Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography for mapping viscoelasticity in zebrafish.

PURPOSE: The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become an important animal model in a wide range of biomedical research disciplines. Growing awareness of the role of biomechanical properties in tumor progression and neuronal development has led to an increasing interest in the noninvasive mapping of the viscoelastic properties of zebrafish by elastography methods applicable to bulky and nontranslucent tissues. METHODS: Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography is introduced for mapping shear wave speed (SWS) and loss angle (φ) as markers of stiffness and viscosity of muscle, brain, and neuroblastoma tumors in postmortem zebrafish with 60 µm in-plane resolution. Experiments were performed in a 7 Tesla MR scanner at 1, 1.2, and 1.4 kHz driving frequencies. RESULTS: Detailed zebrafish viscoelasticity maps revealed that the midbrain region (SWS = 3.1 ± 0.7 m/s, φ = 1.2 ± 0.3 radian [rad]) was stiffer and less viscous than telencephalon (SWS = 2.6 ± 0. 5 m/s, φ = 1.4 ± 0.2 rad) and optic tectum (SWS = 2.6 ± 0.5 m/s, φ = 1.3 ± 0.4 rad), whereas the cerebellum (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.6 m/s, φ = 0.9 ± 0.4 rad) was stiffer but less viscous than both (all p < .05). Overall, brain tissue (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.4 m/s, φ = 1.2 ± 0.2 rad) had similar stiffness but lower viscosity values than muscle tissue (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.5 m/s, φ = 1.4 ± 0.2 rad), whereas neuroblastoma (SWS = 2.4 ± 0.3 m/s, φ = 0.7 ± 0.1 rad, all p < .05) was the softest and least viscous tissue. CONCLUSION: Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography-generated maps of zebrafish show many details of viscoelasticity and resolve tissue regions, of great interest in neuromechanical and oncological research and for which our study provides first reference values.

On the relationship between viscoelasticity and water diffusion in soft biological tissues.

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are complementary imaging techniques that detect disease based on viscoelasticity and water mobility, respectively. However, the relationship between viscoelasticity and water diffusion is still poorly understood, hindering the clinical translation of combined DWI-MRE markers. We used DWI-MRE to study 129 biomaterial samples including native and cross-linked collagen, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) with different sulfation levels, and decellularized specimens of pancreas and liver, all with different proportions of solid tissue, or solid fractions. We developed a theoretical framework of the relationship between mechanical loss and tissue-water mobility based on two parameters, solid and fluid viscosity. These parameters revealed distinct DWI-MRE property clusters characterizing weak, moderate, and strong water-network interactions. Sparse networks interacting weakly with water, such as collagen or diluted decellularized tissue, resulted in marginal changes in water diffusion over increasing solid viscosity. In contrast, dense networks with larger solid fractions exhibited both free and hindered water diffusion depending on the polarity of the solid components. For example, polar and highly sulfated GAGs as well as native soft tissues hindered water diffusion despite relatively low solid viscosity. Our results suggest that two fundamental properties of tissue networks, solid fraction and network polarity, critically influence solid and fluid viscosity in biological tissues. Since clinical DWI and MRE are sensitive to these viscosity parameters, the framework we present here can be used to detect tissue remodeling and architectural changes in the setting of diagnostic imaging. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The viscoelastic properties of biological tissues provide a wealth of information on the vital state of cells and host matrix. Combined measurement of viscoelasticity and water diffusion by medical imaging is sensitive to tissue microarchitecture. However, the relationship between viscoelasticity and water diffusion is still poorly understood, hindering full exploitation of these properties as a combined clinical biomarker. Therefore, we analyzed the parameter space accessible by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and developed a theoretical framework for the relationship between water mobility and mechanical parameters in biomaterials. Our theory of solid material properties related to particle motion can be translated to clinical radiology using clinically established MRE and DWI.

The influence of static portal pressure on liver biophysical properties.

The liver is a highly vascularized organ where fluid properties, including vascular pressure, vessel integrity and fluid viscosity, play a critical role in gross mechanical properties. To study the effects of portal pressure, liver confinement, fluid viscosity, and tissue crosslinking on liver stiffness, water diffusion, and vessel size, we applied multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), including multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, to ex vivo livers from healthy male rats (13.6±1.6 weeks) at room temperature. Four scenarios including altered liver confinement, tissue crosslinking, and vascular fluid viscosity were investigated with mpMRI at different portal pressure levels (0-17.5 cmH2O). Our experiments demonstrated that, with increasing portal pressure, rat livers showed higher water content, water diffusivity, and increased vessel sizes quantified by the vessel tissue volume fraction (VTVF). These effects were most pronounced in native, unconfined livers (VTVF: 300±120%, p<0.05, ADC: 88±29%, p<0.01), while still significant under confinement (confined: VTVF: 53±32%, p<0.01, ADC: 28±19%, p<0.05; confined-fixed: VTVF: 52±20%, p<0.001, ADC: 11±2%, p<0.01; confined-viscous: VTVF: 210±110%, p<0.01, ADC: 26±9%, p<0.001). Softening with elevated portal pressure (-12±5, p<0.05) occurred regardless of confinement and fixation. However, the liver stiffened when exposed to a more viscous inflow fluid (11±4%, p<0.001). Taken together, our results elucidate the complex relationship between macroscopic-biophysical parameters of liver tissue measured by mpMRI and vascular-fluid properties. Influenced by portal pressure, vascular permeability, and matrix crosslinking, liver stiffness is sensitive to intrinsic poroelastic properties, which, alongside vascular architecture and water diffusivity, may aid in the differential diagnosis of liver disease. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Using highly controllable ex vivo rat liver phantoms, hepatic biophysical properties such as tissue-vascular structure, stiffness, and water diffusivity were investigated using multiparametric MRI including multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Through elaborate tuning of the experimental conditions such as the static portal pressure, flow viscosity, amount and distribution of fluid content in the liver, we identified the contributions of the fluid component to the overall imaging-based biophysical properties of the liver. Our finding demonstrated the sensitivity of liver stiffness to the hepatic poroelastic properties, which may aid in the differential diagnosis of liver diseases.

On the relationship between metabolic capacities and in vivo viscoelastic properties of the liver.

The liver is the central metabolic organ. It constantly adapts its metabolic capacity to current physiological requirements. However, the relationship between tissue structure and hepatic function is incompletely understood; this results in a lack of diagnostic markers in medical imaging that can provide information about the liver's metabolic capacity. Therefore, using normal rabbit livers, we combined magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) with proteomics-based kinetic modeling of central liver metabolism to investigate the potential role of MRE for predicting the liver's metabolic function in vivo. Nineteen New Zealand white rabbits were investigated by multifrequency MRE and positron emission tomography (PET). This yielded maps of shear wave speed (SWS), penetration rate (PR) and standardized uptake value (SUV). Proteomic analysis was performed after the scans. Hepatic metabolic functions were assessed on the basis of the HEPATOKIN1 model in combination with a model of hepatic lipid-droplet metabolism using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Our results showed marked differences between individual livers in both metabolic functions and stiffness properties, though not in SUV. When livers were divided into 'stiff' and 'soft' subgroups (cutoff SWS = 1.6 m/s), stiff livers showed a lower capacity for triacylglycerol storage, while at the same time showing an increased capacity for gluconeogenesis and cholesterol synthesis. Furthermore, SWS was correlated with gluconeogenesis and PR with urea production and glutamine exchange. In conclusion, our study indicates a close relationship between the viscoelastic properties of the liver and metabolic function. This could be used in future studies to predict non-invasively the functional reserve capacity of the liver in patients.