Association Between Dietary Acid Load and Grip Strength in Adults 50 Years and Older: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Minimal data exist on whether the acid-base balance of the diet is linked to muscle strength. The aim of this study was to determine if dietary acid load is associated with grip strength in a nationally representative sample of middle- to older-age adults. We examined the cross-sectional association of grip strength with dietary acid load quantified through potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) in 4,059 adults aged 50 years and older in the 2011-2014 NHANES survey cycles. PRAL and NEAP were estimated from two 24-h recalls and categorized into sex-specific quartiles. Grip strength was measured on a dynamometer. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the associations of PRAL and NEAP (as quartiles) with grip strength for men and women separately, adjusting for total energy, age, race/ethnicity, weight, physical activity, smoking, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Mean grip strength was 26.8 ± 0.2 kg in women and 43.0 ± 0.4 kg in men. Adjusted grip strength was inversely associated with quartiles of PRAL (ptrend = 0.049) and NEAP (ptrend = 0.034) in women with quartile 4 vs 1 differences of - 1.21 and - 1.08 kg (both p < 0.05), respectively. Adjusted grip strength was not associated with PRAL or NEAP in men. Overall, we found inverse associations between dietary acid load and grip strength in middle- and older-age women, suggesting that an alkaline diet may be important in maintaining muscle strength in this population. There was no association between dietary acid load and grip strength in men.

Cross-Calibration of Prodigy and Horizon A Densitometers and Precision of the Horizon A Densitometer.

We performed this study to enable a reliable transition for clinical study participants and patients from a GE Lunar Prodigy to a Hologic Horizon A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner and to assess the reproducibility of measurements made on the new DXA scanner. Forty-five older adults had one spine, hip, and total body scan on a Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner and 2 spine, hip, and total body scans, with repositioning, on a new Hologic Horizon A DXA scanner. Linear regression models were used to derive cross calibration equations for each measure on the 2 scanners. Precision (group root-mean-square average coefficient of variation) of bone mineral density (BMD) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (L1-L4), and total body fat, bone, and lean mass, appendicular lean mass, and trabecular bone score (TBS) was assessed using the International Society of Clinical Densitometry's (ISCD's) Advanced Precision Calculation Tool. Correlation coefficients for the BMD and body composition measures on the 2 scanners ranged from 0.94 to 0.99 (p<0.001). When compared with values on the Prodigy, mean BMD on the Horizon A was lower at each skeletal site (0.136 g/cm2 lower at the femoral neck and 0.169 g/cm2 lower at the lumbar spine (L1-4)), fat mass was 0.47 kg lower, and lean mass was 4.50 kg higher. Precision of the Horizon A scans was 1.60% for total hip, 1.94% for femoral neck, and 1.25% for spine (L1-4) BMD. Precision of TBS was 1.67%. Precision of total body fat mass was 2.16%, total body lean mass was 1.26%, appendicular lean mass was 1.97%, and total body bone mass was 1.12%. The differences in BMD and body composition values on the 2 scanners illustrate the importance of cross-calibration to account for these differences when transitioning clinical study participants and patients from one scanner to another.

Effect of a GH Secretagogue, Anamorelin, on Serum Irisin and Inflammation Levels in Osteosarcopenic Adults.

Background: Data suggest an association between GH secretion and circulating levels of the myokine irisin and inflammatory cytokinesIL-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The impact of GH secretagogues on these markers is unknown. Objectives: To determine the effect of treatment with the GH secretagogue anamorelin on 12-month changes in serum irisin, IL-6, and hsCRP levels and to assess whether baseline irisin levels modulate the glycemic response to treatment with anamorelin. Methods: This is an ancillary study in 26 older adults with osteosarcopenia who participated in a 12-month trial examining the effect of anamorelin 100 mg/day vs placebo on musculoskeletal outcomes. Serum irisin, IL-6, and hsCRP were measured at baseline and 12 months. Results: Treatment with anamorelin, compared with placebo, did not significantly alter irisin levels [12-month change = 0.50 ± 1.2 (SD) ng/mL in anamorelin group and -0.08 ± 2.3 ng/mL in placebo; P = .191]. Baseline irisin levels were not significantly correlated with 2-month change in fasting glucose levels in the anamorelin group (r = -0.222, P = .46) or the placebo group (r = 0.30, P = .34); however, the slopes of the 2 regression lines describing the relationship by group tended to differ (P = .0547). Anamorelin treatment for 12 months had no significant effect on serum IL-6 or hsCRP levels. Conclusion: In this small sample of older adults with osteosarcopenia, treatment with the GH secretagogue anamorelin did not significantly alter levels of irisin, IL-6, or hsCRP. Higher baseline irisin levels may attenuate the glycemic response to anamorelin treatment; however, a larger study is needed to confirm this possibility.

Effect of Anamorelin, a Ghrelin Receptor Agonist, on Muscle and Bone in Adults With Osteosarcopenia.

CONTEXT: Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist known to stimulate the pulsatile release of GH from the pituitary, has the potential to improve musculoskeletal health in adults with osteosarcopenia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of anamorelin treatment for 1 year on muscle mass and strength and on biochemical markers of bone turnover in adults with osteosarcopenia (OS). DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, 1-year anamorelin intervention trial. SETTING: The Bone Metabolism Laboratory at the USDA Nutrition Center at Tufts University. PARTICIPANTS: 26 men and women, age 50 years and older, with OS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle mass by D3-creatine dilution and lean body mass (LBM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, muscle strength, serum IGF-1, and bone turnover markers, serum procollagen 1 intact N-terminal (P1NP), and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX). RESULTS: Anamorelin did not have a significant effect on muscle mass or LBM; it significantly increased knee flexion torque at 240°/s by 20% (P = .013) and had a similar nonstatistically significant effect on change in knee extension; it increased bone formation (P1NP) by 75% (P = .006) and had no significant effect on bone resorption (CTX) or BMD. Serum IGF-1 increased by 50% in the anamorelin group and did not change in the placebo group (P = .0001 for group difference). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, anamorelin did not significantly alter muscle mass; however, it may potentially improve lower extremity strength and bone formation in addition to increasing circulating IGF-1 levels in adults with OS. Further study of anamorelin in this population is warranted.