Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/normas , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess if individual case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer influences the risk of mortality and long-term survival. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 2005, 195 resections for oesophageal cancer were performed by nine surgeons in a single institution. Operative mortality, defined as in hospital death, was compared between the high-volume and low-volume surgeons. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for death between the two groups, also in the presence of covariates. RESULTS: There were 140 males and 55 females with mean age of 63.4 (32-84). Two high-volume surgeons performed 61% (118) of the operations with a mean of 11 per year compared to 4 per year in the low-volume group. The patients in the two groups were matched for age (63 years vs 64; p=0.53), sex (67 vs 79% male; p=0.07). Ivor Lewis resections were performed more frequently by high-volume surgeons (95 vs 73%; p<0.001). The operative mortality rate was much lower when high case volume surgeons performed the procedure (4 vs 17%; p=0.001). The relative risk of death when low-volume surgeons performed the procedure was 4.59 (95% CI 1.57-13.46; p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly associated with low-volume surgeon when controlling separately for age (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.55, 13.60, p=0.006), tumor stage (OR 3.76; 95% CI 1.24, 11.45, p=0.02) and tumor type (OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.29, 11.60, p=0.016). Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the survival of high- and low-volume surgeons showed no statistical differences (Log rank p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality rate for oesophagectomy for cancer is strongly influenced by case volume and was 4.6-fold higher when performed by surgeons with low case volume. Patients with oesophageal cancer in need of an oesophagectomy may benefit from referral to a high-volume thoracic surgeon.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
We describe how 2-window video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication and lung mobilization can provide definitive management of stage III empyema. This technique was used in 52 patients with stage III empyema. None required additional ports or a thoracotomy. Three patients (6%) needed computed tomography-guided drainage of persistent large loculi, but none required further surgery. Chest radiographs at 6 weeks after surgery confirmed full lung expansion and resolution of pleural collection in the other 49 patients (94%).