Second-generation Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid immunoassays aid diagnosis of early Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Timely diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for appropriate treatment/patient management. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker analysis is often used to aid diagnosis. We assessed analytical performance of second-generation (Gen II) Elecsys® CSF immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd), and adjusted existing cut-offs, to evaluate their potential utility in clinical routine. METHODS: Analytical performance was assessed using CSF samples measured with Elecsys CSF Gen II immunoassays on cobas e analyzers. Aß42 Gen I/Gen II immunoassay method comparisons were performed (Passing-Bablok regression). Cut-off values were adjusted using estimated bias in biomarker levels between BioFINDER protocol aliquots/Gen I immunoassays and Gen II protocol aliquots/immunoassays. Distribution of Gen II immunoassay values was evaluated in AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively normal cohorts; percentage observations outside the measuring range were derived. RESULTS: The Gen II immunoassays demonstrated good analytical performance, including repeatability, intermediate precision, lot-to-lot agreement (Pearson's r: ≥0.999), and platform agreement (Pearson's r: ≥0.995). Aß42 Gen I/Gen II immunoassay measurements were strongly correlated (Pearson's r: 0.985-0.999). Aß42 Gen II immunoassay cut-offs were adjusted to 1,030 and 800 ng/L, and pTau181/Aß42 ratio cut-offs to 0.023 and 0.029, for Gen II and I protocols, respectively. No observations were below the lower limit of the measuring range; above the upper limit, there were none from the AD cohort, and 2.6 and 6.8% from the MCI and cognitively normal cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the Gen II immunoassays have potential utility in clinical routine to aid diagnosis of AD.

The Alzheimer's Association international guidelines for handling of cerebrospinal fluid for routine clinical measurements of amyloid ß and tau.

The core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid beta (Aß42 and Aß40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau, have been extensively clinically validated, with very high diagnostic performance for AD, including the early phases of the disease. However, between-center differences in pre-analytical procedures may contribute to variability in measurements across laboratories. To resolve this issue, a workgroup was led by the Alzheimer's Association with experts from both academia and industry. The aim of the group was to develop a simplified and standardized pre-analytical protocol for CSF collection and handling before analysis for routine clinical use, and ultimately to ensure high diagnostic performance and minimize patient misclassification rates. Widespread application of the protocol would help minimize variability in measurements, which would facilitate the implementation of unified cut-off levels across laboratories, and foster the use of CSF biomarkers in AD diagnostics for the benefit of the patients.

First amyloid ß1-42 certified reference material for re-calibrating commercial immunoassays.

INTRODUCTION: Reference materials based on human cerebrospinal fluid were certified for the mass concentration of amyloid beta (Aß)1-42 (Aß42 ). They are intended to be used to calibrate diagnostic assays for Aß42 . METHODS: The three certified reference materials (CRMs), ERM-DA480/IFCC, ERM-DA481/IFCC and ERM-DA482/IFCC, were prepared at three concentration levels and characterized using isotope dilution mass spectrometry methods. Roche, EUROIMMUN, and Fujirebio used the three CRMs to re-calibrate their immunoassays. RESULTS: The certified Aß42 mass concentrations in ERM-DA480/IFCC, ERM-DA481/IFCC, and ERM-DA482/IFCC are 0.45, 0.72, and 1.22 µg/L, respectively, with expanded uncertainties (k = 2) of 0.07, 0.11, and 0.18 µg/L, respectively. Before re-calibration, a good correlation (Pearson's r > 0.97), yet large biases, were observed between results from different commercial assays. After re-calibration the between-assay bias was reduced to < 5%. DISCUSSION: The Aß42 CRMs can ensure the equivalence of results between methods and across platforms for the measurement of Aß42 .

Technical and clinical performance of a new assay to detect squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels for the differential diagnosis of cervical, lung, and head and neck cancer.

In squamous cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels are often elevated. This multi-center study evaluated the technical performance of a new Elecsys® squamous cell carcinoma assay, which measures serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1 and 2 levels in an equimolar manner, and investigated the potential of squamous cell carcinoma antigen for differential diagnosis of cervical, lung, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Assay precision and method comparison experiments were performed across three European sites. Reference ranges for reportedly healthy individuals were determined using samples from banked European and Chinese populations. Differential diagnosis experiments determined whether cervical, lung, or head and neck cancer could be differentiated from apparently healthy, benign, or other malignant cohorts using squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels alone. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen cut-off levels were calculated based on squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels at 95% specificity. Repeatability coefficients of variation across nine analyte concentrations were ≤5.3%, and intermediate precision coefficients of variation were ≤10.3%. Method comparisons showed good correlations with Architect and Kryptor systems (slopes of 1.1 and 1.5, respectively). Reference ranges for 95th percentiles for apparently healthy individuals were 2.3 ng/mL (95% confidence interval: 1.9-3.8; European cohort, n = 153) and 2.7 ng/mL (95% confidence interval: 2.2-3.3; Chinese cohort, n = 146). Strongest differential diagnosis results were observed for cervical squamous cell carcinoma: receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels (2.9 ng/mL cut-off) differentiate cervical squamous cell carcinoma (n = 127) from apparently healthy females (n = 286; area under the curve: 86.2%; 95% confidence interval: 81.8-90.6; sensitivity: 61.4%; specificity: 95.6%), benign diseases (n = 187; area under the curve: 86.3%; 95% confidence interval: 81.2-91.3; sensitivity: 61.4%; specificity: 95.0%), and other cervical cancers (n = 157; area under the curve: 78.9%; 95% confidence interval: 70.8-87.1; sensitivity: 61.4%; specificity: 86.7%). Squamous cell carcinoma may also aid in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer. The Elecsys squamous cell carcinoma assay exhibited good technical performance and is suitable for differential diagnosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma in clinical practice.

Commutability of the certified reference materials for the standardization of ß-amyloid 1-42 assay in human cerebrospinal fluid: lessons for tau and ß-amyloid 1-40 measurements.

BACKGROUND: The core Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau), ß-amyloid 1-42 (Aß42) and ß-amyloid 1-40 (Aß40) are increasing in importance and are now part of the research criteria for the diagnosis of the disease. The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether a set of certified reference materials (CRMs) are commutable for Aß42 and to serve as a feasibility study for the other markers. This property is a prerequisite for the establishment of CRMs which will then be used by manufacturers to calibrate their assays against. Once the preanalytical factors have been standardized and proper selection criteria are available for subject cohorts this harmonization between methods will allow for universal cut-offs to be determined. METHODS: Thirty-four individual CSF samples and three different CRMs where analyzed for T-tau, P-tau, Aß42 and Aß40, using up to seven different commercially available methods. For Aß40 and Aß42 a mass spectrometry-based procedure was also employed. RESULTS: There were strong pairwise correlations between the different methods (Spearman's ρ>0.92) for all investigated analytes and the CRMs were not distinguishable from the individual samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the CRMs are commutable for the different assays for Aß42. For the other analytes the results show that it would be feasible to also produce CRMs for these. However, additional studies are needed as the concentration interval for the CRMs were selected based on Aß42 concentrations only and did in general not cover satisfactory large concentration intervals for the other analytes.

The impact of preanalytical variables on measuring cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A review.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer's disease, yet there is a lack of harmonized preanalytical CSF handling protocols. METHODS: This systematic review summarizes the current literature on the influence of preanalytical variables on CSF biomarker concentration. We evaluated the evidence for three core CSF biomarkers: ß-amyloid 42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau. RESULTS: The clinically important variables with the largest amount of conflicting data included the temperature at which samples are stored, the time nonfrozen samples can be stored, and possible effects of additives such as detergents, blood contamination, and centrifugation. Conversely, we discovered that there is consensus that tube material has a significant effect. DISCUSSION: A unified CSF handling protocol is recommended to reduce preanalytical variability and facilitate comparison of CSF biomarkers across studies and laboratories. In future, experiments should use a gold standard with fresh CSF collected in low binding tubes.

Body Image Perception in Acromegaly Is Not Associated with Objective Acromegalic Changes but Depends on Depressive Symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of acromegaly is delayed up to 10 years after disease onset despite obvious external/objective changes such as bone and soft tissue deformities. We hypothesized that a lack of subjective perception of the disease state, possibly mediated by psychiatric or cognitive alterations, might contribute to the delayed initiation of a diagnostic workup. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We investigated perceived body image by standardized questionnaires (FKB-20: Fragebogen zum Körperbild; FBeK: Fragebogen zur Beurteilung des eigenen Körpers) in 81 acromegalic patients and contrasted them to (a) a clinical control group of 60 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) who lack severe facial and physical alterations and (b) healthy controls. We further evaluated body image in relation to objective acromegalic changes as judged by medical experts and psychiatric pathology, e.g. depression and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Patients with acromegaly did not lack subjective perception of the disease state; they showed more negative body image, less vitality, more insecurity/paresthesia and more accentuation of the body compared to normal controls. NFPA patients differed from acromegalic patients only in the 'vital body dynamics' scale of the FKB-20, although they hardly exhibit any physical/bodily changes. Depression correlated with worse body image. No associations were found between body image and objective acromegalic changes as judged by medical experts, cognitive decline or treatment status. CONCLUSIONS: Negative body image in acromegalic patients is unrelated to their objective appearance and similar to those of NFPA patients without major bodily changes. Depression, but not cognitive decline or treatment status, contributes to negative body image.

NGAL, L-FABP, and KIM-1 in comparison to established markers of renal dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: New urinary biomarkers like neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) open the opportunity to detect kidney injuries in early stages. Our study aimed at evaluating NGAL, L-FABP, and KIM-1 in comparison to established markers of urine protein differentiation for detection of renal dysfunction. METHODS: On the basis of the PROTIS expert system (for differentiation of glomerulo-/tubulopathy) urine and plasma samples of 263 randomly selected patients were routinely examined (urine: total protein, albumin, IgG, α1-microglobulin, creatinine, and dip stick results for leukocytes, blood, protein, glucose, pH, and nitrite; plasma: creatinine and cystatin C) followed by the analysis of the new urine biomarkers NGAL (CMIA), L-FABP (ECLIA), and KIM-1 (ELISA). RESULTS: Of the three new markers L-FABP showed the highest correlation with α1-microglobulin (r=0.76, p<0.01) and was closest associated with the degree of tubular proteinuria assessed by the PROTIS system. NGAL distinguished the PROTIS proteinuria groups with distinctive tubular proteinurias from the controls as well, but revealed a marked diagnostic influence by leukocyturia. Urinary KIM-1 revealed only a weak diagnostic value for the detection of renal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary NGAL and L-FABP proved to be promising candidates for detecting injuries of the renal tubular system over a broad range of clinical conditions. L-FABP showed a better diagnostic performance and a lower interference by leukocyturia and hematuria than NGAL. Both markers may serve as sensitive tissue injury markers in addition to the established markers of renal functional impairment.

Pre-analytical protocol for measuring Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in fresh CSF.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to establish a standardized, routine-use pre-analytical protocol for measuring Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). METHODS: The effect of pre-analytical factors (sample collection/handling/storage/transportation) on biomarker levels was assessed using freshly collected CSF. Tube type/sterilization was assessed using previously frozen samples. A low-bind false-bottom tube (FBT, Sarstedt) was used for all experiments, except tube types/sterilization experiments. Biomarkers were measured using Elecsys CSF assays. RESULTS: Amyloid beta (Aß)1-42 levels varied by tube type, using a low-bind FBT reduced variation. Aß1-42 levels were higher with no mixing versus roller/inversion mixing. Aß1-42 levels were lower with horizontal versus upright transportation; this was resolved by maximal tube filling and storage at 2°C to 8°C. Aß1-40 levels were less strongly affected. Phospho-tau and total-tau levels were largely unaffected. DISCUSSION: We propose an easy-to-use, standardized, routine-use pre-analytical protocol, using low-bind FBTs, for measuring AD CSF biomarkers in clinical practice.

Method comparison study of the Elecsys® ß-Amyloid (1-42) CSF assay versus comparator assays and LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-ß (1-42; Aß42), can provide high diagnostic accuracy. Several immunoassays are available for Aß42 quantitation, but standardisation across assays remains an issue. We compared the Elecsys® ß-Amyloid (1-42) CSF assay with three assays and two liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. METHODS: Three method comparison studies evaluated the correlation between the Elecsys® ß-Amyloid (1-42) CSF assay versus: INNOTEST® ß-AMYLOID(1-42) (860 samples) and the Roche Diagnostics-developed LC-MS/MS method (250 samples); INNO-BIA AlzBio3 and the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn)-developed LC-MS/MS method (250 samples); and ADx-EUROIMMUN Beta-Amyloid (1-42) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (49 samples). RESULTS: High correlation was demonstrated between Elecsys® ß-Amyloid (1-42) CSF and comparator assays: INNOTEST® ß-AMYLOID(1-42) (Spearman's ρ, 0.954); INNO-BIA AlzBio3 (Spearman's ρ, 0.864); ADx-EUROIMMUN Beta-Amyloid (1-42) ELISA (Pearson's r, 0.925). Elecsys® assay and LC-MS/MS measurements were highly correlated: Pearson's r, 0.949 (Roche Diagnostics-developed method) and 0.943 (UPenn-developed method). CONCLUSION: Findings from this multicentre evaluation further support use of the Elecsys® ß-Amyloid (1-42) CSF assay to aid AD diagnosis. CSF-based certified reference materials should improve agreement across assays and mass spectrometry-based methods, which is essential to establish a global uniform CSF Aß42 cut-off to detect amyloid pathology.

Comparison of Plasma and Urine Biomarker Performance in Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: New renal biomarkers measured in urine promise to increase specificity for risk stratification and early diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) but concomitantly may be altered by urine concentration effects and chronic renal insufficiency. This study therefore directly compared the performance of AKI biomarkers in urine and plasma. METHODS: This single-center, prospective cohort study included 110 unselected adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2009 and 2010. Plasma and/or urine concentrations of creatinine, cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM1), and albumin as well as 15 additional biomarkers in plasma and urine were measured during the perioperative period. The primary outcome was AKI defined by AKIN serum creatinine criteria within 72 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Biomarkers in plasma showed markedly better discriminative performance for preoperative risk stratification and early postoperative (within 24h after surgery) detection of AKI than urine biomarkers. Discriminative power of urine biomarkers improved when concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine, but urine biomarkers had still lower AUC values than plasma biomarkers. Best diagnostic performance 4h after surgery had plasma NGAL (AUC 0.83), cystatin C (0.76), MIG (0.74), and L-FAPB (0.73). Combinations of multiple biomarkers did not improve their diagnostic power. Preoperative clinical scoring systems (EuroSCORE and Cleveland Clinic Foundation Score) predicted the risk for AKI (AUC 0.76 and 0.71) and were not inferior to biomarkers. Preexisting chronic kidney disease limited the diagnostic performance of both plasma and urine biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort plasma biomarkers had higher discriminative power for risk stratification and early diagnosis of AKI than urine biomarkers. For preoperative risk stratification of AKI clinical models showed similar discriminative performance to biomarkers. The discriminative performance of both plasma and urine biomarkers was reduced by preexisting chronic kidney disease.