by an aggressive disease course, with a higher metastatic rate and worse outcome than conventional colorectal adenocarcinoma. A comprehensive molecular profile of this group of neoplasms is still lacking. A total of 22 cases of colorectal ASCs (with 22 primary lesions and 7 metastases matched with 4 primaries) were subject to NGS targeting 67 cancer-related genes (VariantPlex solid tumor; Archer). Mismatch repair (MMR), p53, and V600EBRAF status were also investigated by immunohistochemistry. In 28 of 29 (96.6%) ASC samples, at least one single-nucleotide variant (SNV) or copy number variation (CNV) was detected. Among the 22 primary tumors, the most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (59.1%), APC (40.9%), KRAS (27.3%), BRAF (13.6%), and GNAS (9.1%). Only 1/22 (4.5%) primary ASC was MMR-deficient (MMRd) and harbored a BRAF mutation. Limited differences in SNVs were observed between primary and metastatic diseases. This study sheds light on the molecular landscape of colorectal ASCs. According to our data, the genomic profile of colorectal ASC is similar to that of conventional colorectal carcinoma, with significant druggable genetic alterations. Further studies are required to understand the more aggressive clinical behavior of this neoplasm.

In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study.

AIMS: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response for first-line PARPIs treatment in patients with HGOSC. On the other hand, this test is extremely complex and therefore it is often externalised. Regrettably, the reliability of outsourced HRD testing can be troubled by inconclusive results and high rejection rates. In this methodological study, we assessed the technical feasibility, interassay and interlaboratory reproducibility of in-house HRD testing using three different commercially available next-generation sequencing assays. METHODS: A total of n=20 epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analysed with MyChoice CDx were subjected to HRD retesting using three different platforms in three different major pathology laboratories, that is, SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution, HRD focus and Oncomine homologous recombination repair pathway predesigned panel. Concordance was calculated by Cohen's (dual) and Fleiss (triple) κ coefficients. RESULTS: In-house BRCA1/2 molecular testing yielded a concordance rate >90.0% among all participating centres. HRD scores were successfully calculated by each institution with a concordance rate of 76.5%. Concerning the external gold standard test, the overall percentage of agreement ranged from 80.0% to 90.0% with a positive percentage agreement ranging from 75.0% to 80.0% and a negative percentage agreement ranging from 80.0% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: In-house testing for HRD can be reliably performed with commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.