[Changes in adherence to the Mediterranean diet observed in a Spanish population during confinement for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic]. / Cambios observados en la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea en una población española durante el confinamiento debido a la pandemia ocasionada por el SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: home confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic can influence the dietary profiles of the population, suddenly subjected to a stressful factor that implies important modifications in life habits. Among others, a restriction of mobility and a change in the way of carrying out work, going from being face-to-face to non-contact (teleworking). Objective: to know the usual dietary pattern prior to confinement, and to assess the evolution of adherence to the Mediterranean diet weekly until its conclusion. Methods: data were collected using a weekly anonymous online questionnaire that monitored adherence to the Mediterranean diet in real time in an initial sample of 490 adults from Spain. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was assessed using the MEDAS (Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener) and modified PREDIMED questionnaires. Results: confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the eating habits of the participants, so that adherence to the Mediterranean diet increased at the end of the confinement period, which is of special interest, since it was based on a good initial adherence (MEDAS adherence: 10.03 ± 1.9 initial and 10.47 ± 2.1 final; p = 0.016; modified PREDIMED adherence: 9.26 ± 2.0 initial and 9.89 ± 2.1 final; p < 0.001), without observing clinically relevant changes in body composition as measured by body mass index (BMI) except in women (23.3 kg/m2 ± 2.9 initial and 23.4 kg/m2 ± 2.9 final; p < 0.001), with a slight increase in this parameter, but maintaining on average the healthy values recommended by the guidelines. Conclusions: in the studied population we observed an improvement in adherence to the Mediterranean diet without observing clinically relevant changes in BMI.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: el confinamiento domiciliario debido a la pandemia de COVID-19 puede influir en los perfiles dietéticos de la población, sometida súbitamente a un factor estresante que implica importantes modificaciones en los hábitos de vida. Entre otros, la restricción de la movilidad y el cambio en la forma de realizar el trabajo, pasando de ser presencial a no presencial (teletrabajo). Objetivo: conocer el patrón dietético habitual previo al confinamiento y valorar la evolución de la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea semanalmente hasta la conclusión del mismo. Métodos: los datos se recopilaron mediante un cuestionario anónimo semanal en línea que monitorizó la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea en tiempo real en una muestra inicial de 490 adultos de España. La adherencia a la dieta mediterránea se valoró mediante los cuestionarios MEDAS (Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener) y PREDIMED modificado. Resultados: el confinamiento debido a la pandemia de COVID-19 influyó en los hábitos alimenticios de los participantes, de modo que la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea aumentó al concluir el período de confinamiento, lo cual tiene especial interés, ya que se partía de una buena adherencia inicial (adherencia MEDAS: 10,03 ± 1,9 inicial y 10,47 ± 2,1 final; p = 0,016; adherencia PREDIMED modificado: 9,26 ± 2,0 inicial y 9,89 ± 2,1 final; p < 0,001), sin observarse cambios clínicamente relevantes en la composición corporal valorada por el índice de masa corporal (IMC) excepto en las mujeres (23,3 kg/m2 ± 2,9 inicial y 23,4 kg/m2 ± 2,9 final; p < 0,001), con un discreto aumento de dicho parámetro pero manteniendo en promedio los valores saludables aconsejados por las guías. Conclusiones: en la población estudiada observamos una mejora de la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea sin observar cambios clínicamente relevantes en el IMC.

Influence of the confinement that occurred in Spain due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreak on adherence to the Mediterranean diet. / Influencia del confinamiento ocurrido en España debido a la pandemia por el virus SARS-CoV-2 en la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea.

INTRODUCTION: The Mediterranean diet (MDiet) reduces morbidity and mortality. The lockdown that took place in Spain between the months of March and May 2020 may have led to behavioural changes. The aim of the present study was to assess adherence to the MDiet at the end of the lockdown period and to compare it with the situation prior to it. METHODS: Data were obtained by means of 2online questionnaires, one at the beginning of lockdown and the other at the end, completed by adults from the Spanish population, who responded anonymously and voluntarily. The assessment of adherence to the MDiet was carried out using 2questionnaires: Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) and modified PREDIMED, which contained 14 questions each. Other variables included were: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), autonomous community of origin, home living conditions, and level of studies achieved. At the end of the lockdown period, the comparison was made using the Student t statistic and the McNemar test. RESULTS: A total of 207 people (137 women) participated, with a mean age 51.3±12.4 years, age range: 20-83 years. After lockdown, BMI remained unchanged (initial 24.55±3.7kg/m2 and final 24.57±3.7kg/m2, P=.752), as well as fish consumption (initial 51.2%) and 60.9% at the end, P=.003), mainly due to the women, and adherence to the Mdiet. The mean total score of MEDAS increased with 10.16±2.0 at the beginning, and 10.57±2.0 at the end; P=.001). This also occurred with the modified PREDIMED (9.47±2.1 at the beginning and 9.93±2.1 at the end, P<.001). Similarly, the proportion of participants that had a score classified as high at the beginning increased at the end of lockdown: from 80.7% initially in MEDAS to 87.9% at the end (P=.021) and from 68.6% initially in modified PREDIMED to 75.8% at the end (P=.037). CONCLUSIONS: In the study sample, during lockdown there were no changes in BMI, but there were increases in fish consumption and adherence to the MDiet.

Effect of a motivational physical activity program on lipid parameters in patients with obesity and overweight. / Efecto de un programa de actividad física motivada en los parámetros lipídicos de pacientes con obesidad o sobrepeso.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a motivated physical activity program on the lipid parameters most related to excess weight (triglycerides [TG], and high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL]) in a weight-loss intervention in obese and overweight patients. METHODS: A randomised and controlled, 2-arm, clinical trial and a 12-months follow-up was conducted. The patients included in the study were randomised into 2 intervention groups: Motivational intervention of obesity with a previously trained nurse (G1), motivational group, with digital platform support and motivated physical activity program (iwopi [G2]). The anthropometric variables measured were height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as the analytical variables, total cholesterol, TG and HDL-C. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients participated in the study, of which 61 were randomised to G1, and 62 to G2. Both groups significantly decreased weight at the end of the study, with the decrease in G1 being 4.898kg, and 6.292kg in G2. In both groups there was also a significantly decrease (P<.05) in total cholesterol and TG, and increase in HDL cholesterol, with these changes being more intense in the G2 group, as well as being the group that lost more weight. CONCLUSIONS: Weight reduction is accompanied by favourable changes in lipid parameters related to overweight and obesity, being more intense the greater the weight loss.

[Efficacy of motivational interventions in the treatment of overweight and obesity]. / Eficacia de las estrategias de motivacion en el tratamiento del sobrepeso y obesidad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Changing unhealthy behaviors: Diet and physical activity are key to treating obesity. The objective of this study is to determine whether an intervention group motivational intervention group by nurses trained by expert psychologist, complementary to the usual intervention is more effective than the latter in the treatment of overweight and obesity in relation to weight reduction percentage and the persistence over time of the reduction achieved. METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial of intervention in overweight and obese patients. Randomization of the intervention by health areas (ZBS). Two groups located in different centers separated, one of which will receive motivational intervention group (study group) and the other routine monitoring (control group) were established. VARIABLES: Sociodemographic, results: percentage of patients reduced by 5% of its weight and maintenance over time, anthropometric assessment, assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and laboratory data. RESULTS: 696 patients were studied; 377 control and 319 study group. In both groups the weight down in each of the visits. The mean percentage weight reduction stood at 1% for the control group and 2.5% in the intervention group (p -value = 0.009). 55.8% of patients reduced the weight in the control group and 65.5% of the study group (p -value = 0.0391). 18.1% of the control patient lost more than 5% by weight, in the intervention group, this percentage increased to 26.9%; statistically significant ( p -value = 0.0304). For the 10% target no significant differences at 2 years were detected (5% vs. 8%). It was found that after two years the BMI in the control group an average 0.9 kg/m2 and 2.4 kg/m2 was reduced in the study group ( p -value = 0.0237). CONCLUSION: based motivational group intervention program can improve anthropometric and lifestyle parameters in obese patients treated in a primary care center.

Introducción y objetivos: La modificación de conductas no saludables: dietas y actividad física son fundamentales para tratar la obesidad. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si una intervención de motivación en grupo, por profesionales de enfermería entrenados por psicólogo experto, complementariamente a la intervención habitual, es más eficaz que esta última en el tratamiento del sobrepeso y obesidad en relación a reducción porcentual del peso, y la persistencia en el tiempo de la reducción conseguida. Métodos: Ensayo clínico aleatorio multicéntrico de intervención en pacientes con sobrepeso y obesidad. Asignación aleatoria de la intervención por Zonas Básicas de Salud (ZBS). Se establecen dos grupos situados en centros diferentes separados, uno de los cuales recibirá la intervención de motivación en grupo (grupo de estudio) y el otro el seguimiento habitual (grupo control). Variables: Sociodemográficas, de resultados: porcentaje de pacientes que reducen un 5 % de su peso y mantenimiento en el tiempo, valoración antropométrica, valoración de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y datos analíticos. Resultados: Se evaluaron 696 pacientes; 377 grupo control y 319 del de estudio. En ambos grupos el peso descendía en cada una de las visitas. La reducción porcentual media del peso se situó en el 1% para el grupo control y del 2,5% en el grupo intervención (p-valor = 0,009). El 55,8% de los pacientes redujeron el peso en el grupo control y el 65,5% del grupo de estudio (p-valor = 0,0391). El 18,1% de los paciente del grupo control redujeron más del 5% del peso, en el grupo intervención este porcentaje aumentó hasta el 26.9%; estadísticamente significativo (p-valor = 0,0304). En el caso del objetivo del 10% no se detectaron diferencias significativas a los 2 años (5% vs. 8%). Se detectó que a los dos años el IMC en el grupo control se redujo una media 0,9 kg/m2 y 2,4 kg/ m2 en el grupo de estudio (p-valor = 0,0237). Conclusión: el programa basado en intervención motivacional en grupo puede mejorar parámetros antropométricos y estilos de vida en pacientes obesos tratados en un centro de Atención Primaria.