Variations in CT Utilization, Protocols, and Radiation Doses in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Results from 28 Countries in the IAEA Study.

Background There is lack of guidance on specific CT protocols for imaging patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Purpose To assess international variations in CT utilization, protocols, and radiation doses in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods In this retrospective data collection study, the International Atomic Energy Agency coordinated a survey between May and July 2020 regarding CT utilization, protocols, and radiation doses from 62 health care sites in 34 countries across five continents for CT examinations performed in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The questionnaire obtained information on local prevalence, method of diagnosis, most frequent imaging, indications for CT, and specific policies on use of CT in COVID-19 pneumonia. Collected data included general information (patient age, weight, clinical indication), CT equipment (CT make and model, year of installation, number of detector rows), scan protocols (body region, scan phases, tube current and potential), and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose index and dose length product). Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were performed. Results Data from 782 patients (median age, 59 years [interquartile range, 15 years]) from 54 health care sites in 28 countries were evaluated. Less than one-half of the health care sites used CT for initial diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and three-fourths used CT for assessing disease severity. CT dose index varied based on CT vendors (7-11 mGy; P < .001), number of detector rows (8-9 mGy; P < .001), year of CT installation (7-10 mGy; P = .006), and reconstruction techniques (7-10 mGy; P = .03). Multiphase chest CT examinations performed at 20% of sites (11 of 54) were associated with higher dose length product compared with single-phase chest CT examinations performed in 80% of sites (43 of 54) (P = .008). Conclusion CT use, scan protocols, and radiation doses in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia showed wide variation across health care sites within the same and between different countries. Many patients were imaged multiple times and/or with multiphase CT scan protocols. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lee in this issue.

Effects of convolution filter with beam hardening correction on computed tomography image quality.

PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of convolution filters (FC) with beam hardening correction (BHC) compared to FC without BHC on the computed tomography (CT) image quality. METHODS: This study was conducted on a Canon® Aquilion Lightning scanner. The exposure protocol includes acquisitions at 120 and 100 kVp. Sixteen FCs (8 with and 8 without BHC) were investigated using a Catphan®504 phantom. Uniformity, slice thickness, spatial resolution, Hounsfield unit and noise were analysed using the SPICE-CT ImageJ plugin and the noise power spectrum was analysed using the Imquest software. RESULTS: It was observed that the BHC did not significantly influence the uniformity, slice thickness, noise and noise power spectrum. Comparisons of 10% MTF between FC01 and FC11 showed relative differences of -29% and -5% at 120 and 100 kVp, respectively, while those between FC09 and FC19 were -55% and -25%. The Hounsfield unit of the Catphan's region of highest electron density was reduced by -7.29% at 120 kVp for FC with BHC. In both cases (FC with and without BHC), the noise values agreed with CT operating manual. At 120 kVp, FC11 and FC09 presented the maximum and minimum noise values, respectively. CONCLUSION: In CT procedures that quantitatively evaluate the bone or calcium Hounsfield unit, FC with BHC should be avoided due to its effects on Hounsfield units, in special at higher voltage, such as 120 kVp.