Prognostic value of blood mRNA expression signatures in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prospective, two-stage study.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers are urgently needed to dissect the heterogeneity of prostate cancer between patients to improve treatment and accelerate drug development. We analysed blood mRNA expression arrays to identify patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with poorer outcome. METHODS: Whole blood was collected into PAXgene tubes from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and patients with prostate cancer selected for active surveillance. In stage I (derivation set), patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer were used as cases and patients under active surveillance were used as controls. These patients were recruited from The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (Sutton, UK) and The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (Glasgow, UK). In stage II (validation-set), patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer recruited from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, USA) were assessed. Whole-blood RNA was hybridised to Affymetrix U133plus2 microarrays. Expression profiles were analysed with Bayesian latent process decomposition (LPD) to identify RNA expression profiles associated with castration-resistant prostate cancer subgroups; these profiles were then confirmed by quantative reverse transcriptase (qRT) PCR studies and correlated with overall survival in both the test-set and validation-set. FINDINGS: LPD analyses of the mRNA expression data divided the evaluable patients in stage I (n=94) into four groups. All patients in LPD1 (14 of 14) and most in LPD2 (17 of 18) had castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and those under active surveillance comprised LPD3 (15 of 31 castration-resistant prostate cancer) and LDP4 (12 of 21 castration-resistant prostate cancer). Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer in the LPD1 subgroup had features associated with worse prognosis and poorer overall survival than patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer in other LPD subgroups (LPD1 overall survival 10·7 months [95% CI 4·1-17·2] vs non-LPD1 25·6 months [18·0-33·4]; p<0·0001). A nine-gene signature verified by qRT-PCR classified patients into this LPD1 subgroup with a very low percentage of misclassification (1·2%). The ten patients who were initially unclassifiable by the LPD analyses were subclassified by this signature. We confirmed the prognostic utility of this nine-gene signature in the validation castration-resistant prostate cancer cohort, where LPD1 membership was also associated with worse overall survival (LPD1 9·2 months [95% CI 2·1-16·4] vs non-LPD1 21·6 months [7·5-35·6]; p=0·001), and remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariable analyses for both cohorts. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that whole-blood gene profiling could identify gene-expression signatures that stratify patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer into distinct prognostic groups. FUNDING: AstraZeneca, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Prostate Cancer Charity, Prostate Cancer Foundation.

CYP17 inhibition as a hormonal strategy for prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling has a key role in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. AR gene amplification, AR overexpression, and activating mutations in the AR occur more frequently as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) evolves, with intratumoral androgen levels remaining sufficient for AR activation despite castration. The source of these androgens might be either adrenal or intratumoral. AR signaling, therefore, remains a valid treatment target for patients with CRPC. CYP17 is a key enzyme for androgen biosynthesis. The imidazole antifungal agent ketoconazole weakly and nonspecifically inhibits CYP17, but remains unlicensed for this indication. Chemists at the Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Therapeutics have designed a novel, selective, irreversible inhibitor of CYP17 called abiraterone, which is more than 20 times more potent than ketoconazole. Abiraterone acetate, a prodrug, has undergone phase I assessment, and is rapidly progressing from phase II to phase III trials, in view of its high level of antitumor activity. This agent is safe and well tolerated, and activity profiles suggest that approximately 50% of CRPC remains AR-ligand driven. Other CYP17 inhibitors with alternative mechanisms of action, for example VN/124-1, are in preclinical development. The rationale for and implications of CYP17 inhibition and the CYP17-targeting agents in development are discussed in this Review.