Increasing Nurse-Physician Family-Centered Rounds Communication: A Quality Improvement Pilot Project.

BACKGROUND: High-quality nurse-physician communication during family-centered rounds (FCRs) can increase patient safety. LOCAL PROBLEM: In our hospital, interdisciplinary team members perceived that nurse-physician communication during FCRs declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Using quality improvement methodology, we measured nurses' perceived awareness of components of the shared mental model, nurses' attendance during FCRs, compliance with completing FCR summaries, and average time spent per FCR encounter. INTERVENTIONS: A structured resident huddle took place prior to an FCR. Residents used a tool to send individualized alerts to bedside nurses to prepare them for an FCR. Residents developed comprehensive summaries after each FCR encounter and sent a summary text to nurses who were unable to attend the FCR. RESULTS: We assessed 40 FCRs over 16 weeks. Nurses' perceived awareness increased from 70% to 87%. Nurse attendance increased from 53% to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully piloted multiple interventions to improve nurse perceived awareness after an FCR.

Agreement between study designs: a systematic review comparing observational studies and randomized trials of surgical treatments for necrotizing enterocolitis.

Background: It is unknown whether observational studies comparing laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the same interventions. Further, in the absence of sufficient RCT evidence, it is uncertain how best to use existing observational data to guide clinical decision making.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles comparing laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for preterm infants with NEC. Two authors independently searched PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from 1 January 1990 to 1 May 2017 and selected articles that: (1) included low birthweight (<2500 g) or preterm (<37-week gestation) infants, (2) compared laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for NEC, and (3) reported all-cause mortality (primary outcome) in both groups. The same two authors extracted data about study outcomes and about study quality, which was assessed using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for reporting of RCTs and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for reporting of observational studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate weighted odds ratios (OR).Results: Twenty-five observational studies and two RCTs met all eligibility criteria. Outcomes were reported for 16,288 patients: 16,103 from observational studies and 185 from RCTs. Meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated significantly lower mortality after laparotomy, as compared to peritoneal drainage (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.84). In contrast, RCTs demonstrated no difference in mortality (pooled OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47-1.54). In post hoc analyses, observational studies were separated into two subgroups: low versus high quality of reporting, based on the STROBE checklist. Observational studies with low quality of reporting significantly favored laparotomy (pooled OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.81). In contrast and similar to RCTs, observational studies with high quality of reporting showed no difference in mortality (pooled OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.37-1.19).Conclusions: Neither RCTs nor observational studies with high quality of reporting demonstrate differences in mortality when preterm infants with surgical NEC are managed with laparotomy or peritoneal drainage. While RCTs remain a gold standard for evaluation of therapies, results from high quality observational studies may approximate the results of RCTs and might guide clinical practice until adequate RCT evidence is available.

Kimura disease: a case report of a rare illness presenting as a common complaint.

Background Kimura is an uncommon inflammatory cause of pediatric head and neck masses due to eosinophilic infiltration of unclear etiology. Kimura can present similarly to infectious lymphadenitis, a much more common pediatric complaint. This case explores the role of anchoring bias when faced with an illness that at first appears to fit a common illness script that led to a delayed diagnosis. Case presentation A 7-year-old boy presented with acute onset of pre-auricular lymphadenopathy and fevers initially thought to be most consistent with infectious cervical lymphadenopathy. Despite treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics and multiple evaluations for underlying abscess requiring surgical drainage, the patient did not improve and remained febrile. Eventually, excisional lymph node biopsy was obtained and a pathologic diagnosis of Kimura disease was made. Conclusions This case illustrates an uncommon pediatric diagnosis which presented similarly to infectious cervical lymphadenitis without additional laboratory features consistent with Kimura. We highlight the role of anchoring bias and care fragmentation leading to repeat imaging and delayed biopsy in the eventual diagnosis of a rare illness.