Immediate Implant Reconstruction Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Lymphedema Compared to Mastectomy Alone: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of lymphedema associated with immediate breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction is increasingly performed at the time of mastectomy. Few studies have examined whether breast reconstruction impacts development of lymphedema. METHODS: A total of 616 patients with breast cancer who underwent 891 mastectomies between 2005 and 2013 were prospectively screened for lymphedema at our institution, with 22.2 months' median follow-up. Mastectomies were categorized as immediate implant, immediate autologous, or no reconstruction. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up using a Perometer. Lymphedema was defined as 10% or more arm volume increase compared to preoperative. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine lymphedema rates and risk factors. RESULTS: Of 891 mastectomies, 65% (580/891) had immediate implant, 11% (101/891) immediate autologous, and 24% (210/891) no reconstruction. The two-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was as follows: 4.08% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.59-6.41%] implant, 9.89% (95% CI: 4.98-19.1%) autologous, and 26.7% (95% CI: 20.4-34.4%) no reconstruction. By multivariate analysis, immediate implant [hazards ratio (HR): 0.352, P < 0.0001] but not autologous (HR: 0.706, P = 0.2151) reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphedema compared to no reconstruction. Axillary lymph node dissection (P < 0.0001), higher body mass index (P < 0.0001), and greater number of nodes dissected (P = 0.0324) were associated with increased lymphedema risk. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study suggests that in patients for whom implant-based reconstruction is available, immediate implant reconstruction does not increase the risk of lymphedema compared to mastectomy alone.

Is a higher boost dose of radiation necessary after breast-conserving therapy for patients with breast cancer with final close or positive margins?

To determine rates of loco-regional recurrence (LRR), distant failure and overall survival for patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with a close or positive surgical margin (C/PM) treated with standard dose boost radiation compared with a higher boost of radiation. We retrospectively studied 1476 patients with T1-T3 invasive breast cancer treated with BCT between 1992 and 2009. Median age was 57 years. Patients were divided into three groups: Group I included 1197 patients (81 %) with negative margins who received a standard boost (median 60 Gy) total dose to the lumpectomy cavity; Group II included 116 patients (8 %) with C/PM who received a standard boost (median 60 Gy); and Group III included 163 patients (11 %) with C/PM who received a higher boost (median 68 Gy). Biological subtypes (e.g., ER, PR, HER2/neu) were available for 858 patients (58 %) and were also assessed for any relationship to LRR rate. The Kaplan-Meier, Cox-regression, and log-rank tests were used to estimate rates of LRR and the significance of risk factors. Median follow-up was 8.6 years. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of LRR were 2.1 % (95 % CI 0.8-2.1 %) and 4.5 % (95 % CI 3.4-6.0 %), respectively. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of LRR for Group I (negative margins + standard boost) were 1.9 and 4.4 %; for Group II (C/PM + standard boost) were 3.9 and 7.0 %; and for Group III (C/PM + higher boost) were 2.9 and 3.8 %, respectively. No statistically significant differences in LRR rates were found among the three groups (p = 0.4). Similar results were obtained for distant failure (p = 0.3) and overall survival (p = 0.4). On multivariate analysis, tumor grade (p = 0.03), systemic-therapy (p = 0.005), node positivity (p = 0.05), young age (p = 0.001), and biological subtype (p = 0.04) were statistically significantly associated with higher LRR. Higher boost dose and margin positivity were not significant. Our data suggest that the 10-year risk of local recurrence for patients with close or positive margins receiving a standard boost was 7 % compared to 3.8 % for those receiving a higher boost; however, this difference was not significant. A higher boost dose did not significantly improve local control, nor did margins impact LRR risk in our cohort of patients.

Long-term outcomes among breast cancer patients with extensive regional lymph node involvement: implications for locoregional management.

Extensive lymph node (LN) involvement portends significant risk for distant metastasis (DM) among breast cancer patients. As a result, local management may be of secondary import to systemic control in this population. We analyzed patients with ≥10 involved LNs (N3) to evaluate the feasibility of breast conserving therapy (BCT) vs modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in this high-risk cohort. Among 98 women with N3 disease 46 (46.9%) underwent BCT and 52 (53.1%) received MRM. Nearly all patients (92%) received comprehensive radiotherapy (RT) including axillary and supraclavicular fields. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to analyze time-to-event outcomes. Median follow-up was 76 months, with a 5-year DFS of 64.9% and OS of 71.9% among the cohort. Poorly differentiated (p = 0.007), ER-negative tumors (p = 0.015) had adverse DFS outcomes. Treatment groups did not differ with regard to 10-year DFS (45.4% for MRM vs. 57.6% for BCT; p = 0.31), or OS (61.4 vs. 63.7%; p = 0.79). DM-free survival was 48.9% following MRM and 60.6% following BCT (p = 0.19). Patients with ≥10 involved LNs have similar outcomes following BCT or MRM, suggesting that RT may obviate the need for more-extensive surgery. While local control is comparably favorable regardless of surgical approach, systemic control remains a challenge in this population.

Outcome following local-regional recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer: impact of biologic subtype.

Local-regional recurrence (LRR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) can result in distant metastasis and decreased disease-free survival (DFS). This study examines factors associated with DFS following LRR. The initial population included 2,233 consecutive women who underwent BCT from 1998 to 2007. Biologic subtype was approximated using a combination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and tumor grade. Cumulative incidence of DFS after LRR was calculated. The association of clinical, pathologic, and treatment parameters with DFS was evaluated using a Cox regression model. At a median follow-up of 105 months, 82 patients (3.7%) had a LRR. Of these, 66 (80%) were in-breast and 16 (20%) involved the ipsilateral lymph nodes. Twenty patients subsequently developed distant metastases. Five-year DFS after initial recurrence was 69.6% for the overall cohort. On univariate analysis, triple-negative disease (ER/PR/HER2 negative, TNBC) was associated with reduced DFS (HR = 3.8; 95% CI: 1.8-8.1; p < 0.001). Other factors associated with reduced DFS were larger tumor size (HR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.03-1.6; p = 0.02), shorter interval from initial diagnosis to LRR (HR = 0.98 per month; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99; p = 0.02), and no salvage surgery (HR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.09-0.5; p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TNBC remained the most significant factor associated with reduced DFS (HR = 4.8; 95% CI: 2.25-10.4; p < 0.001). Compared to women with luminal A disease, those with TNBC had significantly worse DFS (37.5% versus 88.3% at 5 years; p < 0.001). Women with TNBC who developed LRR were at high risk of subsequent recurrence. Efforts should be targeted toward both preventing initial recurrence and decreasing subsequent metastasis.

The impact of isolated tumor cells on loco-regional recurrence in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving treatment or mastectomy without post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

To compare the outcome of patients with invasive breast cancer, who had isolated tumor cells (ITC) in sentinel lymph nodes, pN0(i+), to patients with histologically negative nodes, pN0. We retrospectively studied 1,273 patients diagnosed with T1-T3 breast cancer from 1999 to 2009. Patients were divided into 2 populations: 807 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT), 85(10.5 %) with pN0(i+) and 722(89.5 %) with pN0. And the other population had 466 patients treated with mastectomy without post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), 80(17.2 %) with pN0(i+),and 386(82.8 %)with pN0. All patients underwent sentinel node biopsy, and the presence of ITC was determined. Patients with axillary dissection only or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Among the 1,273 patients studied; 87.3 % received adjuvant systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and log-rank statistical tests were used. Median patient age was 55.7 years. Median follow-up was 69.5 months. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) for patients treated with BCS and RT was 1.6 and 3.5 % for 85 pN0(i+) patients, and 2.4 and 5 % for 722 pN0 patients, respectively. For patients treated with mastectomy without PMRT, 5- and 10-year LRR rates were 2.8 and 2.8 % for 80 pN0(i+) patients, and 1.8 and 3 % for 386 pN0 patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in LRR (p = 0.9), distant recurrence (p = 0.3) ,and overall survival (p = 0.5) among all groups. On multivariate analysis, ITC were not associated with increased risk of LRR, distant recurrence and overall survival. Grade (p = 0.003) and systemic therapy (p = 0.02) were statistically significantly associated with risk of LRR. Sentinel node ITC have no significant impact on LRR, distant recurrence and overall survival in breast cancer patients. Additional treatments such as axillary dissection, chemotherapy, or regional radiation should not be given solely based on the presence of sentinel node ITC.

Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients.

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and radiation therapy (RT) are commonly recommended for mastectomy patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Effective alternatives to ALND that reduce lymphedema risk are needed. We evaluated rates of lymphedema in mastectomy patients who received SLNB with RT, compared to ALND with or without RT. 627 breast cancer patients who underwent 664 mastectomies between 2005 and 2013 were prospectively screened for lymphedema, median 22.8 months follow-up (range 3.0-86.9). Each mastectomy was categorized as SLNB-no RT, SLNB + RT, ALND-no RT, or ALND + RT. RT included chest wall ± nodal radiation. Perometer arm volume measurements were obtained pre- and post-operatively. Lymphedema was defined as ≥10 % arm volume increase. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine lymphedema rates and risk factors. Of 664 mastectomies, 52 % (343/664) were SLNB-no RT, 5 % (34/664) SLNB + RT, 9 % (58/664) ALND-no RT, and 34 % (229/664) ALND + RT. The 2 year cumulative lymphedema incidence was 10.0 % (95 % CI 2.6-34.4 %) for SLNB + RT compared with 19.3 % (95 % CI 10.8-33.1 %) for ALND-no RT, and 30.1 % (95 % CI 23.7-37.8 %) for ALND + RT. The lowest cumulative incidence was 2.19 % (95 % CI 0.88-5.40 %) for SLNB-no RT. By multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with increased lymphedema risk included RT (p = 0.0017), ALND (p = 0.0001), greater number of lymph nodes removed (p = 0.0006), no reconstruction (p = 0.0418), higher BMI (p < 0.0001) and older age (p = 0.0021). In conclusion, avoiding completion ALND and instead receiving SLNB with RT may decrease lymphedema risk in patients requiring mastectomy. Future trials should investigate the safety of applying the ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients.

Locoregional recurrence and survival outcomes by type of local therapy and trastuzumab use among women with node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: While human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is an adverse breast cancer prognostic factor, it is unclear whether there are differences in outcomes between types of local treatment in this population. This retrospective study examined locoregional recurrence and survival in women with node-negative, HER2+ breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. METHODS: Subjects were 748 patients with pT1-2, N0, M0 HER2+ breast cancer, treated with BCT (n = 422) or mastectomy (n = 326). Trastuzumab was used in 54 % of subjects. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence free survival (LRRFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between cohorts treated with BCT versus mastectomy. Subgroup analyses of LRR and survival were performed separately among patients treated with BCT or mastectomy to examine the effect of trastuzumab on outcomes in each group. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Patients treated with mastectomy had higher proportions of grade 3 histology (69 vs 60 %, p = 0.004) and lower rates of hormone therapy (51 vs 64 %, p < 0.001) and trastuzumab therapy (50 vs 57 %, p = 0.04). The 5-year outcomes in women treated with BCT compared with mastectomy were: LRRFS 98.0 versus 98.3 % (p = 0.88), BCSS 97.2 versus 96.1 % (p = 0.70), and OS 95.5 versus 93.4 % (p = 0.19). Trastuzumab was associated with similar LRRFS and improved OS in both local treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BCT is safe in the population of women with pT1-2, N0, HER2+ breast cancer, providing high rates of locoregional control and survival equivalent to mastectomy. Trastuzumab was associated with improved survival in both groups.

Defining a threshold for intervention in breast cancer-related lymphedema: what level of arm volume increase predicts progression?

The purpose of this study is to evaluate arm volume measurements and clinico-pathologic characteristics of breast cancer patients to define a threshold for intervention in breast cancer-related lymphedema. We prospectively performed arm volume measurements on breast cancer patients using a Perometer. Arm measurements were performed pre- and post-operatively, and change in arm volume was quantified using a relative volume change (RVC) equation. Patient and treatment risk factors were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates for RVC were used to evaluate whether RVC elevations of ≥3 to <5 % or ≥5 to <10 % occurring ≤3 months or >3 months after surgery were associated with progression to ≥10 % RVC. 1,173 patients met eligibility criteria with a median of 27 months post-operative follow-up. The cumulative incidence of ≥10 % RVC at 24 months was 5.26 % (95 % CI 4.01-6.88 %). By multivariable analysis, a measurement of ≥5 to <10 % RVC occurring >3 months after surgery was significantly associated with an increased risk of progression to ≥10 % RVC (HR 2.97, p < 0.0001), but a measurement of ≥3 to <5 % RVC during the same time period was not statistically significantly associated (HR 1.55, p = 0.10). Other significant risk factors included a measurement ≤3 months after surgery with RVC of ≥3 to <5 % (p = 0.007), ≥5 to <10 % (p < 0.0001), or ≥10 % (p = 0.023), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (p < 0.0001), and higher BMI at diagnosis (p = 0.0028). Type of breast surgery, age, number of positive or number of lymph nodes removed, nodal radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy were not significant (p > 0.05). Breast cancer patients who experience a relative arm volume increase of ≥3 to <5 % occurring >3 months after surgery do not have a statistically significant increase in risk of progression to ≥10 %, a common lymphedema criterion. Our data support utilization of a ≥5 to <10 % threshold for close monitoring or intervention, warranting further assessment. Additional risk factors for progression to ≥10 % include ALND, higher BMI, and post-operative arm volume elevation.

Deep inspiration breath-hold technique in left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy: Evaluating cardiac contact distance as a predictor of cardiac exposure for patient selection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) over a free-breathing (FB) technique to minimize cardiac radiation exposure in radiation therapy of left-sided breast cancer. Also, to better select patients for DIBH, the correlation between cardiac contact distance (CCD) and cardiac dose was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent DIBH and FB planning computed tomography scans, and the 2 plans were compared. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), left ventricle (LV), and left lung. Axial CCDs and parasagittal CCDs (FB-CCDps) were measured on FB planning computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Dose to heart, LAD, LV, and left lung was significantly lower in DIBH plans than in FB by all metrics. When DIBH was compared with FB, mean dose (Dmean) for heart was 0.9 versus 2.5 Gy; for LAD, 4.0 versus 14.9 Gy; and for LV, 1.1 versus 3.9 Gy (P < .0001), respectively. Seventy-five percent of the patients had a dose reduction of ≥ 0.9 Gy in Dmean to heart, ≥ 3 Gy in Dmean to LAD, and ≥ 1.7 Gy in Dmean to LV. FB-CCDps was associated with an equivalent uniform dose to heart, LAD, and LV for both the DIBH and FB plans (P ≤ .01); FB axial CCD measures were not. CONCLUSIONS: DIBH is a simple and highly effective technique to reduce cardiac exposure without compromising target coverage. FB-CCDps is potentially a very good predictor for cardiac exposure: the longer the FB-CCDps, the higher the dose. Our findings suggest that at least 75% of patients with left-sided breast cancer might benefit from the DIBH technique in terms of potentially clinically relevant dose reduction to cardiac structures, and therefore, it should be instituted as routine clinical practice.

Radiation therapy risk factors for development of lymphedema in patients treated with regional lymph node irradiation for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We previously evaluated the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) with the addition of regional lymph node irradiation (RLNR) and found an increased risk when RLNR is used. Here we analyze the association of technical radiation therapy (RT) factors in RLNR patients with the risk of LE development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2012, we prospectively screened 1476 women for LE who underwent surgery for breast cancer. Among 1507 breasts treated, 172 received RLNR and had complete technical data for analysis. RLNR was delivered as supraclavicular (SC) irradiation (69% [118 of 172 patients]) or SC plus posterior axillary boost (PAB) (31% [54 of 172]). Bilateral arm volume measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. Patients' RT plans were analyzed for SC field lateral border (relative to the humeral head), total dose to SC, RT fraction size, beam energy, and type of tangent (normal vs wide). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze associated risk factors for LE. RESULTS: Median postoperative follow-up was 29.3 months (range: 4.9-74.1 months). The 2-year cumulative incidence of LE was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%-32%) for SC and 20% (95% CI: 11%-37%) for SC plus PAB (SC+PAB). None of the analyzed variables was significantly associated with LE risk (extent of humeral head: P=.74 for <1/3 vs >2/3, P=.41 for 1/3 to 2/3 vs >2/3; P=.40 for fraction size of 1.8 Gy vs 2.0 Gy; P=.57 for beam energy 6 MV vs 10 MV; P=.74 for tangent type wide vs regular; P=.66 for SC vs SC+PAB). Only pretreatment body mass index (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, P=.0007) and the use of axillary lymph node dissection (HR: 7.08, 95% CI: 0.98-51.40, P=.05) were associated with risk of subsequent LE development. CONCLUSIONS: Of the RT parameters tested, none was associated with an increased risk of LE development. This study underscores the need for future work investigating alternative RLNR risk factors for LE.

Clinical outcome of isolated locoregional recurrence in patients with breast cancer according to their primary local treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the clinical outcome and prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer who presented with isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) as a first event. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1970 and 2008, 2960 patients with pT1-2, N0-3, M0 primary invasive breast cancer had either breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using lumpectomy and radiation therapy (RT) (group A = 1849 patients) or mastectomy without RT (group B = 1111 patients). Out of groups A and B, 117 and 103 patients, respectively, developed ILRR as a first event. Those 220 patients served as the basis for this study. A multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the clinical outcome of both groups, taking into account clinically relevant variables for the primary tumor and ILRR. RESULTS: The median follow-up after ILRR was 83 months. The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 79 and 38 months for groups A and B, respectively. The overall survival (OS) for group A was 81% and 69% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. For group B, it was 61% and 46%, respectively. The distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for group A was 84% at 5 years and remained 84% at 8 years. The DMFS for group B was 60% at 5 years and 52% at 8 years. In multivariate analysis, initial local treatment (BCT vs. mastectomy without RT), pathologic T stage, locoregional recurrence site (local vs. regional), and DFI (≤ 4 years vs. > 4 years) were significant prognostic variables for both OS and DMFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer who developed ILRR after BCT as their initial local treatment have better clinical outcome compared with those who had mastectomy without RT.

Is biological subtype prognostic of locoregional recurrence risk in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy?

PURPOSE: To examine locoregional and distant recurrence (LRR and DR) in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer according to approximated subtype and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent datasets were pooled and analyzed. The study participants were 1994 patients with pT1-2N0M0 breast cancer, treated with mastectomy without radiation therapy. The patients were classified into 1 of 5 subtypes: luminal A (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 1-2, n=1202); luminal B (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 3, n=294); luminal HER 2 (ER+ or PR+/HER 2+, n=221); HER 2 (ER-/PR-/HER 2+, n=105) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-/PR-/HER 2-, n=172). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.3 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LRR were 1.8% in luminal A, 3.1% in luminal B, 1.7% in luminal HER 2, 1.9% in HER 2, and 1.9% in TNBC cohorts (P=.81). The 5-year KM DR was highest among women with TNBC: 1.8% in luminal A, 5.0% in luminal B, 2.4% in luminal HER 2, 1.1% in HER 2, and 9.6% in TNBC cohorts (P<.001). Among 172 women with TNBC, the 5-year KM LRR were 1.3% with clear margins versus 12.5% with close or positive margins (P=.04). On multivariable analysis, factors that conferred higher LRR risk were tumors>2 cm, lobular histology, and close/positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year risk of LRR in our pT1-2N0 cohort treated with mastectomy was generally low, with no significant differences observed between approximated subtypes. Among the subtypes, TNBC conferred the highest risk of DR and an elevated risk of LRR in the presence of positive or close margins. Our data suggest that although subtype alone cannot be used as the sole criterion to offer postmastectomy radiation therapy, it may reasonably be considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors including tumor size, histology, and margin status. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up times are needed to define which women with node-negative disease have high postmastectomy LRR risks in contemporary practice.

The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema after breast cancer treatment can be an irreversible condition with a negative impact on quality of life. The goal of this study was to identify radiation therapy-related risk factors for lymphedema. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2012, we prospectively performed arm volume measurements on 1476 breast cancer patients at our institution using a Perometer. Treating each breast individually, 1099 of 1501 patients (73%) received radiation therapy. Arm measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Lymphedema was defined as ≥10% arm volume increase occurring >3 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors for lymphedema. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 25.4 months (range, 3.4-82.6 months), the 2-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema was 6.8%. Cumulative incidence by radiation therapy type was as follows: 3.0% no radiation therapy, 3.1% breast or chest wall alone, 21.9% supraclavicular (SC), and 21.1% SC and posterior axillary boost (PAB). On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for regional lymph node radiation (RLNR) (SC ± PAB) was 1.7 (P=.025) compared with breast/chest wall radiation alone. There was no difference in lymphedema risk between SC and SC + PAB (P=.96). Other independent risk factors included early postoperative swelling (P<.0001), higher body mass index (P<.0001), greater number of lymph nodes dissected (P=.018), and axillary lymph node dissection (P=.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of breast cancer patients prospectively screened for lymphedema, RLNR significantly increased the risk of lymphedema compared with breast/chest wall radiation alone. When considering use of RLNR, clinicians should weigh the potential benefit of RLNR for control of disease against the increased risk of lymphedema.

Atypical presentation of priapism in a patient with acute iliocaval deep venous thrombosis secondary to May-Thurner syndrome.

We report on a 42-year-old male who presented with priapism, severe scrotal swelling, and left lower extremity pain and swelling. Initial management of priapism failed, and he was noted to have both cavernosal and glandular venous obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and identified extensive acute thrombosis involving the distal inferior vena cava and the left iliac veins. Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) was started over the course of two days. At completion of thrombolysis, the culprit lesion in the left common iliac vein was treated with angioplasty and stenting. His postoperative course was uneventful, and his priapism as well as the scrotal and leg swelling improved. He was discharged home on full anticoagulation. To our knowledge, this is the first available description of this rare presentation along with a literature review of the underlying vascular etiology for priapism.

Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary?

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of patients with invasive breast cancer both with and without lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)-positive/close surgical margins after breast-conserving treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively studied 2358 patients with T1-T2 invasive breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy from January 1980 to December 2009. Median age was 57 years (range, 24-91 years). There were 82 patients (3.5%) with positive/close LCIS margins (<0.2 cm) and 2232 patients (95.7%) with negative margins. A total of 1789 patients (76%) had negative lymph nodes. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. A total of 1783 patients (76%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5%-4.1%) for the 2232 patients with LCIS-negative surgical margins (median follow-up 104 months) and 2.8% (95% CI 0.7%-10.8%) for the 82 patients with LCIS-positive/close surgical margins (median follow-up 90 months). This was not statistically significant (P=.5). On MVA, LCIS-positive margins after the final surgery were not associated with increased risk of LRR (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4, 95% CI 0.5-24.5, P=.2). Statistically significant prognostic variables on Cox's MVA for risk of LRR included systemic therapy (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.33-0.75, P=.001), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, P=.001), menopausal status (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, P=.001), and histopathologic grade (grade 3 vs grade 1/2) (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.7, P=.003). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the presence of LCIS at the surgical margin after lumpectomy does not increase the risk of LRR or the final outcome. These findings suggest that re-excision or mastectomy in patients with LCIS-positive/close final surgical margins is unnecessary.

Patency in arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: It is difficult to maintain a working access for patients on hemodialysis. Despite current Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiatives recommendations of "Fistula First," not everyone qualifies for a fistula, and those patients undergoing the alternative treatment, a graft, can experience graft failure. This study examines factors associated with arteriovenous graft (AVG) patency. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was completed for all the patients who had an AVG during 2005 to 2010. Data were collected from electronic medical records, including date of first and subsequent interventions, salvage technique (surgical vs percutaneous), medical comorbidities, and use of antiplatelet medications (aspirin and clopidogrel). Continuous variables were compared with 2 sample t tests, and categorical variables with chi-square/Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio for risk factors associated with patency. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. All analyses were done using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). RESULTS: A total of 193 unique patients had an AVG. Of the 193 patients, 64% were female, 83% were hypertensive, and 64% were diabetic. The locations of the grafts were 80% arm, 15% forearm, and 5% thigh. Configurations, including loop and straight, were 34% and 63%, respectively. Comorbidities were not associated with patency. Primary patency was not found to be different with respect to location and configuration of graft and type of intervention. Primary patency for patients taking only aspirin (n = 43) and only clopidogrel (n = 17) were significantly different from patients on a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 7), with a P = .0051 and P = .0447, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither location nor configuration affects the primary patency of AVGs. Aspirin alone is not inferior to aspirin and clopidogrel. Further prospective studies may be warranted to establish a consensus regarding medications and patency with AVGs.