RESUMO
Inverted formin-2 (INF2) gene mutations are among the most common causes of genetic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) with or without Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. Recent studies suggest that INF2, through its effects on actin and microtubule arrangement, can regulate processes including vesicle trafficking, cell adhesion, mitochondrial calcium uptake, mitochondrial fission, and T-cell polarization. Despite roles for INF2 in multiple cellular processes, neither the human pathogenic R218Q INF2 point mutation nor the INF2 knock-out allele is sufficient to cause disease in mice. This discrepancy challenges our efforts to explain the disease mechanism, as the link between INF2-related processes, podocyte structure, disease inheritance pattern, and their clinical presentation remains enigmatic. Here, we compared the kidney responses to puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN) induced injury between R218Q INF2 point mutant knock-in and INF2 knock-out mouse models and show that R218Q INF2 mice are susceptible to developing proteinuria and FSGS. This contrasts with INF2 knock-out mice, which show only a minimal kidney phenotype. Co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation analysis of wild-type and mutant INF2 coupled with measurements of cellular actin content revealed that the R218Q INF2 point mutation confers a gain-of-function effect by altering the actin cytoskeleton, facilitated in part by alterations in INF2 localization. Differential analysis of RNA expression in PAN-stressed heterozygous R218Q INF2 point-mutant and heterozygous INF2 knock-out mouse glomeruli showed that the adhesion and mitochondria-related pathways were significantly enriched in the disease condition. Mouse podocytes with R218Q INF2, and an INF2-mutant human patient's kidney organoid-derived podocytes with an S186P INF2 mutation, recapitulate the defective adhesion and mitochondria phenotypes. These results link INF2-regulated cellular processes to the onset and progression of glomerular disease. Thus, our data demonstrate that gain-of-function mechanisms drive INF2-related FSGS and explain the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of this disease.
RESUMO
Introduction: Advances in the field of genetic testing have spurred its use in transplantation. Potential benefits of genetic testing in transplant nephrology include diagnosis, treatment, risk stratification of recurrent disease, and risk stratification in potential donors. However, it is unclear how to best apply genetic testing in this population to maximize its yield. We describe our transplant center's approach to selective genetic testing as part of kidney transplant candidate and donor evaluation. Methods: Transplant recipient candidates were tested if they had a history of ESRD at age <50, primary FSGS, complement-mediated or unknown etiology of kidney disease, or had a family history of kidney disease. Donors were tested if age <35, were related to their potential recipients with known genetic susceptibility or had a first-degree relative with a history of kidney disease of unknown etiology. A targeted NGS gene panel of 385 genes was used. Clinical implications and downstream effects were monitored. Results: Over 30% of recipients tested within the established criteria were positive for a pathogenic variant. The most common pathogenic variants were APOL1 high-risk genotypes as well as collagen 4-alpha-3, -4 and -5. Donor testing done according to our inclusion criteria resulted in about 12% yield. Positive test results in recipients helped with stratification of the risk of recurrent disease. Positive test results in potential donors guided informed decisions on when not to move forward with a donation. Discussion: Integrating targeted panel genetic testing into a kidney transplant clinic in conjunction with a selective criteria for testing donors and recipients ensured a reasonable diagnostic yield. The results had implications on clinical management, risk stratification and in some cases were instrumental in directing downstream changes including when to stop the evaluation process. Given the impact on management and transplant decisions, we advocate for the widespread use of genetic testing in selected individuals undergoing transplant evaluation and donation who meet pre-defined criteria.