RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2018, a virtual community of practice (CoP) for pharmacists working in family medicine groups (FMGs) in Quebec province was developed. The aim of this CoP-called Réseau Québécois des Pharmaciens GMF (RQP GMF)-was to foster best practices by supporting FMG pharmacists. This study assesses the processes and outcomes of this CoP 2 years after its creation. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional web-based study from March to May 2020. All FMG pharmacists who were registered as members of the RQP GMF (n = 326) were sent an invitation via a newsletter. The link to the questionnaire was also publicized in the CoP Facebook group. The questionnaire comprised a 38-item validated instrument assessing 8 dimensions of the CoP. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 112 FMG pharmacists (34.4%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents agreed that the RQP GMF was a joint enterprise (mean score, 4.18/5), that members shared their knowledge (mean score, 3.94/5) and engaged mutually (mean score, 3.50/5) and that the RQP GMF provided support (mean score, 3.92/5) and capacity building (mean score, 4.01/5). In general, they were satisfied with the implementation process (mean score, 3.68/5) and with activities proposed (mean score, 3.79/5). A lower proportion of respondents agreed that their participation in the RQP GMF generated external impacts, which led to a smaller mean score (3.37/5) for this dimension. CONCLUSION: The RQP GMF, one of the first communities of practice for pharmacists practising in family medicine groups, attained most of the objectives initially intended by the CoP. These results will facilitate the adaptation of processes and activities to better fulfil members' needs. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) have been associated with a greater risk of adverse drug events and hospitalizations. To reduce PIMs use, a family health team (FHT) implemented a knowledge translation (KT) strategy that included a pharmacist-physician intervention model based on alerts from a computerized alert system (CAS). METHODS: Our pragmatic, single-site, pilot study was conducted in an FHT clinic in Quebec, Canada. We included community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years), with at least 1 alert for selected PIMs and a medical appointment during the study period. PIMs were selected from the Beers and STOPP criteria. The primary outcome was PIMs cessation, decreased dose, or replacement. The secondary outcome was the clinical relevance of the alerts as assessed by the pharmacists. RESULTS: During the 134 days of the study, the CAS screened 369 individuals leading to the identification of 65 (18%) patients with at least 1 new alert. For those 65 patients, the mean age was 77 years, men accounted for 29% of the group and 55% were prescribed 10 or more drugs. One or more clinically relevant alerts were generated for 27 of 65 included patients for an overall clinical relevance of the alerts of 42%. Of the 27 patients with at least 1 relevant alert, 17 (63%) had at least 1 medication change as suggested by the pharmacist. CONCLUSION: An interdisciplinary pharmacist-physician intervention model, based on alerts generated by a CAS, reduced the use of PIMs in community-dwelling older adults followed by an FHT.