RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Olanzapine 10 mg added to standard antiemetic therapy including aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone has been recommended for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Guidelines suggest that a dose reduction to 5 mg should be considered to prevent sedation. In several phase 2 studies, olanzapine 5 mg has shown equivalent activity to olanzapine 10 mg and a favourable safety profile in relation to somnolence. We evaluated the efficacy of olanzapine 5 mg combined with standard antiemetic therapy for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting caused by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine 5 mg with triplet-combination antiemetic therapy done in 26 hospitals in Japan. Key inclusion criteria were patients with a malignant tumour (excluding those with a haemopoietic malignancy) who were scheduled to be treated with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m2) for the first time, age between 20 and 75 years, and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral olanzapine 5 mg or placebo once daily on days 1-4 combined with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone (dosage based on the standard antiemetic therapy against highly emetogenic chemotherapy). Patients were randomly assigned to interventions by use of a web entry system and the minimisation method with a random component, with sex, dose of cisplatin, and age as factors of allocation adjustment. Patients, medical staff, investigators, and individuals handling data were all masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response, defined as absence of vomiting and no use of rescue medications in the delayed phase (24-120 h). All randomly assigned patients who satisfied eligibility criteria received a dose of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or more, and at least one study treatment, were included in efficacy analysis. All patients who received any treatment in this study were assessed for safety. This study is registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000024676. FINDINGS: Between Feb 9, 2017, and July 13, 2018, 710 patients were enrolled; 356 were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine and 354 were assigned to receive placebo. All eligible patients were observed 120 h after cisplatin initiation. One patient in the olanzapine group and three in the placebo group did not receive treatment and were excluded from all analyses. One patient in the olanzapine group discontinued treatment on day 1 and was excluded from the efficacy analysis. In the delayed phase, the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response was 280 (79% [95% CI 75-83] of 354 patients in the olanzapine group and 231 (66% [61-71] of 351 patients in the placebo group (p<0·0001). One patient had grade 3 constipation and one patient had grade 3 somnolence related to treatment in the olanzapine group. INTERPRETATION: Olanzapine 5 mg combined with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone could be a new standard antiemetic therapy for patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy. FUNDING: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
Assuntos
Antieméticos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Olanzapina/administração & dosagem , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Antieméticos/efeitos adversos , Aprepitanto/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Olanzapina/efeitos adversos , Palonossetrom/administração & dosagem , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/induzido quimicamente , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic administration of 5 mg olanzapine (OLZ) combined with neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), 5-hydroxytryptamine type-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA), and dexamethasone (DEX) to prevent nausea and vomiting in carboplatin (CBDCA) combination therapy for patients with gynecological cancer. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, multi-institution, phase II study. Gynecological cancer patients scheduled to receive AUC ≥4 mg/mL/min CBDCA were enrolled. All patients received 5 mg OLZ (once daily after supper on days 1-4) combined with NK1RA, 5-HT3RA, and DEX. The primary end point was complete response (CR; no emesis and rescue therapy) during overall phase (120 h after the start of carboplatin administration). RESULTS: Between May 2018 and June 2019, 60 patients were enrolled from 3 institutions in Japan. A total of 57 patients who met the criteria were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The CR rate for the overall phase was 78.9%. Acute (0-24 h) and delayed phases (24-120 h) were 96.5% and 80.7%, respectively. Somnolence was observed in 73.7% patients. However, somnolence of grade 2 or higher was observed in only 3.5% of cases. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities associated with OLZ. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive use of OLZ combined with standard triplet therapy had promising activity with manageable safety, suggesting that this combination could be an effective standard treatment option for patients with AUC ≥4 mg/mL/min CBDCA combination therapy.
Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Olanzapina/uso terapêutico , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Aprepitanto/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Granisetron/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Olanzapina/efeitos adversos , Vômito/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
Gefitinib and erlotinib are commercially available epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) that are widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Acute severe liver injury, although rare, has been observed in patients receiving these EGFR-TKIs. Some studies have reported that erlotinib treatment does not cause severe liver toxicity in patients with NSCLC who previously presented with severe liver injury during the course of gefitinib treatment. We retrospectively assessed the occurrence of liver toxicity in patients with NSCLC who were receiving erlotinib and had previously presented with severe gefitinib-induced liver injury.Severe liver injury occurred in only 1 of the 8 patients receiving erlotinib treatment. In this case, erlotinib was discontinued because of the onset of grade 3 skin rash and liver injury. After liver function was restored, erlotinib (100 mg) was administered at a lower dose; nonetheless, grade 4 liver injury occurred. Our findings suggest that it is necessary not only to explain the early symptoms of liver toxicity to patients who are receiving erlotinib treatment and have previously experienced gefitinib-induced severe liver injury but also to more closely monitor liver function.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/fisiopatologia , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/enzimologia , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Erlotinib , Feminino , Gefitinibe , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estrutura Molecular , Quinazolinas/químicaRESUMO
Gefitinib is an orally active, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib, which has the same mechanism of action as gefitinib, has been recently approved in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the adverse reactions in 16 patients who had received erlotinib after failure of gefitinib treatment. We examined the adverse reactions that occurred during gefitinib or erlotinib treatment using an electronic chart system. Anorexia was more frequent with erlotinib than with gefitinib treatment. Further, anorexia and diarrhea were significantly more severe with erlotinib than with gefitinib treatment. Most adverse reactions developed earlier during the course of erlotinib treatment than during the course of gefitinib treatment. In one patient who had received gefitinib treatment without pulmonary toxicity, erlotinib had to be discontinued due to the development of interstitial pneumonia. Our findings suggest that adverse reactions such as anorexia and diarrhea should be carefully monitored soon after starting erlotinib in advanced NSCLC patients in whom gefitinib treatment has been ineffective, because these reactions will occur sooner and would be more severe in erlotinib treatment.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Anorexia/induzido quimicamente , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Cloridrato de Erlotinib , Feminino , Gefitinibe , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Carboplatin (CBDCA) administered at a dosage of 4 mg/mL/min or more area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) is considered to be ranked as the highest chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk of the moderately emetogenic chemotherapy agents. The complete response (CR) rate for preventing overall CINV, defined as no emetic episodes and no use of rescue medication, for standard triplet antiemetic therapy (5-HT3RA, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist; NK1RA, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist; DEX, dexamethasone) was approximately 60% in gynaecological cancer patients receiving CBDCA-based therapy. Further improvement in antiemetic treatment is needed to optimise care. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using 5 mg olanzapine (OLZ) plus standard triplet antiemetic therapy for CINV after AUC ≥4 mg/mL/min CBDCA combination therapy in gynaecological cancer patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is an open-label, single-arm, multicentre phase II trial. Patients who receive CBDCA (AUC ≥4)-based therapy and have never been administered moderate to high emetogenic chemotherapy will be enrolled. All patients will receive OLZ (5 mg oral administration on days 1-4, after supper) in combination with 5-HT3RA, NK1RA and DEX. The primary endpoint is the CR rate during the overall period (0-120 hours). Testing the hypothesis that this regimen can improve CR rate from 60% (null hypothesis) to 75% (alternative hypothesis) with a one-sided type I error of 0.1 and power of 0.8 will require 53 patients. Considering the dropout rate, the target sample size is set at 60. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each of the participating centres. Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000031646.