Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the trial was to investigate whether the publicized effects of skin protection creams can be replicated in a real occupational setting during activities that expose the skin. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, four-tailed controlled pilot trial was performed to compare the effect of skin protection and skin care alone or in combination with cleansing against a control group (only cleansing). Two branches were selected for the investigation: the building industry and the timber industry. A total of 1,006 workers from these two branches were recruited, and out of these 485 workers were examined longitudinally for at least three time points over 1 year (lost for follow-up: 430 workers, exclusion: 91 workers). At each time point, as a primary outcome measure, we assessed the condition of the skin at both hands in a blinded manner and the individual was assigned to one of the following categories: no eczema, mild, moderate and severe eczema. As a secondary outcome measure, the worker's transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured under standardized conditions at the back of both hands. In addition, the workers were asked to evaluate their skin condition during the study. RESULTS: With regard to differences in the occurrence of eczemas, we found only in workers in building industry without application of skin protection or skin care creams a statistical significant increase in the incidence between the first and the second visit and a statistical significant decrease in the incidence between the second and third visit. When evaluating the secondary outcome-measurement changes in the TEWL values, an improvement was found for the group skin protection and skin care in combination and by skin care alone. Females in the timber industry started with better TEWL values than males, which may be due to better overall skin care. In this group we found an improvement for the group skin protection and skin care in combination and by skin protection alone. For skin protection alone, we noted a slight, but not significant improvement in all other groups. The subjective improvement of skin condition was reported from the participants who used skin protection and skin care in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Taking all these secondary-outcome measurements together, the main result of this study was that skin protection creams alone have a small effect on the skin barrier in workers in the building and timber industries compared with skin care alone or in combination with skin protection.

Does weight force application to the lower torso have an influence on inferior vena cava and cardiovascular parameters?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether weight force application to the lower torso can lead to impairment of inferior vena cava (IVC) and cardiovascular parameters. METHODS: Using ultrasound sonography and impedance cardiography, the effects of a weight force application of 5, 10, 15, and 25 kg to the lower torso, placed in prone position, on IVC diameter and maximal blood flow, mean artery pressure, stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac index, cardiac output, oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and acceleration index were investigated in 6 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The following parameters showed a statistically significant correlation with the amount of weight force applied: IVC diameter: r=-0.83, P < .001; IVC maximal blood flow: r=-0.76, P < .001; cardiac index: r=-0.33, P < .05; and cardiac output: r=-0.32, P < .05. CONCLUSION: Application of moderate weight force to the lower torso can lead to major changes in IVC parameters and minor changes in cardiovascular parameters.

Schellong test in orthostatic dysregulation: a comparison with tilt-table testing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the Schellong test (ST) in forms of orthostatic dysregulation in comparison with the tilt-table test (TT). METHODS: 67 young males (mean age 22 +/- 4 years) from the military service, representing two different cohorts, were examined by ST and TT, which served as gold standard. 32 of the 67 subjects were asymptomatic while 35 had sought medical advice because of orthostatic complaints. The subjects subsequently were classified into four categories according to the TT: normal TT, orthostatic hypotension (OH), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS). Chi-square test was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of ST in detecting forms of orthostatic dysregulation (OH, POTS and NCS). RESULTS: In total, TT detected 23 recruits with POTS, 16 with NCS and 2 with OH. Out of the 32 asymptomatic subjects only one was diagnosed having POTS by TT and ST, the rest had a normal ST and TT. For detecting POTS, ST sensitivity was 61% and specificity was 100% compared with TT. For detecting NCS, ST sensitivity was 31% and specificity 100% compared with the reference test, the TT. The data concerning OH could not be analyzed because of the small number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the results of our study indicate that ST can be used in first line in the diagnosis of patients with orthostatic symptoms by the medical practitioner. If the ST is normal, further examination by TT is indispensable, because sensitivity of ST concerning POTS and NCS is relatively low.